1
|
Telli FD, Hidalgo JMP, Varón A, Castro L, Tapia NC, Piñero F. Key points for imaging diagnosis and response assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma in Latin America. Ann Hepatol 2024; 29:101514. [PMID: 38944462 DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2024.101514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Diaz Telli
- Department of Radiology, Austral University Hospital, Austral University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Adriana Varón
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, La Cardio Hospital, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Lorena Castro
- Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Clinca Los Andes, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Norberto Chavez Tapia
- Gastroenterology, Translational Department, Research and Ethical Committee, Medica Sur Clinic & Foundation, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Federico Piñero
- Hepatology and Liver Transplant Unit, Austral University Hospital, Austral University, Buenos Aires, Argentina..
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Piñero F, Mauro E, Casciato P, Forner A. From evidence to clinical practice: Bridging the gap of new liver cancer therapies in Latin America. Ann Hepatol 2024; 29:101185. [PMID: 38042481 DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2023.101185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
The most common primary liver tumors are hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. They constitute the sixth most common neoplasia and the third cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Although both tumors may share etiologic factors, diagnosis, prognostic factors, and treatments, they differ substantially in determining distinctive clinical management. In recent years, significant advances have been made in the management of these neoplasms, particularly in advanced stages. In this review, we focus on the most relevant diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment aspects of both, hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma, underlying their applicability in Latin America.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Piñero
- Hospital Universitario Austral, Austral University, School of Medicine, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Ezequiel Mauro
- Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) group. IDIBAPS. Barcelona. Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Spain; Liver Unit. Liver Oncology Unit. ICMDM. Hospital Clinic Barcelona. Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Alejandro Forner
- Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) group. IDIBAPS. Barcelona. Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Spain; Liver Unit. Liver Oncology Unit. ICMDM. Hospital Clinic Barcelona. Barcelona, Spain; University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dioguardi Burgio M, Garzelli L, Cannella R, Ronot M, Vilgrain V. Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Optimal Radiological Evaluation before Liver Transplantation. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:2267. [PMID: 38137868 PMCID: PMC10744421 DOI: 10.3390/life13122267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) is the recommended curative-intent treatment for patients with early or intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are ineligible for resection. Imaging plays a central role in staging and for selecting the best LT candidates. This review will discuss recent developments in pre-LT imaging assessment, in particular LT eligibility criteria on imaging, the technical requirements and the diagnostic performance of imaging for the pre-LT diagnosis of HCC including the recent Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) criteria, the evaluation of the response to locoregional therapy, as well as the non-invasive prediction of HCC aggressiveness and its impact on the outcome of LT. We will also briefly discuss the role of nuclear medicine in the pre-LT evaluation and the emerging role of artificial intelligence models in patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Dioguardi Burgio
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP. Nord, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France (V.V.)
- Centre de Recherche sur l’Inflammation, UMR1149, Université Paris Cité, 75018 Paris, France
| | - Lorenzo Garzelli
- Service d’Imagerie Medicale, Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne, Avenue des Flamboyants, Cayenne 97306, French Guiana
| | - Roberto Cannella
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University Hospital “Paolo Giaccone”, Via del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Maxime Ronot
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP. Nord, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France (V.V.)
- Centre de Recherche sur l’Inflammation, UMR1149, Université Paris Cité, 75018 Paris, France
| | - Valérie Vilgrain
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP. Nord, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France (V.V.)
- Centre de Recherche sur l’Inflammation, UMR1149, Université Paris Cité, 75018 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wei H, Yang T, Chen J, Duan T, Jiang H, Song B. Prognostic implications of CT/MRI LI-RADS in hepatocellular carcinoma: State of the art and future directions. Liver Int 2022; 42:2131-2144. [PMID: 35808845 DOI: 10.1111/liv.15362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth most lethal malignancy with an increasing incidence worldwide. Management of HCC has followed several clinical staging systems that rely on tumour morphologic characteristics and clinical variables. However, these algorithms are unlikely to profile the full landscape of tumour aggressiveness and allow accurate prognosis stratification. Noninvasive imaging biomarkers on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exhibit a promising prospect to refine the prognostication of HCC. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing the terminology, techniques, interpretation, reporting and data collection of liver imaging. At present, it has been widely accepted as an effective diagnostic system for HCC in at-risk patients. Emerging data have provided new insights into the potential of CT/MRI LI-RADS in HCC prognostication, which may help refine the prognostic paradigm of HCC that promises to direct individualized management and improve patient outcomes. Therefore, this review aims to summarize several prognostic imaging features at CT/MRI for patients with HCC; the available evidence regarding the use of LI-RDAS for evaluation of tumour biology and clinical outcomes, pitfalls of current literature, and future directions for LI-RADS in the management of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Wei
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ting Yang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ting Duan
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hanyu Jiang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Bin Song
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ilmer M, Guba MO. Liver Transplant Oncology: Towards Dynamic Tumor-Biology-Oriented Patient Selection. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112662. [PMID: 35681642 PMCID: PMC9179475 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
While liver transplantation was initially considered as a curative treatment modality only for hepatocellular carcinoma, the indication has been increasingly extended to other tumor entities over recent years, most recently to the treatment of non-resectable colorectal liver metastases. Although oncologic outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) are consistently good, organ shortage forces stringent selection of suitable candidates. Dynamic criteria based on tumor biology fulfill the prerequisite of an individual oncological prediction better than traditional morphometric criteria based on tumor burden. The availability of specific (neo-)adjuvant therapies and customized modern immunosuppression may further contribute to favorable post-transplantation outcomes on the one hand and simultaneously open the path to LT as a curative option for advanced stages of tumor patients. Herein, we provide an overview of the oncological LT indications, the selection process, and expected oncological outcome after LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Ilmer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Hospital of the University of Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany;
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Transplantation Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Campus Grosshadern, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Liver Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Markus Otto Guba
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Hospital of the University of Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany;
- Transplantation Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Campus Grosshadern, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Liver Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Singh R, Wilson MP, Manolea F, Ahmed B, Fung C, Receveur D, Low G. Diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader reliability of the MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (version 2018) risk stratification and management system. SA J Radiol 2022; 26:2386. [PMID: 35747784 PMCID: PMC9210145 DOI: 10.4102/sajr.v26i1.2386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed non-invasively, provided certain imaging criteria are met. However, the recent Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 has not been widely validated. Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and reader reliability of the LI-RADS version 2018 lexicon amongst fellowship trained radiologists compared with an expert consensus reference standard. Method This retrospective study was conducted between 2018 and 2020. A total of 50 contrast enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies evaluating focal liver observations in patients with cirrhosis, hepatitis B virus (HBV) or prior HCC were acquired. The standard of reference was a consensus review by three fellowship-trained radiologists. Diagnostic accuracy including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV) and area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated per LI-RADS category for each reader. Kappa statistics were used to measure reader agreement. Results Readers demonstrated excellent specificities (88% – 100%) and NPVs (85% – 100%) across all LI-RADS categories. Sensitivities were variable, ranging from 67% to 83% for LI-RADS 1, 29% to 43% for LI-RADS 2, 100% for LI-RADS 3, 70% to 80% for LI-RADS 4 and 80% to 84% for LI-RADS 5. Readers showed excellent accuracy for differentiating benign and malignant liver lesions with AUC values > 0.90. Overall inter-reader agreement was ‘good’ (kappa = 0.76, p < 0.001). Pairwise inter-reader agreement was ‘very good’ (kappa ≥ 0.90, p < 0.001). Conclusion The LI-RADS version 2018 demonstrates excellent specificity, NPV and AUC values for risk stratification of liver observations by radiologists. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System can reliably differentiate benign from malignant lesions when used in conjunction with corresponding LI-RADS management recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjit Singh
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Mitchell P. Wilson
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Florin Manolea
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Bilal Ahmed
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Christopher Fung
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Darryn Receveur
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Gavin Low
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang H, Guo D, Liu H, He X, Qiao X, Liu X, Liu Y, Zhou J, Zhou Z, Liu X, Fang Z. MRI-Based Radiomics Models to Discriminate Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Non-Hepatocellular Carcinoma in LR-M According to LI-RADS Version 2018. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12051043. [PMID: 35626199 PMCID: PMC9139717 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from other primary liver malignancies in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) M (LR-M) tumours noninvasively is critical for patient treatment options, but visual evaluation based on medical images is a very challenging task. This study aimed to evaluate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) models based on radiomics features could further improve the ability to classify LR-M tumour subtypes. A total of 102 liver tumours were defined as LR-M by two radiologists based on LI-RADS and were confirmed to be HCC (n = 31) and non-HCC (n = 71) by surgery. A radiomics signature was constructed based on reproducible features using the max-relevance and min-redundancy (mRMR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression algorithms with tenfold cross-validation. Logistic regression modelling was applied to establish different models based on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), arterial phase (AP), portal vein phase (PVP), and combined models. These models were verified independently in the validation cohort. The area under the curve (AUC) of the models based on T2WI, AP, PVP, T2WI + AP, T2WI + PVP, AP + PVP, and T2WI + AP + PVP were 0.768, 0.838, 0.778, 0.880, 0.818, 0.832, and 0.884, respectively. The combined model based on T2WI + AP + PVP showed the best performance in the training cohort and validation cohort. The discrimination efficiency of each radiomics model was significantly better than that of junior radiologists’ visual assessment (p < 0.05; Delong). Therefore, the MRI-based radiomics models had a good ability to discriminate between HCC and non-HCC in LR-M tumours, providing more options to improve the accuracy of LI-RADS classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haiping Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China; (H.Z.); (D.G.); (X.H.); (X.Q.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (J.Z.); (Z.Z.); (X.L.)
| | - Dajing Guo
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China; (H.Z.); (D.G.); (X.H.); (X.Q.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (J.Z.); (Z.Z.); (X.L.)
| | - Huan Liu
- GE Healthcare, Shanghai 201203, China;
| | - Xiaojing He
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China; (H.Z.); (D.G.); (X.H.); (X.Q.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (J.Z.); (Z.Z.); (X.L.)
| | - Xiaofeng Qiao
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China; (H.Z.); (D.G.); (X.H.); (X.Q.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (J.Z.); (Z.Z.); (X.L.)
| | - Xinjie Liu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China; (H.Z.); (D.G.); (X.H.); (X.Q.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (J.Z.); (Z.Z.); (X.L.)
| | - Yangyang Liu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China; (H.Z.); (D.G.); (X.H.); (X.Q.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (J.Z.); (Z.Z.); (X.L.)
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China; (H.Z.); (D.G.); (X.H.); (X.Q.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (J.Z.); (Z.Z.); (X.L.)
| | - Zhiming Zhou
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China; (H.Z.); (D.G.); (X.H.); (X.Q.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (J.Z.); (Z.Z.); (X.L.)
| | - Xi Liu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China; (H.Z.); (D.G.); (X.H.); (X.Q.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (J.Z.); (Z.Z.); (X.L.)
| | - Zheng Fang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China; (H.Z.); (D.G.); (X.H.); (X.Q.); (X.L.); (Y.L.); (J.Z.); (Z.Z.); (X.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +86-23-63693238
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Centonze L, De Carlis R, Vella I, Carbonaro L, Incarbone N, Palmieri L, Sgrazzutti C, Ficarelli A, Valsecchi MG, Dello Iacono U, Lauterio A, Bernasconi D, Vanzulli A, De Carlis L. From LI-RADS Classification to HCC Pathology: A Retrospective Single-Institution Analysis of Clinico-Pathological Features Affecting Oncological Outcomes after Curative Surgery. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:160. [PMID: 35054327 PMCID: PMC8775107 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12010160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 01/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The latest Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) classification by the American College of Radiology has been recently endorsed in the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) guidelines for Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) management. Although the LI-RADS protocol has been developed as a diagnostic algorithm, there is some evidence concerning a possible correlation between different LI-RADS classes and specific pathological features of HCC. We aimed to investigate such radiological/pathological correlation and the possible prognostic implication of LI-RADS on a retrospective cohort of HCC patients undergoing surgical resection. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the pathological characteristics of resected HCC, exploring their distribution among different LI-RADS classes and analyzing the risk factors for recurrence-free, overall and cancer-specific survival Results: LI-RADS-5 (LR-5) nodules showed a higher prevalence of microvascular invasion (MVI), satellitosis and capsule infiltration, as well as higher median values of alpha-fetoprotein (αFP) compared to LI-RADS-3/4 (LR-3/4) nodules. MVI, αFP, satellitosis and margin-positive (R1) resection resulted as independent risk factors for recurrence-free survival, while LI-RADS class did not exert any significant impact. Focusing on overall survival, we identified patient age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS), Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, αFP, MVI, satellitosis and R1 resection as independent risk factors for survival, without any impact of LI-RADS classification. Last, MELD score, log10αFP, satellitosis and R1 resection resulted as independent risk factors for cancer-specific survival, while LI-RADS class did not exert any significant impact. Conclusions: Our results suggest an association of LR-5 class with unfavorable pathological characteristics of resected HCC; tumor histology and underlying patient characteristics such as age, ECOG-PS and liver disease severity exert a significant impact on postoperative oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Centonze
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (R.D.C.); (I.V.); (N.I.); (L.P.); (A.F.); (A.L.); (L.D.C.)
| | - Riccardo De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (R.D.C.); (I.V.); (N.I.); (L.P.); (A.F.); (A.L.); (L.D.C.)
| | - Ivan Vella
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (R.D.C.); (I.V.); (N.I.); (L.P.); (A.F.); (A.L.); (L.D.C.)
| | - Luca Carbonaro
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (L.C.); (C.S.); (U.D.I.); (A.V.)
| | - Niccolò Incarbone
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (R.D.C.); (I.V.); (N.I.); (L.P.); (A.F.); (A.L.); (L.D.C.)
| | - Livia Palmieri
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (R.D.C.); (I.V.); (N.I.); (L.P.); (A.F.); (A.L.); (L.D.C.)
| | - Cristiano Sgrazzutti
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (L.C.); (C.S.); (U.D.I.); (A.V.)
| | - Alberto Ficarelli
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (R.D.C.); (I.V.); (N.I.); (L.P.); (A.F.); (A.L.); (L.D.C.)
| | - Maria Grazia Valsecchi
- Bicocca Bioinformatics Biostatistics and Bioimaging Centre—B4, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (M.G.V.); (D.B.)
| | - Umberto Dello Iacono
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (L.C.); (C.S.); (U.D.I.); (A.V.)
| | - Andrea Lauterio
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (R.D.C.); (I.V.); (N.I.); (L.P.); (A.F.); (A.L.); (L.D.C.)
| | - Davide Bernasconi
- Bicocca Bioinformatics Biostatistics and Bioimaging Centre—B4, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (M.G.V.); (D.B.)
| | - Angelo Vanzulli
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (L.C.); (C.S.); (U.D.I.); (A.V.)
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, 20161 Milan, Italy; (R.D.C.); (I.V.); (N.I.); (L.P.); (A.F.); (A.L.); (L.D.C.)
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mettikanont P, Kalluri A, Bittermann T, Phillips N, Loza BL, Rosen M, Siegelman E, Furth E, Abt P, Olthoff K, Shaked A, Hoteit M, Reddy KR. The Course of LIRADS 3 and 4 Hepatic Abnormalities as Correlated With Explant Pathology: A Single Center Experience. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2022; 12:1048-1056. [PMID: 35814502 PMCID: PMC9257948 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2022.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The Liver Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is the standard classification of imaging findings of hepatic abnormalities for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance. We aimed to study the course of LI-RADS 3 and 4 (LR-3 and LR-4) abnormalities through correlations with explant pathology. METHODS A single center retrospective study of liver transplant recipients between January 2016 and September 2019 with HCC on explant pathology was conducted. Eligible patients were divided into three subgroups based on their LI-RADS classification: LR-3/4, LR-5 only, and combination of LR-3/4/5. RESULTS There were 116 eligible patients with 99 LR-3/4 observations (60 LR-3 and 39 LR-4); the rest had LR-5 lesions. LR-4 more often than LR-3 observations progressed to LR-5 (36% vs 12%) and with shorter duration during follow-up (median 175 days and 196 days). Mean size growth of LR-3 and LR-4 abnormalities were 2.6 and 3.8 mm; median growth rates were 0.2 and 0.4 mm/month, respectively. Numbers of HCC lesions per explant, largest HCC lesion size, and cumulative size were higher in LR-3/4/5 subgroup than LR-5 subgroup (P = 0.007, 0.007 and 0.006, respectively); 68% of LR-3 and 82% of LR-4 abnormalities were confirmed HCC on explant (P = 0.09). CONCLUSION Compared to LR-3, more LR-4 abnormalities progressed to LR-5 (12% and 36%, respectively) in a shorter time and with faster growth rate. A high proportion of LR-3 and LR-4 lesions (68% and 82%, respectively) were confirmed HCC on explant, raising the question of whether excluding HCC based on radiologic criteria alone is adequate in those with LR-3/4 abnormalities.
Collapse
Key Words
- AFP, alpha-fetoprotein
- BMI, body mass index
- CT, computed tomography
- HBV, hepatitis b virus
- HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma
- HCV, hepatitis c virus
- LI-RADS, liver reporting and data system
- LIRADS classification
- LR-3, LI-RADS 3
- LR-4, LI-RADS4
- LR-5, LI-RADS 5
- LT, liver transplantation
- MELD-Na, model for end stage liver disease sodium
- MRI, magnetic resonance imaging
- explant pathology
- hepatocellular carcinoma
- liver transplant
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - K. Rajender Reddy
- Address for correspondence: K. Rajender Reddy, Professor of Medicine, Director of Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, 2 Dulles, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bartnik K, Podgórska J, Rosiak G, Korzeniowski K, Giziński J, Sajdek M, Wróblewski T, Zieniewicz K, Nyckowski P, Rowiński O. Performance of initial LI-RADS 2018 treatment response in predicting survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma following TACE: a retrospective, single-center cohort study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2021; 147:3673-3683. [PMID: 33778924 PMCID: PMC8557150 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03603-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Treatment response following transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is frequently evaluated with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Treatment Response (LR-TR) algorithm, but its association with patients’ outcomes is not supported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to provide such data. Methods A retrospective analysis of 99 TACE patients with stage A/B hepatocellular carcinoma according to Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer staging system was performed. Two radiologists assessed LR-TR, while a third radiologist re-assessed divergent results. Overall survival (OS) and time to disease progression (TTP) were the primary endpoints of the study, while the Cox proportional hazard model was used for outcome analyses. Results Interobserver agreement was substantial between the two readers with κ = 0.69 (95% CI 0.58–0.81). The median OS in viable, equivocal, and non-viable groups were 27, 27, and 73 months, respectively (p < 0.001). However, after adjustment for confounding factors, there was no significant association between initial viable response and OS (HR 0.98 [95% CI 0.37–2.63], p = 0.97), while equivocal response remained statistically significant (HR 3.52. [95% CI 1.27–9.71], p = 0.015). No significant association was noted when viable and equivocal groups were analyzed in aggregate (HR 1.03 [95% CI 0.4–2.4], p = 0.96). The median TTP did not differ between non-viable and viable groups (23 vs 18 months, respectively; p = 0.98). None of the analyzed predictors was associated with TTP. Conclusion Initial LR-TR response was not an independent predictor for OS nor TTP. The preliminary results suggest the necessity for more aggressive management of equivocal patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krzysztof Bartnik
- Doctoral School, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.,Second Department of Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Ul. Banacha 1a, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Joanna Podgórska
- Second Department of Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Ul. Banacha 1a, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Grzegorz Rosiak
- Second Department of Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Ul. Banacha 1a, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Korzeniowski
- Second Department of Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Ul. Banacha 1a, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jakub Giziński
- Second Department of Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Ul. Banacha 1a, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Michał Sajdek
- Second Department of Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Ul. Banacha 1a, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tadeusz Wróblewski
- Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Zieniewicz
- Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paweł Nyckowski
- Department of General, Gastroenterological and Oncological Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Olgierd Rowiński
- Second Department of Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Ul. Banacha 1a, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|