1
|
Gong J, Kim DM, De Hoedt AM, Bhowmick N, Figlin R, Kim HL, Sandler H, Theodorescu D, Posadas E, Freedland SJ. Disparities With Systemic Therapies for Black Men Having Advanced Prostate Cancer: Where Do We Stand? J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:228-236. [PMID: 37890125 PMCID: PMC10824384 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate cancer represents the most common cancer diagnosis in Black men and is the second leading cause of cancer death in this population. Multilevel disparities have been well-documented in Black men with prostate cancer and play a role in poorer survival outcomes when compared with White men with prostate cancer. In this review, we highlight the changing trend in disparities for systemic therapy outcomes in Black men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer. METHODS We reviewed data from real-world registries and prospective clinical trials with a particular focus on equal access settings to compare outcomes to systemic therapies between Black and White men with metastatic prostate cancer. RESULTS In metastatic prostate cancer, there is growing evidence to suggest that Black men may have similar, if not better, outcomes to systemic therapies than White men with advanced disease, as corroborated by prospective studies and clinical trials where health care delivery and follow-up are more likely to be standardized. CONCLUSION This review illustrates the importance of nonbiological drivers of racial disparities in Black men with advanced prostate cancer. Mitigating barriers to health care access and delivery as well as including participation in clinical trials will be pivotal to ongoing efforts to address disparities in systemic therapy outcomes for Black men with metastatic prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Gong
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Daniel M. Kim
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Amanda M. De Hoedt
- Urology Section, Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC
| | - Neil Bhowmick
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Robert Figlin
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Hyung L. Kim
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Howard Sandler
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Dan Theodorescu
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Edwin Posadas
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Stephen J. Freedland
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
- Urology Section, Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wei Y, Zhang T, Wang B, Pan J, Jin S, Fang B, Gu W, Qin X, Dai B, Lin G, Gan H, Wu J, Ye D, Zhu Y. Prospective clinical sequencing of 1016 Chinese prostate cancer patients: uncovering genomic characterization and race disparity. Mol Oncol 2023; 17:2183-2199. [PMID: 37584393 PMCID: PMC10552897 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Although there is a well-known disparity in prostate cancer (PC) incidence and mortality between Chinese and Western patients, the underlying genomic differences have been investigated only sparsely. This clinicogenomic study was conducted to reveal the genomic mutations contributing to the PC disparity across ethnicities and investigate the mutational profile of Chinese PC patients. A total of 1016 Chinese PC patients were prospectively enrolled and subjected to targeted sequencing, resulting in usable sequencing data for 41 genes from 859 patients. Genomic data retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; locoregional PC), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center [MSKCC; metastatic castration-sensitive PC (mCSPC)], and Stand Up To Cancer [SU2C; metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC)] cohorts were used as comparators representing Western men. Genomic mutations were analyzed using an integrated bioinformatic strategy. A comparison of the disease stages revealed that mutations in tumor protein 53 (TP53), androgen receptor (AR), forkhead box A1 (FOXA1), and genes involved in the cell cycle pathway were enriched in mCRPC. Mutations in adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene were found to be more prevalent in patients with visceral metastasis. Genomic differences between Western and Chinese men were mainly observed in castration-sensitive PC, with tumors from Chinese men having more FOXA1 (11.4% vs. 4.2%) but fewer TP53 (4.8% vs. 13%) mutations in locoregional PC and harboring fewer TP53 (11% vs. 29.2%), phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN; 2.5% vs. 10.3%), and APC (1.7% vs. 7.4%) mutations in the mCSPC stage than those of Western men. Patients of both ethnicities with mCRPC had similar mutational spectra. Furthermore, FOXA1 class-2 was less common than FOXA1 class-1 and showed no enrichment in metastasis, contrary to the findings in the Western cohort. Our study provides a valuable resource for a better understanding of PC in China and reveals the genomic alterations associated with PC disparity across races.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Wei
- Department of UrologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer InstituteChina
| | - Tingwei Zhang
- Department of UrologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer InstituteChina
| | - Beihe Wang
- Department of UrologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer InstituteChina
| | - Jian Pan
- Department of UrologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer InstituteChina
| | - Shengming Jin
- Department of UrologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer InstituteChina
| | - Bangwei Fang
- Department of UrologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer InstituteChina
| | - Weijie Gu
- Department of UrologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer InstituteChina
| | - Xiaojian Qin
- Department of UrologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer InstituteChina
| | - Bo Dai
- Department of UrologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer InstituteChina
| | - Guowen Lin
- Department of UrologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer InstituteChina
| | - Hualei Gan
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Department of PathologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterChina
| | - Junlong Wu
- Department of UrologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer InstituteChina
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of UrologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer InstituteChina
| | - Yao Zhu
- Department of UrologyFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterChina
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical CollegeFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer InstituteChina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Petinrin OO, Saeed F, Toseef M, Liu Z, Basurra S, Muyide IO, Li X, Lin Q, Wong KC. Machine Learning in Metastatic Cancer Research: Potentials, Possibilities, and Prospects. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2023; 21:2454-2470. [PMID: 37077177 PMCID: PMC10106342 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.03.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer has received extensive recognition for its high mortality rate, with metastatic cancer being the top cause of cancer-related deaths. Metastatic cancer involves the spread of the primary tumor to other body organs. As much as the early detection of cancer is essential, the timely detection of metastasis, the identification of biomarkers, and treatment choice are valuable for improving the quality of life for metastatic cancer patients. This study reviews the existing studies on classical machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) in metastatic cancer research. Since the majority of metastatic cancer research data are collected in the formats of PET/CT and MRI image data, deep learning techniques are heavily involved. However, its black-box nature and expensive computational cost are notable concerns. Furthermore, existing models could be overestimated for their generality due to the non-diverse population in clinical trial datasets. Therefore, research gaps are itemized; follow-up studies should be carried out on metastatic cancer using machine learning and deep learning tools with data in a symmetric manner.
Collapse
|
4
|
Vince RA, Jiang R, Bank M, Quarles J, Patel M, Sun Y, Hartman H, Zaorsky NG, Jia A, Shoag J, Dess RT, Mahal BA, Stensland K, Eyrich NW, Seymore M, Takele R, Morgan TM, Schipper M, Spratt DE. Evaluation of Social Determinants of Health and Prostate Cancer Outcomes Among Black and White Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2250416. [PMID: 36630135 PMCID: PMC9857531 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE As the field of medicine strives for equity in care, research showing the association of social determinants of health (SDOH) with poorer health care outcomes is needed to better inform quality improvement strategies. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of SDOH with prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and overall survival (OS) among Black and White patients with prostate cancer. DATA SOURCES A MEDLINE search was performed of prostate cancer comparative effectiveness research from January 1, 1960, to June 5, 2020. STUDY SELECTION Two authors independently selected studies conducted among patients within the United States and performed comparative outcome analysis between Black and White patients. Studies were required to report time-to-event outcomes. A total of 251 studies were identified for review. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Three authors independently screened and extracted data. End point meta-analyses were performed using both fixed-effects and random-effects models. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline was followed, and 2 authors independently reviewed all steps. All conflicts were resolved by consensus. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was PCSM, and the secondary outcome was OS. With the US Department of Health and Human Services Healthy People 2030 initiative, an SDOH scoring system was incorporated to evaluate the association of SDOH with the predefined end points. The covariables included in the scoring system were age, comorbidities, insurance status, income status, extent of disease, geography, standardized treatment, and equitable and harmonized insurance benefits. The scoring system was discretized into 3 categories: high (≥10 points), intermediate (5-9 points), and low (<5 points). RESULTS The 47 studies identified comprised 1 019 908 patients (176 028 Black men and 843 880 White men; median age, 66.4 years [IQR, 64.8-69.0 years]). The median follow-up was 66.0 months (IQR, 41.5-91.4 months). Pooled estimates found no statistically significant difference in PCSM for Black patients compared with White patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08 [95% CI, 0.99-1.19]; P = .08); results were similar for OS (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.95-1.07]; P = .68). There was a significant race-SDOH interaction for both PCSM (regression coefficient, -0.041 [95% CI, -0.059 to 0.023]; P < .001) and OS (meta-regression coefficient, -0.017 [95% CI, -0.033 to -0.002]; P = .03). In studies with minimal accounting for SDOH (<5-point score), Black patients had significantly higher PCSM compared with White patients (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.17-1.41; P < .001). In studies with greater accounting for SDOH variables (≥10-point score), PCSM was significantly lower among Black patients compared with White patients (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-0.96; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that there is a significant interaction between race and SDOH with respect to PCSM and OS among men with prostate cancer. Incorporating SDOH variables into data collection and analyses are vital to developing strategies for achieving equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randy A. Vince
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ralph Jiang
- Department of Biostatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | | | - Jake Quarles
- Central Michigan University School of Medicine, Mt Pleasant
| | - Milan Patel
- University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor
| | - Yilun Sun
- Department of Population Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Holly Hartman
- Department of Population Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nicholas G. Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Angela Jia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jonathan Shoag
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Robert T. Dess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Brandon A. Mahal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | | | - Nicholas W. Eyrich
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Rebecca Takele
- Department of General Surgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York
| | - Todd M. Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | | | - Daniel E. Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vince RA, Jamieson S, Mahal B, Underwood W. Examining the Racial Disparities in Prostate Cancer. Urology 2022; 163:107-111. [PMID: 34418408 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Currently, Black men in the United States are greater than 1.5 times as likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer and more than twice as likely to succumb to the disease. While racial disparities in prostate cancer have been well documented, we must analyze these disparities in the correct context. Discussion of these disparities without correctly describing race as a social construct and acknowledging the impact of structural racism is insufficient. This article reviews the disparities seen in screening, treatment, outcomes, and clinical trial participation. We conclude by outlining future steps to help understand and study disparities, as we strive toward equitable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randy A Vince
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
| | | | - Brandon Mahal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mahal BA, Gerke T, Awasthi S, Soule HR, Simons JW, Miyahira A, Halabi S, George D, Platz EA, Mucci L, Yamoah K. Prostate Cancer Racial Disparities: A Systematic Review by the Prostate Cancer Foundation Panel. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 5:18-29. [PMID: 34446369 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prostate cancer (PCa) is a complex disease that disproportionately impacts Black men in the USA. The structural factors that drive heterogeneous outcomes for patients of differing backgrounds are probably the same ones that result in population-level disparities. The relative contribution of drivers along the PCa disease continuum is an active area of investigation and debate. OBJECTIVE To critically synthesize the available evidence on PCa disparities from a population-level perspective in comparison to data from "equal access and equal care settings" and to provide a consensus summary of the state of PCa disparities. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A plenary panel on PCa disparities presented at the Prostate Cancer Foundation meeting on October 24, 2019 and ensuing discussions are reported here. We used a systematic literature review approach and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses to select the most relevant publications. A total of 3333 publications between 2011 and 2021 were retrieved, of which 52 were included in the review; an additional 13 articles on screening guidelines, seminal clinical trials, and statistical methodology were used in the evidence synthesis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Race disparities in PCa are a result of a complex interaction between socioeconomic factors impacting access to care and ancestral/genetic factors that may influence tumor biology. Black men in the USA continue to have a nearly 1.8 times higher population-level mortality rate than White men. Failure to account for the race-specific incidence burden would continue to lead to residual disparity even after achieving relatively similar outcomes after primary treatment, resulting in a higher long-term mortality burden. Selection bias remains possible in PCa studies, which often rely on highly specific cohorts of Black men with higher use of health care resources that may not represent the average Black patient in the USA. Novel methods including mediation analysis and genetic ancestry rather than self-identified race can optimize analytical models investigating racial disparities and may lead to a better understanding of PCa genomic diversity and behavior. CONCLUSIONS Our findings emphasize the importance of racially diverse studies, including precision -omics, prevention, and targeted therapy initiatives, to elucidate mechanisms underlying racial differences in outcomes and response to therapy. We propose novel approaches for studying and addressing PCa disparities. Contemporary methods, particularly in the domain of mediation analysis, can promote scientific rigor in understanding these disparities. PATIENT SUMMARY Inaccurate data interpretation or lack of data altogether for Black men can impact policy and ultimately affect millions of individuals of African origin worldwide. Our review identifies a need to develop and prioritize a strategy for including Black and other men with prostate cancer in intervention studies and randomized clinical trials to halt the widening prostate cancer disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon A Mahal
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Travis Gerke
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel George
- Divisions of Medical Oncology and Urology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Platz
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology and the James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lorelei Mucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
George DJ, Halabi S, Heath EI, Sartor AO, Sonpavde GP, Das D, Bitting RL, Berry W, Healy P, Anand M, Winters C, Riggan C, Kephart J, Wilder R, Shobe K, Rasmussen J, Milowsky MI, Fleming MT, Bearden J, Goodman M, Zhang T, Harrison MR, McNamara M, Zhang D, LaCroix BL, Kittles RA, Patierno BM, Sibley AB, Patierno SR, Owzar K, Hyslop T, Freedman JA, Armstrong AJ. A prospective trial of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in Black and White men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer 2021; 127:2954-2965. [PMID: 33951180 PMCID: PMC9527760 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retrospective analyses of randomized trials suggest that Black men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have longer survival than White men. The authors conducted a prospective study of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone to explore outcomes by race. METHODS This race-stratified, multicenter study estimated radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in Black and White men with mCRPC. Secondary end points included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics, overall survival (OS), and safety. Exploratory analysis included genome-wide genotyping to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with progression in a model incorporating genetic ancestry. One hundred patients self-identified as White (n = 50) or Black (n = 50) were enrolled. Eligibility criteria were modified to facilitate the enrollment of individual Black patients. RESULTS The median rPFS for Black and White patients was 16.6 and 16.8 months, respectively; their times to PSA progression (TTP) were 16.6 and 11.5 months, respectively; and their OS was 35.9 and 35.7 months, respectively. Estimated rates of PSA decline by ≥50% in Black and White patients were 74% and 66%, respectively; and PSA declines to <0.2 ng/mL were 26% and 10%, respectively. Rates of grade 3 and 4 hypertension, hypokalemia, and hyperglycemia were higher in Black men. CONCLUSIONS Multicenter prospective studies by race are feasible in men with mCRPC but require less restrictive eligibility. Despite higher comorbidity rates, Black patients demonstrated rPFS and OS similar to those of White patients and trended toward greater TTP and PSA declines, consistent with retrospective reports. Importantly, Black men may have higher side-effect rates than White men. This exploratory genome-wide analysis of TTP identified a possible candidate marker of ancestry-dependent treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J. George
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Susan Halabi
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - A. Oliver Sartor
- Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Guru P. Sonpavde
- Hematology and Oncology Division, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Devika Das
- Hematology and Oncology Division, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Rhonda L. Bitting
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| | - William Berry
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Patrick Healy
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Monika Anand
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Carol Winters
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Colleen Riggan
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Julie Kephart
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Rhonda Wilder
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kellie Shobe
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Julia Rasmussen
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Matthew I. Milowsky
- Department of Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Michael Goodman
- W.G. (Bill) Hefner VA Medical Center, Salisbury, North Carolina
| | - Tian Zhang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Michael R. Harrison
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Megan McNamara
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Dadong Zhang
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Bonnie L. LaCroix
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Rick A. Kittles
- Department of Population Sciences, Division of Health Equities, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Brendon M. Patierno
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Alexander B. Sibley
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Steven R. Patierno
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kouros Owzar
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Terry Hyslop
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jennifer A. Freedman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Andrew J. Armstrong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Norz V, Rausch S. Treatment and resistance mechanisms in castration-resistant prostate cancer: new implications for clinical decision making? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2020; 21:149-163. [PMID: 33106066 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2021.1843430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The armamentarium of treatment options in metastatic and non-metastatic CRPC is rapidly evolving. However, the question of how individual treatment decisions should be balanced by available predictive clinical parameters, pharmacogenetic and drug interaction profiles, or compound-associated molecular biomarkers is a major challenge for clinical practice.Areas covered: We discuss treatment and resistance mechanisms in PC with regard to their association to drug efficacy and tolerability. Current efforts of combination treatment and putative predictive biomarkers of available and upcoming compounds are highlighted with regard to their implication on clinical decision-making.Expert opinion: Several treatment approaches are delineated, where identification of resistance mechanisms in CRPC may guide treatment selection. To date, most of these candidate biomarkers will however be found only in a small subset of patients. While current approaches of combination treatment in CRPC are proving synergistic effects on cancer biology, higher complexity with regard to biomarker analysis and interaction profiles of the respective compounds may be expected. Among other aspects of personalized treatment, consideration of drug-drug interaction and pharmacogenetics is an underrepresented issue. However, the non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer situation may be an example for treatment selection based on drug interaction profiles in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Norz
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Steffen Rausch
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Etzioni R, Nyame YA. Prostate Cancer Screening Guidelines for Black Men: Spotlight on an Empty Stage. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 113:650-651. [PMID: 33146382 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Etzioni
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Yaw A Nyame
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mahal B. Re: Clinical outcomes in men of diverse ethnic backgrounds with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:829. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
|