Usefulness of the nursing home quality measures and quality indicators for assessing skilled nursing facility rehabilitation outcomes

Accuracy of infection reporting in US nursing home ratings

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of nursing home-reported data on urinary tract infections (UTIs), which are publicly reported on Nursing Home Care Compare, and pneumonia, which are not publicly reported.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

We used secondary data for 100% of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in the United States between 2011 and 2017.

STUDY DESIGN

We identified Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who were nursing home residents between 2011 and 2017 and admitted to a hospital with a primary diagnosis of UTI or pneumonia. After linking these hospital claims to resident-level nursing home-reported assessment data in the Minimum Data Set, we calculated the percentages of infections that were appropriately reported and assessed variation by resident- and nursing home-level characteristics. We developed a claims-based nursing home-level measure of hospitalized infections and estimated correlations between this and publicly reported ratings.

DATA EXTRACTION METHODS

Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who were nursing home residents and hospitalized for UTI or pneumonia during the study period were included.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Reporting rates were low for both infections (UTI: short-stay residents 29.1% and long-stay residents 19.2%; pneumonia: short-stay residents 66.0% and long-stay residents 70.6%). UTI reporting rates increased when counting additional assessments, but it is unclear whether these reports are for the same versus a newly developed UTI. Black residents had slightly lower reporting rates, as did nursing homes with more Black residents. Correlations between our claims-based measure and publicly reported ratings were poor.

CONCLUSIONS

UTI and pneumonia were substantially underreported in data used for national public reporting. Alternative approaches are needed to improve surveillance of nursing home quality.

Accuracy of Pressure Ulcer Events in US Nursing Home Ratings

BACKGROUND

The US government relies on nursing home-reported data to create quality of care measures and star ratings for Nursing Home Compare (NHC). These data are not systematically validated, and some evidence indicates NHC's patient safety measures may not be reliable.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of NHC's pressure ulcer measures, which are chief indicators of nursing home patient safety.

RESEARCH DESIGN

For Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who were nursing home residents between 2011 and 2017, we identified hospital admissions for pressure ulcers and linked these to the nursing home-reported data at the patient level. We then calculated the percentages of pressure ulcers that were appropriately reported by stage, long-stay versus short-stay status, and race. After developing an alternative claims-based measure of pressure ulcer events, we estimated the correlation between this indicator and NHC-reported ratings.

SUBJECTS

Medicare nursing home residents with hospitalizations for pressure ulcers.

MEASURES

Pressure ulcer reporting rates; nursing home-level claims-based measure of pressure ulcer events.

RESULTS

Reporting rates were low for both short-stay (70.2% of 173,043 stage 2-4 pressure ulcer hospitalizations) and long-stay (59.7% of 137,315 stage 2-4 pressure ulcer hospitalizations) residents. Black residents experienced more severe pressure ulcers than White residents, however, this translated into having slightly higher reporting rates because higher staged pressure ulcers were more likely to be reported. Correlations between our claims-based measure and NHC ratings were poor.

CONCLUSIONS

Pressure ulcers were substantially underreported in data used by NHC to measure patient safety. Alternative approaches are needed to improve surveillance of health care quality in nursing homes.

Rehabilitation Intensity and Patient Outcomes in Skilled Nursing Facilities in the United States: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Exponential increases in rehabilitation intensity in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) motivated recent changes in Medicare reimbursement policies, which remove financial incentives for providing more minutes of physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy. Yet, there is concern that SNFs will reduce therapy provision and patients will experience worse outcomes. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize current evidence on the relationship between therapy intensity and patient outcomes in SNFs.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, PEDro, and COCHRANE databases were searched. English-language studies published in the United States between 1998 and February 14, 2020, examining the relationship between therapy intensity and community discharge, hospital readmission, length of stay (LOS), and functional improvement for short-stay SNF patients were considered. Data extraction and risk of bias were performed using the American Academy of Neurology Classification of Evidence scale for causation questions. American Academy of Neurology criteria were used to assess confidence in the evidence for each outcome.

RESULTS

Eight observational studies met inclusion criteria. There was moderate evidence that higher intensity therapy was associated with higher rates of community discharge and shorter LOS. One study provided very low-level evidence of associations between higher intensity therapy and lower hospital readmissions after total hip and knee replacement. There was low-level evidence indicating higher intensity therapy is associated with improvements in function.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review concludes with moderate confidence that higher intensity therapy in SNFs leads to higher community discharge rates and shorter LOS. Future research should improve quality of evidence on functional improvement and hospital readmissions.

IMPACT

This systematic review demonstrates that patients in SNFs may benefit from higher intensity therapy. Because new policies no longer incentivize intensive therapy, patient outcomes should be closely monitored to ensure patients in SNFs receive high-quality care.

Functional Improvement Among Short-Stay Nursing Home Residents in the MDS 3.0

OBJECTIVES

To examine the completeness of the activities of daily living (ADL) items on admission and discharge assessments and the improvement in ADL performance among short-stay residents in the newly adopted Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of MDS admission and discharge assessments.

SETTING

Nursing homes from July 1, 2011, to June 30, 2012.

PARTICIPANTS

New nursing home residents admitted from acute hospitals with corresponding admission and discharge assessments between July 1, 2011, and June 30, 2012, who had a length of stay of 100 days or less.

MEASUREMENTS

ADL self-performance items, including bed mobility, transfer, walking in room, walking in corridor, locomotion on unit, locomotion off unit, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene, at admission and discharge.

RESULTS

The ADL self-performance items are complete at both admission and discharge, with less than 1% missing for any item. More than 60% of residents improved over the course of their post-acute stay. New short-stay nursing home residents with conditions such as cognitive impairment, delirium, dementia, heart failure, and stroke showed less improvement in ADL performance during their stay.

CONCLUSION

The discharge assessment data in the MDS 3.0 provide new information to researchers and providers to examine and track ADL performance. Nursing homes can identify and track patients who require more intensive therapies or targeted interventions to achieve functional improvement during their stay. Future research can examine facility-level measures to better understand how ADL improvement varies across facilities.

Postacute rehabilitation quality of care: toward a shared conceptual framework

There is substantial interest in mechanisms for measuring, reporting, and improving the quality of health care, including postacute care (PAC) and rehabilitation. Unfortunately, current activities generally are either too narrow or too poorly specified to reflect PAC rehabilitation quality of care. In part, this is caused by a lack of a shared conceptual understanding of what construes quality of care in PAC rehabilitation. This article presents the PAC-rehab quality framework: an evidence-based conceptual framework articulating elements specifically pertaining to PAC rehabilitation quality of care. The widely recognized Donabedian structure, process, and outcomes (SPO) model furnished the underlying structure for the PAC-rehab quality framework, and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framed the functional outcomes. A comprehensive literature review provided the evidence base to specify elements within the SPO model and ICF-derived framework. A set of macrolevel-outcomes (functional performance, quality of life of patient and caregivers, consumers' experience, place of discharge, health care utilization) were defined for PAC rehabilitation and then related to their (1) immediate and intermediate outcomes, (2) underpinning care processes, (3) supportive team functioning and improvement processes, and (4) underlying care structures. The role of environmental factors and centrality of patients in the framework are explicated as well. Finally, we discuss why outcomes may best measure and reflect the quality of PAC rehabilitation. The PAC-rehab quality framework provides a conceptually sound, evidence-based framework appropriate for quality of care activities across the PAC rehabilitation continuum.

Rehabilitation consumers' use and understanding of quality information: a health literacy perspective

OBJECTIVES

To explore consumers' use and understanding of quality information about postacute rehabilitation facilities.

DESIGN

Thematic, semistructured interviews.

SETTING

Two skilled nursing facilities and 2 inpatient rehabilitation facilities in a large Midwestern city.

PARTICIPANTS

Rehabilitation inpatients (n=17) with stroke, hip fractures, and joint replacements and care partners (n=12) of rehabilitation inpatients.

INTERVENTION

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

None.

RESULTS

Health literacy imposed barriers to participants' understanding of quality information. Using the Institute of Medicine's Health Literacy Framework, we identified specific barriers that limited participants' abilities to (1) obtain quality information, (2) process and understand quality information, and (3) make appropriate decisions about the quality of a rehabilitation facility. Participants tended to rely on informal and nonquality information when choosing a rehabilitation facility.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the barriers imposed by low health literacy, rehabilitation providers have a responsibility to present quality information in a way that consumers, especially those with low health literacy, can use and understand.