I want to brake free: The effect of connected vehicle features on driver behaviour, usability and acceptance

False Alarm Effects in Early Warnings for Emergency Vehicles: Exploring Drivers' Move-Over Behavior

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated drivers' move-over behavior when receiving an Emergency Vehicle Approaching (EVA) warning. Furthermore, the possible effects of false alarms, driver experience, and modality on move-over behavior were explored.

BACKGROUND

EVA warnings are one solution to encourage drivers to move over for emergency vehicles in a safe and timely manner. EVA warnings are distributed based on the predicted path of the emergency vehicle causing a risk of false alarms. Previous EVA studies have suggested a difference between inexperienced and experienced drivers' move-over behavior.

METHOD

A driving simulator study was conducted with 110 participants, whereof 54 inexperienced and 56 experienced drivers. They were approached by an emergency vehicle three times. A control group received no EVA warnings, whereas the experimental groups received either true or false warnings, auditory or visual, 15 seconds before the emergency vehicle overtook them.

RESULTS

Drivers who received EVA warnings moved over more quickly for the emergency vehicle compared to the control group. Drivers moved over more quickly for each emergency vehicle interaction. False alarms impaired move-over behavior. No difference in driver behavior based on driver experience or modality was observed.

CONCLUSION

EVA warnings positively affect drivers' move-over behavior. However, false alarms can decrease drivers' future willingness to comply with the warning.

APPLICATION

The findings regarding measurements of delay can be used to optimize the design of future EVA systems. Moreover, this research should be used to further understand the effect of false alarms in in-car warnings.

Influences of Vehicle Communication on Human Driving Reactions: A Simulator Study on Reaction Times and Behavior for Forensic Accident Analysis

Cooperative intelligent transport systems (C-ITSs) are mass-produced and sold in Europe, promising enhanced safety and comfort. Direct vehicle communication, known as vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication, is crucial in this context. Drivers receive warnings about potential hazards by exchanging vehicle status and environmental data with other communication-enabled vehicles. However, the impact of these warnings on drivers and their inclusion in accident reconstruction remains uncertain. Unlike sensor-based warnings, V2X warnings may not provide a visible reason for the alert, potentially affecting reaction times and behavior. In this work, a simulator study on V2X warnings was conducted with 32 participants to generate findings on reaction times and behavior for accident reconstruction in connection with these systems. Two scenarios from the Car-2-Car Communication Consortium were implemented: "Stationary Vehicle Warning-Broken-Down Vehicle" and "Dangerous Situation-Electronic Emergency Brake Lights". Volkswagen's warning concept was utilized, as they are the sole provider of cooperative vehicles in Europe. Results show that V2X warnings without visible reasons did not negatively impact reaction times or behavior, with average reaction times between 0.58 s (steering) and 0.69 s (braking). No significant distraction or search for warning reasons was observed. However, additional information in the warnings caused confusion and was seldom noticed by subjects. In this study, participants responded correctly and appropriately to the shown false-positive warnings. A wrong reaction triggering an accident is possible but unlikely. Overall, V2X warnings showed no negative impacts compared with sensor-based systems. This means that there are no differences in accident reconstruction regarding the source of the warning (sensors or communication). However, it is important that it is known that there was a warning, which is why the occurrence of V2X warnings should also be saved in the EDR in the future.

Texting While Driving: A Literature Review on Driving Simulator Studies

Road safety is increasingly threatened by distracted driving. Studies have shown that there is a significantly increased risk for a driver of being involved in a car crash due to visual distractions (not watching the road), manual distractions (hands are off the wheel for other non-driving activities), and cognitive and acoustic distractions (the driver is not focused on the driving task). Driving simulators (DSs) are powerful tools for identifying drivers' responses to different distracting factors in a safe manner. This paper aims to systematically review simulator-based studies to investigate what types of distractions are introduced when using the phone for texting while driving (TWD), what hardware and measures are used to analyze distraction, and what the impact of using mobile devices to read and write messages while driving is on driving performance. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A total of 7151 studies were identified in the database search, of which 67 were included in the review, and they were analyzed in order to respond to four research questions. The main findings revealed that TWD distraction has negative effects on driving performance, affecting drivers' divided attention and concentration, which can lead to potentially life-threatening traffic events. We also provide several recommendations for driving simulators that can ensure high reliability and validity for experiments. This review can serve as a basis for regulators and interested parties to propose restrictions related to using mobile phones in a vehicle and improve road safety.

Testing the acceptability of motorcycle-AEB system: Use of unanticipated interventions as a reliable surrogate of genuinely unexpected events

OBJECTIVE

Active safety systems such as motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB) capable of ensuring effectiveness and safe rider-vehicle interaction present many potential benefits to reduce road fatalities but also many challenges. The whole development cycle of MAEB requires research through extensive field tests that reproduce unexpected interventions or real-life driving situation before the system can be available to the end-user. This study aims to better understand the rider's kinematic response required to control the stability of the rider-motorcycle system, as well as the extent of unexpectedness perceived by participants under different degrees of awareness of automatic braking (AB) activation.

METHODS

We compared responses to AB in anticipated and (un)anticipated conditions and in a condition that was intended to be genuinely unexpected (Out of the Blue). Twenty men and women, wearing an inertial measurement unit on their upper-back, rode a scooter-type motorcycle with two front wheels simulating urban riding maneuvers on a closed test-track. Three automatic braking (AB) profiles were tested in different sessions, ranged from 3 to 5 m/s² deceleration and 15 to 25 m/s³ braking-jerk. Differences between AB conditions were analyzed using linear mixed models.

RESULTS

The unanticipated condition was perceived as fairly unexpected (rated between Quite Unexpected and Very Unexpected). Out of the Blue condition was on average close to the highest level of unexpectedness (Completely Unexpected). The exposure to unanticipated AB events resulted in upper-body response with larger peaks of pitch rate (0.20 to 0.77 rad/s higher) and acceleration (1.0 to 2.3 m/s² higher) than those of anticipated. Participants showed less postural stability during unanticipated events taking longer both to start correcting the initial forward lean and to fully stabilize balance. Unanticipated and Out of the Blue conditions did not differ in either the amplitude of the kinematic variables or the time-to-peak pitch rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The kinematic response of the rider's upper-body was found to be a reliable estimator of unexpectedness in AB. The findings suggest that unanticipated AB events while the rider engages in riding tasks can enable testing aimed at designing MAEB systems and assessing end-user acceptance in a reliable manner and within ethical safety limits.

Under pressure: Effect of a ransomware and a screen failure on trust and driving performance in an automated car simulation

One major challenge for automated cars is to not only be safe, but also secure. Indeed, connected vehicles are vulnerable to cyberattacks, which may jeopardize individuals' trust in these vehicles and their safety. In a driving simulator experiment, 38 participants were exposed to two screen failures: silent (i.e., no turn signals on the in-vehicle screen and instrument cluster) and explicit (i.e., ransomware attack), both while performing a non-driving related task (NDRT) in a conditionally automated vehicle. Results showed that objective trust decreased after experiencing the failures. Drivers took over control of the vehicle and stopped their NDRT more often after the explicit failure than after the silent failure. Lateral control of the vehicle was compromised when taking over control after both failures compared to automated driving performance. However, longitudinal control proved to be smoother in terms of speed homogeneity compared to automated driving performance. These findings suggest that connectivity failures negatively affect trust in automation and manual driving performance after taking over control. This research posits the question of the importance of connectivity in the realm of trust in automation. Finally, we argue that engagement in a NDRT while riding in automated mode is an indicator of trust in the system and could be used as a surrogate measure for trust.

Talking on the Phone While Driving: A Literature Review on Driving Simulator Studies

Distracted driving is a growing concern around the world and has been the focus of many naturalistic and simulator-based studies. Driving simulators provide excellent practical and theoretical help in studying the driving process, and considerable efforts have been made to prove their validity. This research aimed to review relevant simulator-based studies focused on investigating the effects of the talking-on-the-phone-while-driving distraction on drivers' behavior. This work is a scoping review which followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. The search was performed on five databases, covering twenty years of research results. It was focused on finding answers to three research questions that could offer an overview of the main sources of distraction, the research infrastructure, and the measures that were used to analyze and predict the effects of distractions. A number of 4332 studies were identified in the database search, from which 83 were included in the review. The main findings revealed that TPWD distraction negatively affects driving performance, exposing drivers to dangerous traffic situations. Moreover, there is a general understanding that the driver's cognitive, manual, visual, and auditory resources are all involved, to a certain degree, when executing a secondary task while driving.

Development and application of connected vehicle technology test platform based on driving simulator: Case study

To ensure safety, it is necessary to test the connected vehicle (CV) technology before application. The goal of this study is to provide a case reference for the testing of the connected vehicle technology. The connected vehicle technology test platform is built based on the driving simulator. Taking fog zone, tunnel zone, and work zone as analysis cases, drivers were invited to participate in driving simulation experiments, related data was collected, and the impact of connected vehicle technology on driving behavior and safety was analyzed. The results of the fog zone imply that drivers have a high degree of compliance with the connected vehicle technology. However, it also increases the visual workload of drivers to a certain extent. The results of the tunnel zone indicate that the connected vehicle technology can enhance driving safety by enabling drivers to remain cautious. The results of the work zone demonstrate that the connected vehicle technology is able to promote drivers' ability of controlling speed and lane-changing. Overall, the results show that the connected vehicle technology has a positive effect on enhancing driving behavior and safety. The research framework and the development of the connected vehicle technology test platform based on the driving simulator given in the paper are dynamic and reproducible, which provides a reference for researchers in related fields, and the case analysis in this paper enriches the research of connected vehicle technology.

An Overview on the Current Status and Future Perspectives of Smart Cars

In recent years, the smart car sector has been increasing enormously in the Internet of Things (IoT) market. Furthermore, the number of smart cars seems set to increase over the next few years. This goal will be achieved because the application of recent IoT technologies to the automotive sector opens up innovative opportunities for the mobility of the future, in which connected cars will be more and more prominent in smart cities. This paper aims to provide an overview of the current status and future perspectives of smart cars, taking into account technological, transport, and social features. An analysis concerning the approaches to making smart a generic car, the possible evolutions that could occur in the coming decades, the characteristics of 5G, ADAS (advanced driver assistance systems), and the power sources is carried out in this paper.