Troubles endocriniens à distance d’une agression cérébrale : quel retentissement ? Quel bilan ?

The history of pituitary dysfunction after traumatic brain injury

PURPOSE

To estimate the total number of articles on traumatic brain injury (TBI)-related hypopituitarism and patients (including children and adolescents) with such disorder that were published until now, particularly after the author's review published on April 2000.

METHODS

Review of the literature retrievable on PubMed.

RESULTS

TBI-related hypopituitarism accounts for 7.2% of the whole literature on hypopituitarism published during the 18 years and half between May 2000 and October 2018. As a result, the total number of patients with TBI-related hypopituitarism now approximates 2200. A number of patients, both adults and children, continue to be published as case reports. Articles, including reviews and guidelines, have been published in national languages in order to maximize locally the information on TBI-related hypopituitarism. TBI-related hypopituitarism has been also studied in animals (rodents, cats and dogs).

CONCLUSIONS

The interest for the damage suffered by anterior pituitary as a result of TBI continues to remain high both in the adulthood and childhood.

Pituitary and/or hypothalamic dysfunction following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: Current perspectives

There is an increasing deliberation regarding hypopituitarism following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and recent data have suggested that pituitary dysfunction is very common among survivors of patients having moderate-severe TBI which may evolve or resolve over time. Due to high prevalence of pituitary dysfunction after moderate-severe TBI and its association with increased morbidity and poor recovery and the fact that it can be easily treated with hormone replacement, it has been suggested that early detection and treatment is necessary to prevent long-term neurological consequences. The cause of pituitary dysfunction after TBI is still not well understood, but evidence suggests few possible primary and secondary causes. Results of recent studies focusing on the incidence of hypopituitarism in the acute and chronic phases after TBI are varied in terms of severity and time of occurrence. Although the literature available does not show consistent values and there is difference in study parameters and diagnostic tests used, it is clear that pituitary dysfunction is very common after moderate to severe TBI and patients should be carefully monitored. The exact timing of development cannot be predicted but has suggested regular assessment of pituitary function up to 1 year after TBI. In this narrative review, we aim to explore the current evidence available regarding the incidence of pituitary dysfunction in acute and chronic phase post-TBI and recommendations for screening and follow-up in these patients. We will also focus light over areas in this field worthy of further investigation.

Clinical outcomes, predictors, and prevalence of anterior pituitary disorders following traumatic brain injury: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical outcomes, predictors, and prevalence of anterior pituitary disorders following traumatic brain injury.

DATA SOURCES

We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Registry, BIOSIS, and Trip Database up to February 2012 and consulted bibliographies of narrative reviews and selected articles.

STUDY SELECTION

We included cohort, case-control, cross-sectional studies and randomized trials enrolling at least five adults with blunt traumatic brain injury in whom at least one anterior pituitary axis was assessed. We excluded case series and studies in which other neurological conditions were indistinguishable from traumatic brain injury.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent reviewers selected citations, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using a standardized form.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We performed meta-analyses using random effect models and assessed heterogeneity using the I index.

RESULTS

We included 66 studies (5,386 patients) evaluating prevalence, 14 evaluating clinical outcomes, and 27 evaluating predictors. Thirty studies were at low risk of bias. Anterior pituitary disorders were associated with a trend toward increased ICU mortality (risk ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.99-3.21; four studies) and no difference in Glasgow Outcome Scale score (mean difference, -0.45; 95% CI, -1.10 to 0.20; three studies). Age (mean difference, 3.19; 95% CI, 0.31-6.08; 19 studies), traumatic brain injury severity (risk ratio, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.20-3.86 for patients with severe vs nonsevere traumatic brain injury; seven studies), and skull fractures (risk ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.03-2.91; six studies) predicted anterior pituitary disorders. Over the long term, 31.6% (95% CI, 23.6-40.1%; 27 studies) of patients had at least one anterior pituitary disorder. We observed significant heterogeneity that was not solely explained by the risk of bias or traumatic brain injury severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one third of traumatic brain injury patients have persistent anterior pituitary disorder. Older age, traumatic brain injury severity, and skull fractures predict anterior pituitary disorders, which in turn may be associated with higher ICU mortality. Further high-quality studies are warranted to better define the burden of anterior pituitary disorders and to identify high-risk patients.