[Anaesthetic considerations for interventional radiology]

[Anesthesia in interventional neuroradiology]

Interventional neuroradiology procedures have become increasingly complex, requiring planning and coordination. Key roles are played by the anesthesiologist and the radiologist, as well as by technicians and nurses. This review aims to analyze the anesthesiologist's part in managing these procedures, from the start of the intervention through the immediate postoperative period. First concerns are to assure patient safety during transfer, maintain the airway, keep the patient immobile and hemodynamically stable, and manage anticoagulant and antiplatelet treatments. Rapid awakening must also be assured so that the patient's neurologic status can be assessed in situ. The anesthesiologist should treat any neurologic complications that develop and that might lead to emergency situations during the procedures.

[Survey of anesthesiologists' practice in treating spontaneous aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage]

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the participation of Spanish anesthesiology departments in the management of patients hospitalized for spontaneous aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Chiefs of anesthesiology departments of hospitals listed in the Spanish National Catalog of Hospitals of the Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs were sent a questionnaire with 30 items covering protocols for the management of patients with spontaneous aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Items asked about the participation of anesthesiologists during both admission and the perioperative period.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was sent to 132 hospitals, of which 18 (13.6%) responded. Forty-six percent of anesthesiology departments do not participate in the initial resuscitation. Only 4 reported having a protocol for treating these patients. The initial diagnosis was reportedly made by cranial computed tomography in all cases. Endovascular treatment was the most common procedure reported (66%) and it was given within the first 48 hours (66%). Basic monitoring was used more than nervous system monitoring. Total intravenous anesthesia was used for craniotomy in 53% of the hospitals and for endovascular treatment in 64%. Complications reported most often were vasospasm (100%) and hydrocephalus (69%).

CONCLUSIONS

Even though few questionnaires were returned, the results reveal scarce use of protocols for the treatment of spontaneous aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage by anesthesiologists. It was also evident that the participation of anesthesiology department staff in the treatment of this condition takes place almost exclusively in the intraoperative period and that the use of nervous system monitoring is scarce. Endovascular treatment is increasing in our practice settings.

[Procedural analgesia : concepts and practice]

The effect of severe pain and its hazardous stress-related cardiocirculatory consequences have been well documented for the perisurgical setting. Independently of surgical intervention however, even short and simple measures (e.g. thorax drain removal, repositioning a limb fracture) and longer diagnostic procedures such as MRI are potentially very painful or stressful to the patient. Though longer diagnostic procedures are frequently supported by systemic medication, short interventions regularly lack this aspect. Specific challenges result from the need to counteract sometimes great changes in pain intensity. Moreover procedural analgesia represents a multidisciplinary measure not restricted to anaesthesiology, as most of these measures are performed without anaesthesia. To avoid endangering the patient, the choice of drugs and patient monitoring have to meet certain professional and technical standards. Competence in respiratory management is of paramount importance. This paper outlines these requirements and serves as an orientation outside the anaesthesiological speciality.