[Hypernatremia in head-injured patients: friend or foe?]

Risk factors for mortality in brain injury patients who have severe hypernatremia and received continuous venovenous hemofiltration

Background and objectives

The mortality rate for people with brain injuries is increased when hypernatremia is present. Patients with severe hypernatremia, who have a significant short-term mortality rate, were shown to benefit from continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), which has been indicated to be successful. Exploring the risk factors for short-term mortality in brain injury patients who underwent CVVH and had severe hypernatremia was the aim of the current study.

Materials and methods

Retrospective screening was performed on patients with brain injuries who underwent CVVH at Xijing Hospital between 1 December 2010 and 31 December 2021 and who have a diagnosis of severe hypernatremia. The outcomes included 28-day patient mortality and hospital stay duration. The patient survival rate was examined using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. To determine the risk factors for short-term death for patients, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis models were used.

Results

Our current study included a total of 83 individuals. The included patients had a median age of 49 (IQR 35-59) years. Of the included patients, 58 patients (69.9 %) died within 28 days. The median length of hospital stay for the patient was 13 (IQR 7-21) days. The APACHE II score, SOFA score, GCS, PLT count, INR, stroke, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressor reliance were related to 28-day mortality according to the univariate Cox analysis. INR (HR = 1.004, 95 % Cl: 1.001-1.006, P = 0.008), stroke (HR = 1.971, 95 % Cl: 1.031-3.768, P = 0.04), mechanical ventilation (HR = 3.948, 95 % Cl: 1.090-14.294, P = 0.036), and vasopressor dependency (HR = 2.262, 95 % Cl: 1.099-4.655, P = 0.027) were independently associated with the risk of 28-day death rates, according to multivariate Cox regression analysis.

Conclusions

Brain injuries who have severe hypernatremia requires CVVH, which has high short-term patient mortality. Mechanical ventilation, INR increase, stroke, and vasopressor dependence are independently associated with increased patient mortality risk.

Diagnosis and treatment of brain injury complicated by hypernatremia

Hypernatremia is a common electrolyte disorder in patients with brain injury. The mortality of brain injury patients with severe hypernatremia may be as high as 86.8%. The efficacy of conventional treatment for hypernatremia is limited. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) can slowly, controllably, and continuously reduce the blood sodium concentration and gradually become an important treatment for severe hypernatremia patients. This review aims to provide important information for clinicians and clinical researchers by describing the etiology, diagnosis, hazards, conventional treatment, and CRRT treatment of hypernatremia in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Lessons from the CONSCIOUS-1 Study

After years of research on treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), including randomized clinical trials, few treatments have been shown to be efficacious. Nevertheless, reductions in morbidity and mortality have occurred over the last decades. Reasons for the improved outcomes remain unclear. One randomized clinical trial that has been examined in detail with these questions in mind is Clazosentan to Overcome Neurological Ischemia and Infarction Occurring After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (CONSCIOUS-1). This was a phase-2 trial testing the effect of clazosentan on angiographic vasospasm (aVSP) in patients with aSAH. Clazosentan decreased moderate to severe aVSP. There was no statistically significant effect on the extended Glasgow outcome score (GOS), although the study was not powered for this endpoint. Data from the approximately 400 patients in the study were detailed, rigorously collected and documented and were generously made available to one investigator. Post-hoc analyses were conducted which have expanded our knowledge of the management of aSAH. We review those analyses here.