1
|
Kinney AET, Richmond SLK, Mizner RL. Cervical spine sensorimotor deficits persist in people post-concussion despite minimal symptoms. Ann Med 2024; 56:2422048. [PMID: 39511971 PMCID: PMC11552255 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2422048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Revised: 10/07/2024] [Accepted: 10/07/2024] [Indexed: 11/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The mechanisms of a concussion place stress on the cervical spine like that of a whiplash event, which can result in cervical spine dysfunction. This study aimed to determine if underlying cervical spine mobility and sensorimotor function deficits occur in individuals who are post-concussion with near resolution of symptoms. METHODS Twenty-five participants with a self-reported concussive event within a year (PC group: post-concussion 157 + 120 d, 9 men, age: 25 ± 8 yr) and 26 comparable peers (Peer group, 9 men, age: 25 ± 7 yr) were tested. The Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS) quantified residual concussion symptoms. Participants completed cervical joint position error (JPE) and cervical spine joint mobility tests blinded from each other. Group mean differences were analyzed using t-tests. RESULTS The PC group had minimal symptoms (PCSS = 6.8 ± 6.5) but substantial differences in JPE tests compared to the Peer group (PC = 7.4 ± 1.8 cm; PG = 5.6 ± 1.1 cm; p < .001). Those PC participants with pain during joint testing (n = 15) had worse JPE (Painful = 8.1 ± 1.8 cm, No-pain = 6.3 ± 1.6 cm; p = .02) and less averaged lower cervical spine joint mobility compared to PC participants without pain (Painful = 0.66 ± 0.22, No-pain = 0.87 ± 0.19; p = .02, Normal motion = 1.0). CONCLUSION Following a concussion, it is a reasonable recommendation to screen the cervical spine to identify impairments in joint mobility and JPE that contribute to neck dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony E. Toby Kinney
- Physical Therapy Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Ryan L. Mizner
- School of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Science, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chang PL, Chen KY, Ou JC, Chiang YH, Chen HC, Liou TH, Escorpizo R, Lin LF. Self-reported Dizziness, Postural Stability, and Sensory Integration After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Naturalistic Follow-up Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2024; 104:26-30. [PMID: 39668436 DOI: 10.1097/phm.0000000000002527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study is to evaluate changes in dizziness, postural stability, and sensory integration after mild traumatic brain injury over a 12-wk period. METHODS One hundred adults with mild traumatic brain injury were analyzed. The Dizziness Handicap Inventory questionnaire was used for subjective evaluations. Postural stability and modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction in Balance were used as objective measures at 0, 6, and 12 wks after mild traumatic brain injury. DESIGN Observational follow-up study. RESULTS Dizziness Handicap Inventory scores decreased significantly over time, indicating improved functional, emotional, physical, and overall aspects. Most indices of postural stability and modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction in Balance decreased significantly over time. The postural stability indices (overall and anteroposterior) and the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction in Balance indices (eyes open on firm and foam surfaces) differed significantly between weeks 0 and 6, according to post hoc analysis. Furthermore, the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction in Balance indices of eyes open on firm and foam surfaces and eyes closed on foam surface demonstrated significant differences between weeks 0 and 12. CONCLUSIONS Subjective and objective measurements indicated improvements in included adults from 0 wks to 6 and 12 wks after mild traumatic brain injury. However, balance dysfunction and sensory integration issues may persist beyond 12 wks after mild traumatic brain injury. The findings highlight the need for longer follow-up and tailored rehabilitation programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pao-Lung Chang
- From the School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan (P-LC); Research Center for Neuroscience, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan (K-YC, J-CO, Y-HC, L-FL); PhD Program in Medical Neuroscience, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan (K-YC, Y-HC); International Master Program in Medical Neuroscience, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan (K-YC); Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y-HC); Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan (J-CO, Y-HC); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan (H-CC, T-HL, L-FL); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan (H-CC, T-HL); Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont (RE); Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland (RE); School of Gerontology and Long-Term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan (L-FL); and Research Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan (L-FL)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abou-El-Hassan H, Bernstock JD, Chalif JI, Yahya T, Rezende RM, Weiner HL, Izzy S. Elucidating the neuroimmunology of traumatic brain injury: methodological approaches to unravel intercellular communication and function. Front Cell Neurosci 2023; 17:1322325. [PMID: 38162004 PMCID: PMC10756680 DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1322325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
The neuroimmunology of traumatic brain injury (TBI) has recently gained recognition as a crucial element in the secondary pathophysiological consequences that occur following neurotrauma. Both immune cells residing within the central nervous system (CNS) and those migrating from the periphery play significant roles in the development of secondary brain injury. However, the precise mechanisms governing communication between innate and adaptive immune cells remain incompletely understood, partly due to a limited utilization of relevant experimental models and techniques. Therefore, in this discussion, we outline current methodologies that can aid in the exploration of TBI neuroimmunology, with a particular emphasis on the interactions between resident neuroglial cells and recruited lymphocytes. These techniques encompass adoptive cell transfer, intra-CNS injection(s), selective cellular depletion, genetic manipulation, molecular neuroimaging, as well as in vitro co-culture systems and the utilization of organoid models. By incorporating key elements of both innate and adaptive immunity, these methods facilitate the examination of clinically relevant interactions. In addition to these preclinical approaches, we also detail an emerging avenue of research that seeks to leverage human biofluids. This approach enables the investigation of how resident and infiltrating immune cells modulate neuroglial responses after TBI. Considering the growing significance of neuroinflammation in TBI, the introduction and application of advanced methodologies will be pivotal in advancing translational research in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadi Abou-El-Hassan
- Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Joshua D. Bernstock
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Joshua I. Chalif
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Taha Yahya
- Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Rafael M. Rezende
- Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Howard L. Weiner
- Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Saef Izzy
- Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|