Inflammatory Mediators Associated With Pressure Ulcer Development in Individuals With Pneumonia After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study

Biomarkers for the early detection of pressure injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pressure injury imposes a significant burden for patients and healthcare systems and the majority of pressure injuries are preventable. The early identification of pressure injury is critical for its prevention. As an objective measure, biomarkers have preliminarily shown the potential to identify individuals at risk for developing pressure injury before it is visually observed to occur. However, these results have not been synthesized.

OBJECTIVE

To assess and synthesise the predictive effect of different biomarkers in the early detection of pressure injury formation.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL Complete and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched for articles up to June 2021. No restrictions were applied to study design type, language, country, race or date of publication.

REVIEW METHODS

Two reviewers independently extracted data from all original eligible studies using a specified data extraction form, resolved disagreements through discussion and the involvement of an additional reviewer. Methodological quality of all included studies was independently appraised by two authors with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist and the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). Heterogeneity of each study was estimated using the I² statistic, and the data was synthesized using StataSE15.

RESULTS

Eight observational studies involving 10595 participants were included. The overall pooled area under curve (AUC) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of Serum albumin (Alb) was 0.66(0.62-0.70), and the Serum haemoglobin (Hb) was 0.67(0.60-0.74). The AUC and 95% CI of C-reactive protein (CRP) was 0.62(0.50-0.74), Braden score was 0.56 (0.429-0.691), Waterlow score was 0.729(0.654-0.803), Alb with Waterlow was 0.741(0.694-0.787), and the combination of Hb, CRP, Alb, Age and Gender was 0.79(0.682-0.898). Besides, the chemokine interferon-γ-induced protein of 10kd/CXCL10, cytokine interferon-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin-15 (IL-15) and combination of creatine kinase (CK), myoglobin (Mb), heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) and CRP may prove potential for detecting pressure injury.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest the combination of Hb, CRP, Alb, Age and Gender is superior to other biomarkers. However, the predictive effect of biomarkers needs to be confirmed by more researches and patient-level data.

Biomarkers from Secondary Complications in Spinal Cord Injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the USA, spinal cord injury (SCI) occurs in 40 people per million every year due to events such as car accidents, falls, violence, or sports injury. Secondary complications that arise from SCI are life-threatening and should be treated as early as possible. In some cases, it is not completely obvious what complication a patient may have until it is too late. Therefore, biomarkers are required to assess the levels of secondary complications after SCI. As there are several complications that pose different warning signs, different biomarkers may be beneficial in early detection, maintenance, and long-term care for patients with SCI.

RECENT FINDINGS

Numerous studies have been conducted on biomarkers in various SCI and its related complications, such as neuropathic pain and deep vein thrombosis. In recent years, research has expanded with biomarkers discovered by cellular and molecular, genome-wide transcriptomic analysis, bioinformatics, and clinical studies. Biomarkers have allowed early prediction of the severity of secondary complications due to SCI.

SUMMARY

In this review, we summarize recent studies on the common biomarkers for the secondary complications related to SCI. We highlight the reliable biomarkers that have been tested, e.g., sclerostin, NGF, D-dimer, oncostatin M (OSM), microbiota, and C-reactive protein, which are valuable and with clinical importance. This review also emphasizes continuing research in biomarkers as they can provide valuable cellular and molecular insight into secondary complications after SCI.

Decreasing pressure injuries and acute care length of stay in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVES

Identifying factors associated with the occurrence of pressure injuries (PI) during acute care and with longer length of stay (LOS), focusing on modifiable factors that can be addressed and optimized by the acute rehabilitation team.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

A single Level-1 trauma center specialized in SCI care.

PARTICIPANTS

A cohort of 301 patients with acute TSCI was studied.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the occurrence of PI during acute care stay. The secondary outcome was acute care LOS. Bivariate and multivariate logistic or linear regression analyses were performed to determine the association between non-modifiable factors and outcomes (PI of any stage and acute LOS), whereas bivariate and hierarchical multivariate logistic or linear regression analyses were used for modifiable factors.

RESULTS

When controlling for the level and severity of the TSCI, the occurrence of pneumonia (OR = 2.1, CI = 1.1-4.1) was significantly associated with the occurrence of PI. When controlling for the level and severity of the TSCI, the occurrence of medical complications (PI, urinary tract infection and pneumonia) and lesser daily therapy resulted in significantly longer acute care LOS (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prevention of PI occurrence and the optimization of the acute care LOS represent crucial challenges of the acute rehabilitation team, as they are significantly associated with higher functional outcomes. Patients who develop pneumonia may benefit from more aggressive prevention strategies to reduce PI occurrence. Systematic protocols for the prevention of complications as well as greater volume of therapy interventions should be considered to optimize the acute care LOS.

Biomarkers for recurrent pressure injury risk in persons with spinal cord injury

Objective: To investigate potential linkages between pressure injury (PrI) recurrence following spinal cord injury (SCI) and muscle-based and circulatory biomarkers, specifically fatty metabolites and inflammatory cytokines. Design: Observational study. Setting: Tertiary Care Center. Participants: 30 individuals with complete or incomplete SCI. Study participants either had never developed a PrI (Group I) or had a history of recurrent PrI (Group II). Interventions: Not applicable. Outcome Measures: Gluteal muscle histology, immunohistochemistry, muscle-based and circulatory fatty metabolites and inflammatory cytokines. Results: Gluteal intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) was greater than 15% in most Group II (83%) individuals. Muscle tissue histology confirmed intramuscular structural differences. Fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4) and fatty acid binding protein 3 (FABP3) were reliably detected in muscle and blood and significantly correlated with IMAT (P < 0.001). FABP4 was significantly higher in Group II muscle and blood (P < 0.05). FABP3 was significantly higher in Group I muscle (P < 0.05). Circulatory FABP3 levels were lower for Group I. Inflammatory biomarkers were more reliably detected in blood. Colony-Stimulating Factor-1 was slightly higher in Group II muscle. Circulatory interleukin-13 was significantly higher (P < 0.01) in Group I. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) was significantly increased (P < 0.05) in Group I muscle and blood. Conclusion: Identifying individuals with SCI at highest risk for recurrent PrI may impact patient management. IMAT content evaluation illustrates that muscle quality is a key biomarker. Low circulatory inflammatory biomarker expression potentially limits clinical significance for between group differences. Circulatory levels of FABP4 hold great potential as a recurrent PrI risk biomarker.

Effect of intraoperative pressure ulcer preventive nursing on inflammatory markers in patients with high-risk pressure ulcers: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study will be designed to appraise the effects of intraoperative pressure ulcer preventive nursing (IPUPN) on inflammatory markers (IMs) in patients with high-risk pressure ulcers (HRPU) based on high quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

In this study, we will perform a rigorous literature search from the following electronic databases: Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. All electronic databases will be retrieved from their initial time to March 1, 2020 without limitations of language and publication status. We will only consider high quality RCTs that explored the effects of IPUPN on IMs in patients with HRPU. Two investigators will identify relevant trials, extract data, and appraise risk of bias in each eligible trial. Data will be pooled by either a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model according to the results of heterogeneity identification. The primary outcomes include IMs, and incidence of new pressure ulcers. The secondary outcomes are time to ulcer development, quality of life, length of hospital stay, and adverse events. Statistical analysis will be undertaken using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

This study will summarize high quality clinical evidence of RCTs to evaluate the effects of IPUPN on IMs in patients with HRPU.

CONCLUSION

The expected findings may provide helpful evidence to determine whether IPUPN is an effective intervention on IMs in patients with HRPU.

INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER

INPLASY202040029.

Perspectives From Family Caregivers of Persons With Spinal Cord Injury in Hospital Versus Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study

PURPOSE

The study aims to assess differences in family preferences for involvement in the ongoing care of a hospitalized family member with spinal cord injury based on whether the patient was hospitalized for initial rehabilitation (Group R) or hospitalized to treat secondary complications (Group C).

DESIGN

Explorative cross-sectional design.

METHOD

Family members rated the importance and experience of involvement on five subscales of the Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire. Differences among the importance and experience scores between the groups were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test.

FINDINGS

Group C scored the importance to be involved significantly higher than Group R (M = 3.17 vs. M = 4.04, p =.01). No other significant differences between groups were detected.

CONCLUSION

Family members of patients hospitalized for secondary complications want greater involvement in care compared to those hospitalized for rehabilitation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Results indicate the need for tailored interventions using a family-centered approach and ongoing needs assessment.

Predictors of pressure ulcer incidence following traumatic spinal cord injury: a secondary analysis of a prospective longitudinal study

STUDY DESIGN

Secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to identify the medical and demographic factors associated with the development of pressure ulcers during acute-care hospitalization and inpatient rehabilitation following acute spinal cord injury.

SETTING

The study was carried out at acute hospitalization, inpatient rehabilitation and outpatient rehabilitation sites at a university medical center in the United States.

METHODS

Adults with acute traumatic spinal cord injury (n=104) were recruited within 24-72 h of admission to the hospital. Pressure ulcer incidence was recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine participants out of 104 (37.5%) developed at least one pressure ulcer during acute-care hospitalization and inpatient rehabilitation. Univariate logistic regression analyses revealed significant association of pressure ulcer incidence for those with pneumonia and mechanical ventilation (P=0.01) and higher injury severity (ASIA A) (P=0.01). Multiple logistic regression showed that the odds of formation of a first pressure ulcer in participants with ASIA A was 4.5 times greater than that for participants with ASIA B, CI (1-20.65), P=0.05, and 4.6 times greater than that for participants with ASIA C, CI (1.3-16.63), P=0.01.

CONCLUSION

Among individuals with acute traumatic SCI, those with high-injury severity were at an increased risk to develop pressure ulcers. Pneumonia was noted to be associated with the formation of pressure ulcers.