The skull vibration-induced nystagmus test: A useful vestibular screening test in children with hearing loss

Comparison Between Effects of Galvanic and Vibration-Based Vestibular Stimulation on Postural Control and Gait Performance in Healthy Participants: A Systematic Review of Cross-Sectional Studies

Electricity and vibration were two commonly used physical agents to provide vestibular stimulation in previous studies. This study aimed to systematically review the effects of galvanic (GVS) and vibration-based vestibular stimulation (VVS) on gait performance and postural control in healthy participants. Five bioscience and engineering databases, including MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL via EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase, were searched until March 19th, 2023. Studies published between 2000 and 2023 in English involving GVS and VVS related to gait performance and postural control were included. The procedure was followed via the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the NIH study quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. A total of 55 cross-sectional studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this study. Five studies were good-quality while 49 were moderate-quality and 1 was poor-quality. There were 50 included studies involving GVS and 5 included studies involving VVS. GVS and VVS utilized different physical agents to provide vestibular stimulation and demonstrated similar effects on vestibular perception. Supra-threshold GVS and VVS produced vestibular perturbation that impaired gait performance and postural control, while sub-threshold GVS and VVS induced stochastic resonance phenomenon that led to an improvement. Bilateral vestibular stimulation demonstrated a greater effect on gait and posture than unilateral vestibular stimulation. Compared to GVS, VVS had the characteristics of better tolerance and fewer side effects, which may substitute GVS to provide more acceptable vestibular stimulation.

Correlation of SVINT and Sensory Organization Test in Children with Hearing Loss

Objective: The skull vibration-induced-nystagmus test (SVINT) is a noninvasive and effective screening tool for the function of the otolith and canal structures in children. It can instantaneously assess vestibular asymmetry. This study aimed to analyze the SVINT results of healthy children vs. children with hearing loss (HL) and to correlate it with sensory organization test (SOT) results as a functional balance evaluation tool. Design: This case-controlled study compared the results of SVINT to the results of the SOT of the computerized dynamic posturography (CDP) in a control group of 120 healthy normal-hearing children (i.e., NH group) vs. hearing loss (HL) group of 60 children, including 30 children with hearing aids (HAs) and 30 children with a unilateral cochlear implant (CI). The SVINT results were compared to the caloric test (CaT) and video head impulse test (vHIT) and associated with SOT scores. Results: Thirty-one children in the HL group had normal SVINT and normal SOT results. A total of 21 children in the HL group had SVINT-negative and abnormal results in the SOT (possibly due to bilateral vestibular loss (BVL)). Eight children in the HL group had positive SVINT and abnormal SOT results. However, none of the children had only positive SVINT with normal SOT findings. Moreover, 52% of children had a normal result on both the SOT and CaT, whereas 27% had abnormal results on both tests (17% bilateral weakness and 10% unilateral), and 22% had the only result of the SOT suggesting a functional abnormality. Similarly, when associating the result to vHIT, 51% had normal results on both tests, and 25% had abnormal results (13% bilateral and 12% unilateral weakness). Conclusion: SVINT findings can be correlated with SOT findings in the case of the unilateral vestibular lesion (UVL), which adds a diagnostic value in these pediatric cases but may differ in the case of the bilateral vestibular lesion (BVL). However, SVINT findings need to be cautiously interpreted in light of other test findings such as the SOT, CaT, and vHIT.

Fifty Years of Development of the Skull Vibration-Induced Nystagmus Test

This review enumerates most of the studies on the Skull Vibration-Induced Nystagmus Test (SVINT) in the past 50 years from different research groups around the world. It is an attempt to demonstrate the evolution of this test and its increased interest around the globe. It explores clinical studies and animal studies, both permitting a better understanding of the importance of SVINT and its pathophysiology.

Update on Nystagmus and Other Ocular Oscillations

This review reports on recent advances in understanding nystagmus and other involuntary eye movements. Advances in quantitative evaluations of eye movements using oculography, computational model simulations, genetics, and imaging technologies have markedly improved our understanding of the pathophysiology of involuntary eye movements, as well as their diagnosis and management. Patient-initiated capture of eye movements, especially when paroxysmal, and the online transfer of these data to clinicians would further enhance the ability to diagnose involuntary eye movements.

How to do and why perform the skull vibration-induced nystagmus test

The skull vibration-induced nystagmus test (SVINT) is a global vestibular test stimulating otoliths and semicircular canals at a frequency of 100Hz, not modified by vestibular compensation, which may reveal vibration-induced nystagmus (VIN). Bone-conducted vibration applied to the mastoid processes and the vertex instantaneously induces predominantly low-velocity (∼10°/s) horizontal nystagmus, with rapid phases beating away from the affected side in patients with unilateral vestibular loss (UVL). VIN starts and stops immediately with stimulation, is continuous, reproducible, beats in the same direction irrespective of which mastoid process is stimulated, with no or little habituation. The SVINT acts like a vestibular Weber test. In peripheral UVL, the SVINT is a good marker of vestibular asymmetry and demonstrates pathological nystagmus beating towards the healthy side in 90% of cases of vestibular neuritis, 71% of cases of Menière's diseases and 44 to 78% of vestibular schwannomas. In superior semicircular canal dehiscence, VIN usually beats towards the affected side due to facilitation of bone conduction related to the presence of a third window. Stimulation of the vertex is more effective than in UVL patients, with sensitivity extending to higher frequencies, up to 700Hz. Observation of vibration-induced nystagmus then reveals equally represented vertical, torsional, and horizontal components beating towards the affected ear, suggesting dominant, but not exclusive, stimulation of the dehiscent superior semicircular canal.