The Effects of Splinting on Outcomes for Epicondylitis

Clinical and Ultrasonographic Effectiveness of Two Different Splints Used for the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

OBJECTIVE

This study compares the clinical and ultrasonographic efficacy of 2 splint types, the lateral epicondylitis band (LEB) and the wrist extensor splint (WES), for treatment of lateral epicondylitis (LE).

DESIGN

Randomized controlled single-blind trial.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

159 participants diagnosed with unilateral LE based on clinical and ultrasonographic findings, and 2-12 weeks from symptom onset, were included (N=159).

INTERVENTIONS

One group received joint-protection education-only (wait-and-see), while the other 2 groups were fit with splints: one the LEB and the other the WES. Both splint groups received joint-protection education.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures were the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, hand grip strength by dynamometry, algometric measurements, patient satisfaction, and selected ultrasonographic parameters (maximum tendon thickness measurements (MTTM) in the capitellar-radiocapitellar region and total ultrasonography scale score [TUSS]). All outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3-weeks, and 6-weeks post intervention initiation.

RESULTS

Participants' mean age was 46.85±8.63 years. Of the participants, 40.88% (n=65) were male and 59.12% (n=94) were female. The baseline median (1Q-3Q) values of PRTEE-total scores were 58.5 (51-68) for the LEB, 63.5 (56.25-70.25) for the WES and 57 (48-68) for the education-only groups. At 6-weeks, the PRTEE-total scores had decreased by 44 points for those randomized to the LEB, 46 points to the WES and 7 points in the education-only groups(P<.001). While the LEB and WES approaches were superior to the wait-and-see approach in algometric measurements, VAS, and PRTEE scores (P<.05), no significant changes were found in MTTM and TUSS values. The LEB group was superior to the WES group in hand grip strength and patient satisfaction (P<.05).

CONCLUSION

Using either splint for 6 weeks can be considered effective for the relief of pain and increased functionality in persons with subacute LE, although the LEB had a more positive effect on grip strength and patient satisfaction than the WES.

Comparison of the efficiency of peloidotherapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapies in patients diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis: a prospective, randomized, controlled study

Various treatment methods are used in the management of lateral epicondylitis (LE); however, there is no universally accepted standard treatment approach. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of peloidotherapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on pain, functional status, and quality of life in the treatment of LE. The study was designed as a hospital-based, prospective randomized controlled trial. Ninety patients, with a mean age of 47.30±7.95 (range, 18 to 65 years), diagnosed with chronic (3 months) unilateral LE were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. The peloidotherapy group received 15 sessions of peloid therapy for 3 weeks, 5 days a week, while the ESWT group received three sessions of ESWT (1.8 bar, 10.0 Hz, 2000 impulses) for 3 weeks, once a week. The patients were evaluated before treatment, at the end of the treatment, and one month after the treatment. The groups were compared in terms of pain, quality of life, functional status, and handgrip strength. At the end of the treatment and one-month follow-up, statistically significant improvements were observed in all parameters. This study is the first randomized trial comparing peloidotherapy to ESWT as an adjunct to exercise therapy in LE. Both ESWT and peloidotherapy, when added to exercise therapy, showed positive short-term effects on pain, quality of life, functional status, and handgrip strength in primary conservative treatment of chronic LE (p<0.001), and no superiority was found between them in terms of efficacy. Peloidotherapy or ESWT may be preferred in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis, depending on the patient's condition. Peloidotherapy appears to be more advantageous due to its lower side effects and painless nature. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04748406.

Lateral Elbow Pain and Muscle Function Impairments

Although often described as a self-limiting condition and likely to resolve on its own, high recurrence rates and extended sick leave frame a need for effective non-surgical treatment for people with lateral elbow tendinopathy. The interrelationship of histological and structural changes to the tendon, the associated impairments in motor control, and potential changes in pain processing may all drive symptoms. This clinical practice guideline covers the epidemiology, functional anatomy and pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical course, prognosis, differential diagnosis, tests and measures, and interventions for managing lateral elbow tendinopathy in the physical therapy clinic. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2022;52(12):CPG1-CPG111. doi:10.2519/jospt.2022.0302.

Comparison of the effectiveness of peloid therapy and kinesio taping in tennis elbow patients: a single-blind controlled study

This study aimed to compare the peloid therapy and kinesio tape treatments in chronic lateral epicondylitis. While home exercise program and cold application were applied to the control group, peloid therapy (5 days a week for 3 weeks at 45 °C for 30 min each day, a total of 15 treatment days) was applied in addition to the first group, and kinesio taping (6 treatment days 2 times a week) was applied to the second group. Patients were evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS), grip strength with Jamar hydraulic dynamometer, Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Disabilities (DASH), quality of life in Short Form-36 (SF-36), and Patient-Rated Forearm Evaluation Questionnaire (PRFEQ) was recorded before treatment, after treatment (third week), and 1 month after the end of treatment. In this study, 156 patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis were included. In the follow-up of the patients, there was a statistically significant improvement in the hand grip strength, DASH, PRFEQ, VAS, and SF-36 scores in the 1st month follow-up after the treatment compared to the pre-treatment control in all groups (p < 0.001). At the end of the treatment, the hand grip strength (p = 0.002), DASH (p < 0.001), PRFEQ pain (p < 0.001) and function (p = 0.007), SF-36 physical health (p = 0.002) scores were statistically significant in the peloid therapy group compared to the control group. At the 1st month after the end of treatment, hand grip strength, VAS, DASH, PRFEQ pain, function, daily activities, and SF-36 physical health scores (all of p < 0.001) were statistically significant in the peloid treatment group compared to the control group. Peloid treatment was found to be more effective than kinesio taping in SF-36 physical health (p = 0.007) and PRFEQ pain (p = 0.003) scores in the 1st month follow-up after treatment. Peloid therapy in addition to exercise seems more effective in chronic lateral epicondylitis. Randomized controlled long-term studies are needed.ClinicalTrials ID: NCT04687943.

Counterforce bracing of lateral epicondylitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Counterforce bracing is one of the common treatment modalities for tennis elbow. The objective of this study was to determine whether counterforce bracing offers any additional benefit over placebo bracing in the treatment of tennis elbow.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial investigated the use of counterforce bracing (n = 17) compared with placebo bracing (n = 14) in the management of acute tennis elbow. Outcome measures included patient-rated pain and functional outcomes, epicondyle tenderness, and strength at 6 months and long term. Follow-up occurred at 2, 6, 12, and 26 weeks, as well as long term (mean follow-up, 3 years). The study duration was 5 years.

RESULTS

The 2 groups, counterforce and placebo, were similar in age, sex, hand dominance, and duration of symptoms. Both braces improved patient-rated pain frequency and severity (P < .01), difficulty with picking up objects and twisting motions, and overall elbow function (P < .001) at 6 months and 3 years. Both braces also improved lateral epicondyle tenderness, grip strength (P < .01), and modified ORI-TETS (Orthopaedic Research Institute-Tennis Elbow Testing System) force (P < .05) at 6 months. Significant intergroup differences were detected for frequency of pain at rest at 6 and 12 weeks (P < .05), level of pain at rest at 2 weeks (P < .001), and patient-rated overall elbow function at 26 weeks (P = .041).

CONCLUSION

The counterforce brace provides significant reduction in the frequency and severity of pain in the short term (2-12 weeks), as well as overall elbow function at 26 weeks, compared with the placebo brace.

Comparison of an epicondylitis bandage with a wrist orthosis in patients with lateral epicondylitis

BACKGROUND:

Lateral epicondylitis is one of the most common causes of elbow pain. It is generally observed in people between the ages of 40 and 50 years, and the dominant extremity is more frequently affected. Various noninvasive methods are frequently used; however, studies investigating the effectiveness of the orthoses are limited and with controversial outcomes.

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate the effectiveness of a hand-wrist resting orthosis and an epicondylitis bandage in lateral epicondylitis.

STUDY DESIGN:

Randomized controlled trial.

METHODS:

In total, 82 patients diagnosed with unilateral lateral epicondylitis were enrolled into the study. Hand-wrist resting orthosis was applied to 45 patients and epicondylitis bandage was applied to 41 patients. Patients were evaluated before treatment and at 6 weeks after treatment with a Visual Analogue Scale; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire; the Short Form 36; and a determination of hand grasping force.

RESULTS:

Both groups were similar in terms of age, body mass index, gender, frequency of lateral epicondylitis on the dominant side, dominant extremity, and duration of complaints ( p > 0.05). A statistically significant recovery was detected in both groups between the pre-therapy values and the values at the sixth week in terms of Visual Analogue Scale scores; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnarie scores; hand grasping forces; and the Short Form 36 mental and physical component scores ( p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences detected between the two therapy methods before the therapy and at the sixth week of treatment in all parameter values ( p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Our results suggest that both epicondylitis bandage and hand-wrist resting orthosis are effective treatment options for lateral epicondylitis-induced pain, functional status, muscle strength, and quality of life. Furthermore, neither treatment option was superior to the other. Large, randomized studies are necessary for more clear statements.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Epicondylitis bandage and hand-wrist resting orthosis are equally effective treatment options for lateral epicondylitis-induced pain, functional status, muscle strength, and quality of life.

Comparison of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and wrist-extensor splint application in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a prospective randomized controlled study

Background

Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) and wrist-extensor splints (WESs) are two commonly used methods in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. In this study, the efficacy of these two methods was compared.

Methods

The study was planned as a prospective randomized controlled study. A total of 67 patients were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 received ESWT (32 patients) and group 2 received WES (35 patients). Patients in group 1 underwent four sessions of ESWT once every week. In each session, an ESWT device at 10–12 Hz, 2,000 pulses, and 1.6–1.8 bar pressure was used. Patients in group 2 used a wrist splint, holding the wrist at 30°–45° extension for 4 weeks. Patients were assessed for handgrip strength, pain at rest, pain while working, and quality of life. Data were collected before and after treatment (at weeks 4, 12, and 24). A visual analog scale was used to evaluate pain at rest and while working, a hand dynamometer for handgrip strength, subscales of the SF36 Health Survey to evaluate quality of life, and the Turkish version of the patient-rated tennis-elbow evaluation was used to evaluate functioning of the affected arm during various daily life activities.

Results

In both ESWT and WES groups, although there were considerably significant improvements (P<0.001) in the parameters evaluated (pain at rest and while working, handgrip strength, Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation, Nirschl score, and SF36 subscales) were observed at 4, 12, and 24 weeks compared to pretreatment values, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of our evaluation parameters at the three time points (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Both ESWT and WES applications were found to yield significantly superior results when compared to pretreatment values. In comparison of the two groups, on the other hand, there was no statistically significant difference.

Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: Development of a Pathophysiology-Based Treatment Algorithm

Lateral elbow tendinopathy, commonly known as tennis elbow, is a condition that can cause significant functional impairment in working-age patients. The term tendinopathy is used to describe chronic overuse tendon disorders encompassing a group of pathologies, a spectrum of disease. This review details the pathophysiology of tendinopathy and tendon healing as an introduction for a system grading the severity of tendinopathy, with each of the 4 grades displaying distinct histopathological features. Currently, there are a large number of nonoperative treatments available for lateral elbow tendinopathy, with little guidance as to when and how to use them. In fact, an appraisal of the clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses studying these treatment modalities reveals that no single treatment reliably achieves outstanding results. This may be due in part to the majority of clinical studies to date including all patients with chronic tendinopathy rather than attempting to categorize patients according to the severity of disease. We relate the pathophysiology of the different grades of tendinopathy to the basic science principles that underpin the mechanisms of action of the nonoperative treatments available to propose a treatment algorithm guiding the management of lateral elbow tendinopathy depending on severity. We believe that this system will be useful both in clinical practice and for the future investigation of the efficacy of treatments.

Systematic Review and Analysis of Work-Related Injuries to and Conditions of the Elbow

This systematic review of literature examines and synthesizes research findings related to interventions for people with work-related elbow injuries, particularly epicondylitis. It was carried out as part of the Evidence-Based Literature Review Project of the American Occupational Therapy Association. The 11 articles included in this review suggest multiple approaches to intervention but do not provide sufficient evidence to determine which methods or approaches are best practice. Research has provided little evidence to support the use of commonly prescribed interventions for epicondylitis, the most frequently reported work-related elbow injury. Collectively, the evidence to support the use of splinting, exercise, or physical agent modalities is weak and provides little guidance for approaching management of elbow injuries. The implications for education and research are discussed, as is the application of the evidence to clinical practice in occupational therapy.

Workplace management of upper limb disorders: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Upper limb pain is common among working-aged adults and a frequent cause of absenteeism.

AIMS

To systematically review the evidence for workplace interventions in four common upper limb disorders.

METHODS

Systematic review of English articles using Medline, Embase, Cinahl, AMED, Physiotherapy Evidence Database PEDro (carpal tunnel syndrome and non-specific arm pain only) and Cochrane Library. Study inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials, cohort studies or systematic reviews employing any workplace intervention for workers with carpal tunnel syndrome, non-specific arm pain, extensor tenosynovitis or lateral epicondylitis. Papers were selected by a single reviewer and appraised by two reviewers independently using methods based on Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology.

RESULTS

1532 abstracts were identified, 28 papers critically appraised and four papers met the minimum quality standard (SIGN grading + or ++) for inclusion. There was limited evidence that computer keyboards with altered force displacement characteristics or altered geometry were effective in reducing carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms. There was limited, but high quality, evidence that multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for non-specific musculoskeletal arm pain was beneficial for those workers absent from work for at least four weeks. In adults with tenosynovitis there was limited evidence that modified computer keyboards were effective in reducing symptoms. There was a lack of high quality evidence to inform workplace management of lateral epicondylitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research is needed focusing on occupational management of upper limb disorders. Where evidence exists, workplace outcomes (e.g. successful return to pre-morbid employment; lost working days) are rarely addressed.

A prospective randomized study comparing a forearm strap brace versus a wrist splint for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis

BACKGROUND

The outcome is unknown for 2 common bracing treatments utilized for patients with lateral epicondylitis. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of a wrist splint with that of a counterforce forearm strap for the management of acute lateral epicondylitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two patients (44 elbows) received either a wrist extension splint (Group I-24 elbows) or a counterforce forearm strap (Group II-20 elbows). Measures on the Mayo Elbow Performance (MEP) and American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) Elbow Assessment Form were collected prior to treatment and at 6 weeks. A total score was derived, utilizing the ASES Elbow Assessment, as was a score utilizing the standard scoring system for the MEP.

RESULTS

Group I's score derived from the ASES form improved 16 points and Group II's score improved 13 points. Group I's score on the MEP improved 13 points and Group II's score improved 12 points. There was no significant difference measured between the Groups with the ASES (P = .60) nor MEP (P = .63) scores. However, within the ASES derived score, pain relief was significantly better with the extension splint group (P = .027). No other variables were statistically significantly different.

DISCUSSION

Significant pain relief with the wrist extension splint may be due to improved immobilization of the wrist extensor muscles in a resting position.

CONCLUSION

The wrist extension splint allows a greater degree of pain relief than does the forearm strap brace for patients with lateral epicondylitis.

Evidence supporting the use of physical modalities in the treatment of upper extremity musculoskeletal conditions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To evaluate recent trials and reviews of physical modalities and conservative treatments for selected upper extremity musculoskeletal conditions for evidence supporting their use.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent evidence suggests that many localized tendinopathies are related more to degenerative than inflammatory processes. With this realization, there is increased emphasis on finding new modalities to treat tendinopathies and other localized musculoskeletal conditions that rely on other than anti-inflammatory mechanisms. Although there is good evidence to support the short-term benefits of corticosteroid injections, convincing evidence in support of other conservative treatments and modalities is generally lacking. Extracorpal shock wave therapy may have significant clinical benefit for calcific tendinitis; however, it requires intravenous sedation in most cases and does not appear to be effective in lateral epicondylitis. The most consistent positive treatment effects for rotator cuff tendinitis were achieved by ultrasound-guided subacromial corticosteroid injection as well as manual therapy in conjunction with therapeutic exercise.

SUMMARY

Although there is evidence supporting the use of several different physical modalities and conservative treatments for upper extremity musculoskeletal conditions, there is a strong need for larger, higher quality randomized controlled trials. Although most studies are able to demonstrate short-term benefits, there is a lack of high-quality data demonstrating that these conservative treatments have long-term benefits, particularly, with regard to functional outcomes.

Conservative treatment of lateral epicondylitis: comparison of two different orthotic devices

We investigated the effectiveness of braces in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis and compared the effects of two different types of most frequently used braces. A total of 50 patients (seven males and 43 females) with an age range of 34 to 60 who had the diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis were included in the study. The patients were distributed into two groups. In group I, 25 patients (21 females and four males) were given a lateral epicondyle bandage. In group II, 25 patients (22 females and three males) were given a wrist resting splint holding the wrist in slight dorsiflexion. Evaluations of the patients were done before treatment and at the second and sixth weeks of treatment. Evaluation parameters were pain during rest and movement, sensitivity, algometer score, hand grip strength, and evaluation of the response to treatment. The response to treatment was evaluated according to the following categories: excellent, good, medium, and bad. In group I, only pain during rest and movement significantly decreased at 2 weeks while significant improvement was obtained for all parameters at 6 weeks. In group II, all parameters except for algometric sensitivity showed significant improvement at 2 weeks. Significant improvement was obtained for all parameters at 6 weeks in this group. Comparison of the two groups showed significantly better improvement in resting pain in group II at 2 weeks while there was no difference for other parameters including response to treatment at either evaluation stage. Braces might be a good strategy to help wait out the natural course of tennis elbow complaints. Although epicondyle bandage was not found to be superior to wrist splint in our study, we may suggest that it could be favored over splint since it is more practical and cosmetically acceptable.

Management of lateral epicondylitis: current concepts

Lateral epicondylitis, or tennis elbow, is a common cause of elbow pain in the general population. Traditionally, lateral epicondylitis has been attributed to degeneration of the extensor carpi radialis brevis origin, although the underlying collateral ligamentous complex and joint capsule also have been implicated. Nonsurgical treatment, the mainstay of management, involves a myriad of options, including rest, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy, cortisone, blood and botulinum toxin injections, supportive forearm bracing, and local modalities. For patients with recalcitrant disease, the traditional open débridement technique has been modified by multiple surgeons, with others relying on arthroscopic or even percutaneous procedures. Without a standard protocol (nonsurgical or surgical), surgeons need to keep abreast of established and evolving treatment options to effectively treat patients with lateral epicondylitis.

A dynamic extensor brace reduces electromyographic activity of wrist extensor muscles in patients with lateral epicondylalgia

STUDY DESIGN

Semiexperimental study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of an external wrist extension force on extensor muscle activity during hand gripping in patients with lateral epicondylalgia.

BACKGROUND

Lateral epicondylalgia or "tennis elbow" is a common, often disabling ailment affecting millions of people. An optimal treatment strategy remains to be identified. The use of an external wrist extension force may reduce the extensor muscle activity during gripping in these patients.

METHODS

Muscle activity of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB), extensor digitorum communis (EDC), and extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) was measured using surface EMG. Subjects gripped at an intensity of 10%, 20%, and 30% of the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) force with and without the dynamic extensor brace and with and without an applied external wrist extension force of 1%, 2%, and 3% of MVC.

RESULTS

At all levels of MVC gripping, the EMG signal of the ECRB and EDC were significantly lower for gripping with than without brace. An extension force of 3% of the MVC force significantly reduced the EMG signal of all muscles in almost all measurement conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that the dynamic extensor brace as well as the external extension force significantly reduced the EMG signal of the wrist extensor muscles during gripping in patients with lateral epicondylalgia. Based on these results, the dynamic extensor brace could be a promising new intervention for lateral epicondylalgia.