Does Bed Rest or Fluid Supplementation Prevent Post–Dural Puncture Headache?

Update and Advances on Post-dural Puncture Headache

This document provides an overview of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH), covering its historical perspective, anatomy and physiology of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment options. PDPH is a common complication of dural puncture, characterized by a postural headache due to CSF leakage. The understanding of CSF and dural anatomy has evolved over time, leading to advancements in diagnosing and managing PDPH. Treatment options range from conservative measures to epidural blood patch, intrathecal catheter, and regional techniques like sphenopalatine ganglion block and greater occipital nerve block. Further research is needed to optimize treatment approaches and improve patient outcomes.

Aminophylline for Prevention and/or Treatment of Post-Dural Puncture Headache: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study Protocol

Objectives

Post-dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) is prevalent among individuals undergoing lumbar punctures. The non-invasive effect of some drugs, such as aminophylline on PDPH has been investigated in several clinical studies. As there is no comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis about the preventive and therapeutic effects of aminophylline on PDPH in the literature, the clinical effectiveness of this drug on the prevention and/or treatment of PDPH will be assessed in this study.

Methods

PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, WoS (Clarivate Analytics), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL Complete, Scopus, and Google Scholar as electronic databases will be precisely searched for clinical studies that assessed the effect of aminophylline on PDPH. Studies between 01-01-1980 and 30-06-2020 will be evaluated in this study, and there will not be any language restrictions. Contradictions between the reviewers within any phase of the study (screening, selecting, quality assessment, and data extraction) will be resolved by consensus; in case of unsolved disagreements, a third reviewer will eventually decide. The combination method will be applied according to the methodological resemblance in the selected articles using the Random Effect Model or the Fixed Effect Model. Also, for the included articles, forest plots will be drawn. For assessing statistical heterogeneity, the I² statistic and the Q-statistic test will be applied. In addition, funnel plots will be used for assessing non-significant study effects and potential reporting bias. Furthermore, Egger’s and Begg’s tests will be done, and publication bias will be indicated by significant findings (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

It is expected that the results of this study will be of benefit to researchers and clinicians for managing PDPH, and will be reported in conferences and publications.

Effect of intrathecal fentanyl on the incidence, severity, and duration of postdural puncture headache in parturients undergoing caesarean section: A randomised controlled trial

Background and Aims:

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a side effect of spinal anaesthesia (SA). This study was conducted to investigate the effect of intrathecal fentanyl on the incidence, severity, and duration of PDPH.

Methods:

This was a prospective randomised controlled study including 220 parturients, who underwent Caesarean section (CS). They were divided into two groups for administration of SA with bupivacaine (bupivacaine group [B0], n = 111) or bupivacaine with fentanyl (bupivacaine fentanyl group [BF], n = 109). Haemodynamics, quality of anaesthesia, maternal side effects, and postoperative analgesia were noted. The neonatal Apgar score was recorded. The patients were followed up for 14 days after CS for the occurrence of PDPH, and its severity and duration. The collected data were statistically analysed, using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 25.

Results:

Regarding haemodynamics, heart rate increased at 5 min post-induction and blood pressure decreased at 2min post-induction in both groups. Excellent intraoperative anaesthesia was obtained in 91.7% and 79.3% of cases in groups BF and B0, respectively (P < 0.01). Longer duration of postoperative analgesia was present in the BF group as compared to the B0 group (P < 0.001). The incidence of PDPH decreased in the BF group in a non-significant manner, whereas its severity and duration increased significantly in the B0 group.

Conclusion:

Although the addition of intrathecal fentanyl to bupivacaine for SA in CS patients did not reduce the incidence of PDPH significantly, its severity and duration decreased significantly.

Postdural puncture headache leads to clinical worsening of pre-existing chronic headache

The incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) in relation to pre-existing chronic headache (CH) was assessed, as was the clinical course of CH, at one, three, and six months after PDPH. The study was conducted as a single center cohort prospective study that included 252 patients (105 men and 147 women), average age of 47.3 ± 15.0 years, on whom lumbar puncture (LP) was performed. PDPH was reported in 133 (52.8%) patients; CH was reported in 82 (32.5%) patients. Patients with CH were more likely to have PDPH (p = 0.003). The individual clinical type of CH did not have an effect on the incidence of PDPH (p = 0.128). Patients with PDPH had a clinical deterioration of CH three and six months after LP (p = 0.047, p = 0.027, respectively) in terms of increased headache days per month and/or incomplete efficacy of performed therapy in relation to baseline values. Six months after LP, the worsening of CH was more common in women with PDPH (OR 5,687 [95% CI: 1526-21,200], p = 0.010) and patients with a longer history of CH (OR 1064 [95% CI: 1007-1124], p = 0.027). Multivariate analysis confirmed the direct association of female sex and duration of CH and its worsening six months after PDPH (OR 4478 [95% CI: 1149-17,452], p = 0.031; OR 1448 [95% CI: 1292-1808], p = 0.022). The presented results could be significant for the prediction/differential diagnosis of PDPH in patients with CH and for the prediction/prevention of CH clinical worsening after PDPH.