Outpatient Rehabilitation in Patients With Coronary Artery and Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease

Development and validation of a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire for patients with peripheral artery disease (QOLPAD)

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a short and feasible questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). The content of the new instrument is intended to correspond with the simultaneously developed instrument Patient Benefit Index for PAD (PBI-PAD), which evaluates treatment goals and benefits in this patient group.

METHODS

Fifty patients stated their disease burden on free-text questionnaires, which was used by an interdisciplinary expert panel to develop 12 items for the new instrument, named Quality of Life questionnaire for patients with peripheral artery disease (QOLPAD). The validity of the instrument was tested in patients from Germany with PAD stages I to IV who completed the QOLPAD, EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L; EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ VAS)), and Vascular Quality of Life questionnaire (VascuQoL) before (baseline) and three months after (follow-up) treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred and three patients were included at baseline (mean age: 68.6 years; 68% male), among whom, 57 provided data at follow-up. Most patients (86.4%) rated the completion of QOLPAD as being easy. Internal consistency was satisfactory, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.74 (baseline) and 0.84 (follow-up). Convergent validity was indicated by significant correlations with the EQ-5D-3L (baseline: - 0.62; follow-up: - 0.81), EQ VAS (baseline: - 0.44, follow-up: - 0.79), VascuQoL global score (baseline: - 0.77; follow-up: - 0.87), global rating of impairment (baseline: 0.64; follow-up: 0.71), and PAD stage (baseline: 0.40; follow-up: 0.67). Sensitivity to change was confirmed by significant correlations of change in the QOLPAD with changes in convergent criteria; however, the high number of dropouts limits the generalizability of this finding.

CONCLUSION

This study provided evidence that the QOLPAD is internally consistent and valid in patients receiving treatment for PAD in Germany.

A Retrospective Comparison of Fitness and Exercise Progression in Patients With Coronary and Peripheral Artery Disease in Cardiac Rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended for patients with coronary (CAD) and peripheral (PAD) artery disease. However, no study has compared changes in cardiorespiratory fitness (VO_2peak) or exercise prescription progression among PAD, CAD, and concomitant PAD and CAD (BOTH). The objectives of this study were to 1) compare change in VO_2peak among patients with PAD, CAD, and BOTH, and 2) examine progression in exercise prescription parameters in a comprehensive 6-month cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patient data recorded from 2006 to 2017 from a large urban hospital was conducted. Patients with PAD (n = 63) and BOTH (n = 164) were included in the analyses. Patients with CAD (n = 63) were matched to PAD by sex (36.5% female), age (69 years), smoking status, diabetes, and year in program.

RESULTS

There were significant improvements in VO_2peak from baseline to 6 months in all groups (CAD +2.7 ± 3.4 mL⋅kg^-1⋅min^-1, PAD +2.4 ± 3.8 mL⋅kg^-1⋅min^-1, BOTH +1.8 ± 3.1 mL⋅kg^-1⋅min^-1; all P < 0.001). Between-group differences were significant between PAD and CAD as well as between CAD and BOTH (P = 0.001). Walking distance, duration, and pace increased for all groups over 6 months (P < 0.001), with a significant difference in pace between CAD and BOTH (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PAD, CAD, and BOTH had significant improvements in VO_2peak following a 6-month CR program. However, despite similar prescribed walking distance and duration, improvements in VO_2peak were mitigated in PAD and BOTH compared with CAD. These results support benefits of CR for patients diagnosed with PAD, but alternate exercise strategies should be explored for patients with PAD.

Functional Improvement After Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients is Not Related to Improvement in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves the functional capacity and the prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease.

AIM

Our study was aimed at assessing the relationship between functional improvement (evaluated with 6-min Walk Test-6MWT) and the improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after CR.

METHODS

We collected data from 249 patients (age 66.79 ± 11.06 years; males 81.52%) with a recent history of Acute Coronary Syndrome that performed CR. The functional improvement after CR was expressed as the Δ between distance covered at the final versus the initial 6-min Walking Test (6-MWT), while LVEF was calculated with transthoracic echocardiogram at the beginning and at the end of the CR.

RESULTS

Patients were divided accordingly to their pre-rehab LVEF (≥ 55% vs < 55%). With superimposable age and baseline 6MWT distance covered (434.58 vs 405.12 m, p = 0.08), the latter group presented higher Δ meter values at 6MWT (167.93 vs 193.97 m, p = 0.018). However, no statistically significant positive correlation between Δ meters and Δ LVEF was found. Moreover, linear regression analyses found that nor baseline LVEF nor Δ LVEF were significant determinants of Δ meters when considering the whole group, with age, basal 6MWT and peak CK-MB as additional covariates in the model.

CONCLUSION

Although it could be expected that an increase in LVEF is related to the functional improvement after CR, no significant correlation was found in our population.

Entering Cardiac Rehabilitation With Peripheral Artery Disease: A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARISON TO CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE

PURPOSE

Supervised exercise is recommended for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Both conditions share common etiology as atherosclerotic diseases. The clinical profile, cardiorespiratory fitness, and exercise prescriptions of PAD, CAD, and patients with concomitant PAD and CAD (BOTH) have yet to be compared upon entry into cardiac rehabilitation (CR).

METHODS

Cardiopulmonary, demographic, and anthropometric assessments were conducted at entry to CR between January 2006 and December 2017.

RESULTS

Among 9701 consecutively enrolled patients, there were 94.6% with CAD (n = 9179), 1.5% with PAD (n = 143), and 3.9% with BOTH (n = 379). Only 5.4% (n = 522) of all patients entering CR had a diagnosis of PAD. Compared with CAD, patients with PAD and BOTH were older (mean ± SD = 62.5 ± 11.1 vs 67.9 ± 11.4 and 69.2 ± 9.8 yr, P < .01), had higher resting systolic blood pressure (124 ± 17 vs 130 ± 17 and 133 ± 18 mm Hg, P < .01), had lower cardiorespiratory fitness (19.7 ± 6.3 vs 15.6 ± 4.8 and 15 ± 4.5 mL/kg/min, P < .01), and were more likely to have diabetes (25% vs 35% and 41%, P < .01), abdominal obesity (39% vs 54% and 51%, P < .01), and initially prescribed lower-intensity exercise (84.4 ± 14.1 vs 74.1 ± 15.7 and 70.0 ± 14.6 m/min exercise pace, P < .01), reflecting the complex nature of patients diagnosed with PAD.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients referred with PAD have a cardiovascular risk profile that places them at a greater risk for a repeat or first cardiac event compared with patients with CAD. Referral to structured exercise and risk factor modification programs should be considered to aid in the management of PAD.

Peripheral Arterial Disease: Supervised Exercise Therapy Through Cardiac Rehabilitation

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated. This review identifies specific subgroups within older adults more likely to develop PAD, and describes methods to diagnose PAD and provide evidence in support of systematic referral to cardiac rehabilitation programs to enhance successful comprehensive management. Clear evidence and guidelines support the routine use of supervised exercise therapy to improve function, reduce risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and enhance the success of endovascular interventions.

Development and validation of the Patient Benefit Index for peripheral arterial disease

Background

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a specific Patient Benefit Index (PBI) version for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

Patients and methods

A non-interventional longitudinal development study was conducted. The first phase comprised a qualitative pre-study with n = 50 patients, in which the PBI was adapted for peripheral arterial disease. The resulting Patient Benefit Index for peripheral arterial disease (PBI-PAD) was validated in the second phase at two points of measurement. The total PBI-PAD score was calculated by weighting item-wise the achievement of treatment goals with the initially assessed needs. Feasibility, internal consistency, and construct validity were analysed and the generic three level version of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) and the disease-specific instrument Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQoL) were used for convergent validation.

Results

In the pre-study, the PBI-PAD, consisting of 12 items, was developed. N = 103 patients participated in the main study. At T2, data were available for n = 57 patients. Mean age was 71.0 years ± 9.1 and 66.7 % of the participants were male. The amount of missing values of the PBI-PAD score was low (< 4.0 %) and no relevant floor effects were observed. Both parts of the PBI (needs at T1 and benefits at T2) were internally consistent with Cronbach’s alpha > 0.7. PBI-PAD total score correlated significantly with the T2-T1-differences of the EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) (r = 0.4, p = 0.007) and the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (r = 0.5, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The PBI-PAD is a feasible, internally consistent, and valid instrument to assess patient-relevant benefits in PAD patients receiving minimally invasive treatment or surgical procedures. It can be recommended for use in routine care as well as in clinical studies.

Psychosocial outcome in cardiovascular rehabilitation of peripheral artery disease and coronary artery disease patients

We investigated patients with a primary diagnosis of peripheral artery disease (n = 69) and coronary heart disease (CAD; n = 520) at baseline and on changes in psychosocial risk factors (depression, anxiety, quality of life, negative and positive affect) during a cardiovascular rehabilitation program. Patients completed psychosocial questionnaires at the beginning and at discharge of a 12-week rehabilitation program. Depression and anxiety were measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), positive and negative affect with the Global Mood Scale, and health-related quality of life with the SF-36 Health Survey. Patients with PAD showed improvements in anxiety (p < 0.001), negative affect (p < 0.001) and bodily pain (p < 0.001). Patients with CAD reported significant improvements in all measured dimensions (all p-values < 0.001).

Recruitment to clinical trials of exercise: challenges in the peripheral arterial disease population

OBJECTIVES

To describe recruitment to a randomised controlled trial of a 12-week (twice-weekly) supervised exercise programme for patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). PAD is a chronic, progressive disease with a significant cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk burden, and exercise is an effective primary management approach.

METHOD

Potential patients were identified from the Non-Invasive Vascular Laboratory records and invited to participate in the study. On successful completion of an incremental treadmill exercise test, patients were allocated at random to a control (usual care) or an exercise group.

RESULTS

Between November 2006 and June 2009, 548 patients were identified. Of the 156 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 40 (26%) declined to participate. Of the 71 patients who underwent exercise testing, 23 (32%) did not complete the test. The final enrolment number was 44 (44/156; 28%). Eleven patients (11/28; 39%) subsequently withdrew from the exercise programme.

CONCLUSION

Recruitment to clinical trials of exercise presents significant challenges in the PAD population due to the presence of co-existing cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease, a reluctance to exercise due to leg pain, and an acceptance of reduced mobility as part of ageing. Early identification in primary care before the onset of significant comorbidity may ameliorate some of these issues.

Exercise interventions for patients with peripheral arterial disease: a review of the literature

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common chronic cardiovascular condition that affects the lower extremities and can substantially limit daily activities and quality of life. Lifestyle interventions, including smoking cessation, diet modification, regular physical activity, and pharmacotherapy, are often prescribed to treat patients with PAD. Exercise interventions can be effective in increasing claudication onset time and maximal walking distance. Of the various types of exercise interventions available for patients with PAD, little is known about the differences that may exist between men and women in patient response to such interventions. The purpose of this literature review is to examine the current knowledge of exercise interventions for individuals with mild (Fontaine stages I-II) PAD and to consider any differences that may exist between men and women. Women with PAD present with a different clinical profile compared with men, but respond similarly to an acute bout of exercise and a training program. Patients with PAD should be encouraged to walk regularly; however, more research is needed to determine differences between men and women in their response to various exercise interventions.

Quality of Life of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease and Chronic Stable Angina

The Coronary Artery Disease in gENeral practiCE (CADENCE) study examined chronic stable angina (CSA). This further analysis examined atherosclerotic risk factors, symptomatic status, clinical management, and quality of life in patients with CSA with and without peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The CADENCE study involved 207 Australian general practitioners (GPs) recruiting 10 to 15 consecutively presenting patients with CSA (n = 2031). General practitioners completed a 2-page case report form, detailing demographic data, cardiovascular status, risk factors, and GP perception of control. Patients completed the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Patients with coexisting CSA and PAD (17%) were more likely to be older and had more comorbidities than patients with CSA without coexisting PAD. Patients with peripheral arterial disease had a longer history of heart disease and were more likely to experience angina on a weekly basis. Patients with peripheral arterial disease had poorer quality-of-life indices.