Abscess Incision and Drainage With or Without Ultrasonography: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Ultrasonography and procedures in intensive care medicine

The use of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is not limited to the diagnosis and/or monitoring of critically ill patients. Further, ultrasound guidance is of paramount relevance to aid in successfully and safely performing several procedures in the intensive care unit (ICU). In this article, we review the role of POCUS as a procedural guidance in the ICU. Core procedures include, but are not limited to, vascular cannulation, pericardiocentesis, thoracentesis, paracentesis, aspiration of soft-tissue collections/arthrocentesis and lumbar puncture. With time, the procedures performed by intensivists may extend beyond the core competencies depicted in this review. Ultrasound guidance should be part of the intensivist's competencies, for which appropriate training should be achieved.

Validation of an Educational Tool for Skin Abscess Incision and Drainage by Delphi and Angoff Methods

BACKGROUND

Bedside incision and drainage (I&D) of skin abscesses is a common medical procedure performed in a variety of medical settings. Yet, there is a paucity of published validated educational tools to teach and assess competency for this procedure.

OBJECTIVE

To validate an educational tool to teach and assess competency for bedside I&D of skin abscesses via the Delphi consensus and Angoff standard setting methods.

DESIGN

Expert consensus on the importance of each procedural step in the educational tool was obtained using the Delphi method, consisting of four rounds of iterative revisions based on input from a panel of experts. The passing cut-off score for a proficient provider was determined using the modified dichotomous Angoff method.

PARTICIPANTS

All participants met the minimum criteria of active involvement in resident education and performance of at least 20 skin abscess I&D's within the past 5 years. Participant specialties included general surgery, emergency medicine, and internal medicine.

MAIN MEASURES

The primary outcome was consensus on procedural steps and errors, defined as an interquartile range ≤ 2 on a 9-point Likert scale. A cut-off score was determined by the average across all respondents for the anticipated number of errors that would be committed by a provider with the level of proficiency defined in the survey. Qualitative input was incorporated into the educational tool.

KEY RESULTS

At the end of four rounds of review via the Delphi process, participants achieved consensus on 93% of items on the clinical checklist and 85% of errors on the assessment checklist. Via the modified dichotomous Angoff method, the determined passing cut-off for competency was 6 out of 22 errors.

CONCLUSION

An educational and evaluation tool for bedside I&D of skin abscesses was validated via the Delphi and Angoff methods.

Clinical failure in abscess treatment: the role of ultrasound and incision and drainage

PURPOSE

Skin and soft tissue abscesses are commonly treated in emergency departments (ED). The use of bedside ultrasound may improve patient outcomes. The primary objective of this study was to examine the relationship between ultrasound use and risk of treatment failure in ED patients treated for abscesses.

METHODS

In this multi-center observational study, we reviewed medical records of adult patients evaluated for abscesses. Demographics, infection characteristics, treatments rendered, use of ultrasound (for diagnosis and/or treatment) and follow-up data were collected from electronic medical record review. Treatment failure, the primary outcome, was defined as any surgical intervention after the initial ED visit. Multivariable logistic regression tested whether incision and drainage utilizing ultrasound was associated with reduced treatment failure.

RESULTS

We identified 609 patients diagnosed with abscesses over a 22-month period. Of them 75% were treated with incision and drainage, 55% had an ultrasound and 15% failed treatment. Multi-variable analysis demonstrated an 8% probability of failure with ultrasound plus incision and drainage, 14% with blind incision and drainage and 25% without incision and drainage. Individuals with incision and drainage performed were 50% less likely to fail treatment (RR 0.53, 95%CI 0.35-0.81) and 70% less likely to fail treatment (RR 0.30, 95%CI 0.18-0.51) with ultrasound and incision and drainage.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ultrasound in diagnosing and or/treating patients with abscesses in the ED is associated with decreased treatment failure risk when utilized with incision and drainage. Consideration of ultrasound use in other studies which assess treatment methods in relation to patient outcomes may be warranted.

Procedural Applications of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Pediatric Emergency Medicine

Point-of-care ultrasound can improve efficacy and safety of pediatric procedures performed in the emergency department. This article reviews ultrasound guidance for the following pediatric emergency medicine procedures: soft tissue (abscess incision and drainage, foreign body identification and removal, and peritonsillar abscess drainage), musculoskeletal and neurologic (hip arthrocentesis, peripheral nerve blocks, and lumbar puncture), vascular access (peripheral intravenous access and central line placement), and critical care (endotracheal tube placement, pericardiocentesis, thoracentesis, and paracentesis). By incorporating ultrasound, emergency physicians caring for pediatric patients have the potential to enhance their procedural scope, confidence, safety, and success.

Abscess Management: An Evidence-Based Review for Emergency Medicine Clinicians

BACKGROUND

Abscesses are commonly evaluated and managed in the emergency department. Recent research has evaluated the use of ultrasonography, packing, incision and drainage (I&D), and antibiotics. There are evidence-based nuances to the management of specific types of abscesses, such as Bartholin, breast, dental, hidradenitis suppurativa, peritonsillar, and pilonidal abscesses.

OBJECTIVE

This review provides emergency medicine clinicians with a summary of the current literature regarding abscess management in the emergency department.

DISCUSSION

Ultrasound is valuable in diagnosing abscesses that are not clinically evident and in guiding I&D procedures. Although I&D is traditionally followed by packing, this practice may be unnecessary for small abscesses. Antibiotics, needle aspiration, and loop drainage are suitable alternatives to I&D of abscesses with certain characteristics. Oral antibiotics can improve outcomes after I&D, although this improvement must be weighed against potential risks. Many strategies are useful in managing Bartholin abscesses, with the Word catheter proving consistently effective. Needle aspiration is the recommended first-line therapy for small breast abscesses. Dental abscesses are often diagnosed with clinical examination alone, but ultrasound may be a useful adjunct. Acute abscess formation caused by hidradenitis suppurativa should be managed surgically by excision when possible, because I&D has a high rate of abscess recurrence. Peritonsillar abscesses can be diagnosed with either intraoral or transcervical ultrasound if clinical examination is inconclusive. Needle aspiration and I&D are both suitable for the management of peritonsillar abscesses. Pilonidal abscesses have traditionally been managed with I&D, but needle aspiration with antibiotics may be a suitable alternative.

CONCLUSIONS

This review evaluates the recent literature surrounding abscess management for emergency medicine clinicians.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Used to Distinguish Between Superficial Skin Abscess and Deep Mediastinal Abscess: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are an increasingly common complaint in the emergency department (ED), but physical examination does not reliably identify abscesses or accurately determine which skin lesions require incision and drainage. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) improves management of soft tissue skin infections by detecting occult abscess, preventing unnecessary procedures, and identifying more complex disease requiring further imaging.

CASE REPORT

Here, we report a case in which POCUS drastically changed the management of what initially appeared to be an uncomplicated superficial skin abscess but was actually a much more serious mediastinal infection. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: This case underscores the importance and utility of POCUS to enhance the physical examination in suspected SSTIs. Because POCUS is easy, accurate, low risk, and can change management, we recommend its consideration as a standard component of the ED work up for SSTIs.

Point-of-care ultrasound in primary care: a systematic review of generalist performed point-of-care ultrasound in unselected populations

BACKGROUND

Both the interest and actual extent of use of point-of-care ultrasound, PoCUS, among general practitioners or family physicians are increasing and training is also increasingly implemented in residency programs. However, the amount of research within the field is still rather limited compared to what is seen within other specialties in which it has become more established, such as in the specialty of emergency medicine. An assumption is made that what is relevant for emergency medicine physicians and their populations is also relevant to the general practitioner, as both groups are generalists working in unselected populations. This systematic review aims to examine the extent of use and to identify clinical studies on the use of PoCUS by either general practitioners or emergency physicians on indications that are relevant for the former, both in their daily practice and in out-of-hours services.

METHODS

Systematic searches were done in PubMed/MEDLINE using terms related to general practice, emergency medicine, and ultrasound.

RESULTS

On the extent of use, we identified 19 articles, as well as 26 meta-analyses and 168 primary studies on the clinical use of PoCUS. We found variable, but generally low, use among general practitioners, while it seems to be thoroughly established in emergency medicine in North America, and increasingly also in the rest of the world. In terms of clinical studies, most were on diagnostic accuracy, and most organ systems were studied; the heart, lungs/thorax, vessels, abdominal and pelvic organs, obstetric ultrasound, the eye, soft tissue, and the musculoskeletal system. The studies found in general either high sensitivity or high specificity for the particular test studied, and in some cases high total accuracy and superiority to other established diagnostic imaging modalities. PoCUS also showed faster time to diagnosis and change in management in some studies.

CONCLUSION

Our review shows that generalists can, given a certain level of pre-test probability, safely use PoCUS in a wide range of clinical settings to aid diagnosis and better the care of their patients.

Seeing Is Believing: Ultrasound in Pediatric Procedural Performance

Point-of-care ultrasound is currently widely used across the landscape of pediatric care. Ultrasound machines are now smaller, are easier to use, and have much improved image quality. They have become common in emergency departments, ICUs, inpatient wards, and outpatient clinics. Recent growth of supportive evidence makes a strong case for using point-of-care ultrasound for pediatric interventions such as vascular access (in particular, central-line placement), lumbar puncture, fluid drainage (paracentesis, thoracentesis, pericardiocentesis), suprapubic aspiration, and soft tissue incision and drainage. Our review of this evidence reveals that point-of-care ultrasound has become a powerful tool for improving procedural success and patient safety. Pediatric patients and clinicians performing procedures stand to benefit greatly from point-of-care ultrasound, because seeing is believing.