[Are parents present during invasive procedures? Assessment in 32 Spanish hospitals]

Accompaniment of minors during health care procedures

In clinical practice, it is not rare to encounter situations in which parents and families are asked to leave the child alone with the health care team in rooms full of devices throughout the performance of procedures, which at times may give rise not only to conflicts but, more importantly, emotional sequelae in children or adolescents. We conducted a narrative review of the literature by searching the digital library of the public health care system of Andalusia for articles concerning the experiences of health care professionals and families with the accompaniment of paediatric patients during health care procedures. We restricted the search to studies published in Spanish or English and conducted in humans. The review evinced the need to humanise care in order to improve care quality. The need to accompany minors is supported by the evidence from works that have analysed the factors involved in the persistence of these behaviours and attitudes in both professionals and parents. We consider it necessary to develop institutional policies and appoint mediators to compile the statements of different national and international societies, taking into account legal aspects but, above all, the pertinent values from a health care ethics perspective, and in pursuit of the best interests of the child.

[Presence of relatives during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Perspectives of health professionals, patients and family in the Basque Country]

Objetivo

Explorar la percepción acerca de la presencia de familiares durante la reanimación cardiopulmonar (RCP) en pacientes adultos, de los propios pacientes y familiares, enfermeras y médicos.

Diseño

Se desarrolló un estudio cualitativo exploratorio y un análisis temático.

Emplazamiento

Atención Primaria, Atención Hospitalaria y Servicio de Emergencias del Servicio Vasco de Salud.

Participantes

La selección de los participantes se realizó a través de muestreo intencional. Se desarrollaron 4 grupos de discusión: uno de pacientes y familiares, 2 de enfermeras y uno de médicos.

Método

Se realizó un análisis temático. Se utilizaron técnicas de triangulación entre investigadores e investigador-informante. Se utilizó el programa informático Open Code 4.1.

Resultados

Se identificaron 3 categorías significativas: impacto de la actuación en la familia; peso de la responsabilidad ética y legal; poder, lugar donde sucede la parada y supuestos culturales.

Conclusiones

La RCP es un constructo social influido por los valores de los contextos socioculturales específicos. En este estudio, los pacientes y familiares describieron temor y resistencia a presenciar la RCP. Por su parte, los profesionales sanitarios consideran que su decisión reviste complejidad, siendo necesario valorar cada caso de forma independiente e integrando a pacientes y familiares en la toma de decisiones. Como líneas de investigación futuras sería recomendable profundizar sobre la experiencia subjetiva de familiares que hayan presenciado la RCP y el impacto de los elementos contextuales y socioculturales en sus percepciones.

Family presence during resuscitation: A Canadian Critical Care Society position paper

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence suggests that patient outcomes are not affected by the offering of family presence during resuscitation (FPDR), and that psychological outcomes are neutral or improved in family members of adult patients. The exclusion of family members from the resuscitation area should, therefore, be reassessed.

OBJECTIVE

The present Canadian Critical Care Society position paper is designed to help clinicians and institutions decide whether to incorporate FPDR as part of their routine clinical practice, and to offer strategies to implement FPDR successfully.

METHODS

The authors conducted a literature search of the perspectives of health care providers, patients and families on the topic of FPDR, and considered the relevant ethical values of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy and justice in light of the clinical evidence for FPDR. They reviewed randomized controlled trials and observational studies of FPDR to determine strategies that have been used to screen family members, select appropriate chaperones and educate staff.

RESULTS

FPDR is an ethically sound practice in Canada, and may be considered for the families of adult and pediatric patients in the hospital setting. Hospitals that choose to implement FPDR should develop transparent policies regarding which family members are to be offered the opportunity to be present during the resuscitation. Experienced chaperones should accompany and support family members in the resuscitation area. Intensive educational interventions and increasing experience with FPDR are associated with increased support for the practice from health care providers.

CONCLUSIONS

FPDR should be considered to be an important component of patient and family-centred care.

[Has the presence of parents during invasive procedures in the emergency department increased in the last few years?]

INTRODUCTION

In the recent years, parents are playing an important role in Pediatric Emergency Department (PED), and wish to be present when invasive procedures (IP) are performed.

OBJECTIVES

1) To compare the presence of parents during IP in PED in Spain between 2008 and 2012. 2) To compare the arguments to restrict the presence and problems arising from this, and 3) To determine whether the views of health personnel have changed on this subject.

METHODOLOGY

A descriptive multicenter comparative study was conducted in 2008 and 2012. A total of 42 questionaires were sent by email to PED managers, with the responding hospitals being included in the 2 periods of the study.

RESULTS

A total of 22 hospitals participated in the study. The presence of parents in the PED increased between 2008 and 2012 for all IP, significantly in the blood test and urine catheterization. In 2012, managers state that children are not so nervous, and anxiety of the parents and staff fear of a poorer performance, as an argument to restrict family presence. There were few problems during the 2 periods, with the poor behavior of the children decreasing. According to managers, the opinion of health personnel has not changed in the last four years.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of parents during the IP in the PED has increased in the last four years, although the presence is low for more invasive procedures. Managers argue the presence of fewer behavior problems to restrict family presence. The opinion of the staff has not changed in the last four years, although more studies are required on this issue.

[Do paediatricians perform lumbar puncture correctly? Review of recommendations and analysis the technique in Spain]

INTRODUCTION

Lumbar puncture (LP) is a commonly performed procedure in paediatrics. Performing this technique properly can avoid the most common associated complications.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether paediatricians and paediatric residents in Spain follow current recommendations for the LP technique.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted by sending a questionnaire by mail through the Spanish Society of Paediatric Emergencies, collecting demographic information and responses to multiple choice questions about LP technique.

RESULTS

A total of 206 questionnaires were analysed, of which 143 (69.5%) were answered by paediatricians, and 63 (30.5%) by paediatric residents. The majority (128; 62.1%) of physicians did not allow parents to be present during LP, 198 (96.1%) routinely use analgesia and sedation; 84 (42%) only used local anaesthesia. The majority of respondents used standard Quincke needles (126; 62.7%). The bevel was correctly positioned when puncturing the dura mater by 22 residents (36.1%) and 21 paediatricians (15.1%), a variation that was statistically significant (P=.001). For neonatal lumbar punctures, 63 paediatricians (46%) and 19 paediatric residents used a butterfly needle which did not contain a stylet, and this difference was also statistically significant (P=.035). Of those surveyed, 190 (92.2%) re-inserted the stylet when re-orientating the needle, and 186 (93%) re-oriented this when removing it. The recommendation of bed rest was made by 195 (94.7%) physicians.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of paediatricians orient the bevel wrongly when inserting the needle during LP, and still use "butterfly" needles in newborns, despite warnings to the contrary. Paediatric residents and less experienced paediatricians follow the recommendations more frequently.

[Presence of family members while performing invasive procedures. A prospective study]

INTRODUCTION

Family members of child patients have traditionally not been allowed to be present during invasive procedures.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the level of satisfaction of family members, healthcare professionals, and the patients themselves, when family members are present during invasive procedures carried out in the pediatric emergency department.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective observational study was carried out, which included a questionnaire containing demographic information, the details of the procedure, and the level of satisfaction of the patient, their family members, and the healthcare professionals present.

RESULTS

Data was obtained from 75 procedures. In 5 of these, family members chose not to be present during the procedure. The most frequent procedures were lumbar punctures (44%), laceration repairs (22,7%) and venopunctures (17,3%). All (100%) the children who were asked wanted their family members to be present. 90% of family members and 57% of healthcare professionals were of the opinion that the presence of family members facilitated the procedure. Furthermore, 90% of family members and 76% of healthcare professionals thought that family presence was beneficial to the patient. 95% of family members and 71% of healthcare professionals thought that the option to be present during invasive procedures should be given to family members. 73% of healthcare professionals were satisfied with the presence of family members. On a scale of one to ten, overall satisfaction of family members was 9.5.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, family presence during invasive procedures is possible, and we have found this to be beneficial to the child. We also found that both family members and healthcare professionals were accepting and also satisfied with this new practice policy.