Using sitting as a component of job rotation strategies: are lifting/lowering kinetics and kinematics altered following prolonged sitting

Lateral Pelvis and Lumbar Motion in Seated and Standing Office Work and Their Association With Transient Low Back Pain

OBJECTIVE

To assess frontal plane motion of the pelvis and lumbar spine during 2 h of seated and standing office work and evaluate associations with transient low back pain.

BACKGROUND

Although bending and twisting motions are cited as risk factors for low back injuries in occupational tasks, few studies have assessed frontal plane motion during sedentary exposures.

METHODS

Twenty-one participants completed 2 h of seated and standing office work while pelvic obliquity, lumbar lateral bending angles, and ratings of perceived low back pain were recorded. Mean absolute angles were compared across 15-min blocks, amplitude probability distribution functions were calculated, and associations between lateral postures and low back pain were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean pelvic obliquity (sit = 4.0 ± 2.8°, stand = 3.5 ± 1.7°) and lumbar lateral bending (sit = 4.5 ± 2.5°, stand = 4.1 ± 1.6°) were consistently asymmetrical. Pelvic obliquity range of motion was 4.7° larger in standing (13.6 ± 7.5°) than sitting (8.9 ± 8.7°). In sitting, 52% (pelvis) and 71% (lumbar) of participants, and in standing, 71% (pelvis and lumbar) of participants, were considered asymmetric for >90% of the protocol. Lateral postures displayed weak to low correlations with peak low back pain (R ≤ 0.388).

CONCLUSION

The majority of participants displayed lateral asymmetries for the pelvis and lumbar spine within 5° of their upright standing posture.

APPLICATION

In short-term sedentary exposures, associations between lateral postures and pain indicated that as the range in lateral postures increases there may be an increased possibility of pain.

Implementing an accelerometer-based pelvis segment for low back kinetic analyses during dynamic movement tasks

An accelerometer-based pelvis has been employed to study segment and joint kinematics during scenarios involving close human-object interface and/or line-of-sight obstructions. However, its accuracy for examining low back kinetic outcomes is unknown. This study compared reaction moments and contact forces of the L5S1 joint calculated with an accelerometer-based and optically tracked pelvis segment. An approach to correct the global pelvis position as a function of thigh angle was developed. One participant performed four dynamic tasks: forward bend, squat, sit-to-stand-to-sit, and forward lunge. A standard bottom-up inverse dynamics approach was used and the root mean square error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination (R2) were calculated to examine kinetic differences between the optical and accelerometer approaches. The RMSE observed for L5S1 reaction flexion-extension moments ranged from 1.32 Nm to 2.20 Nm (R2 ≥ 0.98). The RMSE for net shear and compression reaction forces ranged from 2.13 to 10.45 N and 0.63 - 4.96 N, respectively. Similarly, the RMSE for L5S1 joint contact shear and compression ranged from 13.45 N to 19.51 N (R2 ≥ 0.85) and 31.18 N - 55.97 N (R2 ≥ 0.97), respectively. In conclusion, the accelerometer-based pelvis together with the approach to correct the global pelvis position is a feasible approach for computing low back kinetics with a single equivalent muscle model. The observed error in joint contact forces represents less than 5 % of the NIOSH recommended action limits and is unlikely to alter the interpretation of low back injury risk.

Does a break from sitting change biomechanical outcome measures or transient pain? A laboratory-based experimental study

BACKGROUND

Sitting can induce transient low back pain (LBP) in healthy individuals. A rest from sitting should provide relief, however, the parameters of breaks (activity type, intensity, duration, and timing) are not currently known.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of 2-minute walking breaks at 40-minute intervals on sitting-induced LBP.

METHODS

Thirty-two healthy participants were recruited for a within-control study: two randomly presented sessions of sitting for 2 hours with and without breaks. Outcome measures were compared between condition and pain group using a three-way ANOVA with significance atp > 0.05.

RESULTS

Walking breaks at 40-minute intervals result in significantly lower pain ratings than those taken immediately before the break for sitting-induced back pain developers. However, this relief is short lived (<10 minutes), with ratings increasing to pre-break levels once the sitting exposure resumes. There were no differences in biomechanical factors between sessions. Regardless of session type, pain developers displayed higher spine fidget frequency than non-pain developers, females sat with less spine flexion, with greater gluteal activation levels, and with their center of pressure approximately half a centimeter to the left and forward compared to males, and males had significantly greater peak pressures over a smaller area compared to females.

CONCLUSION

Walking breaks at 40-minute intervals provide significant, but temporary, relief of sitting-induced back pain for pain developers. Future work should optimize break parameters and examine the longer-term benefit of breaks, especially for individuals that are not able to tolerate sitting for extended durations.

Local dynamic stability of the trunk after prolonged seating with axial load

Fatigue from prolonged seating with an axial load on the trunk may impair neuromuscular control and spine stability which may elevate risk of low back pain (LBP) for dynamic tasks following seating. The objective of this study was to assess local dynamic trunk stability using the maximum Lyapunov exponent (λ_MAX) with corresponding coactivation patterns to understand possible effects from prolonged seating. An increase in λ_MAX would indicate decreased stability. Twenty participants (10 male, 10 female) performed a controlled, cyclic sagittal flexion task at 40 cycles per minute before and after three hours of seating in a simulated helicopter-seating environment with a weighted vest. A statistically significant decrease was seen in λ_MAX (bits/s) (Pre-Test = 0.654 ± 0.172; Post-Test = 0.829 ± 0.268, p = 0.002), trunk cumulative coactivation index (unitless/s) (Pre-Test = 1.71 ± 0.97; Post-Test = 1.59 ± 0.96, p = 0.0095), and abdominal activation (normalized) (Pre-Test = 0.46 ± 0.17, Post-Test = 0.41 ± 0.18, p = 0.0146) post-seating exposure. Trunk extension was reduced (∼4°, p = 0.0004) during the post-seating cyclic test with slight corresponding increases in flexion. This study provides evidence of potential effects of fatigue from prolonged seating to neuromuscular control, which may have implications for occupations requiring highly dynamic tasks after prolonged seated postures. Future studies would repeat the tests with dynamic environments (i.e., vibration), test the cyclic flexion protocols with different seating interventions, and continue to test the approach to develop a tool to assess back impairment or intervention effectiveness.

The effect of head movement restriction on the kinematics of the spine during lifting and lowering tasks

This study aimed to examine the effects of head movement restriction on relative angles and their derivatives using the stepwise segmentation approach during lifting and lowering tasks. Ten healthy men lifted and lowered a box using two styles (stoop and squat), with two loads (i.e. 10% and 20% of body weight); they performed these tasks with two instructed head postures [(1) Flexing the neck to keep contact between chin and chest over the task cycle; (2) No instruction, free head posture]. The neck flexion significantly affected the flexion angle of all segments of the spine and specifically the lumbar part. Additionally, this posture significantly affected the derivatives of the relative angles and manifested latency in spine segments movement, that is, cephalad-to-caudad or caudad-to-cephalad patterns. Conclusively, neck flexion as an awkward posture could increase the risk of low back pain during lifting and lowering tasks in occupational environments. Practitioner summary: Little information is available about the effects of neck flexion on other spine segments' kinematics and movement patterns, specifically about the lumbar spine. The result of this experimental study shows that neck flexion can increase the risk of low back pain by increasing lumbar flexion angle and spine awkward posture.

Exposure to Sustained Flexion Impacts Lumbar Extensor Spinae Muscle Fiber Orientation

The lumbar extensor spinae (LES) has an oblique orientation with respect to the compressive axis of the lumbar spine, allowing it to counteract anterior shear forces. This mechanical advantage is lost as spine flexion angle increases. The LES orientation can also alter over time as obliquity decreases with age and is associated with decreased strength and low back pain. However, it is unknown if LES orientation is impacted by recent exposures causing adaptations over shorter timescales. Hence, the effects of a 10-minute sustained spine flexion exposure on LES orientation, thickness, and activity were investigated. Three different submaximally flexed spine postures were observed before and after the exposure. At baseline, orientation (P < .001) and thickness (P = .004) decreased with increasingly flexed postures. After the exposure, obliquity further decreased at low (pairwise comparison P < .001) and moderately (pairwise comparison P = .008) flexed postures. Low back creep occurred, but LES thickness did not change, indicating that decreases in orientation were not solely due to changes in muscle length at a given posture. Activation did not change to counteract decreases in obliquity. These changes encompass a reduced ability to offset anterior shear forces, thus increasing the potential risk of anterior shear-related injury or pain after low back creep-generating exposures.

The effect of age, prolonged seated work and sex on posture and perceived effort during a lifting task

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effect of prolonged seated work, lift task, age and sex on normalized lumbar angles, thoracic angles, perceived effort and duration of lifts. A total of 17 young and 17 mature participants were recruited with an average (standard deviation) age of 23.8 (5.0) years and 63.7 (3.9) years, respectively. Participants completed 3 different floor to knuckle lifts before and following 90 min of seated work. The lifts included; (i) 7 kg symmetrical, (ii) 4.5 kg symmetrical and (iii) 4.5 kg asymmetrical. Prolonged seated work and age interacted to affect normalized peak lumbar angles (p = 0.0469) where older adults adopted 56(15)% flexion after seated work compared to 67(16)% among younger adults. Older adults took significantly longer to complete the lifting tasks compared to younger adults while age did not affect perceived effort across lifting tasks. Older workers may require age specific interventions given age specific responses.

Examining endplate fatigue failure during cyclic compression loading with variable and consistent peak magnitudes using a force weighting adjustment approach: an in vitro study

Repetitive movement is common in many occupational contexts. Therefore, cumulative load is a widely recognised risk factor for lowback injury. This study quantified the effect of force weighting factors on cumulative load estimates and injury prediction during cyclic loading. Forty-eight porcine cervical spine motion segments were assigned to experimental groups that differed by average peak compression magnitude (30%, 50% and 70% of predicted tolerance) and amplitude variation (consistent, variable). Cyclic loading was performed at a frequency of 0.5 Hz until fatigue failure occurred. Weighting factors were determined and applied instantaneously. Inclusion of weighting factors resulted in statistically similar cumulative load estimates at injury between variable and consistent loading (p > .071). Further, survivorship was generally greater when the peak compression magnitude was consistent compared to variable. These results emphasise the importance of weighting factors as an equalisation tool for the evaluation of cumulative low back loading exposures in occupational contexts. Practitioner summary: Weighting factors can equalise the risk of injury based on compression magnitude. When weighted, the cumulative compression was similar between consistent and variable cyclic loading protocols, despite being significantly different when unweighted and having similar injury rates. Therefore, assessing representative occupational exposures without evaluating task performance variability may underestimate injury risk. Abbreviations: FSU: functional spinal unit; UCT: ultimate compression tolerance.

The effect of age on in-vivo spine stiffness, postures and discomfort responses during prolonged sitting exposures

Many industrialised working populations are ageing and prolonged sitting exposures are prevalent across occupational sectors. The purpose of this work was to determine the effect of age and sex on passive spine stiffness, postures and discomfort in response to seated work. A total of 34 participants were recruited, with 17 older adults with an average age of (standard deviation) 63.7 (±3.9) years and 17 younger adults aged 23.8 (±5.0) years. Participants were asked to sit continuously for 90 min while typing. Baseline passive spine stiffness was higher in older adults at 40% flexion compared to younger adults (p = .0233). Older adults sat in less normalised flexion, at 33.4% (±16.4) compared to 60.9% (±20.2) in the younger group (p = .0003). Discomfort was higher among older adults in the neck, right shoulder and middle back regions (p < .0086). An understanding of age-specific responses to workplace exposures is essential to determine whether age-specific interventions are warranted.   Practitioner summary: Older adults had higher passive spine stiffness and sat with less flexion during prolonged sitting. Discomfort was higher among older adults and occurred earlier in the simulation compared to younger participants, indicating that interventions, such as walking breaks may need to be implemented earlier during sitting for aged workers.

Relationships Between Trunk Movement Patterns During Lifting Tasks Compared With Unloaded Extension From a Flexed Posture

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate between movement patterns of trunk extension from full unloaded flexion and lifting techniques, which could provide valuable information to physical therapists, doctors of chiropractic, and other manual therapists.

METHODS

A within-participant study design was used. Whole-body kinematic and kinetic data during lifting and full trunk flexion were collected from 16 healthy male participants using a 3-dimensional motion analysis system (Vicon Motion Systems). To evaluate the relationships of joint movement between lifting and full trunk flexion, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated.

RESULTS

There was no significant correlation between the amount of change in the lumbar extension angle during the first half of the lifting trials and lumbar movement during unloaded trunk flexion and extension. However, the amount of change in the lumbar extension angle during lifting was significantly negatively correlated with hip movement during unloaded trunk flexion and extension (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings that the maximum hip flexion angle during full trunk flexion had a greater influence on kinematics of lumbar-hip complex during lifting provides new insight into human movement during lifting. All study participants were healthy men; thus, findings are limited to this group.

Job rotation designed to prevent musculoskeletal disorders and control risk in manufacturing industries: A systematic review

To better understand job rotation in the manufacturing industry, we completed a systematic review asking the following questions: 1) How do job-rotation programs impact work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and related risk control for these MSDs, as well as psychosocial factors? and 2) How best should the job rotation programs be designed? We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Business Source Premier, ISI Web of Knowledge, CINAHL, PsyINFO, Scopus, and SciELO databases for articles published in peer-reviewed journals. Eligible studies were examined by two independent reviewers for relevance (population of manufacturing workers, outcomes of musculoskeletal disorders, physical factors, psychosocial factors, and strategies used in job-rotation implantation) and methodological quality rating. From 10,809 potential articles, 71 were read for full text analysis. Of the 14 studies included for data extraction, two were non-randomized control trial studies, one was a case-control study, and 11 were cross-sectional comparisons. Only one, with a case-control design, was scored with good methodological quality. Currently, weak evidence exists supporting job rotation as a strategy for the prevention and control of musculoskeletal disorders. Job rotation did not appear to reduce the exposure of physical risk factors; yet, there are positive correlations between job rotation and higher job satisfaction. Worker training has been described as a crucial component of a successful job-rotation program. The studies reported a range of parameters used to implement and measure job-rotation programs. More rigorous studies are needed to better understand the full impact of job rotation on production and health.

PROSPERO REGISTER

CRD42014013319.

The changes of lumbar muscle flexion-relaxation phenomenon due to antero-posteriorly slanted ground surfaces

Uneven ground surface is a common occupational injury risk factor in industries such as agriculture, fishing, transportation and construction. Studies have shown that antero-posteriorly slanted ground surfaces could reduce spinal stability and increase the risk of falling. In this study, the influence of antero-posteriorly slanted ground surfaces on lumbar flexion-relaxation responses was investigated. Fourteen healthy participants performed sagittally symmetric and asymmetric trunk bending motions on one flat and two antero-posteriorly slanted surfaces (-15° (uphill facing) and 15° (downhill facing)), while lumbar muscle electromyography and trunk kinematics were recorded. Results showed that standing on a downhill facing slanted surface delays the onset of lumbar muscle flexion-relaxation phenomenon (FRP), while standing on an uphill facing ground causes lumbar muscle FRP to occur earlier. In addition, compared to symmetric bending, when performing asymmetric bending, FRP occurred earlier on the contralateral side of lumbar muscles and significantly smaller maximum lumbar flexion and trunk inclination angles were observed. Practitioner Summary: Uneven ground surface is a common risk factor among a number of industries. In this study, we investigated the influence of antero-posteriorly slanted ground surface on trunk biomechanics during trunk bending. Results showed the slanted surface alters the lumbar tissue load-sharing mechanism in both sagittally symmetric and asymmetric bending.

Does prolonged seated deskwork alter the lumbar flexion relaxation phenomenon?

Sustained maximum lumbar spine flexion can increase the angle at which the low back flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) is observed. This adaptation has been hypothesized to have implications for the control of lumbar spine stability and increase the potential for low back injury. The objective of this study was to investigate if similar changes in the FRP would occur from sub-maximal spine flexion induced by an extended continuous duration of seated office deskwork. Twenty-three participants (12 male and 11 female) performed three bouts of full forward spine flexion interspersed with two 1-h periods of seated deskwork. Lumbar spine angular kinematics and electromyographic activity from the lumbar erector spinae were obtained throughout all trials. The angles at which myoelectric silence occurred (FRP onset) were documented. Lumbar flexion at FRP onset increased by 1.3±1.5° after 1-h of sitting (p<0.05) with no further increase after 2-h. However, when the angle at the FRP onset was normalized to the total range of flexion, there was no difference in the FRP onset. These results suggest that the seated posture may induce residual deformation in the viscoelastic passive tissues of the low back; this could increase the challenge of controlling spine motion and reduce the load-bearing capacity of the lumbar spine system during activities performed following extended bouts of sitting.

Task rotation effects on upper extremity and back muscle activity

Job rotation is an intuitive approach to distributing work to minimize muscular fatigue. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate rotation between lifting and gripping on muscle activity and effort. Ten male participants performed all 4 combinations of two 15 min tasks in 30 min trials split between separate days to prevent fatigue. The tasks of lifting a 12 kg box and gripping at 20% of maximum were performed 6 times per minute (5 s work: 5 s rest). Muscle activity (percentiles, gaps) and perceived effort were significantly affected by the task combinations. The forearm and upper erector spinae muscles did not benefit as greatly from rotating between lifting and gripping tasks as the lower erector spinae, deltoid or trapezius. In addition to gross task differences, overlaps in muscle activity between "low back" and "upper extremity" tasks must be considered when creating effective job rotation schemes.