1
|
Schindler A, Baijens LWJ, Geneid A, Pizzorni N. Phoniatricians and otorhinolaryngologists approaching oropharyngeal dysphagia: an update on FEES. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 279:2727-2742. [PMID: 34779927 PMCID: PMC8591442 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-07161-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) is a common phenomenon in otorhinolaryngology and phoniatrics. As both sub-disciplines have a strong tradition and clinical experience in endoscopic assessment of the upper aerodigestive tract, the implementation of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) was an almost self-evident evolution. This review aims to provide an update on FEES and the role of phoniatricians and otorhinolaryngologists using FEES in Europe. METHODS A narrative review of the literature was performed by experts in the field of FEES both in the clinical context and in the field of scientific research. RESULTS FEES is the first-choice OD assessment technique for both phoniatricians and otorhinolaryngologists. FEES is becoming increasingly popular because of its usefulness, safety, low costs, wide applicability, and feasibility in different clinical settings. FEES can be performed by health professionals of varying disciplines, once adequate knowledge and skills are acquired. FEES aims to determine OD nature and severity and can provide diagnostic information regarding the underlying etiology. The direct effect of therapeutic interventions can be evaluated using FEES, contributing to design the OD management plan. Standardization of FEES protocols and metrics is still lacking. Technological innovation regarding image resolution, frame rate frequency, endoscopic light source specifications, and endoscopic rotation range has contributed to an increased diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION The rising number of phoniatricians and otorhinolaryngologists performing FEES contributes to the early detection and treatment of OD in an aging European population. Nevertheless, a multidisciplinary approach together with other disciplines is crucial for the success of OD management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Schindler
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", Milan University, UOS Foniatria, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Ospedale Sacco, Via GB Grassi 74, 20154, Milano, Italy.
| | - Laura W J Baijens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School for Oncology and Developmental Biology-GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ahmed Geneid
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Phoniatrics-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Nicole Pizzorni
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", Milan University, UOS Foniatria, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Ospedale Sacco, Via GB Grassi 74, 20154, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Weiland DJ, Goshtasbi K, Verma SP. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing findings in individuals with Zenker's diverticulum and cricopharyngeal bar. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 277:2017-2021. [PMID: 32232630 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-05922-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) findings in individuals with cricopharyngeal bar (CPB) and Zenker's diverticulum (ZD). METHODS In this retrospective chart review spanning from 2010-2018, individuals diagnosed with CPB or ZD and undergoing FEES were identified. Patient demographics, radiographic studies, and treatments were recorded, and findings were compared between CPB, ZD of < 3 cm, and ZD ≥ 3 cm. RESULTS Sixty-one individuals consisting of 48 patients with ZD and 13 patients with CPB met inclusion criteria. Post-swallow hypopharyngeal reflux (PSHR) of undigested food bolus, present with or without Valsalva maneuver, was noted in 23%, 84%, and 75% of patients with CPB, ZD < 3 cm, and ZD ≥ 3 cm, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the finding for those with ZD were 81% and 83%, respectively. Of patients with ZD, reflux resolved in all but six individuals after surgery. Four of these patients underwent revision surgery with the reflux subsequently resolving, and two patients with persistent reflux were asymptomatic and did not desire further treatment. CONCLUSIONS PSHR is a good tool to identify the presence of a ZD and is less helpful to identify a CPB. Elimination of PSHR is a good tool to determine treatment success in patients with ZD and CPB. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Weiland
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 200 S. Manchester Ave., Ste 400, Orange, CA, 92868-3201, USA
| | - Khodayar Goshtasbi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 200 S. Manchester Ave., Ste 400, Orange, CA, 92868-3201, USA
| | - Sunil P Verma
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 200 S. Manchester Ave., Ste 400, Orange, CA, 92868-3201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Crawley B, Dehom S, Tamares S, Marghalani A, Ongkasuwan J, Reder L, Ivey C, Amin M, Fritz M, Pitman M, Tulunay-Ugur O, Weissbrod P. Adverse Events after Rigid and Flexible Endoscopic Repair of Zenker’s Diverticula: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 161:388-400. [DOI: 10.1177/0194599819839991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective To determine adverse events after endoscopic flexible vs endoscopic rigid cricopharyngeal myotomy for treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum (ZD). Data Sources Systematic review of MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for all years according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Additional studies were identified from review citations and a by hand search of manuscripts referencing ZD. Review Methods A structured literature search was conducted to identify studies for this systematic review. Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria were applied to assess study quality. For inclusion, each study had to provide data for at least 10 adult patients who had undergone endoscopic ZD repair reporting clear association with the postprocedure course in each case. Data extracted included all reported adverse events, recurrences, follow-up, and operative times. Results In total, 115 studies were included. All but 8 were retrospective case series. Sixty-one reported series of patients after rigid endoscopic stapler repair, 31 after rigid laser repair, and 13 with other rigid endoscopic instruments. Twenty-nine flexible endoscopic studies were included. Mortality, infection, and perforation were not significantly more likely in either the rigid or the flexible group, but bleeding and recurrence were more likely after flexible endoscopic techniques (20% vs <10% and 4% vs 0%, respectively). Dental injury and vocal fold palsy were reported rarely in the rigid endoscopic groups. Conclusions Adverse events are rare after endoscopic Zenker’s repair. The flexible approach minimizes exposure limitations and can be completed in some patients without general anesthesia. Transoral rigid approaches result in fewer revision surgeries compared with flexible diverticulotomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brianna Crawley
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Loma Linda University Voice and Swallowing Center, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | - Salem Dehom
- School of Nursing, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | - Shanalee Tamares
- School of Medicine and School of Behavioral Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | - Abdullah Marghalani
- Preventive Dentistry Department, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, Saudi Arabia
| | - Julina Ongkasuwan
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lindsay Reder
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Chandra Ivey
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Milan Amin
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mark Fritz
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Michael Pitman
- Division of Laryngology, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ozlem Tulunay-Ugur
- Division of Laryngology, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Philip Weissbrod
- San Diego Division of Laryngology, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|