1
|
Milési C, Baudin F, Durand P, Emeriaud G, Essouri S, Pouyau R, Baleine J, Beldjilali S, Bordessoule A, Breinig S, Demaret P, Desprez P, Gaillard-Leroux B, Guichoux J, Guilbert AS, Guillot C, Jean S, Levy M, Noizet-Yverneau O, Rambaud J, Recher M, Reynaud S, Valla F, Radoui K, Faure MA, Ferraro G, Mortamet G. Clinical practice guidelines: management of severe bronchiolitis in infants under 12 months old admitted to a pediatric critical care unit. Intensive Care Med 2023; 49:5-25. [PMID: 36592200 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06918-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We present guidelines for the management of infants under 12 months of age with severe bronchiolitis with the aim of creating a series of pragmatic recommendations for a patient subgroup that is poorly individualized in national and international guidelines. METHODS Twenty-five French-speaking experts, all members of the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgence Pédiatriques (French-speaking group of paediatric intensive and emergency care; GFRUP) (Algeria, Belgium, Canada, France, Switzerland), collaborated from 2021 to 2022 through teleconferences and face-to-face meetings. The guidelines cover five areas: (1) criteria for admission to a pediatric critical care unit, (2) environment and monitoring, (3) feeding and hydration, (4) ventilatory support and (5) adjuvant therapies. The questions were written in the Patient-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome (PICO) format. An extensive Anglophone and Francophone literature search indexed in the MEDLINE database via PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and Embase was performed using pre-established keywords. The texts were analyzed and classified according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. When this method did not apply, an expert opinion was given. Each of these recommendations was voted on by all the experts according to the Delphi methodology. RESULTS This group proposes 40 recommendations. The GRADE methodology could be applied for 17 of them (3 strong, 14 conditional) and an expert opinion was given for the remaining 23. All received strong approval during the first round of voting. CONCLUSION These guidelines cover the different aspects in the management of severe bronchiolitis in infants admitted to pediatric critical care units. Compared to the different ways to manage patients with severe bronchiolitis described in the literature, our original work proposes an overall less invasive approach in terms of monitoring and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Milési
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
| | - Florent Baudin
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Lyon Hospital Femme-Mère-Enfants, Bron, France
| | - Philippe Durand
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Guillaume Emeriaud
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Sainte-Justine University Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Sandrine Essouri
- Pediatric Department, Sainte-Justine University Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Robin Pouyau
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Lyon Hospital Femme-Mère-Enfants, Bron, France
| | - Julien Baleine
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Sophie Beldjilali
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, La Timone University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Alice Bordessoule
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sophie Breinig
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Pierre Demaret
- Intensive Care Unit, Liège University Hospital, Liège, Belgium
| | - Philippe Desprez
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Point-à-Pitre University Hospital, Point-à-Pitre, France
| | | | - Julie Guichoux
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Guilbert
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Camille Guillot
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Sandrine Jean
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Trousseau Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Michael Levy
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Robert Debré Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Jérôme Rambaud
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Trousseau Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Recher
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Stéphanie Reynaud
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Lyon Hospital Femme-Mère-Enfants, Bron, France
| | - Fréderic Valla
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Lyon Hospital Femme-Mère-Enfants, Bron, France
| | - Karim Radoui
- Pneumology EHS Pediatric Department, Faculté de Médecine d'Oran, Canastel, Oran, Algeria
| | | | - Guillaume Ferraro
- Pediatric Emergency Department, Nice University Hospital, Nice, France
| | - Guillaume Mortamet
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kuitunen I, Kiviranta P, Sankilampi U, Salmi H, Renko M. Helium-oxygen in bronchiolitis-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Pulmonol 2022; 57:1380-1391. [PMID: 35297227 PMCID: PMC9313870 DOI: 10.1002/ppul.25895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Bronchiolitis is common reason for infant hospitalization. The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate helium-oxygen (heliox) in bronchiolitis. METHODS We screened 463 studies, assessed 22 of them, and included six randomized controlled trials. Primary outcomes were the need for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or intubation, hospitalization duration, and change in the modified Woods Clinical Asthma Scale (M-WCAS). We calculated mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS Six studies (five double- and one single-blinded) with 560 infants were included. The risk of bias was high in one, moderate in four, and low in one. The RR for the need for CPAP (three studies) was 0.87 (CI: 0.56-1.35), and for intubation (four studies) was 1.39 (CI: 0.53-3.63), heliox compared to air-oxygen. The hospital stay (four studies) was 0.25 days longer (CI: -0.22 to 0.71) in the heliox group. The mean decrease in M-WCAS from the baseline (three studies) was 1.90 points (CI: 1.46-2.34) greater in the heliox group. CONCLUSION We found low-quality evidence that heliox does not reduce the need for CPAP, intubation, or length of hospitalization for bronchiolitis. Based on the M-WCAS scores, heliox seems to relieve respiratory distress symptoms rapidly after its initiation. The included studies had high heterogeneity in their methods and included relatively mild cases of bronchiolitis. A larger randomized controlled trial with more severe cases of bronchiolitis with enough power to analyze the need for intubation is needed in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilari Kuitunen
- Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Department of Pediatrics, Mikkeli Central Hospital, Mikkeli, Finland
| | - Panu Kiviranta
- Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Department of Pediatrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Ulla Sankilampi
- Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Department of Pediatrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Heli Salmi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Marjo Renko
- Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Department of Pediatrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baša M, Sovtić A. Treatment of the most common respiratory infections in children. ARHIV ZA FARMACIJU 2022. [DOI: 10.5937/arhfarm72-37857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute respiratory infections are the most common group of infective diseases in the pediatric population. Although the improvement of health care and vaccination program has led to a significant reduction in the incidence of certain respiratory infections, the combination of a high prevalence in vulnerable pediatric categories and uncritical prescription of antibiotics, due to the inability to adequately distinguish between viruses and bacterial etiology, still represents a significant challenge for the public health system. In order to promote rational antibiotic therapy with an overall improvement of both diagnostic and therapeutic principles, acute respiratory diseases have been the subject of consideration in numerous publications and national guidelines. Nonspecific clinical manifestations with pathogen heterogeneity and both anatomical and physiological characteristics of the child's respiratory system during growth and development have created the need for individualized therapy. Since the guidelines emphasize the undoubtful and crucial benefits of symptomatic therapy (e.g. analgesics in acute otitis media, supplemental oxygen in lower respiratory tract infections with hypoxemia), the use of antibiotics and corticosteroids is indicated in selected cases with a severe clinical picture. The choice of antibiotic depends on the clinical condition, presumed causative agent, and local epidemiologic circumstances. Respiratory support (oxygen therapy and/or artificial ventilation) is reserved for inpatient treatment of cases with a particularly severe clinical picture and associated complications.
Collapse
|
4
|
LOCATE: a prospective evaluation of the value of Leveraging Ongoing Citation Acquisition Techniques for living Evidence syntheses. Syst Rev 2021; 10:116. [PMID: 33875014 PMCID: PMC8056603 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01665-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Living systematic reviews (LSRs) can expedite evidence synthesis by incorporating new evidence in real time. However, the methods needed to identify new studies in a timely manner are not well established. OBJECTIVES To explore the value of complementary search approaches in terms of search performance, impact on results and conclusions, screening workload, and feasibility compared to the reference standard. METHODS We developed three complementary search approaches for a systematic review on treatments for bronchiolitis: Automated Full Search, PubMed Similar Articles, and Scopus Citing References. These were automated to retrieve results monthly; pairs of reviewers screened the records and commented on feasibility. After 1 year, we conducted a full update search (reference standard). For each complementary approach, we compared search performance (proportion missed, number needed to read [NNR]) and reviewer workload (number of records screened, time required) to the reference standard. We investigated the impact of the new trials on the effect estimate and certainty of evidence for the primary outcomes. We summarized comments about feasibility. RESULTS Via the reference standard, reviewers screened 505 titles/abstracts, 24 full texts, and identified four new trials (NNR 127; 12.4 h). Of the complementary approaches, only the Automated Full Search located all four trials; these were located 6 to 12 months sooner than via the reference standard but did not alter the results nor certainty in the evidence. The Automated Full Search was the most resource-intensive approach (816 records screened; NNR 204; 17.1 h). The PubMed Similar Articles and Scopus Citing References approaches located far fewer records (452 and 244, respectively), thereby requiring less screening time (9.4 and 5.2 h); however, each approach located only one of the four new trials. Reviewers found it feasible and convenient to conduct monthly screening for searches of this yield (median 15-65 records/month). CONCLUSIONS The Automated Full Search was the most resource-intensive approach, but also the only to locate all of the newly published trials. Although the monthly screening time for the PubMed Similar Articles and Scopus Citing Articles was far less, most relevant records were missed. These approaches were feasible to integrate into reviewer work processes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6M28H .
Collapse
|