Demographic and Clinical Variation in Veterans Health Administration Provision of Assistive Technology Devices to Veterans Poststroke

Service delivery for complex rehabilitation technology: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Complex rehabilitation technologies (CRT) support independence for individuals with disabilities by enabling mobility for function, employment, education, and independent living. CRT service delivery is evolving, with changes to funding, provider qualifications, consumer needs, and technological advances. This scoping review investigated service delivery processes for individuals with disabilities who have a mobility impairment, while specifically identifying best practices, barriers, and unique features of health delivery policies and practices.

METHODS

We used a framework described by Colquhoun et. al. for conducting scoping reviews, a six-step process that includes: 1) identifying the research question, 2) identifying studies, 3) selecting studies 4) data charting, 5) reporting results and 6) consultation. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was also used for reporting results of the review.

RESULTS

Common categories were identified and organised into a hierarchical structure of four categories and 16 sub-categories. The primary categories included "policy", "consumer", "service delivery", and "wheeled mobility devices". The sub-categories described funding sources, consumer and professional populations, service delivery guidelines, and types of mobility devices. Analysis indicated the data were from 21 countries and 14 combinations of funding sources, and the articles were primarily descriptive studies.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review identified evidence from various countries, health systems, and stakeholder. Currently, this process does not proactively address the needs of individuals with mobility disabilities. The scoping review provides the foundation for the development of a novel policy on the provision of CRT services and devices to address these needs.Implications for RehabilitationExamination of national and international service delivery practices in diverse clinical and funding environments indicate various challenges and opportunities for improvement.CRT consumers are negatively impacted by current service delivery practices, including long wait times, lack of specialised clinical expertise, and limited consumer education opportunities.More consistent and widespread research is needed within the CRT provision industry to grow evidence-based practice related to complex rehabilitation technology and individuals with disabilities.

Every person is an individual: physical therapist clinical reasoning used in inpatient rehabilitation for walking assistive device prescription in patients with stroke and brain injury

PURPOSE

A complete description of the process of physical therapy clinical reasoning for walking assistive devices in patients with stroke and brain injury has never been undertaken. Describing the clinical reasoning process used in post-acute inpatient rehabilitation is important to shed light on the clinical activities and factors used in practice, prevent device abandonment, and, inform entry-level clinical training. The two purposes were first, to describe the clinical reasoning process used during inpatient rehabilitation for walking assistive devices in patients with stroke and brain injury, and second, to determine whether clinical reasoning differed by two facility types and by diagnosis.

METHODS

A mixed methods study of 67 participants in either an online survey or focus groups.

RESULTS

A consistent and comprehensive method to determine the need and justification for a walking assistive device regardless of diagnosis or facility type was found. The clinical reasoning process included five primary factors, considered throughout the rehabilitation stay (safety, balance, cognition, strength, and function). The three therapist-related factors (experience/preference, training parameters, and use of objective tools), and seven patient-related factors (experience/preference, fluctuations, fear, age, diagnosis/comorbidities, discharge environment, and payer) individualized care. Definitions of the five primary factors were derived from participants' responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study revealed complexity in the clinical reasoning process used in physical therapy practice to determine the best walking assistive device for patients with stroke and brain injury during inpatient rehabilitation. Information from this study can inform post-acute physical therapy practice and education, and may reduce device abandonment. Implications for rehabilitation Clinical reasoning (CR) is a complex process in which a clinician must consider multiple factors, which requires non-linear and iterative thinking, and involves many people, making it shared among the patient, caregivers, and the healthcare team. Describing the actual CR process used by physiotherapists when prescribing a walking assistive device (WAD) will identify the factors considered, thus more accurately explain the process of care. Such a description could lead to better justification of rehabilitation for patients with stroke and brain injury, and furthermore, determine whether treatments are rendered consistently and when, if ever, divergent approaches occur. Better understanding of the CR process of WAD prescription may also reduce the possibility of device abandonment.

Economic value of orthotic and prosthetic services among medicare beneficiaries: a claims-based retrospective cohort study, 2011-2014

Background

There are few studies of the economic value of orthotic and prosthetic services. A prior cohort study of orthotic and prosthetic Medicare beneficiaries based on Medicare Parts A and B claims from 2007 to 2010 concluded that patients who received timely orthotic or prosthetic care had comparable or lower total health care costs than a comparison group of untreated patients. This follow-up study reports on a parallel analysis based on Medicare claims from 2011 to 2014 and includes Part D in addition to Parts A and B services and expenditures. Its purpose is to validate earlier findings on the extent to which Medicare patients who received select orthotic and prosthetic services had less health care utilization, lower Medicare payments, and potentially fewer negative outcomes compared to matched patients not receiving these services.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort analysis of 78,707 matched pairs of Medicare beneficiaries with clinical need for orthotic and prosthetic services (N = 157,414) using 2011–2014 Medicare claims data. It uses propensity score matching techniques to control for observable selection bias. Economically, a cost-consequence evaluation over a four-year time horizon was performed.

Results

Patients who received lower extremity orthotics had 18-month episode costs that were $1939 lower than comparable patients who did not receive orthotic treatment ($22,734 vs $24,673). Patients who received spinal orthotic treatment had 18-month episode costs that were $2094 lower than comparable non-treated patients ($23,560 vs $25,655). Study group beneficiaries receiving both types of orthotics had significantly lower Part D spending than those not receiving treatment (p < 0.05). Patients who received lower extremity prostheses had comparable 15-month episode payments to matched beneficiaries not receiving prostheses ($68,877 vs $68,893) despite the relatively high cost of the prosthesis.

Conclusions

These results were consistent with those found in the prior study and suggest that orthotic and prosthetic services provide value to the Medicare program and to the patient.

Association of Admission Functional Status and Assistive Device Provision for Veterans Poststroke: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the study were (a) to provide knowledge about the provision of assistive devices in practice and (b) to describe the challenges of standardizing device provision.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective study using Department of Veteran Affairs National Prosthetic Patient Database and other administrative databases. The cohort included all veterans treated by the Veterans Health Administration for stroke during fiscal years 2007-2008. Descriptive methods were used to analyze data with emphasis on inspecting relationships between device provision and motor and cognitive function using Functional Independence Measure scores.

RESULTS

A total of 8374 veterans treated for stroke and receiving at least one assistive device are included. Individuals who received standard or caregiver controlled wheelchairs tended to be older, and those who received ultralight or caregiver controlled wheelchairs had a higher proportion of Hispanics than the overall cohort. Veterans who received any type of wheelchair had lower motor, cognitive, and total functioning scores than the cohort as a whole. Veterans who received canes had the highest functioning. Veteran patients who received patient lifts and beds had lower cognitive scores compared with the overall cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional status can provide some objectivity to the largely subjective assistive device provision decision-making process; however, many other factors must be considered simultaneously, complicating efforts to standardize provision.

Equipment provision after stroke: A scoping review of the use of personal care and mobility aids in rehabilitation

Introduction

The aim of this scoping review was to examine and synthesise literature on adaptive equipment use for personal care and mobility after stroke.

Method

We searched databases including Medline, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL and Scopus to February 2016. Two authors independently screened 789 titles, identifying 28 studies for inclusion in the review.

Results

Findings were grouped into four themes: (1) stroke-specific impairments and consequences for equipment use and training; (2) meaning of equipment for people with stroke; (3) cost of equipment after stroke; and (4) conflicts between equipment provision and models of stroke rehabilitation.

Conclusion

The wide range of impairments after stroke increases complexity of how people use equipment. Nonetheless, training needs and the relationship between social context, identity and equipment use are increasingly better understood,. The findings highlight a tension between practice that seeks to re-train function by ‘normal’ movement without equipment and restoration of function by using compensation strategies involving use of equipment. However, there is no evidence that compensation strategies impede recovery of physical abilities. High-quality evidence about costs of equipment after stroke, which could inform policy decisions, is urgently needed.

Understanding the Provision of Assistive Mobility and Daily Living Devices and Service Delivery to Veterans After Stroke

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether facility-level, structural factors affect the provision of assistive devices and services.

DESIGN

A retrospective design was used. Activities of daily living and mobility-related devices were categorized into 11 types. Logistic regression models were performed for each type of device, controlling for patient-level and facility-level covariates.

RESULTS

Non-veteran-level factors significantly affect the provision of assistive devices, even after covariate adjustment. Increased rehabilitation clinician staffing by 1 full-time equivalent position was associated with increased provision odds of 1%-5% for 5 of 11 types of devices. Lower facility complexity was significantly associated with increased provision odds of 35%-59% for 3 types of devices and with decreased provision odds of 16%-69% for 3 types of devices.

CONCLUSION

System-level factors, in addition to patient need, significantly affect the provision of assistive devices. Provision guidelines could assist clinicians in making decisions about device provision.

What factors are associated with the provision of assistive technologies: the Bogotá D.C. case

AIM

To examine what demographics and clinical factors are associated with the provision of assistive technology (AT) devices in a low-income country.

METHOD

Retrospective cross-sectional exploratory study design including 15 of the 20 localities across Bogotá D.C., Colombia, a city with 6,776,009 inhabitants.

RESULTS

The type of AT device provided was significantly dependent (p < 0.001) on the client's diagnosis, impairment, age, and socio-economic strata, whether the client has a care giver, the geographical zone in which the client lives, the year of the AT provision, and the total number of AT delivered. In contrast, the client's gender (p > 0.05) and the client's affiliated type of healthcare service had no effect. In addition to that, the client's age, the client's socio-economic strata, the number of AT devices provided to the client, and the diagnostic type were the factors with the strongest level of association with the type of AT device provided.

CONCLUSIONS

Our research showed that the provision of AT in Bogotá D.C. prioritizes both people who are at the highest levels of vulnerability, and as many people as possible with the budget. That is, the low socio-economic strata, younger and older people, and the provision of at least one AT device.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

Provision of AT is intended for equal opportunities for the social participation of people with a disability. Also, people with disabilities have the right to access AT regardless of the type of limitation, gender, race, age or region where they live. Research regarding AT in developing countries is scarce; thus, there is a need to conduct studies in such contexts. This study provides scientific evidence to support the development of models, approaches and strategies of AT provision in low-income countries where resources for rehabilitation are scarce.

The accuracy of new wheelchair users' predictions about their future wheelchair use

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the accuracy of new wheelchair user predictions about their future wheelchair use.

DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort study of 84 community-dwelling veterans provided a new manual wheelchair.

RESULTS

The association between predicted and actual wheelchair use was strong at 3 mos (ϕ coefficient = 0.56), with 90% of those who anticipated using the wheelchair at 3 mos still using it (i.e., positive predictive value = 0.96) and 60% of those who anticipated not using it indeed no longer using the wheelchair (i.e., negative predictive value = 0.60, overall accuracy = 0.92). Predictive accuracy diminished over time, with overall accuracy declining from 0.92 at 3 mos to 0.66 at 6 mos. At all time points, and for all types of use, patients better predicted use as opposed to disuse, with correspondingly higher positive than negative predictive values. Accuracy of prediction of use in specific indoor and outdoor locations varied according to location.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the importance of better understanding the potential mismatch between the anticipated and actual patterns of wheelchair use. The findings suggest that users can be relied upon to accurately predict their basic wheelchair-related needs in the short-term. Further exploration is needed to identify characteristics that will aid users and their providers in more accurately predicting mobility needs for the long-term.