1
|
Dayyani F, Tam K, Kim EJ, Ejadi S, Valerin J, Taylor TH, Cho MT. A phase 1b multicenter study of TAS-102 in combination with irinotecan in patients with advanced recurrent or unresectable gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma after at least one line of treatment with a fluoropyrimidine and platinum-containing regimen. Med Oncol 2022; 39:102. [PMID: 35599264 PMCID: PMC9769492 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-022-01698-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
TAS-102 is approved for treatment of refractory metastatic gastroesophageal carcinoma (mGEC). This study sought to determine whether the combination of TAS-102 with irinotecan (TASIRI) was safe and effective in previously treated mGEC. This was a single-arm phase 1b study for patients (pts) with mGEC previously treated with at least one line of fluoropyrimidine and platinum-containing regimen. TAS-102 was given at 25 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1 to 5 with irinotecan 180 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 14-day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months ≥ 35% (PFS-6). 20 Pts were enrolled. The study met its primary endpoint. PFS-6 is 40% (95% CI 19.3-60.0). Median PFS and overall survival are 5.3 months and not reached, respectively. 17 of 20 pts had measurable disease by RECIST criteria. Of the 17, 13 had stable disease and 4 had progressive disease as best response (8 pts had tumor shrinkage < 30%). The disease control rate was 75%. In exploratory analyses, mutations in homologous recombination deficiency genes were associated with inferior PFS (P < 0.03). The most common any grade (G) treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were nausea (n = 14, 70%), diarrhea (n = 9, 45%), and fatigue (n = 8, 40%). G3-4 TRAE in > 5% of pts were anemia (20%) and neutropenia (10%). 2 serious TRAE were reported: G4 febrile neutropenia (n = 1) and G3 hypotension (n = 1). There was no G5 TRAE. The combination of TASIRI showed encouraging clinical activity with a meaningful improvement in PFS-6 compared to historic controls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farshid Dayyani
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, 200 S Manchester Ave, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Kit Tam
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Edward J. Kim
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Samuel Ejadi
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, 200 S Manchester Ave, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Jennifer Valerin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, 200 S Manchester Ave, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Thomas H. Taylor
- Department of Epidemiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - May T. Cho
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, 200 S Manchester Ave, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ghidini M, Petrillo A, Botticelli A, Trapani D, Parisi A, La Salvia A, Sajjadi E, Piciotti R, Fusco N, Khakoo S. How to Best Exploit Immunotherapeutics in Advanced Gastric Cancer: Between Biomarkers and Novel Cell-Based Approaches. J Clin Med 2021; 10:1412. [PMID: 33915839 PMCID: PMC8037391 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10071412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite extensive research efforts, advanced gastric cancer still has a dismal prognosis with conventional treatment options. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment landscape for many solid tumors. Amongst gastric cancer subtypes, tumors with microsatellite instability and Epstein Barr Virus positive tumors provide the strongest rationale for responding to immunotherapy. Various predictive biomarkers such as mismatch repair status, programmed death ligand 1 expression, tumor mutational burden, assessment of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and circulating biomarkers have been evaluated. However, results have been inconsistent due to different methodologies and thresholds used. Clinical implementation therefore remains a challenge. The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastric cancer is emerging with data from monotherapy in the heavily pre-treated population already available and studies in earlier disease settings with different combinatorial approaches in progress. Immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations with chemotherapy (CT), anti-angiogenics, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, anti-Her2 directed therapy, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors or dual checkpoint inhibitor strategies are being explored. Moreover, novel strategies including vaccines and CAR T cell therapy are also being trialed. Here we provide an update on predictive biomarkers for response to immunotherapy with an overview of their strengths and limitations. We discuss clinical trials that have been reported and trials in progress whilst providing an account of future steps needed to improve outcome in this lethal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Ghidini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Botticelli
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, Italy;
- Medical Oncology (B), Policlinico Umberto I, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of Early Drug Development for innovative therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Parisi
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
- Medical Oncology Unit, St. Salvatore Hospital, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Anna La Salvia
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital 12 De Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Elham Sajjadi
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (E.S.); (R.P.); (N.F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Piciotti
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (E.S.); (R.P.); (N.F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (E.S.); (R.P.); (N.F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Shelize Khakoo
- Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, London and Surrey, Sutton SM25PT, UK;
| |
Collapse
|