Wheelchair Curb Climbing: Randomized Controlled Comparison of Highly Structured and Conventional Training Methods

Application of visual feedback and AR-enhanced wheelchair skill training

PURPOSE

Manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (SCI) face challenges in wheelchair skill training (WSTr) due to the complexity of learning advanced skills and limited access to rehabilitation services. This review aims to summarize existing WSTr methods for individuals with SCI/disabilities and propose the use of Augmented Reality (AR)-enhanced Immediate Visual Feedback (ARe-IVF) learning modules for wheelie and curbing skill training.

METHODS

The proposed ARe-IVF learning modules will incorporate AR-enhanced visual feedback, allowing users to visualize spatial and temporal aspects of wheelchair skills and assess their performance through computer vision technology. These modules are designed to tailor the learning experience to each user's SCI level, age, gender, body height, and weight. Key features of the ARe-IVF modules include verbal cues, computer graphic indications, and AR-enhanced feedback to support skill acquisition.

RESULTS

The anticipated outcomes of the ARe-IVF modules include improved safety and effectiveness in WSTr by providing intuitive and concise guidance for key movements in wheelie and curbing maneuvers. Additionally, these modules offer an accessible alternative WSTr method for manual wheelchair users, caregivers, and rehabilitation therapists, with potential applications in Rehabilitation Centers, Hospitals, or home settings.

CONCLUSION

The ARe-IVF learning modules present an innovative approach to WSTr for manual wheelchair users with SCI, so that the modules provide promising learning outcomes through tailored, AR-supported feedback. This approach may empower wheelchair users to develop advanced skills with increased safety and confidence, ultimately improving rehabilitation outcomes and expanding training accessibility.

Handrim forces during wheelies performance in able-bodied and SCI subjects

Context: Manual wheelchair users must be able to carry out wheelies in order to tackle obstacles in the outdoor environment. To date, no studies have compared balance variables and forces exerted on the handrim during a stationary wheelie between able bodied and spinal cord injury subjects.Objectives: To compare the distribution of forces applied to the handrim and the center of pressure displacement during a stationary wheelie between able-bodied (AB) subjects and manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (SCI).Design: Prospective experimental study.Setting: A university hospital laboratory.Participants: 27 participants (14 AB and 13 SCI).Outcome Measure: Each participant performed 3 stationary wheelies of 60 s duration using a wheelchair equipped with an instrumented wheel. Two force platforms were used to calculate the displacement of the center of pressure (DCOP).Results: Median group DCOP amplitude in the anteroposterior axis was smaller and less variable in the AB (19.6 mm [8.1,49.6]) than the SCI (14.9 mm [7.6,141.1]) group. Forces applied to the handrim only differed significantly between the AB (6 N [-13.8,16.6]) and SCI groups (2.7 N [-12.1 21.9]) in the posteroanterior axis.Conclusions: The results showed that the participants with SCI exerted greater PA forces on the handrim, moreover, the direction of force was opposite to that of the AB group, suggesting that the SCI group used a proactive balance strategy while the AB group used a retroactive strategy. The results suggest that the direction of force applied should be considered when teaching individuals to perform wheelies.

Manual wheelchair downhill stability: an analysis of factors affecting tip probability

Background

For people who use manual wheelchairs, tips and falls can result in serious injuries including bone fractures, concussions, and traumatic brain injury. We aimed to characterize how wheelchair configuration changes (including on-the-fly adjustments), user variables, and usage conditions affected dynamic tip probability while rolling down a slope and contacting a small block.

Methods

Rigid body dynamic models of a manual wheelchair and test dummy were created using multi-body software (Madymo, TASS International, Livonia, MI), and validated with 189 experiments. Dynamic stability was assessed for a range of seat angles (0 to 20° below horizontal), backrest angles (0 to 20°), rear axle positions (0 to 20 cm from base of backrest), ground slopes (0 to 15°), bump heights (0 to 4 cm), wheelchair speeds (0 to 20 km/hr), user masses (50 to 115 kg), and user positions (0 to 10 cm from base of backrest). The tip classifications (forward tip, backward tip, rolled over bump, or stopped by bump) were investigated using a nominal logistic regression analysis.

Results

Faster wheelchair speeds significantly increased the probability of tipping either forward or backward rather than stopping, but also increased the probability of rolling over the bump (p < 0.001). When the rear axle was positioned forward, this increased the risk of a backward tip compared to all other outcomes (p < 0.001), but also reduced the probability of being stopped by the bump (p < 0.001 compared to forward tip, p < 0.02 compared to rolling over). Reclining the backrest reduced the probability of a forward tip compared to all other outcomes (p < 0.001), and lowering the seat increased the probability of either rolling over the bump or tipping backwards rather than tipping forward (p < 0.001). In general, the wheelchair rolled over bumps < 1.5 cm, and forwards tipping was avoided by reducing the speed to 1 km/hr.

Conclusions

The probability of forward tipping, corresponding to the greatest risk of injury, was significantly reduced for decreased speeds, smaller bumps, a reclined backrest, and a lower rear seat height. For wheelchairs with dynamic seating adjustability, when travelling downhill, on-the-fly adjustments to the seat or backrest can increase the likelihood of safely rolling over a bump.

Effectiveness of the Wheelchair Skills Training Program: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review synthesizing the evidence for the effectiveness of the Wheelchair Skills Training Program (WSTP).

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL and Embase databases, as well as grey literature, up to 10 October 2017.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness of the WSTP.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent reviewers screened articles and extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Meta-analyses (including sub-group analyses) were conducted for the Wheelchair Skills Test (WST) and WST Questionnaire (WST-Q) total capacity scores. We qualitatively assessed retention, WST/WST-Q subtotal and individual-skill capacity scores and other identified outcomes. The quality of evidence was determined using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Thirteen articles (581 participants) were included for analysis. The level of evidence was of moderate quality. The WSTP increased the post-training WST/WST-Q total capacity scores by 14.0% (95% CI: 7.4, 20.8; p < .0001) compared to no treatment, standard care or educational controls, a relative increase over baseline of 21.2%. Subgroup analyses showed that training was more effective for new wheelchair users. Retention of training effects was suggested by the absence of significant declines between tests post-training and at follow-up. The WSTP was found to have positive effects on some other outcomes. No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

There is moderate quality evidence that the WSTP is a safe intervention that has a clinically meaningful effect on WST/WST-Q capacity scores and some other outcomes. Implications for rehabilitation A systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials on a total of 581 participants, using the Wheelchair Skills Training Program (WSTP) as the intervention, found that the WSTP increased Wheelchair Skills Test (WST) and WST Questionnaire (WST-Q) total capacity scores by 21.2% relative to baseline. Subgroup analyses showed that training was more effective for new wheelchair users. The WSTP was found to have positive effects on some other outcomes and no serious adverse events were reported. The WSTP warrants cautious implementation in clinical and educational settings.

Development and evaluation of a wheelchair service provision training of trainers programme

Background

In many countries, availability of basic training and continued professional development programmes in wheelchair services is limited. Therefore, many health professionals lack access to formal training opportunities and new approaches to improve wheelchair service provision. To address this need, the World Health Organization (WHO) developed the WHO Wheelchair Service Training of Trainers Programme (WSTPt), aiming to increase the number of trainers who are well prepared to deliver the WHO Wheelchair Service Training Packages. Despite these efforts, there was no recognised method to prepare trainers to facilitate these training programmes in a standardised manner.

Objectives

To understand if the WSTPt is an effective mechanism to train aspiring wheelchair service provision trainers.

Method

An action research study was conducted using a mixed-methods approach to data collection and analysis to integrate feedback from questionnaires and focus groups from three WHO WSTPt pilots.

Results

Trainees were satisfied with the WHO WSTPt and the iterative process appears to have helped to improve each subsequent pilot and the final training package.

Conclusion

The WHO WSTPt is an effective mechanism to train wheelchair service provision trainers. This programme has potential to increase the number of trainees and may increase the number of qualified service providers.

Training Methods

In reviewing training methods reported in the literature, 13 were identified: case study, games-based training, internship, job rotation, job shadowing, lecture, mentoring and apprenticeship, programmed instruction, role-modeling, role play, simulation, stimulus-based training, and team-training. The nature and characteristics of these training methods and the relationships among them were analyzed using the following seven criteria: learning modality, learning environment, trainer presence, proximity, interaction level, cost considerations, and time demands. Results from this in-depth review suggest that the majority of training methods are not interactive, involve doing, and are off-the-job. As expected, it also concluded that technological advancements have expanded the delivery mode to various distance options. Profiles for the 13 identified training methods generated from this research should assist practitioners in selecting training methods most suitable for their needs and circumstances and serve as a platform for future research and development.

Ascending curbs of progressively higher height increases forward trunk flexion along with upper extremity mechanical and muscular demands in manual wheelchair users with a spinal cord injury

High upper extremity (U/E) demands are required when manual wheelchair users (MWUs) with spinal cord injury (SCI) ascend curbs; this may contribute to the risk of developing U/E musculoskeletal impairments. The aim of this study was to compare movement strategies (kinematics), mechanical loads (kinetics) and muscular demand (EMG) at the non-dominant U/E among 15 MWUs with SCI when ascending curbs of 4 cm (3 trials), 8 cm (3 trials) and 12 cm high (3 trials) from a starting line set 3 m before the curb. Biomechanical data was collected during three trials for each height. The curb ascent task was divided into three adjustment phases: caster pop, rear-wheel ascent and post-ascent. The greatest effort was generated by the shoulder flexors and internal rotators as well as the elbow flexors. A significant difference (p < 0.0167) between the curb heights was found for most outcome measures studied: movement excursion, net joint moments and muscular utilization ratio (MUR) of the main muscles increased with the higher curb heights, mainly around the shoulder joint. These results provide insight that aside from adhering to a highly structured training method for wheelchair curb ascent, rehabilitation professionals need to propose task-specific strength training programs based on the demands documented in this study and continue to advocate for physically accessible environments.

Perceived impacts of a first wheelchair on social participation

PURPOSE

To document perceived impacts in users' daily activities and social roles (social participation) following the acquisition of a first manual or powered wheelchair.

METHODS

A qualitative design with a phenomenological approach was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. An interview guide was developed based on the 12 social participation categories in the Disability Creation Process (DCP) conceptual model as themes underlying the questions: 'What has changed in your daily life since you got your new wheelchair?' and 'What has not changed in your daily life that you thought you would do differently with your new wheelchair?'

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The average age of the ten participants was 64.3 years (±16.3) and 90% had received a manual wheelchair. Four main themes emerged from the detailed analysis: changes in daily activities, expectations not met, impacts on social roles and emotional changes. The participants considered the changes in daily activities to be generally positive. Expectations not met mainly related to outdoor mobility. The participants had not anticipated the impacts on social roles and emotional changes, which demonstrate the complexity of human occupation.

CONCLUSION

Getting a wheelchair is a major and complex event in a person's life.

Sample size calculation in physical medicine and rehabilitation: a systematic review of reporting, characteristics, and results in randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To assess systematically the reporting of sample size calculation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in 5 leading journals in the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R).

DATA SOURCES

The data source was full reports of RCTs in 5 leading PM&R journals (Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Clinical Rehabilitation, and Disability and Rehabilitation) between January and December of 1998 and 2008. Articles were identified in Medline.

STUDY SELECTION

A total of 111 articles met our inclusion criteria, which include RCTs of human studies in the 5 selected journals.

DATA EXTRACTION

Sample size calculation reporting and trial characteristics were collected for each trial by independent investigators.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In 2008, 57.3% of articles reported sample size calculation as compared with only 3.4% in 1998. The parameters that were commonly used were a power of 80% and alpha of 5%. Articles often failed to report effect size or effect estimates for sample size calculation. Studies reporting sample size calculation were more likely to describe the main outcome and to have a sample size greater than 50 subjects. The study outcome (positive vs negative) was not associated with the likelihood of sample size reporting. Trial characteristics of the 2 periods (1998 vs 2008) were similar except that in 1998 there were more negative studies compared with 2008.

CONCLUSIONS

Although sample size calculation reporting has improved dramatically in 10 years and is comparable with other fields in medicine, it is still not adequate given current publication guidelines.