Intrathecal Baclofen Trial Before Device Implantation: 12-Year Experience With Continuous Administration

Neuromodulation and quality of life for patient with spasticity after spinal cord injury

RATIONALE

Spasticity develops in 80% of spinal cord injury cases and negatively affects the patents' quality of life. The most common method of surgical treatment for severe spasticity is a long-term intrathecal baclofen therapy (ITB). Long-term spinal cord stimulation is another possible treatment technique. This paper aims to evaluate the changes in quality of life for patients with spasticity who have been treated with neuromodulation (SCS or ITB) in 12 months after the surgery, as well to compare the changes in quality of life for patients who have been treated with spinal cord stimulation and those who received long-term intrathecal baclofen therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The influence of spasticity, experienced by the patients with a spinal cord injury, on their quality of life was analyzed before the surgery and 12 months after it. The severity of the spinal cord damage was determined with the scale of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA); spasticity was evaluated with the modified Ashworth scale, Penn Spasm Frequency Scale; pain levels were determined with visual analogue scale (VAS), anxiety and depression levels - with HADS. Functional activity of the patients was evaluated with the help of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM).

RESULTS

The treatment results for 33 patients (25 men and 8 women), aged from 18 to 62, are presented. After the trial stimulation, the patients were randomly assigned to either SCS or ITB group (18 and 15 people respectively). The decrease of spasticity in both experimental groups caused lower levels of pain, less functional dependency on other people, lower stress and depression rates and, as a consequence, better quality of life and social adaptation. The obtained results for SCS and ITB groups are statistically similar.

On the recovery of disorders of consciousness under intrathecal baclofen administration for severe spasticity-An observational study

BACKGROUND

Occasionally, patients show dramatic recovery from disorders of consciousness (DOC) under intrathecal baclofen (ITB), an established treatment option for severe supraspinal spasticity. Anecdotal explanations for ITB-related recovery of cognition include modulation of afferent impulses at the spinal level, thereby reducing spasticity-related proprioceptive information overload within cortico-thalamo-cortical connections.

OBJECTIVE

In this retrospective patient chart analysis, we assessed whether a reduction in spasticity would be associated with an increase in Coma Recovery Scale revised (CRS-R) scores in a larger sample of patients than previously published.

METHODS

From a hospital-based ITB treatment register, we extracted data from 26 patients with DOC and severe supraspinal spasticity who improved by >2 points on the Coma Recovery Scale revised (CRS-R) within 6 months after ITB treatment initiation. We assessed Modified Ashworth scale (MAS) scores and CRS-R scores on admission (PRE) and 3 and 6 months after initiation of ITB treatment (3M, 6M). We performed correlation analysis of the scores and their respective changes (PRE to 3M, 3M to 6M). We also correlated the time from acute event until ITB initiation to CRS-R scores at 3M and 6M.

RESULTS

ITB led to significant improvement in spasticity based on MAS scores, which did not correlate to the improvements seen in CRS-R total and subscale scores. Daily ITB dose did neither correlate to MAS scores nor to CRS-total scores in the whole patient group, but after 3 months, ITB dose correlated to some CRS-R subscale scores in some patient subgroups. Time until ITB treatment did not correlate to CRS-R scores later on.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm that ITB may exert beneficial effects in selected DOC patients with respect to improved cognitive functions, which, however, do not correlate to its antispastic effect. The lack of correlation between time to ITB and CRS-R outcome, but significant CRS-R improvements following pump implantation, renders spontaneous remissions unlikely and leaves room for alternative pharmacological mechanisms.

Neuromodulation as a basic platform for neuroprotection and repair after spinal cord injury

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most challenging medical issues. Spasticity is a major complication of SCI. A combination of spinal cord stimulation, new methods of neuroprotection and biomedical cellular products provides fundamentally new options for SCI treatment and rehabilitation. The paper attempts to critically analyze the effectiveness of using these procedures for patients with SCI, suggesting a protocol for a step-by-step personalized treatment of SCI, based on continuity of modern conservative and surgical methods. The study argues the possibility of using neuromodulation as a basis for rehabilitating patients with SCI.