Anti-retroviral drugs do not facilitate hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in vitro

CCR5 receptor antagonism inhibits hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication in vitro

Background and aim

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a single-strand RNA virus that infects millions of people worldwide. Recent advances in therapy have led to viral cure using two- and three- drug combinations of direct acting inhibitors of viral replication. CCR5 is a chemokine receptor that is expressed on hepatocytes and represents a key co-receptor for HIV. We evaluated the effect of CCR5 blockade or knockdown on HCV replication in Huh7.5_JFH1 cells.

Methods

Cells were exposed to varying concentrations of maraviroc (CCR5 inhibitor), cenicriviroc (CCR2/CCR5 inhibitor), sofosbuvir (nucleotide polymerase inhibitor), or raltegravir (HIV integrase inhibitor).

Results

HCV RNA was detected utilizing two qualitative strand-specific RT-PCR assays. HCV core antigen and NS3 protein was quantified in the supernatant and cell lysate, respectively. siRNA was utilized to knockdown CCR5 gene expression in hepatocytes. Alternatively, anti-CCR5 antibodies were employed to block the receptor. Supernatant levels of HCV RNA (expressed as fold change) were not reduced in the presence of raltegravir but were reduced 8.55-fold and 12.42-fold with cenicriviroc and maraviroc, respectively. Sofosbuvir resulted in a 16.20-fold change in HCV RNA levels. HCV core and NS3 protein production was also reduced in a dose-dependent manner. Two distinct anti-CCR5 antibodies also resulted in a significant reduction in HCV protein expression, as did siRNA knockdown of CCR5 gene expression.

Conclusions

These data provide evidence that CCR5 modulation could have a significant effect on HCV replication in an in vitro system. Further evaluation of the role of CCR5 inhibition in clinical settings may be warranted.

HCV very late relapse following an atypical viral kinetics in a HIV patient treated for hepatitis C with direct-acting antivirals

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for the treatment of HCV have dramatically increased the rate of sustained virological response: patients not achieving sustained virological response represent a challenge and rates of late recurrent viremia are very low. We describe here the first case of a very late HCV relapse, following an atypical kinetics (characterized by a spontaneous but transient HCV clearance after an early virological relapse), in a HIV co-infected patient treated with DAAs. Optimal adherence to the therapy was well documented and a phylogenetic analysis ruled out a possible reinfection from a different HCV strain. In conclusion, our case underlines the importance of a long follow-up (> 48 weeks) after DAAs therapies in HCV-HIV co-infected patients who might benefit the most from a very rigorous virological surveillance.