Cancer du sein diagnostiqué par la réduction mammaire. Étude rétrospective sur une période de trois ans

Occult Breast Carcinoma Is More Common in Women Undergoing Breast Reduction after Contralateral Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Occult breast carcinoma is occasionally found in breast reduction specimens. Although its incidence varies widely, there is a trend toward an increased incidence for women with a history of breast cancer. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of occult carcinoma incidence in breast reduction specimens.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies with no language restrictions for studies that recorded the incidence of occult carcinoma in breast reduction specimens. Cancer incidence per specimen was pooled for women with and without a history of breast cancer.

RESULTS

Forty-two studies were eligible for inclusion, of which 29 were quantitatively analyzed. The pooled incidence of carcinoma was higher within specimens from women with breast cancer (3.4 percent; 95 percent CI, 2.2 to 5.3 percent) than without (0.6 percent; 95 percent CI, 0.4 to 0.8 percent), and this increased likelihood was significant when populations were compared directly (OR, 6.02; 95 percent CI, 3.06 to 11.86; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with a history of breast cancer have an increased incidence of occult breast carcinoma within their breast reduction specimens compared with women with no breast cancer history. There is a need for preoperative radiology screening, counseling, and histopathology guidelines to ensure adequate diagnosis and management of these women.

Preoperative imaging prior to breast reconstruction surgery: benchmarking bringing together radiologists and plastic surgeons. Proposed guidelines

BACKGROUND

Prescription of preoperatory imaging assessment prior to planned breast reconstruction surgery (reduction or augmentation mastoplasty, correction of congenital breast asymmetry) is poorly codified. The objective of this study was to analyze the attitudes of French radiologists and plastic surgeons with regard to prescription of preoperative imaging in the framework of non-oncologic breast surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a descriptive and comparative observational study involving two groups, one consisting of 50 plastic surgeons (P) and the other of 50 radiologists (R) specialized in breast imaging. A questionnaire was handed out to radiologists during a conference on breast imaging at the Institut Gustave-Roussy in Paris (France) held on 17th December 2012. The same questionnaire was handed out to plastic surgeons at the National Congress of the French Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (SOFCPRE) held on 19th, 20th and 21st November 2012, also in Paris (France). The questionnaire focused on prescription of preoperative and postoperative imaging evaluation for non-oncologic breast surgery in patients with no risk factors for breast cancer or clinically identified indications.

RESULTS

Forty-six percent of the plastic surgeons considered an imaging exam to be recent when it had been carried out over the previous 6 months, while 40% of the radiologists set the figure at 1 year. Clinical breast density exerted no influence on 92% of the plastic surgeons and 98% of the radiologists. A majority of the plastic surgeons would prescribe a preoperative exam regardless of age (57% for breast reduction, 61% for breast implant placement and 61% for surgical correction of asymmetry) while the radiologists would prescribe exams mainly for patients over 40 years (50% for reduction, 44% for augmentation, 49% for asymmetry correction). The plastic surgeons would prescribe either ultrasound or mammograms (59% for reduction, 72% for augmentation, 66% for asymmetry correction) while radiologists would usually prescribe mammograms (64%, 57%, 64%). Most of the radiologists, along with the plastic surgeons, did not think that postoperative examination is justified (58% of P and 62% of R for reduction, 56% P and 68% of R for augmentation, 52% of P and 64% of R for asymmetry correction).

CONCLUSION

In 2012, there existed no French consensus on prescription of a preoperative imaging assessment in the framework of non-oncologic breast surgery in patients without risk factors for breast cancer. Active cooperation bringing together radiologists and plastic surgeons is likely to facilitate the harmonizing of their respective practices. In this paper, we propose guidelines that could help them to synchronize their efforts.

Incidence of occult contralateral carcinomas of the breast following mastoplasty aimed at symmetrization

INTRODUCTION

Breast carcinomas are the most frequent form of cancer in French women. Following a total mastectomy, only an estimated 25% of patients wish to undergo breast reconstruction. After mammary volume reconstitution, the plastic surgeon often attempts to harmonize the two breasts by carrying out contralateral reduction mammaplasty (CRM). In the literature, the incidence of occult contralateral carcinomas incidentally discovered in surgical specimens ranges from 1.12 to 4.5%. The main objective of this study was to evaluate occurrence of carcinoma in the CRM specimens in the framework of a breast reconstruction operation. The secondary objective was to determine the consequences of the incidentally discovered carcinoma in the contralateral breast.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a 6-year, bicentric, retrospective study involving women having undergone breast cancer surgery who later underwent contralateral reduction mammaplasty (CRM), that is to say reconstruction aimed at harmonization of the two breasts.

RESULTS

Three hundred and nineteen patients were included in the study. Mean age during the CRM was 55years (29-79). Mean weight of the surgical specimens was 323grams (12-2500). Incidence of occult carcinomas found in the specimens was 0.94% (3 patients). The mean age for these 3 cases was 58years (47-64). All 3 patients had superior pedicle mammaplasty. One of the patients benefited from monobloc resection with orientation of the surgical specimen. In the other 2 cases, there existed 3 surgical resection specimens; in one case, they were oriented; in the other, they were not. In all 3 cases, the histological findings were unifocal ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS). Mean tumor size was 5.7mm (3-9). Only the patient having had monobloc resection with orientation of the specimen underwent salvage surgery, which consisted in partial mastectomy, otherwise known as secondary lumpectomy. Adjuvant radiotherapy was administered to all of the patients. After 17months of mean follow-up (12-22), no recurrence was found in any of the three cases.

CONCLUSION

Incidence of occult contralateral breast carcinomas after symmetrization CRM approximates 1%. Our observations are in agreement with the data in the literature. Incidence is greater than in mammaplasty carried out for esthetic or functional reasons; this is probably due to the higher age and the previous breast cancer history of the breast reconstruction population. Monobloc resection and orientation of the surgical specimens with surgeon's knots facilitate precise pinpointing of the occult carcinoma. A secondary lumpectomy may take place when margins of excision are invaded or inadequate.

[Occult primary MALT lymphoma of the breast diagnosed and treated by reduction mammaplasty. An exceptional case report and review of the literature]

Primary Mucosa-associated Lymphoid Tissue (MALT) lymphoma of the breast is a very rare disease. We report here a case of occult primary MALT lymphoma of the breast diagnosed from a mammaplasty specimen. Primary tumor resection during the mammaplasty surgery was the only treatment of this lymphoma, and there was no recurrence at five years. The clinical and radiologic presentation of primary MALT lymphoma of the breast is similar to epithelial breast carcinoma, and the main diagnostic criteria are microscopic examination and immunohistochemistry. The prognosis of breast primary MALT lymphomas is good after local treatment by surgery and/or radiotherapy, and surgery shouldn't be too aggressive. In this case, no other treatment was indicated after the first surgical procedure. To our knowledge, this is the first case report in the literature of occult primary MALT lymphoma of the breast diagnosed from a mammaplasty specimen. This allows us to highlight the need for systematic microscopic examination of mammaplasty specimens conducted by an experienced pathologist, especially as preoperative examinations are not able to detect all occult breast carcinomas.

[Discovered of breast cancer in adolescent during the plastic surgery: a case report]

Authors report the case of a ductal carcinoma diagnosed after a reduction mammaplasty in a 16 years old female. The pre-operative mammography was normal. The histologic diagnosis was made on the specimen. The specificity and efficiency of pre-operative radiology are discussed in plastic surgery in young patients.