Habilitation des pathologistes pour l’évaluation du pourcentage de cellules tumorales lors du contrôle morphologique avant extraction d’acides nucléiques

Real-time multiplex PCR for human echinococcosis and differential diagnosis

Molecular identification of rare human infectious pathogens appears to be one of the most relevant current methods for rapid diagnosis and management of patients. PCR techniques, in particular real-time quantitative PCR, are best suited for the detection of DNA from the pathogens, even at low concentrations. Echinococcosis infections are due to helminths of the Echinococcus genus, with closely related species involved in parasitic lesions affecting animals and, accidentally, humans. We developed a multiplex qPCR (MLX qPCR) assay allowing for the detection of four Echinococcus species involved in Europe in alveolar echinococcosis (AE) and cystic echinococcosis (CE) (Echinococcus multilocularis, E. granulosus sensu stricto, E. ortleppi, and E. canadensis), based on short mitochondrial targets. A collection of 81 fresh and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues (FFPE) of AE and CE lesions was assembled. The qPCR assays were performed in triplex for Echinococcus spp. detection, associated with a qPCR inhibitor control. A duplex qPCR was also designed to enable diagnosis of two other dead-end helminthiases (cysticercosis (Taenia solium), and toxocariasis (Toxocara cati and T. canis)). The sensitivity of the qPCR was assessed and ranged from 1 to 5 × 10^-4 ng/μL (seven PCR assays positive), corresponding to 37-42 cycles for quantifiable DNA. The specificity was 100% for all the targets. This multiplex qPCR, adapted to low amounts of DNA can be implemented in the laboratory for the rapid molecular diagnosis of Echinococcosis species.

EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and HER2 testing in metastatic lung adenocarcinoma: Value of testing on samples with poor specimen adequacy and analysis of discrepancies

Molecular testing on metastatic lung adenocarcinoma or on non-small cell non-squamous lung carcinoma often relies on small specimen. In this group of patient with poor specimen adequacy, we analyzed the rate of EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and HER2 mutations compared to their rate in optimal specimen. We analyzed discrepancies in molecular testing results in patients with iterative analysis on several samples. We performed a retrospective study of 1538 samples consecutively analyzed. 263/665 (39,5%) biopsies and 37/708 (5,2%) surgical specimens were considered as samples with poor specimen adequacy (p<0,0001). A lower tumor cell content was associated with a lower rate of KRAS mutation: 15,8% in samples with <10% of tumor cells or <100 tumor cells versus 29,8% in samples with >10% tumor cell and >100 tumor cells (p=0,001). KRAS mutational rate was at 11,1% in cytology specimens, significantly lower than in biopsy or surgical specimens respectively at 28,2% and 28,5% (p=0,0002). Tumor cell content was not associated with mutational rate for EGFR, BRAF and HER2 mutations. DNA quantity was not associated with mutational rate for EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and HER2. A discrepancy in molecular testing was found in 16 patients. For 5 patients there was also a discrepancy for TTF-1 expression. On the 11 without TTF-1 discrepancy, specimen adequacy was not fulfilled in 10 cases at least for tumor content. Discrepancies were found in the case of low cellularity, poor cell content or testing on cytological specimens. Tumor cell content is a crucial parameter for molecular analysis rather than the type of specimen or the DNA quantity. Discrepancies in molecular testing results are rare but might suggest the presence of another tumor type, the emergence of another clone or a molecular testing in a sample with low cell content.