Preventing Post-Lumbar Puncture Headache

Lumbar Puncture Complications: A Review of Current Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This paper reviews the complications of lumbar puncture with a focus on post-dural puncture headache including pathophysiology, risk factors, prevention, and treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent research has focused on understanding the multifactorial mechanisms of post-dural puncture headache and improving prevention and treatment strategies. Small caliber, pencil-point type needles are encouraged to minimize the risk of post-dural puncture headaches, especially in populations that are at higher risk for complication. While new medications and procedures show promise in small cohorts, conservative medical management and epidural blood patch are still the first and second-line treatments for PDPH. Post-dural puncture headache is the most frequent complication of lumbar puncture. There are both modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors to consider when performing this procedure. Conservative medical management and procedure-based therapies exist for when complications of lumbar puncture arise.

Lumbar puncture training with healthcare simulation improves self-confidence and practical skills of French medical residents in geriatrics

PURPOSE

To assess the skill level and self-confidence of medical residents in geriatrics with regard to conducting the lumbar puncture (LP) procedure and to study the potential benefits of training with simulation and virtual reality.

METHODS

First, a questionnaire survey was conducted among all French residents in geriatrics in the Paris area to assess their knowledge and self-confidence regarding the practice of LP in older adults. Second, we set up a simulation LP training session combined with virtual reality (3D video) training for selected respondents of the first survey. Third, we performed post-simulation survey for the attendees of the simulation training. Finally, a follow-up survey was conducted to examine the change in self-confidence and the success rate in clinical practice.

RESULTS

Fifty-five residents responded to the survey (response rate = 36.4%). The importance of mastering LP was fully recognized by the residents in geriatrics (95.3%), so most of them (94.5%) advocated for the need for additional practical training. Fourteen residents took part in the training (average rating = 4.7 on a 5-point scale). Simulation was regarded by 83% of the respondents as the most useful tool for their practice. We observed a significant pre/post-training mean improvement in self-estimated success of 20.6% (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank W = - 36, p = 0.008). The post-training success rate of the residents in real-life clinical practice was good (85.8%).

CONCLUSION

Residents were aware of the importance of mastering LP and requested additional training. Simulation may represent a major driver to improve their self-confidence and practical skills.

An unexpected effect of traumatic and bloody lumbar puncture among patients with primary headaches in emergency department

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the association between traumatic tap and the incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) following lumbar puncture (LP) among patients who underwent LP with a primary discharge diagnosis of primary headache in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who visited a single tertiary ED with the symptom of a headache and underwent LP for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis between January 2012 and January 2022. Patients who met the definition of PDPH and revisited the ED or outpatient clinic within 2 weeks of discharge were included. For comparative analysis, we divided the groups according to CSF RBC counts (group 1, CSF RBC <10 cells/μL; group 2, 10-100 cells/μL; group 3, ≥100 cells/μL). The primary outcome was the difference in CSF RBC counts between the ED or outpatient clinic revisiting patients who underwent LP within 2 weeks after discharge from the ED. The secondary outcomes were the admission rate and risk factors for PDPH; sex, age, needle size, and CSF pressure.

RESULTS

Data from 112 patients were collected; PDPH was reported in 39 patients (34.8%), and 40 (35.7%) patients were admitted. The median (interquartile range) CSF RBC count was 10 [2-100.8] cells/μL. One-way analysis of variance test of the mean differences among the three groups showed no differences in age, the duration of headache before LP, PLT counts, PT, or aPTT among the groups. There were differences in the number of admitted patients (30 vs. 7 vs. 3, P < 0.001) and the incidence of PDPH (29 vs. 6 vs. 4, P < 0.003). In the comparison of the PDPH and non-PDPH groups, there were differences in age (28.7 ± 8.4 years vs. 36.9 ± 18.4 years, P = 0.01) and the admission rate (85% vs. 9%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Notably, our results suggest that traumatic LP may be an unexpected factor in reducing the occurrence rate of PDPH. Consequently, the admission rate for PDPH was significantly reduced among patients with traumatic LP and those with primary headaches. In this study, we collected and analyzed the data from a relatively small sample size of 112 patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between traumatic LP and PDPH.

Incidence of traumatic lumbar punctures in adults: the impact of a patient's first procedure

INTRODUCTION

Lumbar puncture (LP) is a widely used diagnostic method in patients of all ages. Blood-contaminated cerebrospinal fluid samples are frequent and may compromise diagnostic accuracy.

OBJECTIVES

We determined age-specific incidences of traumatic LPs (TLPs) in adults and examined factors that accounted for the incidence of TLPs.

METHODS

Erythrocyte count data from 15,812 LP procedures (2,404 were performed twice) were collected from hospital records of patients aged from 18 to 104 years. The incidence of TLPs in a patient's second LP procedure was evaluated with logistic regression analysis using the first LP, the time between the procedures and age as predictors.

RESULTS

The incidence of TLP in the second procedure was at least double that in the first procedure. If the first procedure was traumatic, the odds ratio of a TLP in the second procedure was 7-40-fold. One day between the successive procedures was associated with an over 10-fold odds ratio increase of TLP, and a week was still 4-8-fold odds ratio increase. Age was also associated with the incidence of TLP.

CONCLUSIONS

Two factors (a week or less between a patient's two LP procedures or a traumatic first LP) multiply the odds of the second procedure being traumatic and contribute to whether a patient's following LP procedure is successful.

Complications of injections in conservative treatment of degenerative spine disease: a prospective unicentric study

BACKGROUND

Spinal injection has been an accepted part of conservative therapy for degenerative diseases. The drugs used can cause side effects and severe complications. The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of general side effects (GSE) and complications when performing consecutive different types of spinal injections and to evaluate pain reduction.

METHODS

Prospective data evaluation of patients with degenerative spine disease at hospital admission, discharge, and six and 12 weeks after discharge. All patients received a specific injection protocol depending on their symptoms and radiological findings. The injections performed were dorsal sacroiliac joint injections, perineural injections, epidural interlaminar and epidural periradicular injections, and facet joint injections. Potential complications were categorized and recorded as GSE and complications. In addition, the Numerical Analog Scale (NAS) for pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were enrolled. There were 282 spinal injections performed. A total of 131 common treatment-related events were recorded. Depending on the type of injection, transient pain at the injection site (32.4-73.5%), radiating pain (9.4-34.7%), and nerve root irritation (2-18.4%) were the most common. One complication with postpuncture syndrome occurred with epidural-interlaminar injection. No persistent neurologic deficits occurred. The highest rate of GSE was observed with periradicular injections (relative frequency (RF) = 0.8), followed by epidural-interlaminar injections (RF = 0.65), least frequently with FJ injections (RF = 0.32). From the time of admission to discharge, NAS scores were significantly decreased and ODI score significantly improved at discharge (p < 0.001), but relapse occurred at the 12-week follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Various consecutive spinal injections for conservative treatment of degenerative spine diseases are safe and lead to a decrease in pain and improvement in quality of life. GSE are common, but not persistent. Although complications are rare, they can have serious consequences for the patient.

Current perspectives on the recognition and diagnosis of low CSF pressure headache syndromes

INTRODUCTION

Headaches occur when cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure drops following dural puncture or trauma or spontaneously. As the features of these headaches and their accompanying symptoms might not be typical, low CSF pressure headache syndromes, and spontaneous intracranial hypotension in particular, are often misdiagnosed and underdiagnosed.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the most recent evidence regarding the clinical presentation and the diagnosis of low CSF pressure headache syndromes.

EXPERT OPINION

The clinical spectrum low CSF pressure headache syndromes varies significantly and key signs might be missing. Low CSF pressure headache syndromes should be included in the differential diagnosis of any case of refractory headache, even when the headache is not orthostatic, or there are normal neuroimaging findings, and/or lumbar puncture opening pressure is within normal limits. Future research should focus on controlled interventional studies on the treatment of low CSF pressure headache syndromes, which are currently lacking.

Quantification of the trans-synaptic partners neurexin-neuroligin in CSF of neurodegenerative diseases by parallel reaction monitoring mass spectrometry

BACKGROUND

Synaptic proteins are increasingly studied as biomarkers for synaptic dysfunction and loss, which are early and central events in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and strongly correlate with the degree of cognitive decline. In this study, we specifically investigated the synaptic binding partners neurexin (NRXN) and neuroligin (Nlgn) proteins, to assess their biomarker's potential.

METHODS

we developed a parallel reaction monitoring mass spectrometric method for the simultaneous quantification of NRXNs and Nlgns in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of neurodegenerative diseases, focusing on AD. Specifically, NRXN-1α, NRXN-1β, NRXN-2α, NRXN-3α and Nlgn1, Nlgn2, Nlgn3 and Nlgn4 proteins were targeted.

FINDINGS

The proteins were investigated in a clinical cohort including CSF from controls (n=22), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD (n=44), MCI due to other conditions (n=46), AD (n=77) and a group of non-AD dementia (n=28). No difference in levels of NRXNs and Nlgns was found between AD (both at dementia and MCI stages) or controls or the non-AD dementia group for any of the targeted proteins. NRXN and Nlgn proteins correlated strongly with each other, but only a weak correlation with the AD core biomarkers and the synaptic biomarkers neurogranin and growth-associated protein 43, was found, possibly reflecting different pathogenic processing at the synapse.

INTERPRETATION

we conclude that NRXN and Nlgn proteins do not represent suitable biomarkers for synaptic pathology in AD. The panel developed here could aid in future investigations of the potential involvement of NRXNs and Nlgns in synaptic dysfunction in other disorders of the central nervous system.

FUNDING

a full list of funding can be found under the acknowledgments section.

Aminophylline for Prevention and/or Treatment of Post-Dural Puncture Headache: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study Protocol

Objectives

Post-dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) is prevalent among individuals undergoing lumbar punctures. The non-invasive effect of some drugs, such as aminophylline on PDPH has been investigated in several clinical studies. As there is no comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis about the preventive and therapeutic effects of aminophylline on PDPH in the literature, the clinical effectiveness of this drug on the prevention and/or treatment of PDPH will be assessed in this study.

Methods

PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, WoS (Clarivate Analytics), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL Complete, Scopus, and Google Scholar as electronic databases will be precisely searched for clinical studies that assessed the effect of aminophylline on PDPH. Studies between 01-01-1980 and 30-06-2020 will be evaluated in this study, and there will not be any language restrictions. Contradictions between the reviewers within any phase of the study (screening, selecting, quality assessment, and data extraction) will be resolved by consensus; in case of unsolved disagreements, a third reviewer will eventually decide. The combination method will be applied according to the methodological resemblance in the selected articles using the Random Effect Model or the Fixed Effect Model. Also, for the included articles, forest plots will be drawn. For assessing statistical heterogeneity, the I² statistic and the Q-statistic test will be applied. In addition, funnel plots will be used for assessing non-significant study effects and potential reporting bias. Furthermore, Egger’s and Begg’s tests will be done, and publication bias will be indicated by significant findings (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

It is expected that the results of this study will be of benefit to researchers and clinicians for managing PDPH, and will be reported in conferences and publications.

The interrelation between body mass index and post-dural puncture headache in parturient women

Background and Aims

Post-dural puncture headache is seen more frequently in pregnant women due to stress, dehydration, intra-abdominal pressure, and insufficient fluid replacement after delivery. Obesity protects against post-dural puncture headache in pregnant women; increased intra-abdominal fat tissue reduced cerebrospinal fluid leakage by increasing the pressure in the epidural space. Therefore, this study investigated the influence of body mass index on post-dural puncture headache in elective cesarean section patients in whom 27G spinal needles were used.

Material and Methods

The study included 464 women who underwent elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Dural puncture performed with a 27G Quincke spinal needle at the L3-4 or L4-5 intervertebral space and given 12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine intrathecally. The patients were questioned regarding headache and low back pain 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after the procedure, and by phone calls on days 3 and 7.

Results

Post-dural puncture headache developed in 38 (8.2%) patients. Of the patients who developed post-dural puncture headache, 23 (60.5%) had a body mass index <30 and 15 (39.5%) had a body mass index ≥30. Of the patients who did not develop post-dural puncture headache, 258 (60, 6%) had a body mass index <30 and 168 (39, 4%) had a body mass index ≥30.

Conclusion

This prospective study found the body mass index values did not affect post-dural puncture headache in the elective cesarean section performed under spinal anesthesia.