Measurement Properties of the MPAI-4 in Veterans With mTBI

Measurement Properties of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4) and Related Measures: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To assess the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-version 4 (MPAI-4) and related measures' measurement properties and the quality of evidence supporting these results; and identify the interpretability and feasibility of the MPAI-4 and related measures.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a systematic review according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. We searched 9 electronic databases and registries, and hand searched reference lists of included articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Two independent reviewers screened and selected all articles. From 605 retrieved articles, 48 were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent reviewers appraised the evidence quality and rated the extracted classical test theory and Rasch results from each study.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We used meta-analysis and COSMIN's approach to synthesize measurement properties evidence (insufficient, sufficient), and the modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to synthesize evidence quality (very low, low, moderate, high) by diagnosis (traumatic brain injury [TBI], stroke), and setting (inpatient, outpatient). The MPAI-4 and its subscales are sufficiently comprehensible (GRADE: very low), but there is currently no other content validity evidence (relevance, comprehensiveness). The MPAI-4 and its participation index (M2PI) have sufficient interrater reliability for stroke and TBI outpatients (GRADE: moderate), whereas interrater reliability between TBI inpatients and clinicians is currently insufficient (GRADE: moderate). There is no evidence for measurement error. For stroke and TBI outpatients, the MPAI-4 and M2PI have sufficient construct validity (GRADE: high) and responsiveness (GRADE: moderate-high). For TBI inpatients, the MPAI-4 and M2PI have mixed indeterminant/sufficient construct validity and responsiveness evidence (GRADE: moderate-high). There is 1 study with mixed insufficient/sufficient evidence for each MPAI-4 adaptation (21- and 22-item MPAI, 9-item M2PI) (GRADE: low-high).

CONCLUSION

Users can be most confident in using the MPAI-4 and M2PI in TBI and stroke outpatient settings. Future research is needed on reliability, measurement error, predictive validity, and content validity of the MPAI-4 and its related measures across populations and settings.

Post-concussive symptoms mediate the relationship between sleep problems and participation restrictions among veterans with mild traumatic brain injury

Background

Sleep problems are common among Veterans with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and may contribute to participation restrictions. However, explanatory mechanisms underlying this relationship are poorly understood. Sleep problems are associated with post-concussive symptoms (e.g., headaches). In turn, post-concussive symptoms contribute to participation restrictions. We hypothesized that post-concussive symptom severity mediates the purported relationship between sleep problems and participation restrictions among Veterans with mTBI.

Materials and Methods

This study was a retrospective analysis of clinical data among 8,733 Veterans with mTBI receiving Veterans Health Administration outpatient care. Sleep problems (yes/no) were identified using the sleep-related item from the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI). Post-concussive symptoms were measured using remaining NSI items. Participation restrictions were measured using the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory Participation Index. We specified a latent variable path model to estimate relationships between: (1) sleep problems and three latent indicators of post-concussive symptoms [vestibular-sensory (e.g., headache)]; mood-behavioral [e.g., anxiety]; cognitive [e.g., forgetfulness]); and, (2) the three latent indicators of post-concussive symptoms and two latent indicators of participation restrictions (social and community participation [e.g., leisure activities]; productivity [e.g., financial management]). We examined the indirect effects of sleep problems upon participation restrictions, as mediated by post-concussive symptoms. Estimates were adjusted for sociodemographic factors (e.g., age), injury characteristics (e.g., blast), and co-morbid conditions (e.g., depression).

Results

87% of Veterans reported sleep problems. Sleep problems were associated with greater social and community participation restrictions, as mediated by mood-behavioral (β = 0.41, p < 0.001) and cognitive symptoms (β = 0.13, p < 0.001). There was no evidence that vestibular-sensory symptoms mediated this relationship (β = -0.01, p = 0.48). Sleep problems were associated with greater productivity restrictions, as mediated by vestibular-sensory (β = 0.16, p < 0.001) and cognitive symptoms (β = 0.14, p < 0.001). There was no evidence that mood-behavioral symptoms mediated this relationship (β = 0.02, p = 0.37).

Discussion

Findings suggest that evidence-based sleep treatment should occupy a prominent role in the rehabilitation of Veterans with mTBI. Indirect effects of sleep problems differed when considering impact on social and community participation vs. productivity, informing individualized rehabilitative care for Veterans with mTBI.

Feasibility of a Combined Neuromodulation and Yoga Intervention for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Chronic Pain: Protocol for an Open-label Pilot Trial

BACKGROUND

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and chronic pain often co-occur and worsen rehabilitation outcomes. There is a need for improved multimodal nonpharmacologic treatments that could improve outcomes for both conditions. Yoga is a promising activity-based intervention for mTBI and chronic pain, and neuromodulation through transcranial magnetic stimulation is a promising noninvasive, nonpharmacological treatment for mTBI and chronic pain. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a type of patterned, excitatory transcranial magnetic stimulation. iTBS can induce a window of neuroplasticity, making it ideally suited to boost the effects of treatments provided after it. Thus, iTBS may magnify the impacts of subsequently delivered interventions as compared to delivering those interventions alone and accordingly boost their impact on outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to (1) develop a combined iTBS+yoga intervention for mTBI and chronic pain, (2) assess the intervention's feasibility and acceptability, and (3) gather preliminary clinical outcome data on quality of life, function, and pain that will guide future studies.

METHODS

This is a mixed methods, pilot, open-labeled, within-subject intervention study. We will enroll 20 US military veteran participants. The combined iTBS+yoga intervention will be provided in small group settings once a week for 6 weeks. The yoga intervention will follow the LoveYourBrain yoga protocol-specifically developed for individuals with TBI. iTBS will be administered immediately prior to the LoveYourBrain yoga session. We will collect preliminary quantitative outcome data before and after the intervention related to quality of life (TBI-quality of life), function (Mayo-Portland Adaptability Index), and pain (Brief Pain Inventory) to inform larger studies. We will collect qualitative data via semistructured interviews focused on intervention acceptability after completion of the intervention.

RESULTS

This study protocol was approved by Edward Hines Jr Veterans Administration Hospital Institutional Review Board (Hines IRB 1573116-4) and was prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04517604). This study includes a Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption (IDE: G200195). A 2-year research plan timeline was developed. As of March 2022, a total of 6 veterans have enrolled in the study. Data collection is ongoing and will be completed by November 2022. We expect the results of this study to be available by October 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

We will be able to provide preliminary evidence of safety, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel combined iTBS and yoga intervention for mTBI and chronic pain-conditions with unmet treatment needs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04517604; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04517604.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/37836.

Psychometric properties and sex differences on the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory Participation subscale (M2PI) in Veterans with TBI

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the structural validity of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory - Participation subscale (M2PI) in a sample of Veterans and to assess whether the tool functioned similarly for male and female Veterans DESIGN: Rasch analysis of M2PI records from the National Veterans TBI Health Registry database from 2012-2018.

SETTING

National VA Polytrauma System of Care outpatient settings.

PARTICIPANTS

Veterans with a clinically confirmed history of TBI (N = 6,065; 94% male).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

M2PI, a five-point Likert-type scale with eight items. For this analysis, the two employment items were treated individually for a total of nine items.

RESULTS

The employment items misfit the Rasch Measurement model (paid employment MnSq=1.40; other employment MnSq=1.34) and were removed from subsequent iterations. The final model had eigenvalue 1.87 on the 1^st contrast, suggesting unidimensionality of the remaining 7 items. Item order from least to most participation restriction was transportation, self-care, residence management, financial management, initiation, leisure, and social contact. Wright's person separation reliability for non-normal distributions was 0.93 indicating appropriateness of M2PI for making individual-level treatment decisions. Mean person measure was -0.92 logits (SD 1.34) suggesting that participants did not report restrictions on most items (item mean = 0 logits). 3.8% of the sample had the minimum score (no impairment on all items) and 0.2% had the maximum score. Four items had different item calibrations (≥0.25 logits) for females compared to males but the hierarchy of items was unchanged when the female sample was examined separately.

CONCLUSION(S)

These findings suggest that, although employment is a poor indicator of participation restrictions among Veterans with TBI, the M2PI is unidimensional. Because of subtle differences in scale function between male and female Veterans, M2PI should be part of a more thorough clinical interview about participation strengths and restrictions.

The Impact of Combat Ocular Trauma and Traumatic Brain Injury on Vision- and Health-Related Quality of Life Among U.S. Military Casualties

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess visual and health-related quality of life (QOL) among U.S. military service members who sustained combat ocular trauma (COT) with or without associated traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

This was a single-center, prospective observational study of U.S. service members (n = 88) with COT who were treated at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. Participants completed the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) at enrollment and at follow-up (>1 year) and supplemental surveys: Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory, the Medical Outcomes 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36), and Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory.

RESULTS

Initial and follow-up VFQ-25 showed a statistically significant increase in median scores for near activities (initial: 75.0, follow-up 83.3; P = .004) and peripheral vision (initial: 50.0, follow-up: 75.0; P = .009) and in composite scores (initial: 79.5, follow-up: 79.8; P = .022). Comparing those who did (n = 78) and did not (n = 8) have a TBI history, there were no significant differences in median change in VFQ-25 composite scores (with TBI: 2.3 vs. no TBI: 10.7; P = .179). Participants with a TBI history had a significantly lower median SF-36 General Health score (with TBI: 67.5 vs. no TBI: 92.5; P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

Vision-related QOL of COT patients is generally good in the long term. However, those with both COT and a history of TBI conditions showed significantly worse functioning in several domains than those without TBI. As TBI is a common finding in COT, this association is an important factor impacting this population's overall clinical presentation and daily functions.