Musculoskeletal Sonography in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine: Results of the First Worldwide Survey Study

Current and future utility of ultrasound imaging in upper extremity musculoskeletal rehabilitation: A scoping review

STUDY DESIGN

This study was a scoping review.

BACKGROUND

Continued advances in musculoskeletal sonography technology and access have increased the feasibility of point-of-care use to support day-to-day clinical care and decision-making. Sonography can help improve therapeutic outcomes in upper extremity (UE) rehabilitation by enabling clinicians to visualize underlying structures during treatment.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This study aimed to (1) evaluate the growth, range, extent, and composition of sonography literature supporting UE rehabilitation; (2) identify trends, gaps, and opportunities with regard to anatomic areas and diagnoses examined and ultrasound techniques used; and (3) evaluate potential research and practice utility.

METHODS

Searches were completed in PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, and BIOSIS. We included data-driven articles using ultrasound imaging for upper extremity structures in rehabilitation-related conditions. Articles directly applicable to UE rehabilitation were labeled direct articles, while those requiring translation were labeled indirect articles. Articles were further categorized by ultrasound imaging purpose. Article content between the two groups was descriptively compared, and direct articles underwent an evaluation of evidence levels and narrative synthesis to explore potential clinical utility.

RESULTS

Average publication rates for the final included articles (n = 337) steadily increased. Indirect articles (n = 288) used sonography to explore condition etiology, assess measurement properties, inform medical procedure choice, and grade condition severity. Direct articles (n = 49) used sonography to assess outcomes, inform clinical reasoning, and aid intervention delivery. Acute UE conditions and emerging sonography technology were rarely examined, while tendon, muscle, and soft tissue conditions and grayscale imaging were common. Rheumatic and peripheral nerve conditions and Doppler imaging were more prevalent in indirect than direct articles. Among reported sonography service providers, there was a high proportion of nonradiologist clinicians.

CONCLUSION

Sonography literature for UE rehabilitation demonstrates potential utility in evaluating outcomes, informing clinical reasoning, and assisting intervention delivery. A large peripheral knowledge base provides opportunities for clinical applications; however, further research is needed to determine clinical efficacy and impact for specific applications.

Longitudinal Ultrasound-Guided Injection Curriculum for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residents

ABSTRACT

Physiatrists are increasingly using musculoskeletal ultrasound for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. However, a standardized longitudinal curriculum for instructing physical medicine and rehabilitation residents in performing ultrasound-guided interventional procedures has yet to be established. The purpose of this study is to develop and assess the effectiveness of a longitudinal curriculum in training residents to perform common ultrasound-guided musculoskeletal injections using fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens. The course included six weekly hands-on educational sessions, divided by anatomical region, integrated into an established anatomy and physical examination curriculum. After completion of the curriculum, residents reported improved comfort and confidence and displayed improved competence in performing these injections. Other physiatry residency programs should consider implementing longitudinal, hands-on cadaveric training courses to better prepare trainees to perform ultrasound-guided injections as part of their future clinical practice.

Education in the Time of COVID: At-a-Distance Training in Neuromusculoskeletal Ultrasonography

Point of care ultrasound is important to the specialty of physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of a variety of neuromusculoskeletal conditions commonly seen in practice. However, across Canada, resident education of sonoanatomy skills is variable. There remain no standards in terms of how ultrasound is taught as part of the residency curriculum as set by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. As such, residents are often required to find their own educational opportunities. This report describes an alternative approach to learning these skills that was inspired by disruption due to coronavirus disease 2019 in first year residency. This report explores how a PM&R resident was able to develop valuable ultrasound skills from home using not only textbooks and videos, but also new and novel teleguidance technology, namely an ultrasound probe that connects to a clinician’s own smart devices to display images.

An Evaluation of Musculoskeletal Interventional Ultrasound Training in Canadian Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residency Programs

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound is a rapidly evolving field of medicine with strong utility in musculoskeletal practices. In Canadian physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) residency programs there are no national standards for objectives of training in this area. This possible disconnection between demand and availability could lead to gaps in education.

OBJECTIVE

(1) To determine the current state of interventional musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) training in Canadian PM&R residency programs, as perceived by both residents and program directors; (2) to evaluate the perspectives of experts in the field on current and future MSUS curriculum inclusion.

DESIGN

This study was a cross-sectional cohort study using an explanatory sequential mixed methods design.

SETTING

This project included anonymous online surveys and targeted telephone/in-person semistructured interviews.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were Canadian PM&R residents or clinicians. Survey responses included 71 residents and nine program directors. Interviews were conducted with nine MSUS experts.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcome measures included residents' level of interest, amount of exposure, and barriers to training. Themes regarding resident exposure and future directions for MSUS training were obtained based on expert interviews.

RESULTS

The vast majority (97%) of current PM&R residents are interested in using ultrasound clinically, with 73% reporting having had "none" to "limited exposure" in MSUS. Expert interviews revealed four major themes: (1) appropriate training is dependent on access, (2) MSUS represents an emerging standard of care, (3) a minimal baseline level of competence should be expected, and (4) various strategies may be used to integrate basic MSUS into existing residency curriculums.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ultrasound as a clinical tool is rapidly increasing. Current PM&R residents have a desire to incorporate this skill into their future practices. Although barriers exist to implementing this training on a national level, the future looks promising with multiple strategies outlined to assist the process.

EURO-MUSCULUS/USPRM Global Report on Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Publications

The developments in technology have improved access to the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) in different clinical settings. Accordingly, MSUS has been applied to a wide range of musculoskeletal problems including inflammatory and degenerative diseases, sport injuries, and regional pain syndromes both for clinical practice and research. In this report, the authors aimed to globally examine the publications on MSUS among different specialties, countries, and topics. Sixteen reviewers under the umbrella of the European Musculoskeletal Ultrasonography Society Group and the Ultrasound Study Group of International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine have evaluated approximately 15,000 publications on MSUS. The authors believe that the results of this comparative analysis may provide a holistic snapshot with regard to the utility of MSUS, not only for clinicians/academicians but also for the industry. Accordingly, while aiming to further increase their awareness, this article would possibly guide future investments as well.

Effect of Neighbourhood Size in Entropy Mapping of Ultrasound Images

Image filtering is a technique that can create additional visual representations of the original image. Entropy filtering is a specific application that can be used to highlight randomness of pixel grayscale intensities within an image. These image map created from filtering are based on the number of surrounding neighbourhood of pixels considered. However, there is no standard procedure for determining the correct "neighbourhood size" to use. We investigated the effects of neighbourhood size on the entropy calculation and provide a standardized approach for determining an appropriate neighbourhood size in entropy filtering in a musculoskeletal application. Ten healthy subjects showing no symptoms related to neuromuscular disease were recruited and ultrasound images of their trapezius muscle were acquired. The muscle regions in the images were manually isolated and regions of interest with varying neighbourhood sizes (increasing by 2 pixels) from 3x3 to 61X61 pixels were extracted. The entropy, relative signal entropy over noise entropy, statistical effect size as well as the percentage change of the effect size and instantaneous slope of the effect size was examined. The analysis showed that a neighbourhood size within the range of 21-25 pixels provides the maximum amount of information gained and coincides with a percentage change of the effect size of less than 5% and instantaneous slopes < 0.05.

Brief Ultrasound-Aided Teaching to Improve the Accuracy and Confidence of Resident Musculoskeletal Palpation

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies demonstrate poor musculoskeletal palpation accuracy of physiatry residents. With the growing use of ultrasound clinically, it could serve as a powerful educational tool. However, there are no published studies examining the efficacy of ultrasound-aided education at the bedside, where much learning takes place during postgraduate training.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if brief ultrasound-aided teaching improves residents' accuracy and confidence of musculoskeletal palpation.

DESIGN

Before/After Trial.

SETTING

Academic Institution.

PARTICIPANTS

Ten physical medicine and rehabilitation residents were voluntary participants.

INTERVENTION

Each resident was given a survey to assess confidence in palpating the hook of the hamate and medial calcaneal tubercle. They then attempted to palpate and place a marker over these two structures in a model patient. Marker placement accuracy was verified by ultrasound. Faculty spent less than 1 minute per landmark, sonographically teaching its correct localization. The resident, after moving to a new model patient, was then re-tested on accurate marker placement for both landmarks. A repeat survey to assess confidence was administered.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Preintervention and postintervention accuracy and confidence of correct localization of both landmarks.

RESULTS

We used McNemar's and Wilcoxon's tests to determine whether the intervention improved the location accuracy and confidence of successful palpation, respectively. Confidence level of correct localization of two landmarks improved on average from 4.3 to 8.15 on a scale of 10 after intervention. Of 20 palpation attempts, 11 correctly placed the marker postintervention after an incorrect placement, 8 made no change, and one changed from correct to incorrect placement. The odds of improvement in accuracy was 11 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.60-473.47, P < .01). Both tests showed significant improvements after the intervention at the significance level of .05.

CONCLUSIONS

Brief, ultrasound-aided teaching increases accuracy and confidence of residents' musculoskeletal palpation.

Toward a Consensus for Musculoskeletal Ultrasonography Education in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: A National Poll of Residency Directors

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the study were to evaluate integration of musculoskeletal ultrasonography education in physical medicine and rehabilitation training programs in 2014-2015, when the American Academy of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Residency Review Committee both recognized it as a fundamental component of physiatric practice, to identify common musculoskeletal ultrasonography components of physical medicine and rehabilitation residency curricula, and to identify common barriers to integration.

DESIGN

Survey of 78 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited physical medicine and rehabilitation residency programs was conducted.

RESULTS

The 2015 survey response rate was more than 50%, and respondents were representative of programs across the United States. Most programs (80%) reported teaching musculoskeletal ultrasonography, whereas a minority (20%) required mastery of ultrasonography skills for graduation. Ultrasonography curricula varied, although most programs agreed that the scope of resident training in physical medicine and rehabilitation should include diagnostic and interventional musculoskeletal ultrasonography, especially for key joints (shoulder, elbow, knee, wrist, hip, and ankle) and nerves (median, ulnar, fibular, tibial, radial, and sciatic). Barriers to teaching included insufficient expertise of instructors, poor access to equipment, and lack of a structured curriculum.

CONCLUSIONS

Musculoskeletal ultrasonography has become a required component of physical medicine and rehabilitation residency training. Based on survey responses and expert recommendations, we propose a structure for musculoskeletal ultrasonography curricular standards and milestones for trainee competency.

Factors Associated With the Ultrasound Characteristics of the Lumbar Multifidus: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The first aim of this review was to investigate the association between age, sex, height, weight, physical activity level, posture, lumbar level and body side, and structural characteristics (cross-sectional area [CSA], thickness, linear dimensions, and echo intensity) of the lumbar multifidus (LM) measured by ultrasound. Second, differences between healthy individuals and patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) were investigated. TYPE: Systematic review.

LITERATURE SURVEY

PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched until September 2018.

METHODOLOGY

Studies were included if (a) full text was available in English, Dutch, or French; (b) participants were older than 18 years of age and were asymptomatic or had nonspecific CLBP; and (c) the relation between structural characteristics of the LM, measured by ultrasound, and at least one of the above-mentioned factors was described, and/or a comparison between a CLBP and control group was made. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Quality of studies was assessed using an adapted version of the Downs and Black checklist.

SYNTHESIS

Twenty-seven studies were included. Thickness and CSA of the LM do not correlate with age. Males have a larger LM size than females. Thickness and CSA of left and right LM are highly correlated in healthy subjects. More significant side-to-side differences are present in subjects with CLBP than in those without. Muscle size increases from proximal to caudal lumbar levels. The presence of CLBP is associated with muscle size and function.

CONCLUSIONS

The association between the factors age, sex, height, weight, physical activity level, posture, lumbar level, body side, and presence of CLBP, and the ultrasound characteristics of the LM is discussed. These factors should be taken into account in future research on structural muscle characteristics, or when correlating with functional behavior or investigating the effect of a targeted intervention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Resident-Perceived Benefit of a Diagnostic and Interventional Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Curriculum: A Multifaceted Approach Using Independent Study, Peer Teaching, and Interdisciplinary Collaboration

Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) training is now a required component of physiatry residency, but formal curriculum guidelines are not yet required or established. The authors' objective was to assess the educational value of a collaborative residency MSUS training program. The authors designed a structured MSUS training curriculum for residents based on the authors' experience and previous literature. Twenty-five residents participated in this MSUS curriculum designed by faculty and chief residents. Resident volunteers were trained by the faculty as "table trainers" who taught their peers in small groups. Hands-on MSUS training sessions were led by a Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation faculty MSUS expert. A Likert scale-formatted questionnaire assessed resident-perceived value of the curriculum. Response rate was 96% (22 of 23). Self-reported MSUS knowledge comparing precurriculum and postcurriculum implementation resulted in significant improvement (P = 0.001). Peer teaching was highly valued, with 86% of residents rating it "very" or "extremely" beneficial (mean [SD] score, 3.9 [1.1]). Self-guided learning, by supplemental scanning and reading, was rated "beneficial" or "very beneficial" by 73% of residents (3.0 [0.7]). The authors' successful pilot program may serve as a teaching model for other residency programs.

The Current State of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Education in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residency Programs

BACKGROUND

Exposure to musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) is now a mandatory component of physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) residency training. However, reports on the extent of the implementation and efficacy of MSUS education are lacking in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the extent to which PM&R residencies are implementing MSUS education.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Institutional.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-six of the 78 United States PM&R residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.

METHODS

All 78 programs were solicited with an online survey via the residency program director and coordinator in July 2014. The 25 questions on the survey were aimed at determining program MSUS educational characteristics and their effectiveness.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Description of teaching methods used for MSUS, residency demographics, characteristics of MSUS faculty expertise, and faculty-perceived competency in MSUS examinations and procedures among residents. Data were analyzed using both descriptive statistics and tests for independence to identify correlations between program characteristics and resident MSUS competency.

RESULTS

A response was received from 36 of the 78 residency programs (46.2%). Of the 36 residency programs that responded, 97.2% provide exposure to MSUS (a figure that drops to 44.9% when nonrespondents are included); 61% had mandatory MSUS training (28.2% when including nonrespondents); and 44.4% had a formal curriculum (20.5% when including nonrespondents). The most common MSUS educational tools used were lecture (88.9%), outpatient clinic (86.1%), and hands-on workshops (86.1%). Sixty-one percent of responding programs evaluate residents with formal assessment tools. Overall, faculty at 38.8% and 44.4% of programs believed that at least 50% of residents who graduate are competent in diagnostic and interventional MSUS, respectively. These rates were significantly associated with the use of formal assessment.

CONCLUSION

MSUS education is growing in PM&R, but many programs still have not adopted a formal educational curriculum. Formal assessment to evaluate resident MSUS skills significantly improves faculty-perceived MSUS competency.

Accuracy in detecting knee effusion with clinical examination and the effect of effusion, the patient's body mass index, and the clinician's experience

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of detecting knee effusion with clinical examination and to evaluate whether the amount of effusion, patient obesity, and the clinicians' experience affect the clinicians' decisions in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Patients presenting with knee pain were examined by two residents with different levels of experience and underwent ultrasonographic examination, including measurement of effusion in the medial, mid, and lateral aspects of the suprapatellar bursa. One hundred seventy-two knees of 86 patients were examined. Of the knees investigated, 127 (73.8 %) had effusion. The consistency between ultrasonographic and resident examination were weak (κ = 0.193, p = 0.007 and κ = 0.349, p < 0.001), although the more experienced senior resident had a stronger agreement. The overall inter-rater agreement between the two residents was low (κ = 0.254). The senior resident had a significantly higher accuracy ratio (p = 0.036). In the knees without effusion, the two examiners had no agreement (κ = -0.028, p = 0.856); however, the ratios of the true decisions were similar (p = 1.0). The accuracy of the less experienced resident's decisions was affected by effusion depth (p = 0.005). Clinicians' decisions and their accuracy in detecting knee effusion during clinical examination were different, especially in the absence of effusion. The consistency between ultrasonography and residents was low. The accuracy of clinical examination was affected by effusion depth and experience, but not by patient obesity.

Musculoskeletal ultrasound in pediatric rheumatology

Although musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) has emerged as an indispensible tool among physicians involved in musculoskeletal medicine in the last two decades, only recently has it become more attractive to pediatric rheumatologists. Thereafter, the use of MSUS in pediatric rheumatology has started to increase. Yet, an ever-growing body of literature shows parity and even superiority of MSUS when compared to physical examination and other imaging modalities.MSUS is suitable for examination of children of all ages and it has certain advantages over other imaging modalities; as it is cheaper, mobile, instantly accessible bedside, easy to combine with clinical assessment (interactivity) and non-invasive. It does not require sedation, which facilitates repetitive examinations. Assessment of multiple locations is possible during the same session. Agitation is rarely a problem and small children can be seated in their parents' lap or they can even play while being examined.