Fasciotomies percutanées en complément des transferts graisseux : indications en chirurgie du sein

Breast reconstruction through exclusive lipomodeling or in addition to a flap: Current status in Franche-Comté

INTRODUCTION

Breast reconstruction after cancer surgery through lipomodeling can be performed alone or in combination with a flap. Our objective is to describe the proportion of techniques used on patients who underwent autologous reconstructive surgery after tumorectomy or mastectomy in Franche-Comté.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A bicentric retrospective observational study was conducted between October 2017 and December 2021 (NCT06101732), including three groups: those who underwent exclusive lipomodeling reconstruction after mastectomy (1) or in addition to a flap (2), and those who underwent exclusive lipomodeling reconstruction after tumorectomy (3). Socio-demographic, medical, and surgical data were collected and recorded in a specially designed software.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-one lipomodeling procedures were performed on 91 patients. In group 1, the average transferred volume was 1191mL with an average number of sessions of 4.4 spreads over 19.4months. In group 2, the average transferred volume was 676mL with an average operative time of 2.5 spread over 16.1months. In group 3, the average transferred volume was 223mL with an average number of sessions of 1.5 spreads over 6.2months. Regarding postoperative complications, 11% had cysts of fat necrosis, 4.4% had infections, and 2.2% had hematomas.

CONCLUSION

Lipomodeling is a technique that has clearly established itself in the field of breast reconstructive surgery. It results in a few complications and improves the final aesthetic outcome whether used exclusively or in addition to a flap.

[Lipomodeling for congenital breast deformities: Technique, results and indications]

Congenital breast deformities usually occur during adolescence and can disturb the self-development and affect the identity during this crucial stage. Several surgical techniques are now available to correct these different anomalies. The objective is to clarify the place of lipomodeling in thoraco-mammary malformations, resuming the different indications, the results, as well as the limits and potential complications. The adipose tissue was harvested by soft aspiration as to reduce adipocyte trauma and using a syringe fitted with a 3.5mm cannula. After centrifugation, fat was reinjected retrogradely and by making thin cylinders of fat similar to "spaghetti". Moderate to severe asymmetry is one of the best indications for lipomodeling using one or two sessions. Thus, a perfect and lasting symmetry is achieved, without the need of an implant, which would inevitably leads to asymmetry because of a dissimilar evolution of the breast all over the time. In Becker's nevus syndrome, lipomodeling has also been performant in bluring the hyperpigmentation of the nevus. The role of lipomodeling in pectus excavatum deformity (antero-posterior sternocostal depression) is also crucial. Lipomodeling can be used alone, or in combination with a rigid customed silicone implant. Tuberous breasts include various anomalies. Lipomodeling is currently used especially when the anomaly is unilateral (2 fat graft sessions are usually needed). Fasciotomies are frequently performed too. Lipomodeling is a real revolution in the management of Poland syndrome (anomaly characterized by the unilateral lack of the pectoralis major muscle, more or less associated with other ipsilateral anomalies). On average, 3 to 5 sessions are necessary to obtain a suitable symmetry. Lipomodeling is very unlikely to cause major surgical complications. Cytosteatonecrosis nodules mainly occur with novice practitioner and decrease as they become more experienced. However, the principle of the three-dimensional network, and the phenomenon of tissue saturation of the recipient site should be respected. The main limitation of lipomodeling is directly related to the amount of fat available. That's why it is very important to evaluate it during the first clinical consultation, and to carefully select the patients eligible in order to limit the risk of failure. Lipomodeling of congenital breast anomalies is a technique well established, with a precise algorithm to follow, and is a procedure with low surgical risk, less scarring, cosmetic and lasting results. This technique is to be suggested as a first line treatment in all indications of congenital breast deformities, alone or combined to an implant. Therefore, it seems essential that a plastic surgeon fully master the indications and the use of fat tissue transfer procedure, in order to obtain natural and harmonious results.

The Preparation of the Recipient Site in Fat Grafting: A Comprehensive Review of the Preclinical Evidence

BACKGROUND

Several methods to prepare the recipient site in fat grafting have been proposed in recent decades. However, to date, these procedures have never been reviewed exhaustively. The purpose of the present study is to provide a comprehensive overview of the different techniques to prepare the recipient site for fat grafting as they were investigated in preclinical studies, with resulting outcomes and underlying mechanisms of action.

METHODS

The PubMed/MEDLINE database was queried to search for preclinical investigations on the preparation of the recipient site in fat grafting using the following algorithm: ((recipient site) AND (fat grafting) OR (lipofilling) OR (lipograft)). A priori criteria were applied to review the resulting articles.

RESULTS

Thirteen animal studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, five techniques were identified: external volume expansion, implantation of alloplastic material (silicone sheets), administration of cell-proliferation factors (i.e., vascular endothelial growth factor, adipose tissue-derived stromal vascular fraction, and interleukin-8), ischemia, and microneedling. A positive effect on cellular activity (cell proliferation and angiogenesis) was demonstrated by all studies and achieved with all techniques. Seven of the eight authors who examined this aspect reported enhancement of fat graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvement of fat grafting surgical outcomes is documented preclinically using different recipient-site preparation techniques, particularly through enhancement of vascularization and soft-tissue expansion. This understanding will lead to further clinical research, especially for those cases where improvement of the recipient site is recommended, such as contracted scars or preirradiated tissues.

[Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Case report of an undiagnosed form, management and reconstruction (ALCL)]

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is an extremely rare disease. Is a new nosologic entity with a multifactorial origin and a wide occurrence delay after breast implantation. This article reports the case of a 60 years old patient with a progressive swelling of the right breast after aesthetic breast implants. Diagnostic was delayed because first surgeon was not familiar with the disease. Patient was then referred to us for management. We performed an implant removal and a complete capsulectomy. Pathologic report confirms the diagnostic. After one year and normal ultrasound evaluation, we reconstructed the breast with lipomodeling and mastopexy. Contralateral implant was also removed at time of reconstruction. Vast majority of breast implant-associated ALCL occurs at a time lapse of 11 to 15 years after implant augmentation, with a mean age of 63 years. Among the worldwide 173 cases reported in March 2015, smooth implants seem not to be at risk but 80% of cases were associated with macrotexturized implants. Clinical presentation and diagnostic tools are more and more published but there is to date no recommendation concerning reconstruction delay after implant removal for this pathology. We advise the realization of a breast ultrasound every three months during the first year and wait for a one-year period before reconstruction. In case of aesthetic surgery, mastopexia can be done to allow for glandular shaping. Lipomodeling is an excellent technique to correct the lack of volume due to implant removal. In case of reconstructive setting, implant can be replaced by flap procedure with lipomodeling if needed or lipomodeling alone if recipient site is favorable and patient has enough fat tissue. Contralateral implant should be removed during reconstruction time.

Lipofilling, an efficient solution for breast sequelae after cardiothoracic surgery

Evolutions in pediatric cardiovascular surgery have allowed the treatment of a various range of cardiovascular malformations in infants. It is a difficult branch of surgery, with vital impact, which can also leave residual thoracic scars, possible sources for thoracomammary deformities in adults. Most thoracomammary deformities after thoracotomy are observed at puberty, when they appear as breast asymmetries. The main cause is the breast bud injured during thoracotomy. Several techniques have been suggested for breast reconstruction, but none give satisfying results. We have been practicing lipofilling since 1998 for breast reconstruction. Since 2001, we have started applying it to breast deformities. The final result is constant in time, natural, and has a good volume filler effect. We describe the fat grafting technique, an original technique, as a solution for this kind of deformities. The technique is illustrated by two clinical cases. In conclusion, fat grafting has really improved breast asymmetry due to iatrogenic deformation. Even if those cases are rare, surgeons have to know this kind of procedure. It is indeed a simple and efficient solution for those patients after childhood, with natural and long standing results.

Volumetric evaluation of fat resorption after breast lipofilling

INTRODUCTION

The fat transfer or the lipofilling is a technique that had a major impact on the breast surgery results. We have been using this technique since 1998 as an adjuvant in breast reconstruction. The transferred fat is partially resorbed in the first three months after fat grafting. Literature shows that fat resorption varies from 30 to 80% and the experimental studies register a variation between 50 and 90%. The difficulty of the lipomodeling consists in anticipating the fat resorption rate in order to obtain breast symmetry. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the resorption rate of the transferred fat in the reconstructed breast by means of volumetric imaging 3 months after fat grafting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective study was undertaken including breast reconstructions with total autologous latissimus dorsi. All the surgical procedures have been done by the same surgeon (1st author). It focused on the second stage of breast reconstruction: the lipofilling. We registered the average harvested volumes, the volumes obtained after centrifugation and the transferred volumes for every reconstructed breast. The intramuscular volume in the reconstructed breast was measured by volumetric imaging on the third day after lipofilling (D3) and three months after lipofilling (M3). The volumetry was performed by using an after treatment console SIEMENS (SOMATOM definition AS 2*64 barettes). The average intramuscular volume was registered at D3 and M3. The average volume difference was calculated in order to obtain the exact resorption rate.

RESULTS

This prospective study was undertaken on 32 reconstructed breasts by total autologous latissimus dorsi flap. The average age was 52 years, the average BMI was 24.7 kg/m(2). The average harvested fat volume for the breast lipofilling was 560 cc and the volume obtained after centrifugation was evaluated at about 371 cc, the average fat volume transferred being 291 cc. The volumetric study showed that intramuscular volume at D3 was measured at 284 cc and at M3 about 223 cc, of a resorption intramuscular rate of 21.5%.

CONCLUSION

In our study, the rate of resorption of the fat transferred to the muscle in the reconstructed breast was measured at 21.5%. The low resorption rate found in our study, lower than those in the literature, sustains the supposition that the muscle is an excellent receiving matrix for the fat tissue. In order to obtain this percentage, a learning curve is necessary. Once acquired, this technique produces a major improvement of the breast surgery results.

[Fat grafting to improve severe tuberous breast]

INTRODUCTION

Tuberous breast is a rare malformation that has major, negative physical and psychological impacts during puberty. A range of surgical techniques has been used to correct breast shape and volume in this context. Most techniques are based on a combination of skin plasty and mammary gland remodelling, in order to redistribute volumes. Prostheses and local-regional flaps can also be used to correct the missing volume. Fat grafting to the breast has been used in our department since 1998 as a complementary technique in breast reconstruction; it constitutes a natural way of providing volume and modifying the shape of the breast. Since 2000, we have extended this lipomodelling technique to the correction of thorax malformations in general and tuberous breasts in particular. Here, we describe our experience of the correction of severe tuberous breasts by fat grafting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Over an 11-year period, we performed a retrospective study on tuberous breast patients treated solely with fat grafting (i.e. without using an implant). Each breast deformation was graded according to the Grolleau classification. After aspiration, the fat was centrifuged and then transferred with a specific cannula. Using an 18-G trocar, we sometimes also performed fasioctomies to free up fibrous bridges and mammary gland remodelling. We evaluated the lipofilling for each case (number of sessions and mean fat transfer volume). Technical efficacy was evaluated in terms of patient's satisfaction and the surgeon's opinion. Safety was evaluated by screening for recipient site complications.

RESULTS

We performed a retrospective study of 31 cases of tuberous breasts treated between January 2000 and December 2010. The severe tuberous breasts were type 3 in 10 cases. The mean patient age was 21 and the mean body mass index was 21.5. Two session (mean transfer volume: 380 cc) were required in every case. The mean follow-up period after the last fat transfer session was 6 years (range: 1-11). The patients were very satisfied in 90% of cases (n=9) and satisfied in 10% of cases (n=1). No complications were observed. Imaging performed before surgery and one year afterwards did not reveal any anomalies, other than oil cysts.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of severe tuberous breast with fat grafting is a reliable technique that produces excellent results and high levels of patient satisfaction. The aesthetic outcome is natural, implant-free and long-lasting. Fat grafting decreases local fibrosis and helps (along with fasciotomies and mammary gland remodelling) modify the shape of the breast. The technique corrects the missing volume in a precise, personalized manner. Lipomodelling efficacy and absence of complications have made it our reference treatment for the correction of severe tuberous breasts (as long as the patient has sufficient adipose reserves).