Tumeurs neuroendocrines pulmonaires et lésions prénéoplasiques

Systemic treatment for neuroendocrine non-small cell lung carcinoma: A cases series and a systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Neuroendocrine lung cancer constitutes a continuum from carcinoid tumours (CT) to large cell neuroendocrine (LCNEC) and small-cell carcinomas (SCLC). Except for SCLC, there is no consensual agreement on systemic therapy. The aim of this study is to review our clinical experience among patients with CT and LCNEC in the light of a systematic review of the literature.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all patients with CT and LCNEC receiving a systemic therapy at Institut Jules Bordet and Erasme Hospital between 01/01/2000-31/12/2020. A systematic review of the literature was performed in Ovid Medline.

RESULTS

53 patients (21 CT and 32 LCNEC) were included. Despite limited response rates, patients with CT receiving a "carcinoid-like" 1st-line regimen (somatostatin analogues (SSA), everolimus, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)) had a numerically longer survival compared to those receiving other type of regimens (median 51.4 vs 18.6 months, respectively; p = 0.17). We observed a similar survival between 1st line "SCLC-like" vs "non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-like" schemes in LCNEC (median 11.2 vs 12.6 months, respectively; p = 0.46). The systematic review identified 23 studies (12 prospective, 15 and 8 for CT and LCNEC respectively). For CT, everolimus and SSA led to prolonged disease control with an acceptable toxicity profile, while higher response rates but lower tolerance were associated with PRRT and chemotherapy regimens including oxaliplatine and dacarbazine. For LCNEC, no difference emerged when comparing "SCLC-like" and "NSCLC-like" regimens considering response rate, progression-free or overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

SSA, everolimus and PRRT present a good therapeutic index for CT, while the role of chemotherapy remains limited to aggressive and rapidly evolving CT. The best type of chemotherapy regimen remains an open question in LCNEC.

Lung carcinoid tumors with Diffuse Idiopathic Pulmonary NeuroEndocrine Cell Hyperplasia (DIPNECH) exhibit pejorative pathological features

INTRODUCTION

Diffuse Idiopathic Pulmonary NeuroEndocrine Cell Hyperplasia (DIPNECH) is a rare disease often associated with carcinoid tumors. We aimed at evaluating the impact of DIPNECH on characteristics and prognosis of patients who underwent radical treatment of pulmonary carcinoid tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed all patients operated on for curative-intent resection of carcinoid tumor in our department from 2001 to 2020. Cases exhibiting both pathological and radiological features of DIPNECH, as assessed by respective thoracic expert physicians, were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

172 cases of resected carcinoid tumors were identified, including 25 (14.5 %) harboring pathological criteria of DIPNECH and radiologic features like mosaic attenuation (92.0 %), multiple nodules < 5 mm (76.0 %), and mucoid impactions (32 %). In DIPNECH patients, major pulmonary resections were usually performed (92.0 %) and resected tumors were mostly classified as pT1 (92 %). Mean Ki67 staining was 3.7 ± 5.2 %. The early postoperative period was mostly uneventful (96.0 %) and 5-year survival was 92.9 ± 6.9 %. Compared to non-DIPNECH cases, we found that patients were older (mean 65.6 ± 9.3 versus 54.1 ± 17.9, p = 0.002), more frequently female (84.0 % versus 56.5 %, p = 0.009), and exhibiting diabetes mellitus (45.8 % versus 18.5 %, p < 0.001) or hypertension (45.8 % versus 24.1 %, p = 0.039). The rate of atypical carcinoid tumors was significantly higher in DIPNECH patients (40.0 % versus 19.9 %, p = 0.027), as well as rate of mediastinal lymph-nodes involvement (pN2+) (36.0 % versus 4.1 %, p < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, only DIPNECH pattern and atypical histology were independent factors of pN2 invasion which was the only predictor of poorer prognosis on Log-Rank test.

CONCLUSION

Carcinoid tumors with proven DIPNECH are associated with negative pathological features and may deserve a dedicated perioperative management.