Minimizing Sources of Airborne, Aerosolized, and Contact Contaminants in the OR Environment

Refocusing on work-based hazards for the anaesthesiologist in a post-pandemic era

The coronavirus pandemic has raised public awareness of one of the many hazards that healthcare workers face daily: exposure to harmful pathogens. The anaesthesia workplace encompasses the operating room, interventional radiology suite, and other sites that contain many other potential occupational and environmental hazards. This review article highlights the work-based hazards that anaesthesiologists and other clinicians may encounter in the anaesthesia workplace: ergonomic design, physical, chemical, fire, biological, or psychological hazards. As the anaesthesia work environment enters a post-COVID-19 pandemic phase, anaesthesiologists will do well to review and consider these hazards. The current review includes proposed solutions to some hazards and identifies opportunities for future research.

Eliminating sternal wound infections: Why every cardiac surgery program needs an I hate infections team

Objectives

The majority of studies examining deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) prevention focus on ameliorating 1 variable at a time. There is a paucity of data regarding the synergistic effects of combining clinical and environmental interventions. This article describes an interdisciplinary, multimodal approach to eliminate DSWIs at a large community hospital.

Methods

We developed a robust, multidisciplinary infection prevention team to evaluate and act in all phases of perioperative care to achieve a cardiac surgery DSWI rate of 0, named: the I hate infections team. The team identified opportunities for improved care and best practices and implemented changes on an ongoing basis.

Results

Patient-related interventions consisted of preoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus identification, individualized perioperative antibiotics, antimicrobial dosing strategies, and maintenance of normothermia. Operative-related interventions involved glycemic control, sternal adhesives, medications and hemostasis, rigid sternal fixation for high-risk patients, chlorhexidine gluconate dressings over invasive lines, and use of disposable health care equipment. Environment-related interventions included optimizing operating room ventilation and terminal cleaning, reducing airborne particle counts, and decreasing foot traffic. Together, these interventions reduced the DSWI incidence from 1.6% preintervention to 0% for 12 consecutive months after full bundle implementation.

Conclusions

A multidisciplinary team focused on eliminating DSWI identified known risk factors and implemented evidence-based interventions in each phase of care to ameliorate risk. Although the influence of each individual intervention on DSWI remains unknown, use of the bundled infection prevention approach reduced the incidence to 0 for the first 12 months after implementation.

OR Traffic and Surgical Site Infections: A Quality Improvement Project

Operating rooms are dynamic places with a lot of movement and people working as a concerted team. Operating room traffic can be necessary (eg, retrieving an unusual supply) or unnecessary (eg, a social visit). This quality improvement project aimed to reduce the amount of OR traffic to only necessary traffic and reduce the surgical site infection rates for the orthopedic ORs in a northern California community hospital. There were three principle interventions: door signs discouraging traffic, staff member relief in batches, and preference card review for accuracy. During the six-week post-intervention period, there were no reported surgical site infections for orthopedic procedures, and the standardized infection ratio decreased from 1.75 to 0 in 10 weeks. Operating room traffic decreased after implementation by 46.9%. The number of door openings per minute decreased from 1.96 per minute to 1.04 per minute at the project's conclusion. Staff members' awareness of OR traffic increased.

Guidelines in Practice: Environmental Cleaning

All perioperative personnel are responsible for providing a clean environment for patients undergoing operative or other invasive procedures. A contaminated environment can contribute to the incidence of surgical site infections when a patient's skin contacts a contaminated surface or personnel touch a contaminated surface and then transmit microbes to the patient. Airborne contaminants may settle on the sterile field or in the surgical wound. The AORN "Guideline for environmental cleaning" provides guidance on cleaning product selection, cleaning procedures, personnel education, competency verification, and monitoring cleanliness through performance improvement processes. This article discusses guideline recommendations for cleaning procedures and cleaning of operating and procedure rooms. A scenario describes how an ambulatory surgery center team identifies gaps in cleaning processes and modifies the cleaning checklist to improve these processes. Perioperative RNs should review the entire guideline for additional information when creating and updating policies and procedures for environmental cleaning.

Comparison of 3 C-Arm Draping Techniques to Prevent Far Side Contamination

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of reducing contamination using 2 methods of C-Arm draping compared with traditional methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors simulated an operating room using an extremity drape, commercially available C-Arm drapes, and C-Arm. A black light was placed above the field. A fluorescent powder was placed on the nonsterile portions of the field. Baseline light intensity was recorded by photo. The C-Arm was brought into the surgical field for orthogonal imaging for 15 cycles. A repeat photograph was taken to measure the increase in intensity of the fluorescent powder to assess degree of contamination. This was repeated 5 times for each configuration: standard C-Arm drape, a proprietary close-fitting drape, and a split drape secured to the far side with the split wrapped around the C-Arm receiver. Light intensity difference was measured and average change in intensity was compared.

RESULTS

Compared with standard draping, the proprietary close-fitting drape resulted in a 71.3% decrease in contamination (4.84% vs. 16.90%, P = 0.101) that trended toward significance and the split drape resulted in a 99.5% decrease (0.09% vs. 16.90%, P = 0.017) that was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Far side contamination can be reduced by using a split drape connecting the operative table to the C-Arm receiver, effectively "sealing off" contaminants. The proprietary close-fitting drape may also decrease contamination, but this was not statistically significant in this study. Use of the split drape technique will help prevent contamination and may ultimately lead to decreased infection risk.

Benefit of systematic selection of pairs of cases matched by surgical specialty for surveillance of bacterial transmission in operating rooms

BACKGROUND

Bacterial transmission within and between successive surgical cases occurs in operating rooms (ORs), often includes anesthesia equipment as a reservoir, and can be monitored by collecting samples and identifying bacteria by genetic testing. We evaluated how to choose cases for active surveillance to quantify the effectiveness of interventions in 2 groups of ORs (eg, rooms with germicidal lighting vs those without).

METHODS

Data were from a 7 OR single-specialty gastrointestinal endoscopy suite and from a typical 8 OR multispecialty surgical suite.

RESULTS

At the multispecialty hospital, 40.3% (SE 1.2%) of the total number of cases could be used for surveillance (ie, followed by another case of the same specialty and matched with a corresponding pair of cases from the other OR group). Random selection obtained fewer matched pairs than deliberate selection: mean ratio of random/deliberate = 0.64 (0.01) for the single-specialty and 0.51 (0.02) for the multispecialty suite (P <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficiency of sampling to obtain pairs of successive surgical cases of the same specialty is impaired markedly by randomly selecting pairs of cases (or using convenience sampling) as compared to choosing pairs deliberately. This is important because the number of cases that can be suitably used for surveillance of bacterial transmission will typically be less than one-half the total case number.

Assessment of focused multivector ultraviolet disinfection withshadowless delivery using 5-point multisided sampling ofpatientcare equipment without manual-chemical disinfection

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a focused multivector ultraviolet (FMUV) system employing shadowless delivery with a 90-second disinfection cycle for patient care equipment inside and outside the operating room (OR) suite without manual-chemical disinfection.

METHODS

A 5-point multisided sampling protocol was utilized to measure the microbial burden on objects inside and outside the OR environment in a 3-phase nonrandomized observational study. Surface sampling was performed pre- and postdisinfection in between cases (IBCs) to assess the performance of manual-chemical disinfection. FMUV system performance was separately assessed pre- and postdisinfection before the first case and IBCs. Additionally, visibly clean high-touch objects were sampled outside the OR, and the microbial burden reductions after FMUV disinfection were quantified without manual-chemical disinfection.

RESULTS

Manual-chemical disinfection reduced the active microbial burden on sampled objects IBCs by 52.8%-90.9% (P < .05). FMUV reduced the active microbial burden by 92%-97.7% (P < .0001) before the firstcase and IBCs combined, and 96.3%-99.6% (P < .0001) on objects outside the OR without chemical disinfection.

CONCLUSIONS

Five-point multisided sampling proved effective for assessing disinfection performance on all exterior sides of equipment. FMUV produced significant overall reductions of the microbial burden on patient care equipment in all study phases and independent of manual cleaning and chemical disinfection.