[Patient-reported outcome of their breast reconstruction after mastectomy]

[Damage repair in breast cancer has to evolve]

Breast damage is likely to result in compensation according to the principle of full compensation. However, breast damage, little covered in the scales usually used, requires a specific methodology. The quantification of functional prejudice must be done with regard to the age of the victim and must take into account the possible repercussions on mobility (shoulder and/or spine) as well as the psychological repercussions. Whether or not the nipple and areola are preserved should be described. Temporary aesthetic damage (before breast reconstruction) must be assessed on the basis of objective elements, its duration and quantification on a scale of 0 to 7. Permanent aesthetic damage takes into account scars, deformities, amputations and quality of the prosthesis. A new scale for evaluating permanent aesthetic damage is proposed. Sexual prejudice must take into account an impairment of the pleasure related to sexuality and its erotic function, in line with the concept of sexual health. However, even after reconstruction, the areas of quality of sexual life and sexual satisfaction often remain affected. An exploration using standardized questions from validated questionnaires such as BREAST-Q can be useful. The sequelae linked to the damage on a breast can also lead the woman to limit certain pleasure activities, in particular because of psychological discomfort or even be the cause of a loss of opportunity to carry out a family's life plan.

[Secondary surgery of breast reconstructions by breast implant. Assessment of patient satisfaction based on surgical technique implant conservation vs. autologous conversion]

INTRODUCTION

Breast reconstruction with implants has long-term disadvantages and is leading an increasing number of patients to request secondary corrective surgery. Two surgical strategies are possible: implant replacement (associated with capsulectomy/capsulotomy and/or lipofilling procedures) and implant removal associated with the provision of autologous tissue (flap and/or lipofilling).

METHOD

Between 2010 and 2018, 54 patients underwent secondary surgery for correction of a first implant breast reconstruction. The reasons for dissatisfaction with the initial reconstruction, the procedures performed, and postoperative complications were analysed. Patient well-being and satisfaction were evaluated using the BREAST-Q questionnaire.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients benefited from a prosthesis change and 20 patients benefited from a permanent removal of their prosthesis combined with the addition of autologous tissue. The presence of a periprosthetic shell, pain, fixed appearance of the breast and breast asymmetry were the most frequent reasons for dissatisfaction. With a mean follow-up of 2.6 years, autologous conversion patients were generally more satisfied with the appearance of their breasts than patients who retained a breast implant (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In cases of poor esthetic or functional outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction, removal of the prosthesis in combination with autologous reconstruction provides better results in terms of well-being and satisfaction than implant replacement.

[Oncoplasty by the Thorek technique for lower quadrant cancers in a condition of gigantomastia]

OBJECTIVE

Describe our experience of Oncoplasty according to Thorek in gigantomastia with hard and less plastic breasts and a major ptosis.

METHODOLOGY

Thirteen cases of breast carcinoma on gigantomastia operated using the Thorek technique between 2014 and 2019 in Burkina Faso were analyzed retrospectively. The operative indications, technique and results were considered. Breast Q was used to assess patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

The indication of oncoplasty by the Thorek's technique was breast lower quadrants carcinoma, associated with a major ptosis, gigantomastia. There was a consequence on the spine in 9 over 13 cases. The breasts were hard and less plastic, making the other breast reduction techniques difficult. This technique helped remove the carcinoma, reduce the volume of the breast and address the ptosis. The patients were satisfied with the volume of the remaining breasts and their aesthetic look. The resection margins were safe. Two cases of aerolar dyschromia were noticed.

CONCLUSION

The Thorek technique remains an alternative concerning tumours on gigantomastia, with hard and less plastic breasts and a major ptosis. The results combine carcinological and aesthetic requirements.

[Current situation of breast reconstruction after breast cancer in Reunion Island]

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to describe the current trends of breast reconstruction (BR) and breast oncoplasty (BO) for breast cancer patients in Reunion Island.

METHODS

This is a multicenter retrospective descriptive study of all BR and BO surgeries in 2016. We studied the first stage of BR that corresponds to the choice of surgical technique. Patient's age, care center, technique and duration of surgery, complications and their risk factors were reviewed. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the modified BREAST-Q^©.

RESULTS

In 2016, BR rate over total mastectomy was 47.6% and BO rate was 6.3% over partial mastectomy. Among the 92 patients included, 25 immediate BR were performed (84% in private institution) and 44 delayed BR (67% in public hospital). Although prosthetic techniques were the most used, satisfaction seems to be better with autologous techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

The ratio of BR is high in Reunion Island with a wide range of techniques but uneven practice. Conversely, BO's ratio is low and improvement is needed.

Adipose regeneration and implications for breast reconstruction: update and the future

The evolution of breast reconstruction and management of breast cancer has evolved significantly since the earliest descriptions in the Edwin Smith Papyrus (3,000 BC). The development of surgical and scientific expertise has changed the way that women are managed, and plastic surgeons are now able to offer a wide range of reconstructive options to suit individual needs. Beyond the gold standard autologous flap based reconstructions, regenerative therapies promise the elimination of donor site morbidity whilst providing equivalent aesthetic and functional outcomes. Future research aims to address questions regarding ideal cell source, optimisation of scaffold composition and interaction of de novo adipose tissue in the microenvironment of breast cancer.