Pembrolizumab and nab-paclitaxel as salvage therapy for platinum-treated, locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: interim results of the open-label, single-arm, phase II PEANUT study

Efficacy and biomarker analysis of second-line nab-paclitaxel plus sintilimab in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with limited second-line therapy. We conducted this phase 2 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-line nab-paclitaxel plus sintilimab in advanced BTC. Histologically confirmed advanced BTC patients with documented disease progression after first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. Subjects received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus sintilimab 200 mg on day 1, administered every 3 weeks. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse reactions. Simultaneously, next-generation sequencing, programmed cell death ligand 1 immunohistochemistry and multiplex immunofluorescence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were applied to explore potential biomarkers. Twenty-six subjects were consecutively enrolled. The ORR was 26.9% (7/26), including two complete responses and five partial responses, which met the primary end point. The disease control rate was 61.5% (16/26). The median PFS was 169 days (about 5.6 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 60-278 days). The median OS was 442 days (about 14.7 months, 95% CI 298-586 days). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were mainly anemia (27%), leukopenia (23%), neutropenia (19%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (8%). No grade 4 or 5 TRAEs occurred. Biomarker analysis suggested that positive PD-L1 and high proportions of CD8+ T-cell infiltration were correlated with improved clinical outcome. Nab-paclitaxel plus sintilimab is a potentially effective and tolerable second-line regimen for advanced BTC that deserves to be studied in large-scale trials. PD-L1 status and CD8+ T cell infiltration might be promising biomarkers for efficacy prediction.

Phase 2 Study of Preoperative Tislelizumab in Combination with Low-dose Nab-Paclitaxel in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors and nab-paclitaxel have achieved significant therapeutic effects in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with low-dose nab-paclitaxel in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

METHODS

TRUCE-01 was a single-arm phase 2 study that included 62 patients with T2-4a N0/X M0 MIBC tumors with predominant urothelial carcinoma histology. Eligible patients received three 21-d cycles of intravenous 200 mg tislelizumab on day 1 plus intravenous 200 mg nab-paclitaxel on day 2, followed by surgical assessment. The primary study endpoint was a clinical complete response (cCR). Treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) profiles were recorded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

The safety analysis included all 62 patients and the efficacy analysis included 48 patients. The primary efficacy endpoint (cCR) was met by 25 patients (52%) patients. Among the 62 patients in the safety analysis, six (9.7%) had grade ≥3 TRAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Tislelizumab combined with low-dose nab-paclitaxel showed promising antitumor effectiveness and was generally well tolerated, which makes it an excellent preoperative therapy option for MIBC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We found that a combination of the drugs tislelizumab and low-dose nab-paclitaxel had satisfactory efficacy and safety for preoperative treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

A systematic review of nanocarriers for treatment of urologic cancers

Nanocarriers (NCs) are a form of nanotechnology widely investigated in cancer treatment to improve the safety and efficacy of systemic therapies by increasing tumor specificity. Numerous clinical trials have explored the use of NCs in urologic cancers since the approval of the first NCs for cancer treatment over 20 years ago. The objective of this systematic review is to examine the effectiveness and safety of NCs in treating urological cancers. This paper summarizes the state of the field by investigating peer-reviewed, published results from 43 clinical trials involving the use of NCs in bladder, prostate, and kidney cancer patients with a focus on safety and efficacy data. Among the 43 trials, 16 were phase I, 20 phase II, and 4 phase I/II. No phase III trials have been reported. While both novel and classic NCs have been explored in urologic cancers, NCs already approved for the treatment of other cancers were more widely represented. Trials in prostate cancer and mixed trials involving both urologic and non-urologic cancer patients were the most commonly reported trials. Although NCs have demonstrable efficacy with adequate safety in non-urologic cancer patient populations, current clinical stage NC options appear to be less beneficial in the urologic cancer setting. For example, nab-paclitaxel and liposomal doxorubicin have proven ineffective in the treatment of urologic cancers despite successes in other cancers. However, several ongoing pre-clinical studies using targeted and locally applied improved NCs may eventually improve their utility.

Low-dose Paclitaxel with Pembrolizumab Enhances Clinical and Immunologic Responses in Platinum-refractory Urothelial Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Single-agent checkpoint inhibition is effective in a minority of patients with platinum-refractory urothelial carcinoma; therefore, the efficacy of combining low-dose paclitaxel with pembrolizumab was tested.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, single-arm phase II trial with key inclusion criteria of imaging progression within 12 months of platinum therapy and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≤1. Treatment was pembrolizumab 200 mg day 1 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle for up to eight cycles unless progression or unacceptable adverse events (AE). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) with overall survival (OS), 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), and safety as key secondary endpoints. Change in circulating immune cell populations, plasma, and urinary miRs were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were treated between April 2016 and June 2020, with median follow-up of 12.4 months. Baseline median age was 68 years, with 81% men and 78% non-Hispanic White. ORR was 33% by intention to treat and 36% in imaging-evaluable patients with three complete responses. Six-month PFS rate was 48.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 28.7-65.2] and median OS 12.4 months (95% CI: 8.7 months to not reached). Common ≥ grade 2 possibly-related AEs were anemia, lymphopenia, hyperglycemia, and fatigue; grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 56%, including two immune-mediated AEs (pneumonitis and nephritis). Responding patients had a higher percentage of circulating CD4+IFNγ+ T cells. Levels of some miRs, including plasma miR 181 and miR 223, varied in responders compared with nonresponders.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of low-dose paclitaxel to pembrolizumab is active and safe in platinum-refractory urothelial carcinoma.

SIGNIFICANCE

We found that combining pembrolizumab with low-dose paclitaxel may be effective in patients with urothelial carcinoma progressing on platinum chemotherapy, with favorable safety profiles.

Cancer Nano-Immunotherapy: The Novel and Promising Weapon to Fight Cancer

Cancer is a complex disease that, despite advances in treatment and the greater understanding of the tumor biology until today, continues to be a prevalent and lethal disease. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery are the conventional treatments, which have increased the survival for cancer patients. However, the complexity of this disease together with the persistent problems due to tumor progression and recurrence, drug resistance, or side effects of therapy make it necessary to explore new strategies that address the challenges to obtain a positive response. One important point is that tumor cells can interact with the microenvironment, promoting proliferation, dissemination, and immune evasion. Therefore, immunotherapy has emerged as a novel therapy based on the modulation of the immune system for combating cancer, as reflected in the promising results both in preclinical studies and clinical trials obtained. In order to enhance the immune response, the combination of immunotherapy with nanoparticles has been conducted, improving the access of immune cells to the tumor, antigen presentation, as well as the induction of persistent immune responses. Therefore, nanomedicine holds an enormous potential to enhance the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. Here, we review the most recent advances in specific molecular and cellular immunotherapy and in nano-immunotherapy against cancer in the light of the latest published preclinical studies and clinical trials.

Incidence of Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events and Outcomes in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Containing Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used to treat many cancers, and cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) are among the most frequently encountered toxic effects. Understanding the incidence and prognostic associations of cirAEs is of importance as their uses in different settings, combinations, and tumor types expand. To evaluate the incidence of cirAEs and their association with outcome measures across a variety of ICI regimens and cancers, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published trials of anti-programmed death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) ICIs, both alone and in combination with chemotherapy, antiangiogenic agents, or other ICIs in patients with melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and urothelial carcinoma. Key findings of our study include variable cirAE incidence among tumors and ICI regimens, positive association with increased cirAE incidence and response rate, as well as significant association between increased vitiligo incidence and overall survival. Across 174 studies, rash, pruritis, and vitiligo were the most reported cirAEs, with incidences of 16.7%, 18.0%, and 6.6%, respectively. Higher incidence of cirAEs was associated with ICI combination regimens and with CTLA-4-containing regimens, particularly with higher doses of ipilimumab, as compared to PD-1/L1 monotherapies. Outcome measures including response rate and progression-free survival were positively correlated with incidence of cirAEs. The response rate and incidence of pruritis, vitiligo, and rash were associated with expected rises in incidence of 0.17% (p = 0.0238), 0.40% (p = 0.0010), and 0.18% (p = 0.0413), respectively. Overall survival was positively correlated with the incidence of pruritis, vitiligo, and rash; this association was significant for vitiligo (p = 0.0483). Our analysis provides benchmark incidence rates for cirAEs and links cirAEs with favorable treatment outcomes at a study level across diverse solid tumors and multiple ICI regimens.

A Comprehensive Review of Immunotherapy Clinical Trials for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone or in Combination, Novel Antibodies, Cellular Therapies, and Vaccines

Urothelial cancer is an immune-responsive cancer, but only a subset of patients benefits from immune checkpoint inhibition. Currently, single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the combination of pembrolizumab with the antibody-drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin are approved to treat patients with metastatic UC (mUC). Approval of first-line nivolumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin is expected imminently. Many treatment approaches are being investigated to better harness the immune system to fight mUC. In this review, we summarize the landmark clinical trials of ICIs that led to their incorporation into the current standard of care for mUC. We further discuss recent and ongoing clinical trials in mUC, which are investigating ICIs in combination with other agents, including chemotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and novel antibodies. Lastly, we review novel approaches utilizing bispecific antibodies, cellular therapies, and vaccines. The landscape of immunotherapy for mUC is rapidly evolving and will hopefully lead to better outcomes for patients.

Sintilimab plus nab-paclitaxel as second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer: study protocol for an investigator-initiated phase 2 trial (NapaSinti trial)

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a relatively rare but highly aggressive malignancy. However, there is currently no satisfactory second-line regimen for patients without specific genetic mutations. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel, also known as nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane, Bristol Myers Squibb), has shown activity in patients with BTC. Studies investigating the immunogenic features of BTC suggested that checkpoint inhibition may lead to antitumor immune responses. In recent years, improved survival has been observed in patients treated with chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy across multiple cancer types, including BTC. This clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-line sintilimab in combination with nab-paclitaxel in advanced BTC patients.

METHODS

The NapaSinti trial is a prospective, nonrandomized, open-label, phase 2 study conducted at a tertiary hospital in Chengdu, China. Eligible patients are those with histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced non-resectable or metastatic adenocarcinoma in the biliary tract (including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder cancer), aged between 18 and 75 years, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, who have experienced disease progression after prior gemcitabine- or fluorouracil-based chemotherapy and have not received taxane or immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Enrolled patients will receive intravenous administration of sintilimab 200 mg on day 1 and nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, every three weeks. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate (ORR), while the secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Exploratory objectives aim to identify biomarkers and molecular signatures for predicting response or prognosis. Using Simon's two-stage design, a total of 63 participants will be enrolled in the study. This trial was initiated in March 2022 in China.

DISCUSSION

The NapaSinti trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of second-line sintilimab plus nab-paclitaxel for advanced biliary tract cancer. Additionally, the trial provides an opportunity for translational research.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100052118. Registered October 19, 2021.

Effect of liver metastasis on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Liver metastasis is a frequent phenomenon in advanced tumor disease. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a new class of therapeutics that can improve the prognosis of cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the relationship between liver metastasis and survival outcomes of patients receiving ICIs treatment. We searched four main databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were the survival outcomes of our concern. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the relationship between liver metastasis and OS/ PFS. Finally, 163 articles were included in the study. The pooled results showed that patients with liver metastasis receiving ICIs treatment had worse OS (HR=1.82, 95%CI:1.59-2.08) and PFS (HR=1.68, 95%CI:1.49-1.89) than patients without liver metastasis. The effect of liver metastasis on ICIs efficacy differed in different tumor types, and patients with urinary system tumors (renal cell carcinoma OS: HR=2.47, 95%CI:1.76-3.45; urothelial carcinoma OS: HR=2.37, 95%CI:2.03-2.76) had the worst prognosis, followed by patients with melanoma (OS: HR=2.04, 95%CI:1.68-2.49) or non-small cell lung cancer (OS: HR=1.81, 95%CI:1.72-1.91). ICIs efficacy in digestive system tumors (colorectal cancer OS: HR=1.35, 95%CI:1.07-1.71; gastric cancer/ esophagogastric cancer OS: HR=1.17, 95%CI:0.90-1.52) was less affected, and peritoneal metastasis and the number of metastases have a greater clinical significance than liver metastasis based on univariate data. For cancer patients receiving ICIs treatment, the occurrence of liver metastasis is associated with poor prognosis. Different cancer types and metastatic sites may hold a different prognostic effect on the efficacy of ICIs treatment in cancer patients.

Perspectives on the future of urothelial carcinoma therapy: chemotherapy and beyond

INTRODUCTION

Despite recent developments in the landscape of urothelial carcinoma (UC) treatment, platinum combination chemotherapy still remains a milestone. Recently immunotherapeutic agents have gained ever-growing attractivity, particularly in the metastatic setting. Novel chemotherapeutic strategies and agents, such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and powerful combination regimens have been developed to overcome the resistance of most UC to current therapies.

AREAS COVERED

Herein, we review the current standard-of-care chemotherapy, the development of ADCs, the rationale for combining therapy regimens with chemotherapy in current trials, and future directions in UC management.

EXPERT OPINION

Immunotherapy has prompted a revolution in the treatment paradigm of UC. However, only a few patients experience a long-term response when treated with single-agent immunotherapies. Combination treatments are necessary to bypass resistance mechanisms and broaden the clinical utility of current options. Current evidence supports the intensification of standard-of-care chemotherapy with maintenance immunotherapy. However, the optimal sequence, combination, and duration must be determined to achieve individual longevity with acceptable health-related quality of life. In that regard, ADCs appear as a promising alternative for single and combination strategies in UC, as they specifically target the tumor cells, thereby, theoretically improving treatment efficacy and avoiding extensive off-target toxicities.

Case report: Complete response of a bladder cancer patient with multiple hepatic and pelvic metastases treated by nab-paclitaxel combined with sintilimab

This article described a patient with metastatic bladder cancer (mBC) who was successfully treated with nab-paclitaxel plus sintilimab. Localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) was discovered in a 56-year-old man who received radical cystectomy and platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Eleven months after cystectomy, this patient developed numerous hepatic and pelvic metastases and progressed to mBC. The patient was given an anti-PD-1 antibody (sintilimab 200mg, q3w) in combination with Nab-paclitaxel (100mg, qw) for mBC. Complete remission (CR) was achieved after nine cycles of therapy, and the patient had no severe side effects during the treatment. The disease remained in CR after 41 months of follow-up. This case suggests that nab-paclitaxel combined with sintilimab is a safe and effective option in treatment of mBC.

Durable response to the combination of pembrolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in a metastatic extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A case report and literature review

Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly aggressive malignant tumor with poor overall survival. Although the first-line standard chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus cisplatin) combined with immunotherapy has yielded positive results with survival prolongation, the efficacy remains unsatisfactory, and new treatment modalities need to be explored.

Case presentation: We report the case of a patient with metastatic extrahepatic CCA who achieved a durable response and good tolerance to the combination treatment of pembrolizumab and nab-paclitaxel following progression on gemcitabine plus capecitabine chemotherapy. The tumor samples of the patient revealed low TMB, MSS, negative PD-L1 expression, and negative CD8+ TIL expression. This patient was treated with 3 cycles of pembrolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin, followed by 5 cycles of pembrolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel. Finally, 10 cycles of pembrolizumab monotherapy were administered. The patient survived for over 27 months after the initiation of combined therapy and was still in continuous remission at the last follow-up.

Conclusion: As far as we know, this is the first report that pembrolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel successfully treated a patient with advanced CCA. This combination therapy might be a potential treatment option for patients with cholangiocarcinoma, and further clinical trials are needed to explore the outcomes.

PD-1 inhibitors plus nab-paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy for advanced gallbladder cancer in a second-line setting: A retrospective analysis of a case series

Background

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a fatal cancer, and the efficacy of the current standard second-line chemotherapy for GBC is limited. Novel therapies need to be explored. This retrospective analysis was aimed to investigate the outcomes of patients treated at West China Hospital with PD-1 inhibitors combined with nab-paclitaxel-based chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel monotherapy or nab-paclitaxel plus other cytotoxic agents) in a second-line setting.

Methods

Between April 2020 and May 2022, the patients with advanced GBC receiving PD-1 inhibitors combined with nab-paclitaxel-based chemotherapy after resistance to first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy at West China Hospital were retrospectively screened.

Results

Eleven patients were included, and all received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy. Eight patients underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS), and all had microsatellite stability (MSS) and a low tumor mutation burden (TMB). Six patients were negative for PD-L1 expression and one patient was positive for PD-L1. Therapeutically relevant genetic alterations were not found. All patients received PD-1 inhibitors in combination with nab-paclitaxel-based chemotherapy as second-line therapy. Pembrolizumab was administered in 3 patients, and sintilimab was administered in eight patients. One patient had no measurable target lesion. Complete response (CR) was observed in one (10.0%) patient, partial response (PR) in four (40%) patients, and stable disease (SD) in four (40%) patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 (95% CI: 2.5-12.5) months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 12.7 (95% CI: 5.5-19.9) months. The adverse events (AEs) were manageable.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that PD-1 inhibitors combined with nab-paclitaxel-based chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced GBC might be a potential treatment and deserves further evaluation.

Genome-wide aneuploidy detected by mFast-SeqS in circulating cell-free DNA is associated with poor response to pembrolizumab in patients with advanced urothelial cancer

Second-line treatment with immune checkpoint inhibition in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) has a low success rate (~ 20%). Circulating tumour-derived DNA (ctDNA) levels may guide patient stratification, provided that an affordable and robust assay is available. Here, we investigate whether the modified fast aneuploidy screening test-sequencing system (mFast-SeqS) may provide such an assay. To this end, mFast-SeqS was performed on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from 74 patients with mUC prior to treatment with pembrolizumab. Results were associated with corresponding tissue-based profiles, plasma-based variant allele frequencies (VAFs) and clinical response. We found that plasma-derived mFast-SeqS-based aneuploidy scores significantly correlated with those observed in the corresponding tumour tissue as well as with the ctDNA level in the plasma. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, a high aneuploidy score was independently associated with lack of clinical benefit from treatment with pembrolizumab. In conclusion, mFast-SeqS provides a patient-friendly, high-throughput and affordable method to estimate ctDNA level. Following independent validation, this test could be used to stratify mUC patients for response prior to the initiation of treatment with pembrolizumab.

Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel: Worthy of Further Study in Sarcomas

Taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel) play an important role in the treatment of advanced sarcomas. Albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) is a new kind of taxane and has many advantages compared with paclitaxel and docetaxel. Nab-paclitaxel is currently approved for the treatment of advanced breast, non-small cell lung, and pancreatic cancers. However, the efficacy of nab-paclitaxel in sarcomas has not been reviewed. In this review, we first compare the similarities and differences among nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel, and docetaxel and then summarize the efficacy of nab-paclitaxel against various non-sarcoma malignancies based on clinical trials with reported results. The efficacy and clinical research progress on nab-paclitaxel in sarcomas are also summarized. This review will serve as a good reference for the application of nab-paclitaxel in clinical sarcoma treatment studies and the design of clinical trials.

Submicron particle docetaxel intratumoral injection in combination with anti-mCTLA-4 into 4T1-Luc orthotopic implants reduces primary tumor and metastatic pulmonary lesions

We describe here characterization of the response of local and metastatic disease and immunomodulation following intratumoral (IT) injection of submicron particle docetaxel (SPD) administered alone or in combination with systemic antibody anti-mCTLA-4 (anti-mCTLA-4) in the metastatic 4T1-Luc2-1A4 (4T1) murine breast cancer model. In-life assessments of treatment tolerance, tumor volume (TV), and metastasis were performed (n = 10 animals/group). At study end, immune cell populations in tumor-site tissues and peripheral blood were analyzed using flow cytometry. Signs of distress typical of this aggressive tumor model occurred across all animals except for the combination treated which were asymptomatic and gained weight. TV at study end was significantly reduced in the combination group versus untreated [43% reduced (p < 0.05)] and vehicle controls [54% reduced (p < 0.0001)]. No evidence of thoracic metastasis was found in 40% of combination group animals and thoracic bioluminescence imaging (BLI) was reduced vs. untreated controls (p < 0.01). Significant elevations (p < 0.05) in CD4 + T, CD4 + helper T, Treg, and NKT cells were found in tumor and blood in SPD or combination treatment compared to controls or anti-mCTLA-4. Combination treatment increased tumor-associated CD8 + T cells (p < 0.01), peripheral B cells (p < 0.01), and tumor associated and circulating dendritic cells (DC) (p < 0.05). Tumor-associated NK cells were significantly increased in SPD ± anti-mCTLA-4 treatments (p < 0.01). Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) were reduced in bloods in SPD ± anti-mCTLA-4 groups (p < 0.05). These data demonstrate that both SPD and anti-mCTLA-4 produce local anti-tumor effects as well as reductions in metastasis which are significantly enhanced when administered in combination.

Case Report: Anlotinib Combined With Sintilimab as Third-Line Treatment in a Metastatic Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma Patient With FGFR3 Mutation

We report on a case of metastatic urothelial bladder carcinoma (mUBC) treated with anlotinib combined with sintilimab. A 69-year-old male was diagnosed with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). He received transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and intravesical gemcitabine chemotherapy. After the patients' cancer progressed to mUBC, cisplatin-based chemotherapy (gemcitabine combined with cisplatin, GC) was performed to this patient as first line therapy for four cycles. However, the disease progressed again within 6 months. Local radiotherapy was performed on the metastatic lesions, and after radiotherapy, the patient received anti-PD-1 antibody (sintilimab 200 mg, q3w)combined with Albumin-bound (Nab)-paclitaxel (100 mg, qw) as the second-line therapy, but the patient's cancer was still observed to be progressing. Molecular characterization confirmed the presence of FGFR3 mutations in the patient. Anlotinib was recommended to this patient. After the patient was fully informed and he was aware of off-label use of the drug, then, Nab-paclitaxel was replaced by anlotinib (10 mg D1-14, q3w) and sintilimab infusions were maintained for every 3 weeks. Partial response (PR) was observed through imaging examinations and stable disease (SD) was observed for more than 11 months; the patient's quality of life also improved. This case suggested that anlotinib combined with sintilimab may be a safe and effective choice in the treatment of mUBC in patients with FGFR3 mutations.

Avelumab in Combination with Eribulin Mesylate in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: BTCRC GU-051, a Phase 1b Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) have poor prognosis, so further development of novel combinations for these patients is needed.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and efficacy of eribulin mesylate (eribulin) with avelumab in mUC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was an open-label, phase 1b study in which patients with mUC who were cisplatin-ineligible and treatment-naïve or platinum-resistant were treated with eribulin and avelumab. A 3 + 3 design was used. The study was prematurely terminated because the free study drug became unavailable, but we performed extended follow-up for patients enrolled in the study.

INTERVENTION

Patients received eribulin 1.1 mg/m² plus avelumab 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 in every 28-d cycle in cohort 0, or eribulin 1.4 mg/m² plus avelumab 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 in every 28-d cycle in cohort +1.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of eribulin with avelumab and assess the objective response rate. A key secondary endpoint was to assess efficacy by evaluating the disease control rate. Exploratory endpoints included PD-1 expression on T cells in peripheral blood and in tumor cells, and tumor DNA sequencing.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of six patients were enrolled in the MTD group (n = 3 in cohort 0 and n = 3 in cohort +1). No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed in cohort 0, whereas two DLT events were observed in cohort +1. Two patients in cohort 0 had a partial response that was durable, with one patient having a durable response for 7.8 mo. Disease control was observed in 4/6 patients (66.7%). Owing to the early termination, MTD could not be determined.

CONCLUSIONS

While early termination of this trial precludes any definitive conclusions, the combination of eribulin and avelumab shows promise in mUC. We observed that treatment was better tolerated and efficacious at lower doses of eribulin. Further research is warranted for this combination in mUC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We evaluated different doses of eribulin (a chemotherapy drug) in combination with a fixed dose of avelumab (an antibody used to treat several different cancers) in a small group of patients with metastatic cancer of the urinary tract. The lower dose of eribulin was easier to tolerate and the combination had an anti-cancer effect. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03502681.

Salvage systemic therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma: an unmet clinical need

INTRODUCTION

Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) remains a fatal malignancy, despite the recent addition of immune check point inhibitors (ICIs), an FGFR inhibitor and an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) to the therapeutic armamentarium. The survival rates are particularly dismal after first-line treatment failure, entailing an urgent need for more effective therapies. Advances in understanding biomarkers and identifying targetable molecules have broadened the pathways under investigation in mUC.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes mUC salvage therapy options, including chemotherapy, ICI, and novel promising agents, including targeted therapies, ADCs, cytotoxic agents and vaccines. For the literature review, a PubMed search and relevant data presented at international conferences were used.

EXPERT OPINION

The approval of ICIs, FGFR inhibitor erdafitinib and ADC enfortumab vedotin in the salvage setting has transformed the mUC landscape. Yet there are additional promising agents currently under study. Toxicities are observed with ADCs and FGFR inhibitors, but appear manageable in most patients. The molecular heterogeneity and complex tumor biology are challenging barriers for progress in the therapy of mUC. Advances in molecular profiling, defining validated predictive markers, rational combinations of agents and therapeutically actionable targets will help develop personalized compounds with higher efficacy and less toxicity with hopes to improve outcomes for mUC.

PD-L1 testing in urothelial bladder cancer: essentials of clinical practice

PURPOSE

While immunotherapy has become an increasingly attractive strategy in patients with urothelial bladder cancer, the need for a biomarker to identify patients whose cancer is the most likely to respond has never been more crucial. This review systematically evaluates evidence regarding PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker of response to anti-PD(L)1 monoclonal antibodies in patients with urothelial bladder carcinoma, and discusses its current limits in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

We performed a critical review of PubMed/Medline according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Prospective clinical trials evaluating anti-PD(L)1 monoclonal antibodies in urothelial bladder carcinoma together with retrospective studies evaluating PD-L1 expression in patients with bladder cancer were included.

RESULTS

Evidence data related to PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker of response to immune checkpoint blockade monotherapy across clinical trials are detailed in this review. The different companion diagnostic assays, and the methods for PD-L1 scoring in urothelial bladder carcinoma are reported. Additionally, the issues related to the implementation of PD-L1 testing in clinical practice are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-(L)1 monoclonal antibodies atezolizumab and pembrolizumab are restricted to patients with PD-L1 positive status in the first-line setting in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial bladder carcinoma who are ineligible to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Importantly, the use of anti-PD(L)1 mAb in the other clinical settings is not based on PD-L1 status, but rather on patients' clinical characteristics. Further identification of biomarkers with high negative predictive value will also be of utmost importance to identify patients who may not respond to such immunotherapies.