Demande d'analgésie périmédullaire par les patientes et les équipes obstétricales dans quatre régions françaises. Partie II : réalisation des analgésies périmédullaires

Satisfaction of patients in pain management delivering in Reunion Island with or without neuraxial analgesia

BACKGROUND

Neuraxial analgesia (NA) rate during labour in Reunion Island is below the average rate in continental France. Our study objective was to know if the patients that deliver with or without NA were satisfied. We also wanted to identify the reasons of this lower rate.

METHOD

This was a multicentre prospective observational study led in the seven Reunion Island maternity hospitals including all patients who delivered after 24 weeks of gestation onwards during two weeks in 2019 and excluding scheduled caesarean sections. Included patients received a satisfaction questionnaire the day after delivery and returned it before leaving.

RESULTS

Of the 497 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 303 questionnaires were analysable. 216 patients had NA (71.3 %) and 87 patients (28.7 %) delivered without. A total of 88.0 % of patients with NA were satisfied with pain management compared to 83.9 % without. There was no significant difference between the groups (p=0.68). Among patients who delivered without NA, it was their choice in 55.2 % of cases. They wanted the most natural birth possible in 87.5 % of cases. Birth without NA in opposition to their wish was related to too rapid dilation in 90.0 % of lowerecases.

DISCUSSION

No significant difference in satisfaction between women who delivered with or without NA was found. The lower regional NA rate seems to be linked to a choice to give birth as naturally as possible and to too fast dilation at the time of requesting NA.

Pain acceptance and personal control in pain relief in two maternity care models: a cross-national comparison of Belgium and the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

A cross-national comparison of Belgian and Dutch childbearing women allows us to gain insight into the relative importance of pain acceptance and personal control in pain relief in 2 maternity care models. Although Belgium and the Netherlands are neighbouring countries sharing the same language, political system and geography, they are characterised by a different organisation of health care, particularly in maternity care. In Belgium the medical risks of childbirth are emphasised but neutralised by a strong belief in the merits of the medical model. Labour pain is perceived as a needless inconvenience easily resolved by means of pain medication. In the Netherlands the midwifery model of care defines childbirth as a normal physiological process and family event. Labour pain is perceived as an ally in the birth process.

METHODS

Women were invited to participate in the study by independent midwives and obstetricians during antenatal visits in 2004-2005. Two questionnaires were filled out by 611 women, one at 30 weeks of pregnancy and one within the first 2 weeks after childbirth either at home or in a hospital. However, only women having a hospital birth without obstetric intervention (N = 327) were included in this analysis. A logistic regression analysis has been performed.

RESULTS

Labour pain acceptance and personal control in pain relief render pain medication use during labour less likely, especially if they occur together. Apart from this general result, we also find large country differences. Dutch women with a normal hospital birth are six times less likely to use pain medication during labour, compared to their Belgian counterparts. This country difference cannot be explained by labour pain acceptance, since - in contrast to our working hypothesis - Dutch and Belgian women giving birth in a hospital setting are characterised by a similar labour pain acceptance. Our findings suggest that personal control in pain relief can partially explain the country differences in coping with labour pain. For Dutch women we find that the use of pain medication is lowest if women experience control over the reception of pain medication and have a positive attitude towards labour pain. In Belgium however, not personal control over the use of pain relief predicts the use of pain medication, but negative attitudes towards labour.

CONCLUSIONS

Apart from individual level determinants, such as length of labour or pain acceptance, our findings suggest that the maternity care context is of major importance in the study of the management of labour pain. The pain medication use in Belgian hospital maternity care is high and is very sensitive to negative attitudes towards labour pain. In the Netherlands, on the contrary, pain medication use is already low. This can partially be explained by a low degree of personal control in pain relief, especially when co-occurring with positive pain attitudes.

Factors associated with the choice of delivery without epidural analgesia in women at low risk in France

BACKGROUND

Regional anesthesia is used for three-fourths of the deliveries in France. Epidural analgesia during labor is supposed to be available to all women at low risk. The purpose of our study was to examine how the choice of delivery without an epidural varied in this context according to women's characteristics, prenatal care, and type of maternity unit.

METHODS

The 2003 National Perinatal Survey in France collected data about a representative sample of births. We selected 8,233 women who were at low risk and therefore should have been able to choose whether or not to deliver without epidural analgesia. Women were interviewed in the maternity unit after delivery. The factors associated with women's choice to deliver without epidural analgesia were studied with multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 2,720 women who gave birth without epidural analgesia, 37 percent reported that they had not wanted one; other reasons were labor occurring too quickly (43.9%), medical contraindication (3.3%), and unavailability of an anesthesiologist (2.8%). The reported decision to deliver without epidural analgesia was closely associated with high parity. It was also more frequent among women in an unfavorable social situation (not cohabiting, no or low-qualified job) and among women who gave birth in non-university public hospitals, in small- or medium-sized maternity units, and in maternity units without an anesthesiologist always on site.

CONCLUSIONS

Unfavorable social situation and organizational factors are associated with the reported choice to give birth without epidural analgesia. This finding suggests that women are not always in a position to make a real choice. It would be useful to improve the understanding of how pregnant women define their preferences and to know how these preferences change during pregnancy and labor.

Contraindications to regional anaesthesia in obstetrics: a survey of German practice

BACKGROUND

We assessed current practice regarding indications and contraindications to regional analgesia and anaesthesia for labour and delivery in Germany.

METHODS

Questionnaires were mailed to the directors of 918 German departments of anaesthesiology.

RESULTS

A total of 397 completed replies were received representing 41.3% of all deliveries in Germany. More than half of the respondents never perform spinal or epidural anaesthesia when the platelet count falls below 65x10(9)/L. Preeclampsia, which was not graded for severity, was considered an absolute contraindication to regional block by 15% and placenta praevia by 30% of respondents. If a woman had taken aspirin three days before, the numbers of respondents considering epidural anaesthesia contraindicated (40.2%) were nearly double those considering spinal anaesthesia contraindicated (21.7%) (P<0.001). For a platelet count of 79x10(9)/L, epidural anaesthesia was thought to be contraindicated by 37% and spinal anaesthesia by 22.2% (P=0.001). In departments with <500 deliveries/year, reluctance to use regional blockade was more pronounced than in departments with >1000 deliveries/year.

CONCLUSION

Clinical practice varies considerably in Germany. Concerns regarding the use of regional blockade were more prevalent in hospitals with small delivery units. Indications and contraindications are not consistent in Germany and some recommendations or guidelines are needed.