Vérification peropératoire de la vascularisation d’un lambeau perforant par angiographie au vert d’indocyanine

Correlation between Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography and Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging in a Flap Model

Background

Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) is used to assess tissue intraoperatively in reconstructive surgery. This requires an intra-venous dye injection for each assessment. This is not necessary in laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI); therefore, this method may be better suited for tissue evaluation. To determine this, we compared the two methods in a porcine flap model.

Methods

One random and one pedicled flap were raised on each buttock of six animals. They were assessed with LSCI at baseline, when raised (T0), at 30 minutes (T30) and with ICG-FA at T0 and T30. Regions of interest (ROI) were chosen along the flap axis. Perfusion, measured as perfusion units (PU) in the LSCI assessment and pixel-intensity for the ICG-FA video uptake, was calculated in the ROI. Correlation was calculated between PU and pixel-intensity measured as time to peak (TTP) and area under curve for 60 seconds (AUC60).

Results

Correlation between LSCI and AUC60 for the ICG-FA in corresponding ROI could be seen in all flaps at all time points. The correlation was higher for T0 (r=0.7 for random flap and r=0.6 for pedicled flap) than for T30 (r=0.57 for random flap and r=0.59 for pedicled flap). Even higher correlation could be seen PU and TTP (T0: random flap r=-0.8 and pedicled flap r=0.76. T30: random flap r=-0.8 and pedicled flap r=0.71).

Conclusion

There is a correlation between PU from LSCI and TTP and AUC60 for ICG-FA, indicating that LSCI could be considered for intraoperative tissue assessment.

Use of Perforator-Based Fasciocutaneous Flaps for Pressure Sore Reconstruction: Single-Perforator-Based Versus Multiple-Perforator-Based Flaps

BACKGROUND

A perforator-based fasciocutaneous flap is an alternative type of flap for pressure sore reconstruction. The aim of the present study was to determine whether a single-perforator-based flap or a multiple-perforator-based flap is better for pressure sore reconstruction.

METHODS

We reviewed the general data and postoperative complications in patients who received single-perforator-based or multiple-perforator-based fasciocutaneous flaps for pressure sore reconstruction between July 2009 and July 2012.

RESULTS

No differences in general data, comorbidities, wound locations, flap sizes (73.9 vs. 67.0 cm(2), P = 0.455), and operative times were noted between the single-perforator-based and multiple-perforator-based flap groups. The flap rotation arc was larger in the single-perforator-based flap group than in the multiple-perforator-based flap group; however, the difference in the rotation arc was not significant (99.2° vs. 55.5°, respectively; P = 0.199). Two patients had total flap necrosis and one had partial flap necrosis in the single-perforator-based flap group. None of flap necrosis was noted in the multiple-perforator-based flap group; however, no significant differences in major complications were noted between the two groups. All donor sites underwent primary closure.

CONCLUSION

This is the first clinical patient-matched research that considered the number of perforators and the rotation arc in applying perforator-based fasciocutaneous flaps in wound reconstruction. The results showed that the number of perforators is not the determinant factor of surgical outcome of the use of perforator-based fasciocutaneous flaps in pressure sore reconstruction. Thus, whether a single- or a multiple-perforator-based fasciocutaneous flap is used for flap perfusion does not jeopardize the operation. These results emphasize the reliability and convenience of using freestyle design of perforator-based flaps for pressure sore reconstruction. The design and clinical utility of the flaps have the advantage of being versatile.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

[Evaluation of green indocyanine interest compared to Technetium in sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer]

INTRODUCTION

Axillary sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy by using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence for breast cancer is a recent technique. However, compared to Technetium-99m (Tc), which is the reference technique, its efficiency has received little testing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between December 2013 and January 2014, 40 patients with node-negative breast cancer underwent SN biopsy by injecting sub areolar Tc in preoperative stage and injecting sub areolar ICG in intraoperative stage. SN were previously identified and resected by using ICG coupled with infrared camera. After resection of fluorescent SN, we check its radioactivity with a gamma probe (isotopic method). In case of residual radioactive labeling in the axillary crease, we remove the remaining SN. We have retrospectively analyzed the SN detection concordance rates of these two methods.

RESULTS

In total we resected 53 SN, among which 48 (90.6%) were indocyanine green positive and 53 (100%) Tc positive. The remaining 5 SN were all ICG negative and Tc positive. Using ICG has not caused any side effect.

CONCLUSION

SN detection for breast cancer by using ICG fluorescence is a promising, reliable technique which nonetheless requires a degree of expertise before reaching similar results as the Tc technique.

[Harvesting technique of chimeric multiple paddles fibular flap for wide oromandibular defects]

Carcinological head and neck reconstruction still remains a challenge due to the volume and varied tissues needed. Large and wide oromandibular defects require, not just the bone but also soft tissues for the pelvilingual reconstruction and therefore, a second free flap may become necessary in addition to a fibular flap. The option of an unique chimeric flap based on the fibular artery and its branches is less known whereas it offers the advantage of a unique flap with bone, muscle and multiple skin paddles, independent of each other. The aim of this technical note is to present step by step the surgical procedure of this chimeric flap and share this method that avoids a second free flap.