A new shoulder range of motion screening measurement: Its reliability and application in the assessment of the prevalence of shoulder contractures in patients with impaired consciousness caused by severe brain damage

Assistive technologies, including orthotic devices, for the management of contractures in adults after a stroke

BACKGROUND

Contractures (reduced range of motion and increased stiffness of a joint) are a frequent complication of stroke. Contractures can interfere with function and cause cosmetic and hygiene problems. Preventing and managing contractures might improve rehabilitation and recovery after stroke.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of assistive technologies for the management of contractures in adults after a stroke.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, five other databases, and three trials registers in May 2022. We also searched for reference lists of relevant studies, contacted experts in the field, and ran forward citation searches.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled studies (RCTs) that used electrical, mechanical, or electromechanical devices to manage contractures in adults with stroke were eligible for inclusion in this review. We planned to include studies that compared assistive technologies against no treatment, routine therapy, or another assistive technology.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors (working in pairs) selected all studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The primary outcomes were passive joint range of motion (PROM) with and without standardised force, and indirect measures of PROM. The secondary outcomes included hygiene. We also wanted to evaluate the adverse effects of assistive technology. Effects were expressed as mean differences (MDs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

Seven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Five of these were meta-analysed; they included 252 adults treated in acute and subacute rehabilitation settings. All studies compared assistive technology with routine therapy; one study also compared assistive technology with no treatment, but we were unable to obtain separate data for stroke participants. The assistive technologies used in the studies were electrical stimulation, splinting, positioning using a hinged board, and active repetitive motor training using a non-robotic device with electrical stimulation. Only one study applied stretching to end range. Treatment duration ranged from four to 12 weeks. The overall risk of bias was high for all studies. We are uncertain whether: • electrical stimulation to wrist extensors improves passive range of wrist extension (MD -7.30°, 95% CI -18.26° to 3.66°; 1 study, 81 participants; very low-certainty evidence); • a non-robotic device with electrical stimulation to shoulder flexors improves passive range of shoulder flexion (MD -9.00°, 95% CI -25.71° to 7.71°; 1 study; 50 participants; very low-certainty evidence); • assistive technology improves passive range of wrist extension with standardised force (SMD -0.05, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.29; four studies, 145 participants; very low-certainty evidence): • a non-robotic device with electrical stimulation to elbow extensors improves passive range of elbow extension (MD 0.41°, 95% CI -0.15° to 0.97°; 1 study, 50 participants; very low-certainty evidence). One study reported the adverse outcome of pain when using a hinged board to apply stretch to wrist and finger flexors, and another study reported skin breakdown when using a thumb splint. No studies reported hygiene or indirect measures of PROM.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Only seven small RCTs met the eligibility criteria of this review, and all provided very low-certainty evidence. Consequently, we cannot draw firm conclusions on the effects of assistive technology compared with routine therapy or no therapy. It was also difficult to confirm whether there is a risk of harm associated with treatment using assistive technology. Future studies should apply adequate treatment intensity (i.e. magnitude and the duration of stretch) and use valid and reliable outcome measures. Such studies might better identify the role of assistive technology in the management of contractures in adults after a stroke.

The Delphi of ORACLE: An Expert Consensus Survey for the Development of the Observational Risk Assessment of Contractures (Longitudinal Evaluation)

OBJECTIVE

Despite rising prevalence rates, no standard tool is available to identify individuals at risk of developing contractures. This study aimed to gain expert consensus on items for the development of the Observational Risk Assessment Tool for Contractures: Longitudinal Evaluation (ORACLE) for care home residents.

DESIGN

A two-round, online modified Delphi study.

PARTICIPANTS

Panellists were qualified healthcare professionals with a background in physiotherapy, occupational therapy, nursing, and rehabilitation medicine.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

In the first round, the experts were asked to rate the predesigned list of items on a Likert scale while in the second round, consensus was sought in the areas of disagreement identified in the previous round.

RESULTS

The two rounds of the Delphi survey included 30 and 25 panellists, respectively. The average clinical and academic experience of the panellists was 22.2 years and 10.5 years, respectively. The panel demonstrated a high level of consensus regarding the clinical factors (10 out of 15 items); preventive care approaches (9 out of 10 items), and contextual factors (12 out of 13 items) ranging from 70% to 100%.

CONCLUSION

This Delphi study determined expert consensus on items to be included in a contracture risk assessment tool (ORACLE). The items were related to factors associated with joint contractures, appropriate preventive care interventions, and potentially relevant contextual factors associated with care home settings. The promise of a risk assessment tool that includes these items has the capacity to reduce the risk of contracture development or progression and to trigger timely and appropriate referrals to help prevent further loss of function and independence.

Factors associated with joint contractures in adults: a systematic review with narrative synthesis

PURPOSE

The primary objective of the review was to collate the available evidence on factors associated with joint contractures in adults.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, CINAHL, AMED, and EMBASE. Studies that involved participants aged ≥18 and assessed joint contracture as a primary or secondary outcome were included. Two independent reviewers screened studies against the eligibility criteria, performed data extraction, and assessed the quality of evidence. A narrative synthesis by domain and sub-domain was undertaken. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO: CRD42019145079.

RESULTS

Forty-seven studies were included in the review. Identified factors were broadly classified into three major domains: sociodemographic factors, physical factors, and proxies for bed confinement. Sociodemographic factors were not associated with joint contractures. Functional ability, pain, muscle weakness, physical mobility, and bed confinement provided the most consistent evidence of association with joint contractures. The evidence regarding the relationship between spasticity and joint contractures remains unclear. Other factors might be important, but there was insufficient evidence to make inferences.

CONCLUSIONS

The review identified and collated evidence on factors associated with joint contractures, which can be utilised to develop effective prevention and management strategies. Implications for rehabilitationClinical interventions based on the timely identification of risks related to joint contractures in vulnerable adults have the potential to prevent or ameliorate their development or progression.Quality and consistency of care for vulnerable adults would be enhanced by developing effective joint contracture prevention and rehabilitation strategies based on the evidence presented in this review.As many vulnerable adults are located in the community or non-acute care settings, strategies should target these loci of care.Structured risk assessments that can support non-physiotherapy staff working in these loci of care to identify risks related to joint contractures would provide an important resource for risk management.

Smartphone applications for the evaluation of pathologic shoulder range of motion and shoulder scores-a comparative study

Hypothesis and background

Accurate measurement of range of motion (ROM) is important in evaluating a pathologic shoulder and calculating shoulder scores. The aim of this study was to establish the reliability and validity of different smartphone applications (apps) in assessing pathologic shoulder ROM and to determine whether differences in recorded ROM measurements affect calculated shoulder scores. The authors hypothesized that there is no difference between shoulder ROM assessment methods and calculated shoulder scores.

Methods

In this nonrandomized controlled clinical trial, ROM of 75 participants with a history of shoulder disease (21 women, 54 men) was assessed using a smartphone inclinometer and virtual goniometer, a standard goniometer, and clinicians' visual estimation. Shoulder strength was assessed, and Constant-Murley (CM) and University of California–Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scores were calculated.

Results

Independent of diagnosis or operation, all cases (except for passive glenohumeral abduction of unstable shoulders) showed excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (>0.84). Interobserver reliability was excellent for all ROM measures (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.97). All modalities had excellent agreement to values attained with the universal goniometer. There were no differences for the calculated CM or UCLA scores between the modalities employed to measure ROM.

Conclusions

A smartphone inclinometer or virtual goniometer is comparable to other clinical methods of measuring pathologic shoulder ROM. Clinicians can employ smartphone applications with confidence to measure shoulder ROM and to calculate UCLA and CM scores. The apps are also available to patients and may be a useful adjunct to physiotherapy, especially in cases of limited access to health care services.

Validation of an innovative method of shoulder range-of-motion measurement using a smartphone clinometer application

BACKGROUND

An accurate and reliable measurement of shoulder range of motion (ROM) is important in the evaluation of the shoulder. A smartphone digital clinometer application is a potentially simpler method for measuring shoulder ROM. The goal of this study was to establish the reliability and validity of shoulder ROM measurements among varying health care providers using a smartphone clinometer application in healthy and symptomatic adults.

METHODS

An attending surgeon, fellow, resident, physician assistant, and student served as examiners. Bilateral shoulders of 24 healthy subjects were included. Fifteen postoperative patients served as the symptomatic cohort. Examiners measured ROM of each shoulder, first using visual estimation and then using a goniometer and smartphone clinometer in a randomized fashion.

RESULTS

The interobserver reliability among examiners showed significant correlation, with average intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC(2,1)] values of 0.61 (estimation), 0.69 (goniometer), and 0.80 (smartphone). All 5 examiners had substantial agreement with the gold standard in healthy subjects, with average ICC(2,1) values ranging from 0.62 to 0.79. The interobserver reliability in symptomatic patients showed significant correlation, with average ICC(2,1) values of 0.72 (estimation), 0.79 (goniometer), and 0.89 (smartphone). Examiners had excellent agreement with the gold standard in symptomatic patients, with an average ICC(2,1) value of 0.98.

CONCLUSION

The smartphone clinometer has excellent agreement with a goniometer-based gold standard for measurement of shoulder ROM in both healthy and symptomatic subjects. There is good correlation among different skill levels of providers for measurements obtained using the smartphone. A smartphone-based clinometer is a good resource for shoulder ROM measurement in both healthy subjects and symptomatic patients.

The hemiplegic arm: Interrater reliability and concurrent validity of passive range of motion measurements

PURPOSE

To assess whether our measurement protocol using two raters simultaneously yielded reliable passive range of motion measurements of the hemiplegic arm. Additionally, motion ranges were correlated to several factors to examine the concurrent validity of these measurements.

METHOD

Two raters simultaneously assessed five arm motions at baseline, after five and ten weeks in respectively 18, 13 and 12 stroke patients. One tester made the passive movement and the other read the hydrogoniometer. Raters then switched roles.

RESULTS

Intraclass correlation coefficients revealed high agreement between the raters with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging between 0.84 and 0.99. Standard errors of measurement and smallest detectable differences were large for shoulder abduction. Significant correlations were found between shoulder external rotation and flexion. All arm motions correlated negatively to pain at the end range of these motions. Shoulder external rotation and flexion were significantly correlated to the time post stroke. Concurrent validity with Ashworth Scale, Fugl-Meyer Assessment and Barthel Index was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

The current measurement protocol yielded high reliability indices and seems useful for further use. However, standard error of measurement and smallest detectable difference for shoulder abduction were high, implying the necessity to include a large sample size in future studies. Correlations revealed that restricted range of arm motions relate to the time post-stroke and coincide with pain.

Contractures and involuntary muscle overactivity in severe brain injury

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association of contractures with an increase or reduction of non-spastic muscle overactivity due to severe cerebral damage.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Forty-five patients with tetraparesis after severe cerebral damage were investigated. Three groups were defined based on the presence of spasticity (revealed as resistance to passive stretch (= hypertonia)), and the presence of contracture of the relevant knee joint: Group(s) (17 patients with hypertonia without contracture), Group(s+c) (20 patients with hypertonia and contracture), and Group(c) (eight patients without hypertonia and with contracture). In all groups spontaneous involuntary muscle activity was assessed continuously over a 12-hour period through isometric measurement of knee joint flexion torque. A mathematical algorithm differentiated an hourly muscle activity spectrum (PI(h)). The frequency of peaks (peaks(h)) from the activity spectrum was determined.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

We revealed that Group(s) had higher PI(h) and more frequent peaks(h) compared with Group(s+c) and Group(c) (p<0.05). Group(c) had comparable PI(h) and peaks(h) compared with Group(s+c) (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The presence of contractures was associated with lower involuntary muscle overactivity in terms of lower PI(h) and less frequent peaks(h), indicating that contractures may be associated with reduced non-spastic positive features of the upper motor neurone syndrome in patients with severe brain damage.

Genetic influences on joint contractures secondary to immobilization

The primary research question of this study queries whether, beyond environmental conditions, genetic factors affect the development of joint contractures. We hypothesized that intrinsic genetic factors influence the severity of joint contractures developing secondary to joint immobilization. Forty rats from four inbred rat strains had one leg immobilized in knee flexion for 4 weeks. The contracture was measured mechanically as the lack of range of motion to a standardized torque. Using the contralateral leg as a control, the average severity of the contracture could be calculated and compared between strains. All immobilized legs presented knee contractures after 4 weeks of immobilization. Two strains (Dark Agouti and Fisher 344) showed a larger mean knee contracture than those of the two other rat strains (Augustus Copenhagen Irish and Brown Norway). Environmental factors, such as immobility, are usually identified as a cause of a joint contracture. These results demonstrate that, in addition to mechanical factors in the environment of a joint, intrinsic genetic factors participate in the process leading to joint contracture. This demonstration has important consequences for directing future research and may lead to interventions to help patients at risk of developing joint contractures.

The epidemiology of major joint contractures: a systematic review of the literature

Current knowledge on the epidemiology of major joint contractures is limited. We systematically reviewed the literature to identify studies examining the epidemiology of joint contracture regardless of clinical condition. Epidemiologic measures of interest were prevalence, incidence, and prognostic risk factors. We used Medline to identify all epidemiologic studies of major joint contractures published from 1966 to March 2005. There was a high prevalence of major joint contractures. Most studies focused on one joint rather than including all relevant major contractures. However, most studies did provide a definition of a contracture or the measures used to assess contractures. Immobility is a highly prevalent disability in at-risk populations, and constitutes a tremendous burden to patients in nursing homes, hospitals, and the outpatient community. The lack of epidemiologic data is a major impediment to providing appropriate treatment.