Lopinavir/ritonavir vs. indinavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral naive HIV-infected patients: immunovirological outcome and side effects

A review of medications used to control and improve the signs and symptoms of COVID-19 patients

In December 2019, an unprecedented outbreak of pneumonia associated with a novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged in Wuhan City, Hubei province, China. The virus that caused the disease was officially named by the World Health Organization (WHO) as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). According to the high transmission rate of SARS-CoV-2, it became a global pandemic and public health emergency within few months. Since SARS-CoV-2 is genetically 80% homologous with the SARS-CoVs family, it is hypothesized that medications developed for the treatment of SARS-CoVs may be useful in the control and management of SARS-CoV-2. In this regard, some medication being tested in clinical trials and in vitro studies include anti-viral RNA polymerase inhibitors, HIV-protease inhibitors, anti-inflammatory agents, angiotensin converting enzyme type 2 (ACE 2) blockers, and some other novel medications. In this communication, we reviewed the general characteristics of medications, medical usage, mechanism of action, as well as SARS-CoV-2 related trials.

Resveratrol protects against protease inhibitor-induced reactive oxygen species production, reticulum stress and lipid raft perturbation

OBJECTIVE

HIV protease inhibitors have been successfully used in highly active antiretroviral therapy of HIV-1 infection, but their benefits are compromised by a number of clinically important adverse side-effects. Several studies showed that protease inhibitors induce sarco/endoplasmic reticulum stress and overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), but the hierarchy of these events was never established in protease inhibitor-treated cells. Our objective was to determine whether ROS production and sarco/endoplasmic reticulum stress were co-induced by protease inhibitors in human primary skeletal myotubes and whether antioxidant treatment with resveratrol could protect against protease inhibitor-induced cellular damages.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We analyzed in cultures of primary human skeletal myotubes the effects of four protease inhibitors (atazanavir, lopinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir) on ROS production (by measuring the reduction of nitro blue tetrazolium and by fluorescence microscopy using CM-H2DCFDA), on sarco/endoplasmic reticulum stress induction (by immunofluorescence and electron microscopy) and on the expression and localization at lipid rafts of Caveolin 3 and Flotillin 1, two major components of lipid rafts (by immunoblotting and biochemical experiments). Cells were co-incubated with resveratrol to assess its protective effects.

RESULTS

In myotubes, protease inhibitors increased ROS production, altered sarco/endoplasmic reticulum morphology, increased expression of C/EBP homologous protein, a sarco/endoplasmic reticulum stress marker, and decreased expression and localization at lipid rafts of Caveolin 3 and Flotillin 1. Importantly, these deleterious protease inhibitor effects were inhibited by the antioxidant resveratrol.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate a protective effect of resveratrol against protease inhibitor-induced sarco/endoplasmic reticulum stress in human myotubes.

Formulation preference, tolerability and quality of life assessment following a switch from lopinavir/ritonavir soft gel capsule to tablet in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

BACKGROUND

Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) tablet compared to the soft gel capsule (SGC) formulation has no oleic acid or sorbitol, has no refrigeration or food-restriction requirements, and has less pharmacokinetic variability. We compared the tolerability, quality of life (QoL), and formulation preference after switching from LPV/r SGC to the tablet formulation.

METHODS

In a prospective, single-arm, cohort study-design, 74 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected subjects stable on LPV/r-based therapy were enrolled prior to (n = 25) or 8 weeks (n = 49) after switching from SGC to tablet. Baseline data included clinical laboratory tests, bowel habit survey (BHS) and QoL questionnaire (recalled if enrolled post-switch). Global Condition Improvement (GCI)-score, BHS-score, QoL-score, and formulation preference data were captured at weeks 4 and 12.

RESULTS

At week 12 post-enrollment; the tablet was preferred to the SGC (74% vs. 10%, p < 0.0001). GCI-overall-tolerability score was 2.46 +/- 3.30 on a scale of -7 to +7, with 90% admitting to feeling better or about the same. Stool frequency, consistency, volume, and +/- blood improved, however the improvement was significant in "consistency" only (p = 0.03). Aggregate Bowel Habit-Profile improved (BHS-score change = -0.227, p = 0.01). Inverse relationship existed between GCI and BHS (slope = -1.2, p = 0.02) at week-4, suggesting that improved overall-tolerability was related to better gastrointestinal (GI)-tolerance. QoL-scores were stable. Mean reductions in total cholesterol of 9.20 mg/dL (p = 0.02), in triglycerides of 33 mg/dL (p = 0.04), and in HDL of 4.50 mg/dL (p = 0.01) unrelated to lipid-lowering therapy, were observed at week 12.

CONCLUSIONS

LPV/r-tablet was well tolerated and preferred to the SGC in HIV infected subjects, with stable QoL and appreciable improvement in GI-tolerability. The unexpected changes in lipid profile deserve further evaluation.

Regimen-dependent variations in adherence to therapy and virological suppression in patients initiating protease inhibitor-based highly active antiretroviral therapy

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences among four protease inhibitor (PI)-based drug regimens in adherence to therapy and rate of achievement of virological suppression in a cohort of antiretroviral-naive patients initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).

METHODS

Participants were antiretroviral-naive and were first dispensed combination therapy containing two nucleosides and a ritonavir (RTV)-boosted PI, or unboosted nelfinavir, between 1 January 2000 and 30 September 2003. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine associations between the prescribed PI and other baseline factors associated with being >90% adherent to therapy and then to determine the associations of prescribed drug regimen, adherence to therapy and baseline variables with the odds of achieving two consecutive viral loads of <500 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL. RESULTS A total of 385 subjects were available for analysis. Lopinavir (LPV)/RTV was prescribed for 168 patients (42% of total); 86 (22%) received indinavir (IDV)/RTV; 91 (24%) received nelfinavir (NFV) and 40 (10%) received saquinavir (SQV)/RTV. SQV/RTV-based HAART was associated with reduced adherence to therapy [odds ratio (OR)=0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19-0.83]. In multivariate models, IDV/RTV (OR=0.45; 95% CI 0.22-0.92), SQV/RTV (OR=0.18; 95% CI 0.07-0.43) and NFV were associated with reduced odds of achieving virological suppression within 1 year in comparison to LPV/RTV-based therapy. For patients receiving NFV, adjusting for adherence (OR=0.73; 95% CI 0.36-1.47) rendered this association nonsignificant.

CONCLUSION

Patients prescribed IDV/RTV, NFV or SQV/RTV were less likely to achieve virological suppression on their first regimen compared with patients prescribed LPV/RTV. Reduced adherence to these therapies only partly explained these observed differences.

Ritonavir-Boosted Protease Inhibitors: Impact of Ritonavir on Toxicities in Treatment-Experienced Patients

The purpose of this review is to discuss the basis for ritonavir boosting of protease inhibitors as well as the complications and benefits associated with ritonavir boosting when designing an antiretroviral regimen for treatment-experienced patients. Such patients have fewer viable options because of cross-resistance arising from previous regimen failures. Ritonavir administered at a low dose to boost another protease inhibitor may be a useful strategy for achieving virological efficacy while minimizing the toxicities associated with full-dose ritonavir. There may be an increased risk of adverse events associated with increased plasma concentration of the concurrent protease inhibitor. Still, the incidence of these adverse events is generally low, and clinical trials have suggested that they rarely result in discontinuation or alteration of the regimen. In highly treatment-experienced patients in particular, the potential benefits associated with ritonavir boosting usually outweigh the risks.

Hepatotoxicity and antiretroviral therapy with protease inhibitors: A review

Highly active antiretroviral therapy including protease inhibitors has led to dramatic decrease in the morbidity and mortality resulting from infection with human immunodeficiency virus-1. However, this combination regimen can be associated with the occurrence of serious toxicities, which may reduce patient compliance. In particular, human immunodeficiency virus-1 protease inhibitors and nevirapine among nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, have the potential for producing hepatotoxicity. We summarise current knowledge of the hepatotoxic effects associated with the commercially available human immunodeficiency virus-1 protease inhibitors based on a literature review of the major retrospective and prospective clinical studies designed to elucidate risk factors for developing hepatotoxicity among human immunodeficiency virus-1-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy containing protease inhibitors. Coinfection with chronic hepatitis, a common occurrence in human immunodeficiency virus-1-infected patients, is identified as an independent risk factor for developing hepatotoxicity in antiretroviral-treated human immunodeficiency virus-1-infected patients treated with antiretroviral regimens containing protease inhibitors. The importance of other risk factors for developing protease inhibitor-associated hepatotoxicity and the mechanism underlying the drug-related hepatotoxicity are discussed. The data indicate that the potential for producing hepatotoxicity is variable among the protease inhibitors and suggest that based on differences in drug-related hepatotoxicity, certain protease inhibitors may be preferred for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus-hepatitis C virus coinfected patients.

Metabolic Abnormalities Associated with the Use of Protease Inhibitors and Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

The use of protease inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors for the treatment of HIV infection and AIDS has been associated with multiple abnormalities in glucose and lipid metabolism. Specifically, these abnormalities include insulin resistance, increased triglycerides and increased LDL cholesterol levels. The metabolic disturbances are due to a combination of factors, including the direct effect of medications, restoration to health and HIV disease, as well as individual genetic predisposition. Of the available anti-retroviral medications, indinavir has been associated with causing the most insulin resistance and ritonavir with causing the most hypertriglyceridemia.

Predictive factors of lopinavir/ritonavir discontinuation for drug-related toxicity: results from a cohort of 416 multi-experienced HIV-infected individuals

The objective of this study was to find predictive factors of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) discontinuation for drug-related toxicities in highly pre-treated human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected subjects. The study was an observational study of HIV patients starting LPV/r with HIV RNA > 3log10 copies/mL and a follow-up > or = 6 months. Parameters studied were HIV RNA, CD4+ cell counts, metabolic parameters and drug-related adverse events. Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) events and deaths were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) model was used to estimate time-dependent probability, and the multivariable Cox model to identify predictors of LPV/r discontinuation for adverse events. The study evaluated 416 HIV-infected patients. Seventy-seven patients (18.5%) discontinued LPV/r for toxicities. Adverse events leading to LPV/r discontinuation were gastrointestinal symptoms in 40 cases, hyperlipidaemia in 27 and increase of aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in 10 patients. Nineteen patients (4.6%) developed an AIDS event during observation and 15 (3.6%) died. The KM probability of LPV/r discontinuation for toxicities was 5.3% (range 3.1-7.5%) at month 12 and 15.7% (range 12.1-19.3%) at month 24. Subjects with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-HIV co-infection (odds ratio (OR) 7.40; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.73-14.66 versus HCV-negative; P = 0.001) and receiving LPV/r plus nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and protease inhibitor (PI)/non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.04-2.91 versus LPV/r plus only NRTIs; P = 0.04) showed a higher risk of LPV/r discontinuation by a Cox analysis, whereas non-intravenous drug abusers (IVDUs) (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.24-0.67 versus IVDUs; P = 0.001) had a lower risk. The rate of discontinuation for toxicity decreased by 17% for each additional month of LPV/r exposure (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.80-0.86 for each additional month; P < 0.001). LPV/r was substantially well tolerated. Diarrhoea was the most frequent adverse event leading to discontinuation. HCV-HIV co-infected patients and patients with a short exposure to LPV/r have a higher risk of discontinuing LPV/r and should be strictly monitored.

Lipid Profiles for Antiretroviral-Naive Patients Starting Pi- and Nnrti-Based Therapy in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study

Background

Blood lipid abnormalities in patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) have been associated with exposure to protease inhibitors (PIs), particularly ritonavir. First therapy with a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) leads to relatively favourable lipid profiles. We report on medium-term lipid profiles (up to 5 years) for antiretroviral-naive patients starting NNRTI- and PI-based HAART in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study.

Methods

Since April 2000, blood samples taken at visits scheduled every 6 months have been analysed for cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations. For 1065 antiretroviral-naive patients starting HAART after April 2000, we estimated changes in concentration over time using multivariate linear regression with adjustment for baseline covariates, use of lipid-lowering drugs and whether the sample was taken in a fasting state.

Results

Non-high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels increase with increasing exposure to either PI- or NNRTI-based therapy, HDL cholesterol levels increase and triglyceride levels decrease with increasing exposure to NNRTI-based therapy, whereas triglyceride levels increase with increasing exposure to PI-based therapy. Between NNRTI-based therapies, there is a slight difference in triglyceride levels, which tend to increase with increasing exposure to efavirenz and to decrease with increasing exposure to nevirapine. Of the three common PI-based therapies, nelfinavir appears to have a relatively favourable lipid profile, with little change with increasing exposure. Of the other two PI therapies, lopinavir with ritonavir has a more favourable profile than indinavir with ritonavir, with smaller increases in both non-HDL cholesterol and triglycerides and an increase in HDL cholesterol. Increasing exposure to abacavir is associated with a decrease in the level of triglycerides.

Conclusion

In general, NNRTI-based therapy is associated with a more favourable lipid profile than PI-based therapy, but different PI-based therapies are associated with very different lipid profiles. Nelfinavir appears to have a relatively favourable lipid profile. Of the two boosted PI therapies, lopinavir appears to have a more favourable lipid profile than indinavir.

HIV protease inhibitors activate the unfolded protein response in macrophages: implication for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors have been successfully used in highly active antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infection. Treatment of patients infected with HIV with HIV protease inhibitors is unfortunately associated with a number of clinically significant metabolic abnormalities and an increased risk of premature atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction. However, the cellular/molecular mechanisms of the HIV protease inhibitor-induced lipid dysregulation and atherosclerosis remain elusive. Macrophages are the most prominent cell type present in atherosclerotic lesions and play essential roles in both early lesion development and late lesion complications. In this study, we demonstrate that three different HIV protease inhibitors (ritonavir, indinavir, and atazanavir) induce endoplasmic reticulum stress and activate the unfolded protein response in mouse macrophages. Furthermore, at therapeutic concentrations (5-15 microM), these HIV protease inhibitors were found to increase the levels of transcriptionally active sterol regulatory element binding proteins, decrease endogenous cholesterol esterification, cause the accumulation of free cholesterol in intracellular membranes, deplete endoplasmic reticulum calcium stores, activate caspase-12, and increase apoptosis in macrophages. These findings provide possible cellular mechanisms by which HIV protease inhibitors promote atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease in HIV-1 infected patients treated with HIV protease inhibitors.

Hepatotoxicity and nelfinavir: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The inclusion of protease inhibitors in 3-drug highly active antiretroviral regimens for treating patients who are infected with human immunodeficiency virus-1 has had a significant impact in increasing survival and decreasing morbidity. However, the effectiveness of this class of drugs may be compromised by the occurrence of drug-related hepatotoxicity, which is problematic especially in individuals co-infected with hepatitis viruses. Based on its clinical and pharmacologic profile, especially its unique pattern of resistance, nelfinavir has been used frequently as a first-line protease-inhibitor therapy for human immunodeficiency virus-1-infected patients. The aim of this study was to identify the relative potential for developing hepatotoxicity for nelfinavir vs other protease inhibitors.

METHODS

An exploratory meta-analysis of liver enzyme level increases was conducted in a combined total of 4268 patients derived from 3 large recently conducted prospective and retrospective clinical trials and a prospective cohort study.

RESULTS

The results indicate that among 4 commercially available protease inhibitors and a 2-protease inhibitor combination, nelfinavir and indinavir are associated with the lowest rates of occurrence of severe hepatotoxicity (ie, combined estimates of liver enzyme level increases of 2.9% and 3.1%, respectively). The low rate of occurrence of severe hepatotoxicity for nelfinavir was shown even among patients co-infected with hepatitis viruses.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, these data provide support for the conclusion that differences in the potential for hepatotoxicity do exist among the commercially available protease inhibitors.

Use of lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected patients failing a first-line protease-inhibitor-containing HAART

OBJECTIVES

The long-term virological efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in HIV-infected patients failing a first-line protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen is still unclear.

METHODS

An observational study was carried out from December 2000-December 2002 on 111 consecutive patients starting lopinavir/ritonavir. The primary end-point was virological success (HIV RNA <50 copies/mL in two consecutive determinations). CD4 outcome, lipid levels and adverse events were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate the time-dependent probability of reaching the end-point using intention-to-treat and on-treatment approaches.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients obtained virological success during follow-up; Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the time-dependent probability of obtaining this end-point was 78.4% at month 12 and 85.8% at month 24. The median CD4+cell count increased by 118 cells/mm(3) from baseline to month 12 and by 153 cells/mm(3) to month 24. Thirty-one patients discontinued lopinavir/ritonavir: 16 because of drug-related toxicities, six for simplification, five because of virological failure, one patient was lost at follow-up and three died. An elevation in lipid parameters was observed, but only a minority of patients developed a grade 3 or higher hypertriglyceridaemia and/or hypercholesterolaemia. Among the 15 patients not reaching virological success, five had < or =5 mutations in the protease region known to reduce susceptibility to lopinavir/ritonavir (one discontinued lopinavir/ritonavir because of gastrointestinal intolerance), five had no mutations (two discontinued lopinavir/ritonavir because of gastrointestinal intolerance) and five showed > or =6 mutations (all discontinued lopinavir/ritonavir); however, of the patients who discontinued lopinavir/ritonavir none achieved HIV RNA <50 copies/mL on subsequent regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Lopinavir/ritonavir was highly effective and well tolerated in HIV-infected patients failing a first-line PI-based HAART.