[Physicochemical stability study of injectable solutions of cisatracurium besilate in clinical conditions]

Cistracurium Besylate 10 mg/mL Solution Compounded in a Hospital Pharmacy to Prevent Drug Shortages: A Stability Study Involving Four Degradation Products

BACKGROUND

Stability study of a 10 mg/mL injectable cisatracurium solution stored refrigerated in amber glass ampoules for 18 months (M18).

METHODS

4000 ampoules were aseptically compounded using European Pharmacopoeia (EP)-grade cisatracurium besylate, sterile water for injection, and benzenesulfonic acid. We developed and validated a stability-indicating HPLC-UV method for cisatracurium and laudanosine. At each stability study time point, we recorded the visual aspect, cisatracurium and laudanosine levels, pH, and osmolality. Sterility, bacterial endotoxin content, and non-visible particles in solution were checked after compounding (T0) and after M12 and M18 of storage. We used HPLC-MS/MS to identify the degradation products (DPs).

RESULTS

During the study, osmolality remained stable, pH decreased slightly, and the organoleptic properties did not change. The number of non-visible particles remained below the EP's threshold. Sterility was preserved, and bacterial endotoxin level remained below the calculated threshold. Cisatracurium concentration remained within the ±10% acceptance interval for 15 months and then decreased to 88.7% of C0 after M18. The laudanosine generated accounted for less than a fifth of the cisatracurium degradation, and three DPs were generated-identified as EP impurity A, impurities E/F, and impurities N/O.

CONCLUSION

Compounded 10 mg/mL cisatracurium injectable solution is stable for at least 15 months.

Comparative Analysis of the Anesthesia Effect of Cisatracurium Besylate and Mivacurium Chloride Otolaryngology Surgery

Objective

The aim is to investigate and compare the anesthesia effect of cisatracurium besylate and mivacurium chloride otolaryngology surgery.

Materials and Methods

108 patients who underwent ENT surgery under general anesthesia in our hospital from November 2021 to March 2022 were recruited for retrospective analysis, in which patients in the experimental group A were anesthetized with cisatracurium besylate and patients in the experimental group B were anesthetized with mivacurium, and the anesthetic effects and recovery of the two groups were compared and analyzed.

Results

There was no significant difference in mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and pulse oximetry levels between the two groups at the six time points of admission, anesthesia induction, intubation, end of operation, recovery of consciousness, and extubation (all P > 0.05). The train of four stimulation values at end of operation, recovery of consciousness, and extubation were significantly higher than those of the experimental group A (all P > 0.05). The recovery time of self-consciousness, extubation time, and eye-opening time of the experimental group B were significantly shorter than those of the experimental group A, and the occurrence of agitation was significantly less than that of the experimental group A (all P > 0.05). The total incidence of adverse conditions in the experimental group B was significantly lower than that in the experimental group A (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with cisatracurium besylate in otolaryngology surgery, mivacurium chloride anesthesia offers a promising route with respect to less impact on hemodynamics, faster postoperative recovery, absence of the accumulation of neuromuscular blockade, less adverse reactions, and higher safety.