Septorhinoplasty by disarticulation

Partial Release of Pyriform Ligament to Prevent Deformities on Keystone Area

The dorsal hump deformity is common among Western countries based on the nasal structure of Caucasians. Dorsal preservation techniques which leads keeping the keystone area intact can bring positive outcomes such as obtaining aesthetic dorsal lines and better functional results. The positions of soft tissue in the face are supported with a combination of static and dynamic ansatomy. The static support is maintained by ligaments and their associations. Among the ligaments, the pyriform ligament takes a particular role in terms of supporting the alar base, lower lateral cartilages, and nasal tip. In the present research, it was aimed to investigate the beneficial effects of releasing pyriform ligament partially in patients who received dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. The data of the patients who had dorsal rhinoplasty operations for hump deformity were screened retrospectively. A total of 139 patients were included according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and their records were assessed (112 females and 27 males). Twelve months after surgery, the median Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation score increased from 52.5 to 91.5 points ( P <0.001). Patient satisfaction was excellent in 86.95% of the included cases according to the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation score. The present study shows a new, suitable, and easy approach for releasing the pyriform ligaments partially and as well as also were left intact. It is suggested that manipulation of the pyriform ligament during push-down and let-down procedures seems to be essential for obtaining a better nasal tip as well as narrowing the nose base and getting better functional outcomes.

Advanced Preservation Rhinoplasty in the Era of Osteoplasty and Chondroplasty: How Have We Moved Beyond the Cottle Technique?

BACKGROUND

Over the last 10 years, many new papers on innovative strategies from different surgeons worldwide have elevated the philosophy of preservation rhinoplasty (PR) to a different level: advanced preservation rhinoplasty.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this article was to illustrate how 4 experienced surgeons approach important anatomical and functional issues related to PR.

METHODS

M.G.F., A.M.K., B.S., and D.M.T. were asked about how they approach classical problems and relative contraindications for dorsal PR with different modern advanced preservation rhinoplasty techniques.

RESULTS

The answers of each surgeon make clear a new reality in dorsal PR that did not exist in the recent past. These advances in dorsal PR techniques are due to many surgeons' contributions, leading this practice to a different level: advanced preservation rhinoplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

Dorsal preservation is making a dramatic resurgence and is fueled by the many very talented surgeons who are demonstrating outstanding outcomes with preservation techniques. The authors believe that this trend will continue, and a mutual collaboration between structuralists and preservationists going forward will continue to advance rhinoplasty as a specialty.

Critical review of diagnosis in rhinology and its therapeutical implications

Diagnosis in rhinology is currently based on the concept of inflammation (chronic rhinosinusitis [CRS]) or the clinical concept of chronic nasal dysfunction (CND). The complementarity between these two approaches can be discussed by a critical review of the literature structured by the analysis of the fundamental and diagnostic bases and the therapeutic implications linked to each. The concept of CRS is based on the anatomical continuity of the nasal and sinus respiratory mucosa and molecular biology data, seeking to analyze the mechanisms of chronic inflammation and to identify proteins and biomarkers involved in the different supposed endotypes of chronic inflammation of this mucosa. The concept of CND seeks to analyze medical, instrumental or surgical diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, taking account of both inflammatory and non-inflammatory causes impacting the anatomy or physiology of each of the three noses (olfactory, respiratory and sinus) that make up the mid-face sinonasal organ of evolution-development (Evo-Devo) theory. Thus, the concept of CRS offers an endotypic approach, based on biological characterization of mucosal inflammation, while the concept of CND offers a compartmentalized phenotypic and pathophysiological approach to sinonasal diseases. The joint contribution of these two concepts in characterizing nasal functional pathology could in future improve the medical service provided to patients.

Minimal clinically important differences on the DyNaChron questionnaire after surgery

OBJECTIVES

To determine minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for the DyNaChron chronic rhinosinusitis quality-of-life questionnaire.

INTRODUCTION

MCIDs are the smallest changes in a quality-of-life score that are of clinical relevance for the patient. They allow treatment benefit to be estimated. MCIDs have not previously been determined for DyNaChron.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective study analyzed DyNaChron questionnaires filled out between June 2016 and December 2021 by all patients consulting for chronic nasal dysfunction. Five hundred and thirteen of the 2390 patients were operated on for nasal polyposis (NP; n=282) or septo(rhino)plasty+inferior turbinoplasty (SPIT; n=231). Standard error of measurement was used to determine MCIDs.

RESULTS

MCID for DyNaChron global score was 60 in NP and 58 in SPIT. MCIDs per symptom domain in NP and SPIT respectively were: 15 and 13 for nasal obstruction, 21 and 21 for anterior rhinorrhea, 20 and 19 for posterior rhinorrhea, and 17 and 17 for olfaction. In agreement with global MCID, 257 NPs (91%) and 149 SPITs (65%) showed clinical improvement.

CONCLUSION

MCID helps assess response to treatment. In the DyNaChron questionnaire, MCIDs enable global and symptom-specific assessment of chronic nasal dysfunction and its impact on quality of life in a single patient or in groups.

The analgesic efficacy of ketamine for septorhinoplasty: a meta-analysis study

BACKGROUND

The analgesic efficacy of ketamine supplementation was not well-established for septorhinoplasty and this meta-analysis aimed to compare ketamine supplementation with placebo for the postoperative pain control of septorhinoplasty.

METHODS

We systematically searched several databases, including PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO and Cochrane library databases, and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the effect of ketamine supplementation versus placebo for pain control after septorhinoplasty. This meta-analysis was conducted by random effect model.

RESULTS

Five RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. In comparison with control group for septorhinoplasty, ketamine supplementation was associated with significantly decreased pain scores at 30 min (SMD = - 3.84; 95% CI = - 6.73 to - 0.96; P = 0.009), pain scores at 1 h (SMD = - 2.70; 95% CI = - 3.79 to - 1.61; P < 0.00001), pain scores at 2 h (SMD = - 1.83; 95% CI = - 3.01 to - 0.64; P = 0.003), rescue analgesics (OR = 0.08; 95% CI = 0.04 to 0.17; P < 0.00001), but unraveled no obvious impact on pain scores at 4 h (SMD = - 1.13; 95% CI = - 3.37 to 1.12; P = 0.32) or the incidence of nausea and vomiting (OR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.30 to 1.72; P = 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Ketamine supplementation was effective to improve pain relief after septorhinoplasty.