EncephalApp Stroop Test validation for the screening of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in Brazil

Stroop test, Quickstroop, and the 1-min animal naming test for minimal hepatic encephalopathy diagnosis: A multicenter study in Mexico

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Although the Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score (PHES) remains the gold standard in diagnosing minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE), its complexity limits its application in clinical practice. While more convenient tests, such as the Stroop test, Quickstroop, and the 1-min animal naming test (ANT-1), have emerged, they haven't been validated in our setting. Our objective was to validate these tests in our population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter, observational, descriptive, and cross-sectional study was conducted in three hospitals in northeastern Mexico. MHE was defined as a PHES <-4. We included patients with cirrhosis aged >15 years without a history of overt hepatic encephalopathy. Data regarding sex, age, education, Child-Pugh/MELD-Na scores, etiology of cirrhosis, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, ascites, and clinically significant portal hypertension was collected. Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 121 patients included, 35.5 % were diagnosed with MHE. The presence of MHE was significantly associated with education level, years of study, and scores in the Stroop test, Quickstroop, and ANT-1. The AUROC curves were 77.9 %, 74.6 %, and 72.7 % for the Stroop test, Quickstroop, and ANT-1, respectively. The resulting cut-off points were 218.398 (sensitivity: 74 %; specificity: 74 %), 40.535 (sensitivity: 77 %; specificity: 68 %), and <16 animals (sensitivity: 58 %; specificity: 79 %), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These tests are valid diagnostic tools for detecting MHE in our population. Their simpler use and applicability could increase the early diagnosis of MHE and prompt primary prophylaxis initiation for overt hepatic encephalopathy.

A shortened Stroop test to identify covert hepatic encephalopathy and predict overt hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Covert hepatic encephalopathy (CHE) adversely affects the clinical outcomes of patients with cirrhosis but remains largely undiagnosed and untreated. Although the Stroop test is a useful method for CHE detection, a faster, simpler, and more accurate test is required to diagnose CHE. This prospective study aimed to develop a new shortened Stroop test that can detect CHE and predict overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) in Japanese patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent neuropsychological tests (NPT) and the Stroop test between November 2018 and December 2021 were enrolled and followed until OHE occurrence or March 2022. The discriminative ability of various run combinations in the off and on states to detect CHE was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared with that of the total Stroop test time.

RESULTS

Among the 227 eligible patients, the On1-2Time cutoff value of 44.4 s had a comparable discriminative ability with the total Stroop test time to detect CHE, with an AUC of 0.791, a sensitivity of 0.827, and a specificity of 0.685. During a median follow-up period of 16 months, 37 patients developed OHE. On1-2Time ≥ 44.4 s (hazard ratio [HR], 3.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-11.36) and serum albumin levels (HR, 0.28; 95% CI 0.11-0.67) were independently associated with OHE occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The shortened Stroop test (On1-2Time) is equivalent to the total Stroop test not only for identifying CHE but also for estimating the risk of progression to OHE.

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Decompensated Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review on Safety and Efficacy

Background and Aims: Due to increasing knowledge of the “gut–liver axis”, there has been growing interest regarding the use of fecal microbiota transplant in the management of chronic liver disease. There are limited data available and current guidelines are mostly based on expert opinions. We aim to perform the first systematic review investigating safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplant particularly among high-risk decompensated cirrhosis patient populations. Methods: Literature search was performed using variations of the keywords “fecal microbiota transplant” and “cirrhosis” on PubMed/Medline from inception to 3 October 2021. The resulting 116 articles were independently screened by two authors. In total, 5 qualifying studies, including 2 randomized control trials and 3 retrospective case series, were found to meet established eligibility criteria and have adequate quality of evidence to be included in this review. Results: Of the total 58 qualifying patients, there were 2 deaths post fecal microbiota transplant, 1 of which could not rule out being related (1.7%). Among the remaining 56 participants, 8 serious adverse events were reported, of which 2 could not rule out being related (3.6%). The success rate of fecal microbiota transplantation in treating recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection among patients with decompensated cirrhosis was 77.8%. The success rate when used as investigational treatment for hepatic encephalopathy was 86.7%, with multiple studies reporting clinically significant improvement in encephalopathy testing scores. Conclusions: We found a marginally higher rate of deaths and serious adverse events from fecal microbiota transplant in our patient population compared with the average immunocompetent population, where it was previously found to have 0 deaths and SAE rate of 2.83%. The efficacy when used for recurrent C.difficile infection was 77.8% and 87% in the decompensated cirrhotic and general populations, respectively. Studies on efficacy in novel treatment of hepatic encephalopathy have been promising. This study concludes that fecal microbiota transplant use in decompensated cirrhosis patients should be used with caution and preferably be limited to research purposes until better data are available.

A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Treatment of Hepatic Encephalopathy and Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients With Cirrhosis

The microbiome of the human gut and liver coexists by influencing the health and disease state of each system. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has recently emerged as a potential treatment for conditions associated with cirrhosis, such as hepatic encephalopathy and recurrent/refractory Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI). We have conducted a systematic review of the safety and efficacy of FMT in treating hepatic encephalopathy and rCDI. A literature search was performed using variations of the keywords "fecal microbiota transplant" and "cirrhosis" on PubMed/MEDLINE from inception to October 3, 2021. The resulting 116 articles were independently reviewed by two authors. Eight qualifying studies were included in the systematic review. A total of 127 cirrhotic patients received FMT. Hepatic encephalopathy was evaluated by cognitive tests, such as the Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score (PHES) and EncephalApp Stroop test. Not only was there an improvement in the cognitive performance in the FMT cohort, but the improvement was also maintained throughout long-term follow-up. In the treatment of rCDI, the FMT success rate is similar between cirrhotic patients and the general population, although more than one dose may be needed in the former. The rate of serious adverse events and adverse events in the cirrhotic cohort was slightly higher than that in the general population but was low overall. We found evidence that supports the therapeutic potential and safety profile of FMT to treat hepatic encephalopathy and rCDI in cirrhotic patients. Further research will be beneficial to better understand the role of FMT in cirrhosis.