[Timing of tracheostomy and outcome of patients requiring mechanical ventilation]

Factors related to tracheostomy timing and ventilator weaning: findings from a population in Northern Taiwan

INTRODUCTION

Determining the optimal time for performing a tracheostomy and weaning a patient off a ventilator is typically challenging for physicians, respiratory therapists, patients and patients' families.

PURPOSE

This study examined the factors influencing tracheostomy timing and ventilator weaning and described the transition-care placement of patients who experience unsuccessful ventilator weaning.

METHODS

A retrospective design was employed, and 2 years of data were collected through a medical chart review performed at a hospital in Northern Taiwan. Sixty patients who received tracheostomies in the intensive care unit (ICU) or respiratory care center were enrolled. The data included each patient's demographic information, disease diagnosis, and Glasgow Coma Scale score and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores.

RESULTS

For patients on a ventilator in an ICU, the tracheostomy rate was 2.7%. Early (within 21 days) and late (>21 days) tracheostomies accounted for 36.7% and 63.3%, respectively. Of the patients who had received tracheostomies, 36.7% experienced ventilator weaning. The factors related to tracheostomy timing were disease diagnosis (P = 0.036) and days of ventilator use (P = 0.003). The factors related to ventilator weaning included disease diagnosis (P = 0.010) and tracheostomy timing (P = 0.001). Early tracheostomies were 10.9 times more likely than late tracheostomies to result in ventilator weaning (95%CI =2.5-47.7, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Tracheostomy timing was strongly correlated with ventilator weaning. Early tracheostomy was higher successful ventilator weaning rates. The surgical patients were more likely to receive an early tracheostomy. However, the number of patients in Taiwan who received tracheostomies was lower than that in other countries. Further study maybe need to understand cultural variations in the acceptance of tracheostomies by patients.

Timing of tracheotomy in ICU patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Introduction

The optimal timing of tracheotomy in critically ill patients remains a topic of debate. We performed a systematic review to clarify the potential benefits of early versus late tracheotomy.

Methods

We searched PubMed and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials that compared outcomes in patients managed with early and late tracheotomy. A random-effects meta-analysis, combining data from three a priori-defined categories of timing of tracheotomy (within 4 versus after 10 days, within 4 versus after 5 days, within 10 versus after 10 days), was performed to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) or odds ratio (OR).

Results

Of the 142 studies identified in the search, 12, including a total of 2,689 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The tracheotomy rate was significantly higher with early than with late tracheotomy (87 % versus 53 %, OR 16.1 (5.7-45.7); p <0.01). Early tracheotomy was associated with more ventilator-free days (WMD 2.12 (0.94, 3.30), p <0.01), a shorter ICU stay (WMD -5.14 (-9.99, -0.28), p = 0.04), a shorter duration of sedation (WMD -5.07 (-10.03, -0.10), p <0.05) and reduced long-term mortality (OR 0.83 (0.69-0.99), p = 0.04) than late tracheotomy.

Conclusions

This updated meta-analysis reveals that early tracheotomy is associated with higher tracheotomy rates and better outcomes, including more ventilator-free days, shorter ICU stays, less sedation, and reduced long-term mortality, compared to late tracheotomy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-015-1138-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Early versus late tracheostomy for critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Long-term mechanical ventilation is the most common situation for which tracheostomy is indicated for patients in intensive care units (ICUs). 'Early' and 'late' tracheostomies are two categories of the timing of tracheostomy. Evidence on the advantages attributed to early versus late tracheostomy is somewhat conflicting but includes shorter hospital stays and lower mortality rates.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of early (≤ 10 days after tracheal intubation) versus late tracheostomy (> 10 days after tracheal intubation) in critically ill adults predicted to be on prolonged mechanical ventilation with different clinical conditions.

SEARCH METHODS

This is an update of a review last published in 2012 (Issue 3, The Cochrane Library) with previous searches run in December 2010. In this version, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2013, Issue 8); MEDLINE (via PubMed) (1966 to August 2013); EMBASE (via Ovid) (1974 to August 2013); LILACS (1986 to August 2013); PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) at www.pedro.fhs.usyd.edu.au (1999 to August 2013) and CINAHL (1982 to August 2013). We reran the search in October 2014 and will deal with any studies of interest when we update the review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCTs or QRCTs) comparing early tracheostomy (two to 10 days after intubation) against late tracheostomy (> 10 days after intubation) for critically ill adult patients expected to be on prolonged mechanical ventilation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted data and conducted a quality assessment. Meta-analyses with random-effects models were conducted for mortality, time spent on mechanical ventilation and time spent in the ICU.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight RCTs (N = 1977 participants). At the longest follow-up time available in these studies, evidence of moderate quality from seven RCTs (n = 1903) showed lower mortality rates in the early as compared with the late tracheostomy group (risk ratio (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 0.98; P value 0.03; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) ≅ 11). Divergent results were reported on the time spent on mechanical ventilation and no differences were noted for pneumonia, but the probability of discharge from the ICU was higher at day 28 in the early tracheostomy group (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.55; P value 0.006; NNTB ≅ 8).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The whole findings of this systematic review are no more than suggestive of the superiority of early over late tracheostomy because no information of high quality is available for specific subgroups with particular characteristics.

The Role of Early Tracheostomy in Patients with Posterior Fossa Haemorrhage in Neurocritical Care

Studies indicate that early tracheostomy may improve outcomes in critically ill patients, but there is a lack of data specifically relating to patients with posterior fossa haemorrhage. This retrospective study assesses the type and duration of airway management for patients with posterior fossa haemorrhage admitted to a neurocritical care unit (NCCU). Of the 21 patients identified, seven required no airway intervention, eight were managed with endotracheal intubation alone, and six required tracheostomy. Although the median length of airway management for patients with endotracheal intubation alone was two days (n=8), the median delay to tracheostomy was 11 days (n=6). Four patients requiring intubation did not survive their NCCU stay. No patient was successfully extubated later than two days post admission. We recommend early tracheostomy in patients who are not extubatable within a few days of admission but in whom admission characteristics and neurological progress otherwise suggest survival with useful recovery.

Early versus late tracheostomy for critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Long-term mechanical ventilation is the most common situation where tracheostomy is indicated for patients in intensive care units (ICU). 'Early' and 'late' tracheostomies are two categories of the timing of tracheostomy. The evidence on the advantages attributed to early over late tracheostomy is somewhat conflicting but includes shorter hospital stays and lower mortality rates.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of early (≤ 10 days after intubation) versus late tracheostomy (> 10 days after intubation) in critically ill adult patients predicted to be on prolonged mechanical ventilation and with different clinical conditions.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 12); MEDLINE (via PubMed) (1966 to December 2010); EMBASE (via Ovid) (from 1974 to December 2010); LILACS (1986 to December 2010); PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) at www.pedro.fhs.usyd.edu.au (1999 to December 2010) and CINAHL (1982 to December 2010).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials which compared early tracheostomy (two to10 days after intubation) against late tracheostomy (> 10 days after intubation) for critically ill adult patients expected to be on prolonged mechanical ventilation. There was no language restriction.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors extracted data and conducted a quality assessment. Meta-analyses using the random-effects model were conducted for mortality and pneumonia.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four studies, with a high risk of bias, in which a total of 673 patients were randomized to either early or late tracheostomy. We could not pool data in a meta-analysis because of clinical, methodological and statistical heterogeneity between the included studies. There is no strong evidence for real differences between early and late tracheostomy in the primary outcome of mortality. In one study a statistically significant result favouring early tracheostomy was observed in the outcome measuring time spent on ventilatory support (mean difference (MD) -9.80 days, 95% CI -11.48 to -8.12, P < 0.001).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Updated evidence is of low quality, and potential differences between early and late tracheostomy need to be better investigated by means of randomized controlled trials. At present there is no specific information about any subgroup or individual characteristics potentially associated with better outcomes with either early or late tracheostomy.