1
|
Budczies J, Kazdal D, Menzel M, Beck S, Kluck K, Altbürger C, Schwab C, Allgäuer M, Ahadova A, Kloor M, Schirmacher P, Peters S, Krämer A, Christopoulos P, Stenzinger A. Tumour mutational burden: clinical utility, challenges and emerging improvements. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2024; 21:725-742. [PMID: 39192001 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-024-00932-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024]
Abstract
Tumour mutational burden (TMB), defined as the total number of somatic non-synonymous mutations present within the cancer genome, varies across and within cancer types. A first wave of retrospective and prospective research identified TMB as a predictive biomarker of response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors and culminated in the disease-agnostic approval of pembrolizumab for patients with TMB-high tumours based on data from the Keynote-158 trial. Although the applicability of outcomes from this trial to all cancer types and the optimal thresholds for TMB are yet to be ascertained, research into TMB is advancing along three principal avenues: enhancement of TMB assessments through rigorous quality control measures within the laboratory process, including the mitigation of confounding factors such as limited panel scope and low tumour purity; refinement of the traditional TMB framework through the incorporation of innovative concepts such as clonal, persistent or HLA-corrected TMB, tumour neoantigen load and mutational signatures; and integration of TMB with established and emerging biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression, microsatellite instability, immune gene expression profiles and the tumour immune contexture. Given its pivotal functions in both the pathogenesis of cancer and the ability of the immune system to recognize tumours, a profound comprehension of the foundational principles and the continued evolution of TMB are of paramount relevance for the field of oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Budczies
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC) Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Daniel Kazdal
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC) Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Menzel
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Susanne Beck
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Kluck
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Altbürger
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Constantin Schwab
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Allgäuer
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aysel Ahadova
- Department of Applied Tumour Biology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumour Biology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Kloor
- Department of Applied Tumour Biology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumour Biology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Schirmacher
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Solange Peters
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alwin Krämer
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Hematology/Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Petros Christopoulos
- Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC) Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik and National Center for Tumour Diseases at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC) Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gristina V, Russo TDB, Barraco N, Gottardo A, Pepe F, Russo G, Fulfaro F, Incorvaia L, Badalamenti G, Troncone G, Malapelle U, Russo A, Bazan V, Galvano A. Clinical utility of ctDNA by amplicon based next generation sequencing in first line non small cell lung cancer patients. Sci Rep 2024; 14:22141. [PMID: 39333636 PMCID: PMC11436775 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73046-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 09/12/2024] [Indexed: 09/29/2024] Open
Abstract
The assessment of ctDNA has emerged as a minimally invasive avenue for molecular diagnosis and real-time tracking of tumor progression in NSCLC. However, the evaluation of ctDNA by amplicon-based NGS has been not endorsed by all the healthcare systems and remains to be fully integrated into clinical routine practice. To compare tissue single-gene with plasma multiplexed testing, we retrospectively evaluated 120 plasma samples from 12 consecutive patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC who were part of a prospective study enrolling treatment-naïve patients and in which tissue samples were evaluated using a single-gene testing approach. While the plasma ctDNA detection of EGFR and BRAF mutations had an acceptable level of concordance with the archival tissue (85%), discordance was seen in all the patients in whom ALK alterations were only detected in tissue samples. Among six responders and six non-responders, early ctDNA mutant allelic frequency (MAF) reduction seemed to predict radiologic responses and longer survival, whereas increasing MAF values with the emergence of co-mutations like BRAFV600E, KRASG12V or TP53M237I seemed to be an early indicator of molecular and radiologic progression. This report using an amplicon-based NGS assay on ctDNA underscores the real-life need for plasma and tissue genotyping as complementary tools in the diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Gristina
- Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Tancredi Didier Bazan Russo
- Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Nadia Barraco
- Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Andrea Gottardo
- Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Francesco Pepe
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluca Russo
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Fabio Fulfaro
- Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Lorena Incorvaia
- Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Badalamenti
- Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
| | - Giancarlo Troncone
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Umberto Malapelle
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
| | - Viviana Bazan
- Department of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Antonio Galvano
- Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rassy E, Mosele MF, Di Meglio A, Pistilli B, Andre F. Precision oncology in patients with breast cancer: towards a 'screen and characterize' approach. ESMO Open 2024; 9:103716. [PMID: 39303452 PMCID: PMC11439525 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2024] [Revised: 08/17/2024] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- E Rassy
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Médecine Oncologique, Villjuif; Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Equipe labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif
| | - M F Mosele
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Médecine Oncologique, Villjuif; Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Inserm U981, Villejuif
| | - A Di Meglio
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Médecine Oncologique, Villjuif; Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Inserm U981, Villejuif
| | - B Pistilli
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Médecine Oncologique, Villjuif; INSERM U1279, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - F Andre
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Médecine Oncologique, Villjuif; Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Inserm U981, Villejuif.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lawler M, Keeling P, Kholmanskikh O, Minnaard W, Moehlig-Zuttermeister H, Normanno N, Philip R, Popp C, Salgado R, Santiago-Walker AE, Trullas A, van Doorn-Khosrovani SBVW, Vart R, Vermeulen J, Vitaloni M, Verweij J. Empowering effective biomarker-driven precision oncology: A call to action. Eur J Cancer 2024; 209:114225. [PMID: 39053288 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Revised: 07/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Precision oncology has a significant role to play in delivering optimal patient care. Biomarkers are critical enablers for precision oncology across the continuum of cancer diagnosis, in defining patient prognosis, and in predicting the response to treatments and their potential toxicities, as well as delineating the risk of hereditary cancer syndromes. Biomarkers also potentiate cancer drug development, accelerating patient access to safe and effective therapies. However, despite an accurate and timely diagnosis being critical to patient survival, advances in genomic testing are not being fully exploited in daily clinical practice, leading to missed opportunities to deliver the most effective treatments for patients. Biomarker testing availability and implementation often lag behind approvals of respective biomarker-informed therapies, limiting prompt patient access to these life-saving drugs. Multiple factors currently impede the routine adoption of biomarker testing including, but not limited to, cost, lack of test reimbursement, limited access, regulatory hurdles, lack of knowledge, insufficient cooperation on assay development, and the urgent need to harmonize and validate testing assays, all leading to inefficient diagnostic pathways. Clinical guidelines increasingly include genomic profiling, and recent evidence suggests that precision oncology can be delivered in a cost-effective way for financially-challenged health systems. Therefore, precision genomic testing for cancer biomarkers must be embedded into the clinical practice of oncology care delivery going forward. We articulate a series of recommendations and a call to action to underpin the mainstreaming of a biomarker-informed precision oncology approach to enhance patient outcomes and deliver cost effective 21st century cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Lawler
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK; Cancer Drug Development Forum, Clos Chapelle-aux-Champs 30, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Peter Keeling
- Diaceutics PLC, Health and Wellbeing Park, Kings Hall, First Floor Building Two, Dataworks at, 490 Lisburn Rd, BT9 6GU Belfast, UK.
| | - Olga Kholmanskikh
- Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, Galileelaan 5/03, 1210 Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Warnyta Minnaard
- Missie Tumor Onbekend, Fannius Scholtenstraat 69H 1051 EV, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | | | - Nicola Normanno
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Via Piero Maroncelli, 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - Reena Philip
- Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
| | - Claudia Popp
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Building 2, CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of Pathology, ZAS Hospitals, Lindendreef 1, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium; Division of Research, Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne VIC 3052, Australia.
| | - Ademi E Santiago-Walker
- Janssen Research & Development LLC, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, 1400 McKean Road, Spring House, PA 19477, USA.
| | - Ana Trullas
- European Medicines Agency, Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Sahar B van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands; CZ Health Insurance, Ringbaan West 236, 5038 KE Tilburg, the Netherlands.
| | - Richard Vart
- Eli Lilly and Company Ltd, 8 Arlington Square West, Downshire Way, Bracknell, RG12 1PU, UK.
| | - Jessica Vermeulen
- Janssen Biologics B.V., a Johnson & Johnson company, Emmy Noetherweg 6, 2333 BK Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Marianna Vitaloni
- Digestive Cancers Europe, Rue de la Loi 235/27, 1040 Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Jaap Verweij
- Cancer Drug Development Forum, Clos Chapelle-aux-Champs 30, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vu M, Degeling K, Westerman D, IJzerman MJ. Scenario analysis and multi-criteria decision analysis to explore alternative reimbursement pathways for whole genome sequencing for blood cancer patients. J Cancer Policy 2024; 41:100501. [PMID: 39142605 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Revised: 08/07/2024] [Accepted: 08/11/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whole genome sequencing (WGS) has transformative potential for blood cancer management, but reimbursement is hindered by uncertain benefits relative to added costs. This study employed scenario planning and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to evaluate stakeholders' preferences for alternative reimbursement pathways, informing future health technology assessment (HTA) submission of WGS in blood cancer. METHODS Key factors influencing WGS reimbursement in blood cancers were identified through a literature search. Hypothetical scenarios describing various evidential characteristics of WGS for HTA were developed using the morphological approach. An online survey, incorporating MCDA weights, was designed to gather stakeholder preferences (consumers/patients, clinicians/health professionals, industry representatives, health economists, and HTA committee members) for these scenarios. The survey assessed participants' approval of WGS reimbursement for each scenario, and scenario preferences were determined using the geometric mean method, applying an algorithm to improve reliability and precision by addressing inconsistent responses. RESULTS Nineteen participants provided complete survey responses, primarily clinicians or health professionals (n = 6; 32 %), consumers/patients and industry representatives (both at n = 5; 26 %). "Clinical impact of WGS results on patient care" was the most critical criterion (criteria weight of 0.25), followed by "diagnostic accuracy of WGS" (0.21), "cost-effectiveness of WGS" (0.19), "availability of reimbursed treatment after WGS" (0.16), and "eligibility criteria for reimbursed treatment based on actionable WGS results" and "cost comparison of WGS" (both at 0.09). Participants preferred a scenario with substantial clinical evidence, high access to reimbursed targeted treatment, cost-effectiveness below $50,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, and affordability relative to standard molecular tests. Reimbursement was initially opposed until criteria such as equal cost to standard tests and better treatment accessibility were met. CONCLUSION Payers commonly emphasize acceptable cost-effectiveness, but strong clinical evidence for many variants and comparable costs to standard tests are likely to drive positive reimbursement decisions for WGS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Vu
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Koen Degeling
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David Westerman
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre/Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Maarten J IJzerman
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Smids J, Bomhof C, IJzerman M, Bunnik E. Whole genome sequencing as a ticket to cancer treatment in the Netherlands: Are inequalities in access to molecular diagnostics unfair? J Cancer Policy 2024; 41:100492. [PMID: 38908820 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/24/2024]
Abstract
Whole genome sequencing (WGS) of a tumour may sometimes reveal additional potential targets for medical treatment. Practice variation in the use of WGS is therefore a source of unequal access to targeted therapies and, as a consequence, of disparities in health outcomes. Moreover, this may even be more significant if patients seek access to WGS by paying a relatively limited amount of money out of pocket, and sometimes effectively buy themselves a ticket to (very) expensive publicly funded treatments. Should resulting unequal access to WGS be considered unfair? Drawing from current practice in the Dutch healthcare system, known as egalitarian, we argue that differences in employment of WGS between hospitals are the consequence of the fact that medical innovation and its subsequent uptake inevitably takes time. Consequently, temporal inequalities in access can be deemed acceptable, or at least tolerated, because and insofar as, ultimately, all patients benefit. However, we argue against allowing a practice of out-of-pocket payments for WGS in publicly funded healthcare systems, for four reasons: because allowing private spending favours patients with higher socio-economic status significantly more than practice variation between hospitals does, may lead to displacement of publicly funded health care, does not help to ultimately benefit all, and may undermine the solidaristic ethos essential for egalitarian healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jilles Smids
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Maarten IJzerman
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eline Bunnik
- Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Horgan D, Pesapane F, Van der Buckle M, de Maria R, Dube F, Singh J, Ługowska I, Bayle A, Hofman P, Malapelle U, Hills T, Capoluongo ED, Subbiah V. From theory to practice: Implementing next-generation sequencing and public health genomics in healthcare systems. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 201:104433. [PMID: 38955310 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
If Europe's health systems make a conscious decision to increase their utilization of technology and techniques that can enhance prevention and expedite early-stage diagnosis, they can effectively address the growing challenges of disease. By embracing these advancements, these health systems can significantly improve their response to emerging health issues.However, at present the effective integration and exploitation of these opportunities remains hesitant and suboptimal, and health and health services underperform accordingly, with patients suffering from the continuing variations in diagnosis and access to innovation. This paper presents a comprehensive study that examines the current state of various influential disciplines and factors in European countries. It specifically focuses on the adoption of Next Generation Screening technologies and the development stage of Public Health Genomics. The assessment of these areas is presented in the context of a rapidly changing policy environment, which provides an opportunity for a fundamental reconsideration of how and where new tools can be integrated into healthcare systems and routine practices. Top of Form.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis Horgan
- European Alliance for Personalised Medicine, Brussels 1040, Belgium; Department of Molecular and Cellular Engineering, Jacob Institute of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj 211007, India.
| | - Filippo Pesapane
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Ruggero de Maria
- Institute of General Pathology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome 20123, Italy
| | - France Dube
- Astra Zeneca, Concord Pike, Wilmington, DE 19803, USA
| | - Jaya Singh
- European Alliance for Personalised Medicine, Brussels 1040, Belgium
| | - Iwona Ługowska
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Roentgena 5, Warsaw 02-781, Poland
| | - Arnaud Bayle
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Université Paris Sacla, Villejuif, France
| | - Paul Hofman
- European Liquid Biopsy Society, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Umberto Malapelle
- Department of Public Health, University Federico II of Naples, Naples 80138, Italy
| | - Tanya Hills
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Binger Str. 173, Ingelheim am Rhein 55218, Germany
| | - Ettore D Capoluongo
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, Naples 80138, Italy; Department of Clinical Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata, Via Amba Aradam 8, Rome 00184, Italy
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mirza M, Goerke L, Anderson A, Wilsdon T. Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Next-Generation Sequencing as a Biomarker Testing Approach in Oncology and Policy Implications: A Literature Review. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:1300-1309. [PMID: 38729563 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.04.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A key hurdle in broader next-generation sequencing (NGS) biomarker testing access in oncology is the ongoing debate on NGS's cost-effectiveness. We conducted a systematic review of existing evidence of the costs of NGS as a biomarker testing strategy in oncology and developed policy suggestions. METHODS We searched multiple databases for studies reporting cost comparisons and cost-effectiveness of NGS across oncology indications and geographies between 2017 and 2022, inclusive. Inclusion criteria were established based on indication and type of cost-effectiveness analysis provided. We validated analyses and policy recommendations with 5 payer/policy maker interviews in the United States, Europe, and United Kingdom. RESULTS Of the 634 identified studies, 29 met inclusion criteria, spanning 12 countries and 6 indications. Cost comparisons of NGS were evaluated using 3 methodologies: (1) comparison of direct testing costs, (2) comparison of holistic testing costs, and (3) comparison of long-term patient outcomes and costs. Targeted panel testing (2-52 genes) was considered cost-effective when 4+ genes were assessed, and larger panels (hundreds of genes) were generally not cost-effective. Holistic analysis demonstrated that NGS reduces turnaround time, healthcare staff requirements, number of hospital visits, and hospital costs. Finally, studies evaluating NGS testing including the cost of targeted therapies generally found the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio to be above common thresholds but highlighted valuable patient benefits. CONCLUSIONS Current literature supports NGS's cost-effectiveness as an oncology biomarker testing strategy under specific conditions. These findings underscore the need to develop policies to support holistic assessment of NGS to ensure appropriate reimbursement and access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myriam Mirza
- Charles River Associates, Palais Leopold, Munich, Germany.
| | - Lutz Goerke
- Charles River Associates, Palais Leopold, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Tim Wilsdon
- Charles River Associates, London, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Veney DJ, Wei LY, Toland AE, Presley CJ, Hampel HL, Padamsee TJ, Lee CN, Irvin WJ, Bishop MJ, Kim JJ, Hovick SR, Senter LA, Stover DG. A video intervention to improve patient understanding of tumor genomic testing in patients with cancer. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e70095. [PMID: 39258462 PMCID: PMC11387988 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Tumor genomic testing (TGT) is standard-of-care for most patients with advanced/metastatic cancer. Despite established guidelines, patient education prior to TGT is frequently omitted. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a concise 4 min video for patient education prior to TGT. METHODS Based on a quality improvement cycle, an animated video was created to be applicable to any cancer type, incorporating culturally diverse images, available in English and Spanish. Patients undergoing standard-of-care TGT were enrolled at a tertiary academic institution and completed survey instruments prior to video viewing (T1) and immediately post-viewing (T2). Instruments included: (1) 10-question objective genomic knowledge; (2) 10-question video message-specific knowledge; (3) 11-question Trust in Provider; (4) attitudes regarding TGT. RESULTS A total of 150 participants were enrolled. For the primary objective, there was a significant increase in video message-specific knowledge (median 10 point increase; p < 0.0001) with no significant change in genomic knowledge/understanding (p = 0.89) or trust in physician/provider (p = 0.59). Results for five questions significantly improved, including the likelihood of TGT impact on treatment decision, incidental germline findings, and cost of testing. Improvement in video message-specific knowledge was consistent across demographic groups, including age, income, and education. CONCLUSIONS A concise, 3-4 min, broadly applicable video incorporating culturally diverse images administered prior to TGT significantly improved video message-specific knowledge across all demographic groups. This resource is publicly available at http://www.tumor-testing.com, with a goal to efficiently educate and empower patients regarding TGT while addressing guidelines within the flow of clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deloris J. Veney
- Division of Medical OncologyOhio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Lai Y. Wei
- Department of Biomedical InformaticsOhio State UniversityColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Amanda E. Toland
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal MedicineThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusOhioUSA
- Department of Cancer Biology and GeneticsThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Carolyn J. Presley
- Division of Medical OncologyOhio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Heather L. Hampel
- Division of Clinical Cancer Genomics, Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics ResearchCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCaliforniaUSA
| | - Tasleem J. Padamsee
- Division of Health Services Management and PolicyCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State UniversityColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Clara N. Lee
- Division of Health Services Management and PolicyCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State UniversityColumbusOhioUSA
- Present address:
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | | | - James J. Kim
- Bon Secours‐Mercy Health St. ElizabethYoungstownOhioUSA
| | | | - Leigha A. Senter
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal MedicineThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Daniel G. Stover
- Division of Medical OncologyOhio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusOhioUSA
- Department of Biomedical InformaticsOhio State UniversityColumbusOhioUSA
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno‐Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive CancerColumbusOhioUSA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ehman M, Punian J, Weymann D, Regier DA. Next-generation sequencing in oncology: challenges in economic evaluations. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2024:1-18. [PMID: 39096135 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2388814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2024] [Revised: 07/19/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Next-generation sequencing (NGS) identifies genetic variants to inform personalized treatment plans. Insufficient evidence of cost-effectiveness impedes the integration of NGS into routine cancer care. The complexity of personalized treatment challenges conventional economic evaluation. Clearly delineating challenges informs future cost-effectiveness analyses to better value and contextualize health, preference-, and equity-based outcomes. AREAS COVERED We conducted a scoping review to characterize the applied methods and outcomes of economic evaluations of NGS in oncology and identify existing challenges. We included 27 articles published since 2016 from a search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Identified challenges included defining the evaluative scope, managing evidentiary limitations including lack of causal evidence, incorporating preference-based utility, and assessing distributional and equity-based impacts. These challenges reflect the difficulty of generating high-quality clinical effectiveness and real-world evidence (RWE) for NGS-guided interventions. EXPERT OPINION Adapting methodological approaches and developing life-cycle health technology assessment (HTA) guidance using RWE is crucial for implementing NGS in oncology. Healthcare systems, decision-makers, and HTA organizations are facing a pivotal opportunity to adapt to an evolving clinical paradigm and create innovative regulatory and reimbursement processes that will enable more sustainable, equitable, and patient-oriented healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan Ehman
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jesman Punian
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Deirdre Weymann
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Dean A Regier
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ignatiadis M, Poulakaki F, Spanic T, Brain E, Lacombe D, Sonke GS, Vincent-Salomon A, Van Duijnhoven F, Meattini I, Kaidar-Person O, Aftimos P, Lecouvet F, Cardoso F, Retèl VP, Cameron D. EBCC-14 manifesto: Addressing disparities in access to innovation for patients with metastatic breast cancer across Europe. Eur J Cancer 2024; 207:114156. [PMID: 38861756 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
The European Breast Cancer Council (EBCC) traditionally identifies controversies or major deficiencies in the management of patients with breast cancer and selects a multidisciplinary expert team to collaborate in setting crucial principles and recommendations to improve breast cancer care. The 2024 EBCC manifesto focuses on disparities in the care of patients with metastatic breast cancer. There are several reasons for existing disparities both between and within countries. Our recommendations aim to address the stigma of metastatic disease, which has led to significant disparities in access to innovative care regardless of the gross national income of a country. These recommendations are for different stakeholders to promote the care of patients with metastatic breast cancer across Europe and worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michail Ignatiadis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Fiorita Poulakaki
- Breast Surgery Department, Athens Medical Center, Athens, Greece; Europa Donna - The European Breast Cancer Coalition, Milan, Italy
| | - Tanja Spanic
- Europa Donna - The European Breast Cancer Coalition, Milan, Italy; Europa Donna Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Etienne Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | - Denis Lacombe
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gabe S Sonke
- University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Diagnostic and Theragnostic Medicine, Institut Curie Hospital Group, Paris, France
| | - Frederieke Van Duijnhoven
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology & Breast Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Tel Aviv School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Philippe Aftimos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frederic Lecouvet
- Institut du Cancer Roi Albert II (IRA2), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Medical Imaging, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Valesca P Retèl
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam (ESHPM), Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David Cameron
- Edinburgh University Cancer Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vu M, Degeling K, Ryland GL, Hofmann O, Ng AP, Westerman D, IJzerman MJ. Economic Impact of Whole Genome Sequencing and Whole Transcriptome Sequencing Versus Routine Diagnostic Molecular Testing to Stratify Patients with B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J Mol Diagn 2024; 26:673-684. [PMID: 39059881 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Whole genome and whole transcriptome sequencing (WGTS) can accurately distinguish B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) genomic subtypes. However, whether this is economically viable remains unclear. This study compared the direct costs and molecular subtype classification yield using different testing strategies for WGTS in adolescent and young adult/adult patients with B-ALL. These approaches were: (1) combined BCR::ABL1 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) + WGTS for all patients; and (2) sequential BCR::ABL1 FISH + WGTS contingent on initial BCR::ABL1 FISH test outcome. The cost of routine diagnostic testing was estimated using Medicare or hospital fees, and the additional cost of WGTS was evaluated from the health care provider perspective using time-driven activity-based costing with resource identification elicited from experts. Molecular subtype classification yield data were derived from literature sources. Parameter uncertainty was assessed through deterministic sensitivity analysis; additional scenario analyses were performed. The total per patient cost of WGTS was $4319 (all costs reported in US dollars); consumables accounted for 74% of the overall cost, primarily driven by sequencing-related consumables. The incremental cost per additional patient categorized into molecular subtype was $8498 for combined BCR::ABL1 FISH + WGTS for all patients and $5656 for initial BCR::ABL1 FISH + WGTS for select patients compared with routine diagnostic testing. A reduction in the consumable costs of WGTS or an increase in the yield of molecular subtype classification is favorable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Vu
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Koen Degeling
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Georgina L Ryland
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Oliver Hofmann
- Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ashley P Ng
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre/Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; WEHI (Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Westerman
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maarten J IJzerman
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Boileve A, Smolenschi C, Lambert A, Boige V, Tarabay A, Valery M, Fuerea A, Pudlarz T, Conroy T, Hollebecque A, Ducreux M. Role of molecular biology in the management of pancreatic cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:2902-2914. [PMID: 39072173 PMCID: PMC11271790 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i7.2902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents significant challenges in patient management due to a dismal prognosis, increasing incidence, and limited treatment options. In this regard, precision medicine, which personalizes treatments based on tumour molecular characteristics, has gained great interest. However, its widespread implementation is not fully endorsed in current recommendations. This review explores key molecular alterations in PDAC, while emphasizing differences between KRAS-mutated and KRAS-wild-type tumours. It assesses the practical application of precision medicine in clinical settings and outlines potential future directions with respect to PDAC. Actionable molecular targets are examined with the aim of enhancing our understanding of PDAC molecular biology. Insights from this analysis may contribute to a more refined and personalized approach to pancreatic cancer treatment, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Boileve
- Department of Medical, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif 94800, France
| | | | - Aurélien Lambert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy 54519, France
| | - Valérie Boige
- Department of Medical, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif 94800, France
| | - Anthony Tarabay
- Department of Medical, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif 94800, France
| | - Marine Valery
- Department of Medical, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif 94800, France
| | - Alina Fuerea
- Department of Medical, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif 94800, France
| | - Thomas Pudlarz
- Department of Medical, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif 94800, France
| | - Thierry Conroy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy 54519, France
| | | | - Michel Ducreux
- Department of Medical, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif 94800, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Klümper N, Tran NK, Zschäbitz S, Hahn O, Büttner T, Roghmann F, Bolenz C, Zengerling F, Schwab C, Nagy D, Toma M, Kristiansen G, Heers H, Ivanyi P, Niegisch G, Grunewald CM, Darr C, Farid A, Schlack K, Abbas M, Aydogdu C, Casuscelli J, Mokry T, Mayr M, Niedersüß-Beke D, Rausch S, Dietrich D, Saal J, Ellinger J, Ritter M, Alajati A, Kuppe C, Meeks J, Vera Badillo FE, Nakauma-González JA, Boormans J, Junker K, Hartmann A, Grünwald V, Hölzel M, Eckstein M. NECTIN4 Amplification Is Frequent in Solid Tumors and Predicts Enfortumab Vedotin Response in Metastatic Urothelial Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:2446-2455. [PMID: 38657187 PMCID: PMC11227306 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The anti-NECTIN4 antibody-drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin (EV) is approved for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). However, durable benefit is only achieved in a small, yet uncharacterized patient subset. NECTIN4 is located on chromosome 1q23.3, and 1q23.3 gains represent frequent copy number variations (CNVs) in urothelial cancer. Here, we aimed to evaluate NECTIN4 amplifications as a genomic biomarker to predict EV response in patients with mUC. MATERIALS AND METHODS We established a NECTIN4-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay to assess the predictive value of NECTIN4 CNVs in a multicenter EV-treated mUC patient cohort (mUC-EV, n = 108). CNVs were correlated with membranous NECTIN4 protein expression, EV treatment responses, and outcomes. We also assessed the prognostic value of NECTIN4 CNVs measured in metastatic biopsies of non-EV-treated mUC (mUC-non-EV, n = 103). Furthermore, we queried The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data sets (10,712 patients across 32 cancer types) for NECTIN4 CNVs. RESULTS NECTIN4 amplifications are frequent genomic events in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (TCGA bladder cancer data set: approximately 17%) and mUC (approximately 26% in our mUC cohorts). In mUC-EV, NECTIN4 amplification represents a stable genomic alteration during metastatic progression and associates with enhanced membranous NECTIN4 protein expression. Ninety-six percent (27 of 28) of patients with NECTIN4 amplifications demonstrated objective responses to EV compared with 32% (24 of 74) in the nonamplified subgroup (P < .001). In multivariable Cox analysis adjusted for age, sex, and Bellmunt risk factors, NECTIN4 amplifications led to a 92% risk reduction for death (hazard ratio, 0.08 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.34]; P < .001). In the mUC-non-EV, NECTIN4 amplifications were not associated with outcomes. TCGA Pan-Cancer analysis demonstrated that NECTIN4 amplifications occur frequently in other cancers, for example, in 5%-10% of breast and lung cancers. CONCLUSION NECTIN4 amplifications are genomic predictors of EV responses and long-term survival in patients with mUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niklas Klümper
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen/Bonn/Cologne/Düsseldorf (CIO-ABCD), Bonn, Germany
- BRIDGE-Consortium Germany e.V., Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ngoc Khanh Tran
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen/Bonn/Cologne/Düsseldorf (CIO-ABCD), Bonn, Germany
| | - Stefanie Zschäbitz
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Disease (NCT), University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Hahn
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Julius Maximilians University Medical Center of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Büttner
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen/Bonn/Cologne/Düsseldorf (CIO-ABCD), Bonn, Germany
| | - Florian Roghmann
- BRIDGE-Consortium Germany e.V., Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Christian Bolenz
- BRIDGE-Consortium Germany e.V., Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Friedemann Zengerling
- BRIDGE-Consortium Germany e.V., Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantin Schwab
- Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dora Nagy
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen/Bonn/Cologne/Düsseldorf (CIO-ABCD), Bonn, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Marieta Toma
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen/Bonn/Cologne/Düsseldorf (CIO-ABCD), Bonn, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Glen Kristiansen
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen/Bonn/Cologne/Düsseldorf (CIO-ABCD), Bonn, Germany
- BRIDGE-Consortium Germany e.V., Mannheim, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Hendrik Heers
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Philipp Ivanyi
- Department of Hemostaseology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Medical University Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Günter Niegisch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Christopher Darr
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Arian Farid
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Katrin Schlack
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Mahmoud Abbas
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Can Aydogdu
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jozefina Casuscelli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Theresa Mokry
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Mayr
- Clinic Ottakring, Institute of Pathology and Microbiology, Wien, Austria
| | | | - Steffen Rausch
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Dimo Dietrich
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Jonas Saal
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen/Bonn/Cologne/Düsseldorf (CIO-ABCD), Bonn, Germany
- Medical Clinic III for Oncology, Hematology, Immune-Oncology and Rheumatology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Jörg Ellinger
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen/Bonn/Cologne/Düsseldorf (CIO-ABCD), Bonn, Germany
| | - Manuel Ritter
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen/Bonn/Cologne/Düsseldorf (CIO-ABCD), Bonn, Germany
- BRIDGE-Consortium Germany e.V., Mannheim, Germany
| | - Abdullah Alajati
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen/Bonn/Cologne/Düsseldorf (CIO-ABCD), Bonn, Germany
| | - Christoph Kuppe
- Institute of Experimental Medicine and Systems Biology and Division of Nephrology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Joshua Meeks
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | | | - J. Alberto Nakauma-González
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kerstin Junker
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- BRIDGE-Consortium Germany e.V., Mannheim, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (Bayerisches Zentrum für Krebsforschung, BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Viktor Grünwald
- Clinic for Internal Medicine (Tumor Research) and Clinic for Urology, Interdisciplinary Genitourinary Oncology at the West-German Cancer Center, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | - Michael Hölzel
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen/Bonn/Cologne/Düsseldorf (CIO-ABCD), Bonn, Germany
| | - Markus Eckstein
- BRIDGE-Consortium Germany e.V., Mannheim, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (Bayerisches Zentrum für Krebsforschung, BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mosele MF, Westphalen CB, Stenzinger A, Barlesi F, Bayle A, Bièche I, Bonastre J, Castro E, Dienstmann R, Krämer A, Czarnecka AM, Meric-Bernstam F, Michiels S, Miller R, Normanno N, Reis-Filho J, Remon J, Robson M, Rouleau E, Scarpa A, Serrano C, Mateo J, André F. Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with advanced cancer in 2024: a report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:588-606. [PMID: 38834388 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advancements in the field of precision medicine have prompted the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Precision Medicine Working Group to update the recommendations for the use of tumour next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with advanced cancers in routine practice. METHODS The group discussed the clinical impact of tumour NGS in guiding treatment decision using the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) considering cost-effectiveness and accessibility. RESULTS As for 2020 recommendations, ESMO recommends running tumour NGS in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, and ovarian cancer. Moreover, it is recommended to carry out tumour NGS in clinical research centres and under specific circumstances discussed with patients. In this updated report, the consensus within the group has led to an expansion of the recommendations to encompass patients with advanced breast cancer and rare tumours such as gastrointestinal stromal tumours, sarcoma, thyroid cancer, and cancer of unknown primary. Finally, ESMO recommends carrying out tumour NGS to detect tumour-agnostic alterations in patients with metastatic cancers where access to matched therapies is available. CONCLUSION Tumour NGS is increasingly expanding its scope and application within oncology with the aim of enhancing the efficacy of precision medicine for patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M F Mosele
- INSERM U981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - C B Westphalen
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich & Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich
| | - A Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg and Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - F Barlesi
- INSERM U981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Faculty of Medicine, Université Paris-Saclay, Kremlin Bicêtre
| | - A Bayle
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Paris-Saclay, Kremlin Bicêtre; Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif; Service de Biostatistique et Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - I Bièche
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, INSERM U1016, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - J Bonastre
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif; Service de Biostatistique et Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - E Castro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid
| | - R Dienstmann
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona; University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, Vic, Spain; Oncoclínicas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - A Krämer
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Hematology/Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg; Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A M Czarnecka
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw; Department of Experimental Pharmacology, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
| | - F Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - S Michiels
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif; Service de Biostatistique et Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - R Miller
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College London, London; Department of Medical Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - N Normanno
- Scientific Directorate, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - J Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - J Remon
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - M Robson
- Breast Medicine and Clinical Genetics Services, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - E Rouleau
- Tumor Genetics Service, Medical Biology and Pathology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - A Scarpa
- Section of Pathology, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona-School of Medicine, Verona, Italy
| | - C Serrano
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona
| | - J Mateo
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona
| | - F André
- INSERM U981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Faculty of Medicine, Université Paris-Saclay, Kremlin Bicêtre.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
García-Foncillas J, Arnold D, Avouac B, Lassen U, Laurent-Puig P, Taieb J, Helland Å, Stenzinger A. Overcoming barriers in biomarker testing. Letter to the Editor regarding: 'ESMO study on the availability and accessibility of biomolecular technologies in oncology in Europe', by A. Bayle et al. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:677-678. [PMID: 38723866 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J García-Foncillas
- University Cancer Institute & The Department of Oncology, University Hospital Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Autonomous University, Madrid, Spain.
| | - D Arnold
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - U Lassen
- Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - P Laurent-Puig
- Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - J Taieb
- Georges Pompidou European Hospital SIRIC-CARPEM, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Å Helland
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - A Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology and Center for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Corbaux P, Bayle A, Besle S, Vinceneux A, Vanacker H, Ouali K, Hanvic B, Baldini C, Cassier PA, Terret C, Verlingue L. Patients' selection and trial matching in early-phase oncology clinical trials. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 196:104307. [PMID: 38401694 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early-phase clinical trials (EPCT) represent an important part of innovations in medical oncology and a valuable therapeutic option for patients with metastatic cancers, particularly in the era of precision medicine. Nevertheless, adult patients' participation in oncology clinical trials is low, ranging from 2% to 8% worldwide, with unequal access, and up to 40% risk of early discontinuation in EPCT, mostly due to cancer-related complications. DESIGN We review the tools and initiatives to increase patients' orientation and access to early phase cancer clinical trials, and to limit early discontinuation. RESULTS New approaches to optimize the early-phase clinical trial referring process in oncology include automatic trial matching, tools to facilitate the estimation of patients' prognostic and/or to better predict patients' eligibility to clinical trials. Classical and innovative approaches should be associated to double patient recruitment, improve clinical trial enrollment experience and reduce early discontinuation rates. CONCLUSIONS Whereas EPCT are essential for patients to access the latest medical innovations in oncology, offering the appropriate trial when it is relevant for patients should increase by organizational and technological innovations. The oncologic community will need to closely monitor their performance, portability and simplicity for implementation in daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Corbaux
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie et d'Hématologie Universitaire de Saint-Étienne (ICHUSE), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, France
| | - A Bayle
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif F-94805, France
| | - S Besle
- Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (CRCL), France
| | - A Vinceneux
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - H Vanacker
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (CRCL), France
| | - K Ouali
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif F-94805, France
| | - B Hanvic
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - C Baldini
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif F-94805, France
| | - P A Cassier
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (CRCL), France
| | - C Terret
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - L Verlingue
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (CRCL), France.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Passaro A, Al Bakir M, Hamilton EG, Diehn M, André F, Roy-Chowdhuri S, Mountzios G, Wistuba II, Swanton C, Peters S. Cancer biomarkers: Emerging trends and clinical implications for personalized treatment. Cell 2024; 187:1617-1635. [PMID: 38552610 PMCID: PMC7616034 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.02.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
The integration of cancer biomarkers into oncology has revolutionized cancer treatment, yielding remarkable advancements in cancer therapeutics and the prognosis of cancer patients. The development of personalized medicine represents a turning point and a new paradigm in cancer management, as biomarkers enable oncologists to tailor treatments based on the unique molecular profile of each patient's tumor. In this review, we discuss the scientific milestones of cancer biomarkers and explore future possibilities to improve the management of patients with solid tumors. This progress is primarily attributed to the biological characterization of cancers, advancements in testing methodologies, elucidation of the immune microenvironment, and the ability to profile circulating tumor fractions. Integrating these insights promises to continually advance the precision oncology field, fostering better patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Passaro
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Maise Al Bakir
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK; Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - Emily G Hamilton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Maximilian Diehn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Fabrice André
- Gustave-Roussy Cancer Center, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri
- Department of Anatomic Pathology and Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Giannis Mountzios
- Fourth Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Trials Unit, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Ignacio I Wistuba
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Charles Swanton
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK; Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Solange Peters
- Department of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Puiu A, Gómez Tapia C, Weiss MER, Singh V, Kamen A, Siebert M. Prediction uncertainty estimates elucidate the limitation of current NSCLC subtype classification in representing mutational heterogeneity. Sci Rep 2024; 14:6779. [PMID: 38514696 PMCID: PMC10958018 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57057-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
The heterogeneous pathogenesis and treatment response of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has led clinical treatment decisions to be guided by NSCLC subtypes, with lung adenocarcinoma and lung squamous cell carcinoma being the most common subtypes. While histology-based subtyping remains challenging, NSCLC subtypes were found to be distinct at the transcriptomic level. However, unlike genomic alterations, gene expression is generally not assessed in clinical routine. Since subtyping of NSCLC has remained elusive using mutational data, we aimed at developing a neural network model that simultaneously learns from adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma samples of other tissue types and is regularized using a neural network model trained from gene expression data. While substructures of the expression-based manifold were captured in the mutation-based manifold, NSCLC classification accuracy did not significantly improve. However, performance was increased when rejecting inconclusive samples using an ensemble-based approach capturing prediction uncertainty. Importantly, SHAP analysis of misclassified samples identified co-occurring mutations indicative of both NSCLC subtypes, questioning the current NSCLC subtype classification to adequately represent inherent mutational heterogeneity. Since our model captures mutational patterns linked to clinical heterogeneity, we anticipate it to be suited as foundational model of genomic data for clinically relevant prognostic or predictive downstream tasks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrei Puiu
- Advanta, Siemens SRL, Brasov, 500007, Romania
- Automation and Information Technology, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, 500174, Romania
| | - Carlos Gómez Tapia
- Digital Technology and Innovation, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, 91052, Germany
| | - Maximilian E R Weiss
- Digital Technology and Innovation, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, 91052, Germany
| | - Vivek Singh
- Digital Technology and Innovation, Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, 08540, USA
| | - Ali Kamen
- Digital Technology and Innovation, Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, 08540, USA
| | - Matthias Siebert
- Digital Technology and Innovation, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, 91052, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Houda I, Dickhoff C, Uyl-de Groot CA, Damhuis RA, Reguart N, Provencio M, Levy A, Dziadziuszko R, Pompili C, Di Maio M, Thomas M, Brunelli A, Popat S, Senan S, Bahce I. Challenges and controversies in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a clinician's perspective. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2024; 38:100841. [PMID: 38476749 PMCID: PMC10928275 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
The treatment landscape of resectable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is transforming due to the approval of novel adjuvant and neoadjuvant systemic treatments. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) recently approved adjuvant osimertinib, adjuvant atezolizumab, adjuvant pembrolizumab, and neoadjuvant nivolumab combined with chemotherapy, and the approval of other agents or new indications may follow soon. Despite encouraging results, many unaddressed questions remain. Moreover, the transformed treatment paradigm in resectable NSCLC can pose major challenges to healthcare systems and magnify existing disparities in care as differences in reimbursement may vary across different European countries. This Viewpoint discusses the challenges and controversies in resectable early-stage NSCLC and how existing inequalities in access to these treatments could be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilias Houda
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VU Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Chris Dickhoff
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VU Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carin A. Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management/Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald A.M. Damhuis
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Noemi Reguart
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C. de Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mariano Provencio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta De Hierro, C. Joaquín Rodrigo, 1, Majadahonda, 28222 Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonin Levy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Université Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Rafal Dziadziuszko
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Cecilia Pompili
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University and Hospital Trust – Ospedale Borgo Trento, P.Le A. Stefani, 1, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Massimo Di Maio
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Medical Oncology 1U, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Michael Thomas
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg University Hospital and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, A Partnership Between DKFZ and Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alessandro Brunelli
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, St. James’s University Hospital, Beckett Street, LS9 7TF Leeds, UK
| | - Sanjay Popat
- Lung Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, SW3 6JJ London, UK
| | - Suresh Senan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location VU Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Idris Bahce
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VU Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Klümper N, Eckstein M. Biomarkers of Response to Anti-NECTIN4 Antibody-Drug Conjugate Enfortumab Vedotin in Urothelial Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2024; 10:224-226. [PMID: 38631991 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Initial studies indicated that NECTIN4 expression is widespread in metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC), which led to approval of the anti-NECTIN4 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) enfortumab vedotin (EV) for unselected patients with mUC. However, the recent literature suggests that there has been overestimation of membranous NECTIN4 expression in UC, which is a prerequisite for EV binding. It is well established from the development of Her2-targeting ADCs that treatment response is strongly dependent on membranous expression level of the relevant target antigen. In this context, it has been demonstrated that membranous NECTIN4 expression correlates with EV responses and outcomes. Another promising biomarker could be NECTIN4 copy number alteration, a genomic alteration that occurs in approximately 25% of mUC cases, which is associated with strong membranous NECTIN4 expression. Patients with NECTIN4 amplification exhibit an objective response rate of >90% to EV monotherapy and long-term survival. Given the heterogeneous expression of NECTIN4 in UC, future biomarker research is essential for the development of biomarker-driven mUC treatment strategies to further improve outcomes for patients with mUC. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed current evidence on biomarkers for predicting response to enfortumab vedotin (EV) treatment for metastatic urinary tract cancer (mUC). Studies to date have shown that patients with high levels of the protein NECTIN4 on their cancer cells respond well to EV. This information has the potential to guide future treatment strategies for mUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niklas Klümper
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen/Bonn/Cologne/Düsseldorf, Bonn, Germany; Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Markus Eckstein
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Center for Cancer Research
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
de Jager VD, Timens W, Bayle A, Botling J, Brcic L, Büttner R, Fernandes MGO, Havel L, Hochmair MJ, Hofman P, Janssens A, Johansson M, van Kempen L, Kern I, Lopez-Rios F, Lüchtenborg M, Machado JC, Mohorcic K, Paz-Ares L, Popat S, Ryška A, Taniere P, Wolf J, Schuuring E, van der Wekken AJ. Developments in predictive biomarker testing and targeted therapy in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer and their application across European countries. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2024; 38:100838. [PMID: 38476742 PMCID: PMC10928289 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
In the past two decades, the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), has undergone significant changes due to the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. These advancements have led to the need for predictive molecular tests to identify patients eligible for targeted therapy. This review provides an overview of the development and current application of targeted therapies and predictive biomarker testing in European patients with advanced stage NSCLC. Using data from eleven European countries, we conclude that recommendations for predictive testing are incorporated in national guidelines across Europe, although there are differences in their comprehensiveness. Moreover, the availability of recently EMA-approved targeted therapies varies between European countries. Unfortunately, routine assessment of national/regional molecular testing rates is limited. As a result, it remains uncertain which proportion of patients with metastatic NSCLC in Europe receive adequate predictive biomarker testing. Lastly, Molecular Tumor Boards (MTBs) for discussion of molecular test results are widely implemented, but national guidelines for their composition and functioning are lacking. The establishment of MTB guidelines can provide a framework for interpreting rare or complex mutations, facilitating appropriate treatment decision-making, and ensuring quality control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent D. de Jager
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Wim Timens
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Arnaud Bayle
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Johan Botling
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy of University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Luka Brcic
- Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Reinhard Büttner
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Libor Havel
- Charles University and Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Maximilian J. Hochmair
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Lung Research and Pulmonary Oncology, Klinik Floridsdorf, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Klinik Floridsdorf, Vienna Healthcare Group, Vienna, Austria
| | - Paul Hofman
- IHU RespirERA, FHU OncoAge, Nice University Hospital, Côte d’Azur University, Nice, France
| | - Annelies Janssens
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Mikael Johansson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Léon van Kempen
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Izidor Kern
- Laboratory for Cytology and Pathology, University Clinic Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - Fernando Lopez-Rios
- Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Ciberonc, Madrid, Spain
| | - Margreet Lüchtenborg
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS England, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Cancer, Society & Public Health, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - José Carlos Machado
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Institute for Research and Innovation in Health (i3S), Porto, Portugal
| | - Katja Mohorcic
- University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - Luis Paz-Ares
- Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, H12O-CNIO Lung Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12)/Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Ciberonc, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sanjay Popat
- Lung Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Aleš Ryška
- The Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Czech Republic
| | - Phillipe Taniere
- Department of Histopathology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jürgen Wolf
- Lung Cancer Group Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne/Bonn, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ed Schuuring
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Anthonie J. van der Wekken
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
de Jager VD, Timens W, Bayle A, Botling J, Brcic L, Büttner R, Fernandes MGO, Havel L, Hochmair M, Hofman P, Janssens A, van Kempen L, Kern I, Machado JC, Mohorčič K, Popat S, Ryška A, Wolf J, Schuuring E, van der Wekken AJ. Future perspective for the application of predictive biomarker testing in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2024; 38:100839. [PMID: 38476751 PMCID: PMC10928270 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
For patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treatment strategies have changed significantly due to the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. In the last few years, we have seen an explosive growth of newly introduced targeted therapies in oncology and this development is expected to continue in the future. Besides primary targetable aberrations, emerging diagnostic biomarkers also include relevant co-occurring mutations and resistance mechanisms involved in disease progression, that have impact on optimal treatment management. To accommodate testing of pending biomarkers, it is necessary to establish routine large-panel next-generation sequencing (NGS) for all patients with advanced stage NSCLC. For cost-effectiveness and accessibility, it is recommended to implement predictive molecular testing using large-panel NGS in a dedicated, centralized expert laboratory within a regional oncology network. The central molecular testing center should host a regional Molecular Tumor Board and function as a hub for interpretation of rare and complex testing results and clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent D. de Jager
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Wim Timens
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Arnaud Bayle
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Johan Botling
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy of University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Luka Brcic
- Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Reinhard Büttner
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Libor Havel
- Charles University and Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Maximilian Hochmair
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Lung Research and Pulmonary Oncology, Klinik Floridsdorf, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Klinik Floridsdorf, Vienna Healthcare Group, Vienna, Austria
| | - Paul Hofman
- IHU RespirERA, FHU OncoAge, Nice University Hospital, Côte d’Azur University, Nice, France
| | - Annelies Janssens
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Léon van Kempen
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Izidor Kern
- Laboratory for Cytology and Pathology, University Clinic Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - José Carlos Machado
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Portugal
- Institute for Research and Innovation in Health (i3S), Porto, Portugal
| | - Katja Mohorčič
- University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - Sanjay Popat
- Lung Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London, England, UK
| | - Aleš Ryška
- The Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Czech Republic
| | - Jürgen Wolf
- Lung Cancer Group Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne/Bonn, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ed Schuuring
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Anthonie J. van der Wekken
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Esposito Abate R, Pasquale R, Sacco A, Simeon V, Maiello MR, Frezzetti D, Chiodini P, Normanno N. Harmonization of tumor mutation burden testing with comprehensive genomic profiling assays: an IQN Path initiative. J Immunother Cancer 2024; 12:e007800. [PMID: 38309725 PMCID: PMC10840060 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although conflicting results emerged from different studies, the tumor mutational burden (TMB) appears as one of most reliable biomarkers of sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Several laboratories are reporting TMB values when performing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) without providing a clinical interpretation, due to the lack of validated cut-off values. The International Quality Network for Pathology launched an initiative to harmonize TMB testing with CGP assay and favor the clinical implementation of this biomarker. METHODS TMB evaluation was performed with three commercially available CGP panels, TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500), Oncomine Comprehensive Plus Assay (OCA) and QIAseq Multimodal Panel (QIA), versus the reference assay FoundationOne CDx (F1CDx). Archived clinical samples derived from 60 patients with non-small cell lung cancer were used for TMB assessment. Adjusted cut-off values for each panel were calculated. RESULTS Testing was successful for 91.7%, 100%, 96.7% and 100% of cases using F1CDx, TSO500, OCA and QIA, respectively. The matrix comparison analysis, between the F1CDx and CGP assays, showed a linear correlation for all three panels, with a higher correlation between F1CDx and TSO500 (rho=0.88) than in the other two comparisons (rho=0.77 for QIA; 0.72 for OCA). The TSO500 showed the best area under the curve (AUC, value 0.96), with a statistically significant difference when compared with the AUC of OCA (0.83, p value=0.01) and QIA (0.88, p value=0.028). The Youden Index calculation allowed us to extrapolate TMB cut-offs of the different panels corresponding to the 10 mutations/megabase (muts/Mb) cut-off of F1CDx: 10.19, 10.4 and 12.37 muts/Mb for TSO500, OCA and QIA, respectively. Using these values, we calculated the relative accuracy measures for the three panels. TSO500 showed 86% specificity and 96% sensitivity, while OCA and QIA had lower yet similar values of specificity and sensitivity (73% and 88%, respectively). CONCLUSION This study estimated TMB cut-off values for commercially available CGP panels. The results showed a good performance of all panels on clinical samples and the calculated cut-offs support better accuracy measures for TSO500. The validated cut-off values can drive clinical interpretation of TMB testing in clinical research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riziero Esposito Abate
- Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G.Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Alessandra Sacco
- Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G.Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Vittorio Simeon
- Medical Statistics Unit, Department of Mental Health and Public Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Napoli, Italy
| | - Monica Rosaria Maiello
- Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G.Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Daniela Frezzetti
- Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G.Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Paolo Chiodini
- Medical Statistics Unit, Department of Mental Health and Public Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Napoli, Italy
| | - Nicola Normanno
- Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G.Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hofman P, Berezowska S, Kazdal D, Mograbi B, Ilié M, Stenzinger A, Hofman V. Current challenges and practical aspects of molecular pathology for non-small cell lung cancers. Virchows Arch 2024; 484:233-246. [PMID: 37801103 PMCID: PMC10948551 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-023-03651-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
The continuing evolution of treatment options in thoracic oncology requires the pathologist to regularly update diagnostic algorithms for management of tumor samples. It is essential to decide on the best way to use tissue biopsies, cytological samples, as well as liquid biopsies to identify the different mandatory predictive biomarkers of lung cancers in a short turnaround time. However, biological resources and laboratory member workforce are limited and may be not sufficient for the increased complexity of molecular pathological analyses and for complementary translational research development. In this context, the surgical pathologist is the only one who makes the decisions whether or not to send specimens to immunohistochemical and molecular pathology platforms. Moreover, the pathologist can rapidly contact the oncologist to obtain a new tissue biopsy and/or a liquid biopsy if he/she considers that the biological material is not sufficient in quantity or quality for assessment of predictive biomarkers. Inadequate control of algorithms and sampling workflow may lead to false negative, inconclusive, and incomplete findings, resulting in inappropriate choice of therapeutic strategy and potentially poor outcome for patients. International guidelines for lung cancer treatment are based on the results of the expression of different proteins and on genomic alterations. These guidelines have been established taking into consideration the best practices to be set up in clinical and molecular pathology laboratories. This review addresses the current predictive biomarkers and algorithms for use in thoracic oncology molecular pathology as well as the central role of the pathologist, notably in the molecular tumor board and her/his participation in the treatment decision-making. The perspectives in this setting will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Hofman
- Côte d'Azur University, FHU OncoAge, IHU RespirERA, Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, BB-0033-00025, Louis Pasteur Hospital, 30 avenue de la voie romaine, BP69, 06001, Nice cedex 01, France.
- Côte d'Azur University, IRCAN, Inserm, CNRS 7284, U1081, Nice, France.
| | - Sabina Berezowska
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Kazdal
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
- Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Baharia Mograbi
- Côte d'Azur University, FHU OncoAge, IHU RespirERA, Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, BB-0033-00025, Louis Pasteur Hospital, 30 avenue de la voie romaine, BP69, 06001, Nice cedex 01, France
- Côte d'Azur University, IRCAN, Inserm, CNRS 7284, U1081, Nice, France
| | - Marius Ilié
- Côte d'Azur University, FHU OncoAge, IHU RespirERA, Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, BB-0033-00025, Louis Pasteur Hospital, 30 avenue de la voie romaine, BP69, 06001, Nice cedex 01, France
- Côte d'Azur University, IRCAN, Inserm, CNRS 7284, U1081, Nice, France
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
- Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Véronique Hofman
- Côte d'Azur University, FHU OncoAge, IHU RespirERA, Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, BB-0033-00025, Louis Pasteur Hospital, 30 avenue de la voie romaine, BP69, 06001, Nice cedex 01, France
- Côte d'Azur University, IRCAN, Inserm, CNRS 7284, U1081, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Febbo PG, Allo M, Alme EB, Cuyun Carter G, Dumanois R, Essig A, Kiernan E, Kubler CB, Martin N, Popescu MC, Leiman LC. Recommendations for the Equitable and Widespread Implementation of Liquid Biopsy for Cancer Care. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300382. [PMID: 38166232 PMCID: PMC10803048 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Liquid biopsies-tests that detect circulating tumor cellular components in the bloodstream-have the potential to transform cancer by reducing health inequities in screening, diagnostics, and monitoring. Today, liquid biopsies are being used to guide treatment choices for patients and monitor for cancer recurrence, and promising work in multi-cancer early detection is ongoing. However, without awareness of the barriers to adoption of this new technology and a willingness to build mitigation efforts into the implementation of widespread liquid biopsy testing, the communities that could most benefit may be the last to access and use them. In this work, we review the challenges likely to affect the accessibility of liquid biopsies in both the general population and underserved populations, and recommend specific actions to facilitate equitable access for all patients.
Collapse
|
27
|
Remon J, Lopez A, Planchard D, Besse B. Are we ready to escalate or de-escalate immune treatment strategies in NSCLC based on liquid biopsy data? Eur J Cancer 2023; 195:113369. [PMID: 37913681 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Remon
- Paris-Saclay University, Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| | - Alvaro Lopez
- Paris-Saclay University, Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - David Planchard
- Paris-Saclay University, Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Benjamin Besse
- Paris-Saclay University, Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lamarca A, Vogel A. Futibatinib: second EMA approval for FGFR inhibitor in cholangiocarcinoma. ESMO Open 2023; 8:102049. [PMID: 37922686 PMCID: PMC10651450 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A Lamarca
- Department of Medical Oncology - OncoHealth Institute, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - A Vogel
- Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Medical Oncology, Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Aldea M, Vasseur D, Italiano A, Nikolaev SI. WGS/WES-RNAseq compared to targeted NGS in oncology: is there something to unlock? Ann Oncol 2023; 34:1090-1093. [PMID: 37816462 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.09.3118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- M Aldea
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Paris-Saclay University, Kremlin-Bicetre; Precision Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - D Vasseur
- Precision Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Department of Molecular Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - A Italiano
- Precision Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Drug Development Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Stenzinger A, Moltzen EK, Winkler E, Molnar-Gabor F, Malek N, Costescu A, Jensen BN, Nowak F, Pinto C, Ottersen OP, Schirmacher P, Nordborg J, Seufferlein T, Fröhling S, Edsjö A, Garcia-Foncillas J, Normanno N, Lundgren B, Friedman M, Bolanos N, Tatton-Brown K, Hill S, Rosenquist R. Implementation of precision medicine in healthcare-A European perspective. J Intern Med 2023; 294:437-454. [PMID: 37455247 DOI: 10.1111/joim.13698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
The technical development of high-throughput sequencing technologies and the parallel development of targeted therapies in the last decade have enabled a transition from traditional medicine to personalized treatment and care. In this way, by using comprehensive genomic testing, more effective treatments with fewer side effects are provided to each patient-that is, precision or personalized medicine (PM). In several European countries-such as in England, France, Denmark, and Spain-the governments have adopted national strategies and taken "top-down" decisions to invest in national infrastructure for PM. In other countries-such as Sweden, Germany, and Italy with regionally organized healthcare systems-the profession has instead taken "bottom-up" initiatives to build competence networks and infrastructure to enable equal access to PM. In this review, we summarize key learnings at the European level on the implementation process to establish sustainable governance and organization for PM at the regional, national, and EU/international levels. We also discuss critical ethical and legal aspects of implementing PM, and the importance of access to real-world data and performing clinical trials for evidence generation, as well as the need for improved reimbursement models, increased cross-disciplinary education and patient involvement. In summary, PM represents a paradigm shift, and modernization of healthcare and all relevant stakeholders-that is, healthcare, academia, policymakers, industry, and patients-must be involved in this system transformation to create a sustainable, non-siloed ecosystem for precision healthcare that benefits our patients and society at large.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Germany
| | - Ejner K Moltzen
- Innovation Fund Denmark, International Consortium for Personalised Medicine (IC PerMed), Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Eva Winkler
- Section of Translational Medical Ethics, National Center for Tumour Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Nisar Malek
- Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Germany
- Department for Internal Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Carmine Pinto
- Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | - Peter Schirmacher
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Germany
| | - Jenni Nordborg
- Lif - The Research-Based Pharmaceutical Industry, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Thomas Seufferlein
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Division of Translational Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anders Edsjö
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Office for Medical Services, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden
- Division of Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Genomic Medicine Sweden (GMS), Sweden
| | - Jesus Garcia-Foncillas
- Department of Oncology and Cancer Institute, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital, Autonomous University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nicola Normanno
- Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Mikaela Friedman
- Genomic Medicine Sweden (GMS), Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Katrina Tatton-Brown
- National Genomics Education, NHS England, London, UK
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Sue Hill
- Office of Chief Scientific Officer and the Genomics Unit, NHS England, London, UK
| | - Richard Rosenquist
- Genomic Medicine Sweden (GMS), Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Normanno N, Machado JC, Pescarmona E, Buglioni S, Navarro L, Esposito Abate R, Ferro A, Mensink R, Lambiase M, Lespinet-Fabre V, Calgua B, Jermann PM, Ilié M, Hofman P. European Real-World Assessment of the Clinical Validity of a CE-IVD Panel for Ultra-Fast Next-Generation Sequencing in Solid Tumors. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:13788. [PMID: 37762091 PMCID: PMC10531166 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241813788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Molecular profiling of solid tumors facilitates personalized, targeted therapeutic interventions. The ability to perform next-generation sequencing (NGS), especially from small tissue samples, in a short turnaround time (TAT) is essential to providing results that enable rapid clinical decisions. This multicenter study evaluated the performance of a CE in vitro diagnostic (IVD) assay, the Oncomine Dx Express Test, on the Ion Torrent Genexus System for detecting DNA and RNA variants in solid tumors. Eighty-two archived formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue samples from lung, colorectal, central nervous system, melanoma, breast, gastric, thyroid, and soft tissue cancers were used to assess the presence of single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions and deletions (indels), copy number variations (CNVs), gene fusions, and splice variants. These clinical samples were previously characterized at the various academic centers using orthogonal methods. The Oncomine Dx Express Test showed high performance with 100% concordance with previous characterization for SNVs, indels, CNVs, gene fusions, and splice variants. SNVs and indels with allele frequencies as low as 5% were correctly identified. The test detected all the expected ALK, RET, NTRK1, and ROS1 fusion isoforms and MET exon 14-skipping splice variants. The average TAT from extracted nucleic acids to the final variant report was 18.3 h. The Oncomine Dx Express Test in combination with the Ion Torrent Genexus System is a CE-IVD-compliant, performant, and multicenter reproducible method for NGS detection of actionable biomarkers from a range of tumor samples, providing results in a short TAT that could support timely decision- making for targeted therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Normanno
- Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.N.); (R.E.A.)
| | - José Carlos Machado
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; (J.C.M.); (A.F.); (R.M.)
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto (Ipatimup), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto (FMUP), 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Edoardo Pescarmona
- I.R.C.C.S. Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (E.P.); (S.B.)
| | - Simonetta Buglioni
- I.R.C.C.S. Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (E.P.); (S.B.)
| | - Lara Navarro
- Consorcio Hospital General de Valencia, 46014 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Riziero Esposito Abate
- Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.N.); (R.E.A.)
| | - Anabela Ferro
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; (J.C.M.); (A.F.); (R.M.)
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto (Ipatimup), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Rob Mensink
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; (J.C.M.); (A.F.); (R.M.)
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto (Ipatimup), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Matilde Lambiase
- Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.N.); (R.E.A.)
| | - Virginie Lespinet-Fabre
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Biobank BB-0033-00025, FHU OncoAge, IHU RespirERA, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (V.L.-F.); (M.I.)
| | - Byron Calgua
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; (B.C.); (P.M.J.)
| | - Philip M. Jermann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; (B.C.); (P.M.J.)
| | - Marius Ilié
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Biobank BB-0033-00025, FHU OncoAge, IHU RespirERA, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (V.L.-F.); (M.I.)
| | - Paul Hofman
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Biobank BB-0033-00025, FHU OncoAge, IHU RespirERA, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (V.L.-F.); (M.I.)
| |
Collapse
|