The effectiveness of anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents in preventing venous thromboembolism during stroke rehabilitation: a historical cohort study

Risk factors and predictors for venous thromboembolism in people with ischemic stroke: A systematic review

Identification of individuals with ischemic stroke at particularly high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is crucial for targeted thromboprophylaxis. To guide clinical decision-making and development of risk prediction models, increased knowledge on risk factors and biomarkers is needed. Therefore, we set out to identify risk factors and predictors for VTE in people with ischemic stroke by conducting a systematic review of the literature. Medline and Embase were searched from January 1990 and onwards. Studies investigating demographic, clinical, and/or laboratory factors for stroke-related VTE were considered. Two reviewers screened all retrieved records, independently and in duplicate. Risk of bias assessments were guided by a structured framework (PROSPERO-ID: CRD42020176361). Of 4674 identified records, 26 studies were included. Twenty-six demographic, clinical, and laboratory factors associated with increased risk of stroke-related VTE after multivariable adjustments were identified. The following factors were reported by ≥2 studies: prior VTE, cancer, prestroke disability, leg weakness, increasing lesion volume of the brain infarct, infection, low Barthel Index, increasing length of hospital stay, biochemical indices of dehydration, as well as elevated levels of D-dimer, C-reactive protein, and homocysteine. The majority of the studies were of poor quality with moderate or high risk of bias. In conclusion, this systematic review informs on several potential risk factors and predictors for VTE in people with ischemic stroke. To improve risk stratification and guide development of risk prediction models, further confirmation is needed because there were few high-quality studies on each factor.

A Nomogram for Individualized Prediction of Calf Muscular Vein Thrombosis in Stroke Patients During Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Study

Objectives: To develop a nomogram for predicting calf muscle veins thrombosis (CMVT) in stroke patients during rehabilitation. Methods: We enrolled 360 stroke patients from the Rehabilitation Medicine Center from December 2015 to February 2019. Of the participants, 123 were included in the CMVT group and 237 in the no CMVT group. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model was applied to optimize feature selection for the model. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to construct a predictive model. Performance and clinical utility of the nomogram were generated using the Harrell's concordance index, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Age, Brunnstrom stage (lower extremity), D-dimer, and antiplatelet therapy were associated with the occurrence of CMVT. The prediction nomogram showed satisfactory performance with a concordance index of 0.718 (95% CI: 0.663-0.773) in internal verification. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = .217, suggested that the model was of goodness-of-fit. In addition, the DCA demonstrated that the CMVT nomogram had a good clinical net benefit. Conclusions: We developed a nomogram that could help clinicians identify high-risk groups of CMVT in stroke patients during rehabilitation for early intervention.

PREvention of VENous Thromboembolism in Hemorrhagic Stroke Patients - PREVENTIHS Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial and a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

In this randomized trial, currently utilized standard treatments were compared with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).

METHODS

Enoxaparin (0.4 mg daily for 10 days) was started after 72 h from the onset of ICH. The primary outcome was symptomatic or asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis as assessed by ultrasound at the end of study treatment. The safety of enoxaparin was also assessed. We included the results of this study in a meta-analysis of all relevant studies comparing anticoagulants with standard treatments or placebo.

RESULTS

PREVENTIHS was prematurely stopped after the randomization of 73 patients, due to the low recruitment rate. The prevalence of any VTE at 10 days was 15.8% in the enoxaparin group and 20.0% in the control group (RR 0.79 [95% CI 0.29-2.12]); 2.6% of enoxaparin and 8.6% of standard therapy patients had severe bleedings (RR 0.31 [95% CI 0.03-2.82]). When these results were meta-analyzed with the results of the selected studies (4,609 patients; 194 from randomized trials), anticoagulants were associated with a nonsignificant reduction in any VTE (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.43-1.51), in pulmonary embolism (OR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.17-1.60), and in mortality (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.64-1.12) without increase in hematoma enlargement (OR 0.97; 95% CI, 0.31-3.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute ICH, the use of anticoagulants to prevent VTE was safe but the overall level of evidence was low due to the low number of patients included in randomized clinical trials.

The Role of Stroke as a Trigger for Incident Venous Thromboembolism: Results from a Population-based Case-Crossover Study

Stroke is associated with a short-term increased risk of subsequent venous thromboembolism (VTE). It is unclear to what extent this association is mediated by stroke-related complications that are potential triggers for VTE, such as immobilization and infection. We aimed to investigate the role of acute stroke as a trigger for incident VTE while taking other concomitant VTE triggers into account. We conducted a population-based case-crossover study with 707 VTE patients. Triggers were registered during the 90 days before a VTE event (hazard period) and in four preceding 90-day control periods. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for VTE according to triggers. Stroke was registered in 30 of the 707 (4.2%) hazard periods and in 6 of the 2,828 (0.2%) control periods, resulting in a high risk of VTE, with odds ratios of 20.0 (95% CI: 8.3–48.1). After adjustments for immobilization and infection, odds ratios for VTE conferred by stroke were attenuated to 6.0 (95% CI: 1.6–22.1), and further to 4.0 (95% CI: 1.1–14.2) when other triggers (major surgery, red blood cell transfusion, trauma, and central venous catheter) were added to the regression model. A mediation analysis revealed that 67.8% of the total effect of stroke on VTE risk could be mediated through immobilization and infection. Analyses restricted to ischemic stroke yielded similar results. In conclusion, acute stroke was a trigger for VTE, and the association between stroke and VTE risk appeared to be largely mediated by immobilization and infection.

Is Prophylactic Anticoagulation for Deep Venous Thrombosis Common Practice After Intracerebral Hemorrhage?

Background and Purpose—

Prophylactic anticoagulation for deep venous thrombosis prevention after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is safe. Current guidelines recommend prophylactic anticoagulation after cessation of hematoma growth. We aimed to evaluate nationwide trends in deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis after ICH.

Methods—

In an analysis of the Premier database, we identified adult patients with ICH ( International Classification of Diseases Ninth edition code 431) from 2006 to 2010 who survived to day 2 of hospitalization. We excluded those with trauma or who underwent craniotomy or angiography. We abstracted type of anticoagulant used and date of first administration. We used univariate statistics and multivariable logistic regression to assess factors associated with prophylactic anticoagulation after ICH.

Results—

Among 32 690 (mean age, 69.7 years; 50.1% men) patients with spontaneous ICH, 5395 (16.5%) patients received any prophylactic anticoagulation during the hospital stay. Among these patients, 2416 (44.8%) received prophylactic anticoagulation by day 2. The most commonly used agents were heparin (71.1%), enoxaparin (27.5%), and dalteparin (1.4%). The proportion of patients receiving prophylactic anticoagulation increased slightly during the study period from 14.3% to 18.0% ( P <0.01 for trend). Use of prophylactic anticoagulation varied by geographic region ( P <0.001) in the United States: Northeast (23.2%), South (19.0%), Midwest (10.8%), and West (9.8%). In multivariable analysis, geographic region remained an independent predictor of prophylactic anticoagulation.

Conclusions—

Less than 20% of patients with ICH receive anticoagulation for deep venous thrombosis in the United States. When used, the time to initiation is <2 days in less than half of the patients. Further study should focus on understanding variations in practice and emphasize guideline-driven care.

Rate of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism during the care continuum in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the United States

BACKGROUND

Deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are frequent and life-threatening complications of ischemic stroke. We evaluated rates of symptomatic DVT/PE, and of in-hospital and post-discharge thromboprophylaxis in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

METHODS

In a retrospective US database analysis, data were extracted from the Premier Perspective™-i3 Pharma Informatics linked database for patients aged ≥18 years who were hospitalized for ischemic stroke from January 2005 to November 2007, and who had ≥6 months' continuous plan enrollment prior to index hospitalization. Patients discharged to an acute-care facility or with atrial fibrillation were excluded. Prophylaxis was evaluated during index hospitalization and for 14 days' post-discharge. DVT/PE rates were calculated during index hospitalization and up to 30 days post-discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 1524 patients were included; 46.1% received pharmacological and/or mechanical prophylaxis in-hospital (28.3%, 11.4% and 12.3% received unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin and mechanical prophylaxis, respectively). 6.4% of patients received outpatient pharmacological prophylaxis; warfarin was most frequently prescribed (5.9%). Total mean ± standard deviation length of index hospitalization was 3.0 ± 2.5 days. Mean prophylaxis duration in all patients was 0.9 ± 1.5 days in-hospital and 1.7 ± 6.9 days post-discharge. Symptomatic DVT/PE occurred in 25 patients overall (1.64%), with an inpatient rate of 0.98% and an outpatient rate of 0.66%.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 1% of patients with AIS experienced symptomatic in-hospital and/or post-discharge DVT/PE. Although 46% received prophylaxis in-hospital, only 6% received prophylaxis in the outpatient setting. This highlights the need for sustained thromboprophylaxis prescribing across the continuum of care.

Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Ischemic Stroke Patients Receiving Extended-Duration Enoxaparin Prophylaxis: Results From the EXCLAIM Study

Background and Purpose—

The optimal duration of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acute stroke patients is unknown. This subanalysis of the Extended Prophylaxis for Venous ThromboEmbolism in Acutely Ill Medical Patients With Prolonged Immobilization (EXCLAIM) study investigated extended-duration thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin, compared with placebo following standard-duration enoxaparin, in ischemic stroke patients.

Methods—

Acutely ill medical patients with recently reduced mobility received open-label enoxaparin 40 mg for 10±4 days, and they were then randomized to double-blind enoxaparin 40 mg daily or placebo for further 28±4 days. Venous thromboembolism incidence (symptomatic/asymptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, symptomatic/fatal pulmonary embolism) up to day 28 after randomization and major bleeding rates up to 48 h after the last dose of study treatment were reported.

Results—

In total, 389 of 5963 (6.5%) randomized patients had ischemic stroke: 198 received extended-duration prophylaxis and 191 placebo. Extended-duration prophylaxis reduced venous thromboembolism incidence versus placebo (2.4% versus 8.0%; absolute risk difference, −5.6%; 95% CI, −10.5% to −0.7%), but it was associated with an increase in major bleeding (1.5% versus 0% in enoxaparin and placebo groups; absolute risk difference, +1.5%; 95% CI, −0.2% to 3.2%).

Conclusion—

Extended-duration thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin was associated with reduced venous thromboembolism risk and increased major bleeding in the subgroup of patients with ischemic stroke in the EXCLAIM study.

Clinical Trial Registration Information—

URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov . Unique Identifier: NCT00077753.

Pharmacological prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism during acute phase of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: what do we know about risks and benefits?

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) represents a devastating clinical event with high mortality and morbidity rates. Only few patients with sICH are treated with neurosurgical evacuation of the hematoma, and the majority of them need only a good conservative medical approach. The goal of medical treatment is to avoid secondary neurological and systemic complications. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents one of the most feared complications of sICH, and it is a potential cause of death. The balance between the benefit of VTE prevention and the risk of hematoma enlargement and/or rebleeding with the use of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis remains controversial because of the lack of consistent evidences in the literature. The efficacy of mechanical prophylaxis is also uncertain. Consequently, until now there are no clear guidelines and scientific evidences available for physicians in this field. The aim of this review is to analyze the available literature and guidelines about pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in patients with nonsurgical sICH.

Efficacy and safety of anticoagulants in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage: a meta-analysis of controlled studies

AIM

The role of anticoagulants for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acute hemorrhagic stroke is uncertain. We performed an updated meta-analysis of studies to obtain the best estimates of the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with acute hemorrhagic stroke.

METHODS

Using electronic and manual searches of the literature, we identified randomized and non-randomized studies comparing anticoagulants (unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin or heparinoids) with treatments other than anticoagulants (elastic stockings, intermittent pneumatic compression or placebo) in patients with acute hemorrhagic stroke. Study outcomes included symptomatic and asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT), symptomatic and asymptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), any hematoma enlargement or death. Risk ratios (RRs) for individual outcomes were calculated for each study and data from all studies were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

RESULTS

Four studies (two randomized) involving 1000 patients with acute hemorrhagic stroke met the criteria for inclusion in this meta-analysis. Compared with other treatments, anticoagulants were associated with a significant reduction in PE (1.7% vs. 2.9%; RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.17-0.80; P = 0.01), a DVT rate of 4.2% compared with 3.3% (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.44-1.34; P = 0.36), an increase in any hematoma enlargement (8.0% vs. 4.0%; RR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.57-3.53; P = 0.45), and a non-significant reduction in mortality (16.1% vs. 20.9%; RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.57-1.03; P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that in patients with hemorrhagic stroke, early anticoagulation is associated with a significant reduction in PE and a non-significant reduction in mortality, with the trade-off of a non-significant increase in hematoma enlargement. These results must be taken with caution and should encourage the assessment of the clinical benefit of antithrombotic prophylaxis in patients with cerebral bleeding by properly designed clinical trials.

Systematic review of observational research studying the long-term use of antithrombotic medicines following intracerebral hemorrhage

Patients with intracerebral hemorrhage frequently have indications for antithrombotic therapy. This represents a therapeutic dilemma as intracerebral hemorrhage is considered a contraindication to antithrombotic medication. Previous systematic reviews have revealed no long-term randomised studies addressing this issue. Our objective was to review observational studies describing the long-term follow-up of patients receiving antithrombotic therapy following intracerebral hemorrhage. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1984 to 2008 for any observational studies detailing use of antithrombotic treatments in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Included studies must have had follow-up extending beyond discharge. The primary endpoint was recurrent intracerebral hemorrhage. Secondary endpoints were ischemic events and serious vascular events. 1,301 articles were reviewed: two epidemiological studies and six case series met the inclusion criteria. These described a total of 46 subjects receiving antiplatelet agents (from one study) and 42 patients receiving oral anticoagulants (from one study and six case-series). For patients receiving subsequent aspirin there were seven recurrent intracerebral hemorrhages and four subsequent thrombo-occulsive events. Amongst patients restarting oral anticoagulation there were four recurrent intracerebral bleeds and nine subsequent thrombo-occulsive events. There is a marked paucity of evidence to guide clinicians when planning the long-term management of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and cogent indications for antithrombotic therapy. Published guidance addressing this issue is not evidence based. In the continued absence of randomised studies addressing antithrombotic use following intracerebral hemorrhage, there is a clear requirement for further high quality observational data on the clinical impact of antithrombotic therapy in this important patient group.

Deep venous thrombosis in stroke patients during rehabilitation phase

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence, factors, and effects of antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents on sub-acute and chronic ischemic stroke patients during the rehabilitation phase for rates of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) from the perspective for rehabilitation medicine.

METHODS

In this study of 272 patients undergoing rehabilitation for completed cerebral infarction, multiple circumference measurements of calf and thigh along with presence or absence of symptoms (congestion, swelling, skin redness, warmth, pain, pigmentation, fever and/or Homan sign or Luck's sign) documented in the physical examination were recorded in all patients. Patients with these symptoms suggestive of DVT were included for D-dimer assay and venous duplex ultrasonography to confirm presence of DVT.

RESULTS

DVT was documented in 24 patients (8.8%), most of whom displayed distal DVT on the hemiparetic side. A significant association was seen between occurrence of DVT and more severe lower limb paresis, manifesting as gait disturbance, severe calf muscle spasticity, use of ankle-foot orthosis (AFO). A significant increase in development of DVT was associated with severe spasticity in hemiparetic calf muscles (odds ratio (OR) 28.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 6.9-113.5). Cilostazol seemed to be the only effective antiplatelet drug for preventing DVT in cerebral infarction patients.

CONCLUSION

Incidence of DVT in the rehabilitation phase following stroke was not low, which was predominant as distal DVT on the hemiparetic side. Lower limb paresis, gait disturbance, calf muscle spasticity and use of AFO contributed to occurrence of DVT. It is likely that micro-injuries in the venous endothelium due to spasticity and AFO might cause DVT. Cilostazol seems effective for protecting against venous endothelial damage following DVT.

Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults With Ischemic Stroke

Purpose— Our goal is to provide an overview of the current evidence about components of the evaluation and treatment of adults with acute ischemic stroke. The intended audience is physicians and other emergency healthcare providers who treat patients within the first 48 hours after stroke. In addition, information for healthcare policy makers is included.

Methods— Members of the panel were appointed by the American Heart Association Stroke Council’s Scientific Statement Oversight Committee and represented different areas of expertise. The panel reviewed the relevant literature with an emphasis on reports published since 2003 and used the American Heart Association Stroke Council’s Levels of Evidence grading algorithm to rate the evidence and to make recommendations. After approval of the statement by the panel, it underwent peer review and approval by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee. It is intended that this guideline be fully updated in 3 years.

Results— Management of patients with acute ischemic stroke remains multifaceted and includes several aspects of care that have not been tested in clinical trials. This statement includes recommendations for management from the first contact by emergency medical services personnel through initial admission to the hospital. Intravenous administration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator remains the most beneficial proven intervention for emergency treatment of stroke. Several interventions, including intra-arterial administration of thrombolytic agents and mechanical interventions, show promise. Because many of the recommendations are based on limited data, additional research on treatment of acute ischemic stroke is needed.

Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists

PURPOSE

Our goal is to provide an overview of the current evidence about components of the evaluation and treatment of adults with acute ischemic stroke. The intended audience is physicians and other emergency healthcare providers who treat patients within the first 48 hours after stroke. In addition, information for healthcare policy makers is included.

METHODS

Members of the panel were appointed by the American Heart Association Stroke Council's Scientific Statement Oversight Committee and represented different areas of expertise. The panel reviewed the relevant literature with an emphasis on reports published since 2003 and used the American Heart Association Stroke Council's Levels of Evidence grading algorithm to rate the evidence and to make recommendations. After approval of the statement by the panel, it underwent peer review and approval by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee. It is intended that this guideline be fully updated in 3 years.

RESULTS

Management of patients with acute ischemic stroke remains multifaceted and includes several aspects of care that have not been tested in clinical trials. This statement includes recommendations for management from the first contact by emergency medical services personnel through initial admission to the hospital. Intravenous administration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator remains the most beneficial proven intervention for emergency treatment of stroke. Several interventions, including intra-arterial administration of thrombolytic agents and mechanical interventions, show promise. Because many of the recommendations are based on limited data, additional research on treatment of acute ischemic stroke is needed.

Prevention of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism following stroke: a systematic review of published articles

We performed a systematic review of the literature on venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following cerebral infarct (CI) and haemorrhagic stroke. MEDLINE, Cochrane, LILACS and SciELO databases were scanned, and the Abstracts from Brazilian, American and European Neurology and Stroke Congresses were scrutinized for clinical trials. Moreover, the reference lists of articles and reviews were searched. A pooled analysis of two large studies with aspirin was made. Both unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparins/heparinoids (LMWH) are partially effective for VTE prophylaxis after CI, and should be routinely used in patients with motor deficit and reduced mobility and no contraindications. Reduction of deep venous thrombosis is better established than the effect over pulmonary embolism or mortality. Some evidence points to a greater efficacy of LMWH. The available evidence does not support the use of mechanical methods or dextran. Aspirin may have a mild protective effect. Low-dose Warfarin might be useful in the rehabilitation setting. Strict recommendations cannot be made in patients with haemorrhagic stroke but intermittent pneumatic compression merits further study. There are important limitations of current VTE preventive strategies following stroke. Additional studies on the combination of methods after CI and of low doses of anticoagulants following cerebral haemorrhage are urgently needed.

Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism, Recurrent Stroke, and Other Vascular Events After Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Role of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Antiplatelet Therapy

Patients with stroke or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) are at increased risk of vascular events, such as recurrent stroke or venous thromboembolism (VTE), and thus the secondary prevention of such events is an important element of managing these patients. Current guidelines recommend that patients with acute stroke, restricted mobility, and no contraindications to anticoagulants receive thromboprophylactic therapy with low-dose unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), or heparinoids to prevent VTE. This recommendation is based on clinical trial evidence that UFH is effective in reducing the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after stroke. LMWHs have been shown to be at least as effective as UFH in preventing VTE, and offer advantages in terms of a more predictable anticoagulant effect, lower risk of bleeding, and ease of administration. However, adequately powered trials are needed to confirm their relative benefits and risks; the Prevention of VTE after Acute Ischemic Stroke with LMWH (PREVAIL) study with enoxaparin, currently in progress, should provide valuable information in this context. Antiplatelet therapy has been shown to be effective in preventing recurrent vascular events, as evidenced by the results of studies such as the Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events (CAPRIE) trial. In contrast, evidence for the efficacy of LMWH in this situation is contradictory. Given the potential benefits of LMWH in preventing VTE in stroke patients, a potential rationale exists for combination therapy with antiplatelet agents and LMWHs. Clinical trials with such combinations are warranted.

Cost-effectiveness of screening for deep vein thrombosis by ultrasound at admission to stroke rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE

This project was a cost-effectiveness analysis of the practice of routine Doppler ultrasound screening for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with ischemic stroke at the time of admission to rehabilitation.

DESIGN

A decision-analysis model was created to compare 2 approaches for detecting DVT in a stroke population: (1) screening all patients with acute ischemic stroke at admission to stroke rehabilitation for DVT by Doppler ultrasound with subsequent treatment; or (2) clinical surveillance for signs of DVT and treatment after confirmation by Doppler ultrasound. The prevalence of DVT, risk of complication from DVT, and risk of complication from treatment were obtained from published reports. Costs are in 2004 dollars and the effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. We conducted these analyses from a societal perspective.

SETTING

Inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit.

PARTICIPANTS

Not applicable.

INTERVENTION

Screening all patients with acute ischemic stroke at admission to stroke rehabilitation for DVT by Doppler ultrasound with subsequent treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Cost in 2004 dollars per QALY gained by screening all patients with acute ischemic stroke at admission to stroke rehabilitation for DVT by Doppler ultrasound with subsequent treatment.

RESULTS

The expected utility of screening patients with ischemic stroke for DVT by Doppler ultrasound on admission to rehabilitation is 1.875 QALYs and that of not screening is 1.872 QALYs. The expected gain is .0026 QALYs (23 h). Obtaining this increase in quality-adjusted life incurs additional cost of 168 dollars per stroke patient and a marginal cost-effectiveness of 67,200 dollars for each QALY gained.

CONCLUSIONS

This study estimates that the cost-effectiveness ratio is considerably higher than that reported in other rehabilitation conditions and higher than the commonly stated level for an intervention to be considered cost-effective. The difference from previous reports primarily relates to the shorter life expectancy following stroke, the prevalence of occult DVT at admission, rate of complications of anticoagulation, and the estimates of the screening's test characteristics used in our study. Further study of these areas is likely to contribute to improving our understanding of the most appropriate care of these patients.

Prevention of venous thromboembolism after acute ischemic stroke

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication after acute ischemic stroke. When screened by 125I fibrinogen scanning or venography, the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) in stroke patients is comparable with that seen in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. Most stroke patients have multiple risk factors for VTE, like advanced age, low Barthel Index severity score or hemiplegia. As pulmonary embolism is a major cause of death after acute stroke, the prevention of this complication is of crucial importance. Prospective trials have shown that both unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are effective in reducing DVT and pulmonary embolism in stroke patients. Current guidelines recommend the use of these agents in stroke patients with risk factors for VTE. Some clinicians are concerned that the rate of intracranial bleeding associated with thromboprophylaxis may outweigh the benefit of prevention of VTE. Low-dose LMWH and UFH seem, however, safe in stroke patients. Higher doses clearly increase the risk of cerebral bleeding and should be avoided for prophylactic use. Both aspirin and mechanical prophylaxis are suboptimal to prevent VTE. Graduated compression stockings should be reserved to patients with a clear contraindication to antithrombotic agents.

Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in an ambulatory chronic stroke patient

PURPOSE

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a well-known complication of stroke and frequently develops in acute stroke patients. Immobility in stroke patients increases the risk of DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE). The incidence of DVT in non-ambulatory stroke patients is more frequent than the incidence in ambulatory stroke patients. We report a case of DVT and PE in an ambulatory chronic stroke patient.

METHOD

Initial physical examination showed heat and swelling of hemiplegic leg. The patient was only able to ambulate with the assist of a monocane and a plastic leaf spring orthosis due to ankle dorsiflexor weakness. The patient was treated with anticoagulation and inferior vena cava filter placement.

RESULTS

After long-term anticoagulation, follow-up studies revealed satisfactory resolution of DVT and PE.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a case of DVT and PE which developed during the chronic stage of stroke, 2 years from the onset of stroke, and review the cause of DVT.