The Current State of Perioperative Pain Management: Challenges and Potential Opportunities for Nurses

Improving Perioperative Pain Education for Patients Prescribed Opioids: An Integrative Review

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain is still inadequately managed for a significant number of patients despite the extensive use of opioids. Among several pain management strategies, patient education is a vital component of perioperative pain management. However, perioperative education practices remain inconsistent and incomplete in many hospital settings.

AIM

This integrative review aims to synthesize current evidence regarding pain education interventions across all phases of perioperative care in order to promote the safe use of opioids among patients prescribed opioids.

METHODS

The literature search identified 443 records published since 2016 through Cochrane Library, PubMed, the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature Plus, and Embase. This review process was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A total of 12 articles met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

The study settings varied from a general surgery center to multiple settings in the United States or Canada, with sample sizes ranging from 27 to 536. The main themes from the analysis include the key components of education, the optimal timing and frequency of education, education delivery methods, and a multidisciplinary team approach.

CONCLUSION

The findings from this review will help nursing professionals across surgical specialties identify effective educational approaches for patients prescribed opioids during the perioperative period. Developing education interventions based on these findings would enhance the quality and effectiveness of pain education, improve patient understanding and their preparedness to manage pain at home, and, ultimately, promote the safe use of opioids postoperatively.

The Pain Nurse Practitioner and Pain Nurse's Role and Views on Opioid Management in Australia: A National Questionnaire Survey

BACKGROUND

The demand for access to Australian pain management services is growing. The dual crisis of opioid misuse and chronic pain, means pain nurses and nurse practitioners (NPs) have a unique opportunity to meet clinical demands and advance their scope of practice.

AIMS

To understand the role of pain nurses and pain NPs across Australia and explore their perceptions of current opioid management.

DESIGN

This cross-sectional study involved pain nurses or pain NPs working in Australia who are a members of a pain interest group, which are subgroups of The Australian Pain Society.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study involved pain nurses or pain NPs working in Australia who are a members of a pain interest group, which are subgroups of The Australian Pain Society. Survey respondents were contacted via the eight nursing Pain Interest Groups in Australia.

RESULTS

Acute pain management (92.7%) and chronic pain management (80.5%) were the primary services provided, with pain specialty nurses providing nurse education (100.0%), patient support, clinician education, and policy development. Pain nurses believed there was an over prescription of opioid analgesics in Australia (97.6%), with NPs able to reduce opioid medication doses as part of opioid harm mitigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain nurses have a breadth of knowledge and experience highlight they can contribute to opioid management in the future, with the support of policy and organizations.

Delphi Study: ASPAN Adult Patient Pain and Comfort Practices

PURPOSE

The American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses (ASPAN) is responsible for establishing evidence-based standards to guide perianesthesia nursing practice. The ASPAN model for evidence-based practice acknowledges the potential for the Delphi technique to identify priorities for perianesthesia research. The purpose of this Delphi study was to generate a consensus on pain and comfort among a panel of experts.

DESIGN

ASPAN convened a panel of experts to provide recommendations based on seven categories, this led to the development of a questionnaire to build consensus.

METHODS

Survey conducted among panel of experts to obtain consensus. Two survey rounds were completed.

FINDINGS

A consensus was obtained reaching a 70% benchmark for an acceptance.

CONCLUSIONS

The results found a consensus on topics required for education and competency among perianesthesia nurses including transfer and discharge criteria related to pain and comfort, resources for perianesthesia nurses, policy guidelines, and the management of the special needs of perianesthesia patients.