Comparative Effectiveness of Corticosteroid Dosages for Ultrasound-Guided Glenohumeral Joint Hydrodilatation in Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The most effective corticosteroid dose in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis: Feasibility pilot and protocol for double blinded randomized controlled trial

Objective

Osteoarthritis affects over 5.4 million people in the United States. A common treatment is to perform intra-articular corticosteroid injections. However, the ideal steroid dose is unknown. This study aimed to pilot a corticosteroid injection protocol for primary glenohumeral OA.

Methods

We conducted a double blinded randomized feasibility pilot study. Patients with primary osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint were recruited and randomized to receive 20 ​mg, 40 ​mg, or 80 ​mg of triamcinolone. The primary outcome was the feasibility of the protocol and change in the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) 6 months following injection.

Results

300 patients were screened for participation with 78 meeting inclusion criteria. 19 subjects completed the study. The most common reason for not participating was concern they would receive a smaller dose than previous injections. There was a 26% dropout rate, with 2 patients undergoing a total shoulder arthroplasty. There was no clinically significant difference (p ​= ​0.090) between the groups at 6-months for the SPADI although all treatment groups showed a reduction of SPADI from baseline at 6 months. There was one adverse event in the 20 ​mg group, with a patient experiencing facial flushing after the injection.

Conclusion

We were successful in developing a feasible protocol. In the future excluding those who have received previous injections would be helpful for a higher enrollment rate. This patient concern highlights the need to complete clinical trials to guide medical decisions surrounding corticosteroid administration. NCT03586687.

Ultrasound therapy for pain reduction in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Ultrasound therapy is a non-invasive technique used to address a variety of health issues.

Objectives

This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the effectiveness of ultrasound therapy in alleviating pain associated with musculoskeletal diseases.

Design

This study was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, with relevant articles identified through comprehensive searches in electronic databases.

Data sources and methods

We conducted searches across multiple databases, including Scopus, PubMed, MEDLINE, ProQuest, Science Direct, CINAHL, AIM, and ELDIS. Two independent reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of the retrieved articles. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies published between 2010 and 2023 that evaluated ultrasound therapy for knee and shoulder skeletal disorders. The selected data were analyzed qualitatively and synthesized, with the risk of bias assessed using the RoB2 tool.

Results

Initially, 117 articles were reviewed using the search strategy, and 10 trials that met the inclusion criteria were identified. In seven of these studies, the primary musculoskeletal disorder was osteoarthritis, while three studies focused on shoulder pain and impingement. Most studies indicated that ultrasound therapy significantly reduced pain. The meta-analysis showed that ultrasound therapy was significantly more effective than other interventions for knee disorders (I 2 = 51%, Z = 2.65, p = 0.008). However, for shoulder disorders, both ultrasound and other intervention methods were found to be ineffective (I 2 = 93%, Z = 0.73, p = 0.46).

Conclusion

The current evidence supports the effectiveness of ultrasound therapy in reducing pain and aiding rehabilitation for knee conditions. However, there are mixed results regarding its efficacy for shoulder conditions, highlighting the need for further research in this area.

The comparative effectiveness of combined hydrodilatation/corticosteroid procedure with two different quantities for adhesive capsulitis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of injecting various amounts of fluid into the shoulder joints for capsule distension in patients with adhesive capsulitis.

DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic of a tertiary care centre.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-four patients with adhesive capsulitis underwent a baseline (time0), 6 weeks (time1), and 12 weeks (time2) follow-up after hydrodilitation.

INTERVENTION

Group 1 (n  =  42) received 20 ml of lidocaine, steroid, and saline hydrodilatation via posterior glenohumeral recess, while Group 2 (n  =  42) received 10 ml of lidocaine, steroid, and saline hydrodilitation.

MAIN MEASURES

The primary outcome was the visual analogue scale for pain. The secondary outcomes were shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) and ROM of the shoulder.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduce in VAS scores for pain, SPADI scores, and increased shoulder ROM in both groups over time; however, the group-by-time interactions for any of the outcomes between groups were not significant except VAS pain in motion. Post-hoc pairwise analysis of the marginal effect of time and group showed that the significant difference of VAS in motion is due to time effect: time1 vs time0 (95% CI -4.09 to -2.68), time2 vs time0 (-4.21 to -2.77), and time2 vs time1 (-0.83 to 0.63), without between-group difference: group 1 vs group 2 (-0.38 to 0.59).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests hydrodilatation achieved an optimal effect at time1 for patients with adhesive capsulitis in both groups, and adding more saline offers additional benefits in flexion and external roatation until time2.

Corticosteroid Injection Methods for Frozen Shoulder: A Network Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of corticosteroid (CS) injection methods for frozen shoulder.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to May 6, 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated CS injection methods for frozen shoulder were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted independently by 2 authors. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A random-effects network meta-analysis was performed within a frequentist framework. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. A total of 66 RCTs involving 4491 patients were included. For short-term outcomes, 4-site injection (vs placebo [PLA]: standardized mean difference [SMD]=-2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.81 to -1.59 in pain; SMD=2.02; 95% CI, 1.39-2.65 in global function) was the most effective (low certainty). Rotator interval injection was the optimal treatment with moderate to high certainty (vs PLA: SMD=-1.07, 95% CI, -1.51 to -0.64 in pain; SMD=0.94, 95% CI, 0.49-1.40 in global function). For midterm outcomes, 4-site injection was most effective (vs PLA: SMD=-1.71, 95% CI, -2.41 to -1.01 in pain; SMD=2.22, 95% CI, 1.34-3.09 in global function; low certainty). Distension via rotator interval (D-RI) was the optimal treatment with moderate to high certainty (vs PLA: SMD=-1.10, 95% CI, -1.69 to -0.51 in pain; SMD=1.46, 95% CI, 0.73-2.20 in global function). Distension and intra-articular injection via anterior or posterior approaches produced effects equivalent to those of rotator interval injection and D-RI.

CONCLUSIONS

Rotator interval injection, distension, and intra-articular injection had equivalent effects on symptom relief. More RCTs are required to validate the superiority of multisite injections.

Similar outcomes between arthroscopic capsular release and manipulation under anaesthesia for frozen shoulder: A meta-analysis

To compared the arthroscopic capsular release (ACR) with manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) for the surgical treatment of frozen shoulder (FS) based on postoperative outcomes and complications. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were searched on October 2, 2023 to retrieve eligible studies that compared ACR with MUA in terms of clinical outcomes (pain visual analogue scale, external rotation, forward flexion and adverse events) for patients with FS. Mean differences (MD) were calculated for continuous outcomes and odds ratios (OR) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. Six papers, including 5 clinical studies (a total of 690 shoulders), were included in the final meta-analysis. The forward flexion was found to be larger in the ACR group at 3 months (MD, 2.73; 95%CI, 0.42-5.04; I2 = 44%; P = 0.02) and 6 months (MD, 2.36; 95%CI, 1.29-3.44; I2 = 0%; P < 0.0001). Except for this, ACR was comparable with MUA in terms of pain visual analogue scale at 3, 6 and 12 months (p = 0.25, p = 0.11, p = 0.28, respectively), external rotation at 3, 6 and 12 months (p = 0.15, p = 0.52, p = 0.23, respectively), and forward flexion at 12 months (p = 0.08). There were no differences in complication rates between the two groups (OR, 0.82; 95%CI, 0.47-1.44; I2 = 0%; P = 0.50). In comparison with MUA, ACR demonstrated better outcomes for forward flexion at 3 and 6 months, while there were no significant differences between ACR and MUA in terms of pain visual analogue scale, external rotation and adverse events.

Benefit of Using Both Ultrasound Imaging and Clinical Information for Predicting Malignant Soft Tissue Tumors

OBJECTIVE

Ultrasonography (US) is the primary imaging method for soft tissue tumors (STTs), the diagnostic performance of which still requires improvement. To achieve an accurate evaluation of STTs, we built the diagnostic nomogram for STTs using the clinical and US features of patients with STTs.

METHODS

A total of 613 patients with 195 malignant and 418 benign STTs were retrospectively recruited. We used a blend of clinical and ultrasonic features, as well as exclusively US features, to develop two distinct diagnostic models for STTs: the clinical-US model and the US-only model, respectively. The two models were evaluated and compared by measuring their areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and decision curve analysis. The performance of the clinical-US model was also compared with that of two radiologists.

RESULTS

The clinical-US model had better diagnostic performance than the model based on US imaging features alone (AUCs of the clinical-US and US-only models: 0.95 [0.93-0.97] vs. 0.89 [0.87-0.92], p < 0.001; IDI of the two models: 0.15 ± 0.03, p < 0.001). The clinical-US model was also superior to the two radiologists in diagnosing STTs (AUCs of clinical-US model and two radiologists: 0.95 [0.93-0.97] vs. 0.79 [0.75-0.82] and 0.83 [0.80-0.85], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic model based on clinical and US imaging features had high diagnostic performance in STTs, which could help identify malignant STTs for radiologists.

Efficacy of hydrodilatation in frozen shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

It is unclear whether hydrodilatation is beneficial in the management of frozen shoulder compared with other common conservative management modalities. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of hydrodilatation for the management of frozen shoulder.

SOURCES OF DATA

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. An extensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central, Web of Science and CINAHL databases using multiple keyword combinations of 'shoulder', 'rotator', 'adhesive capsulitis', 'hydrodilatat*', 'distension' since inception of the databases to June 2023 was implemented.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Hydrodilatation leads to at least transient more marked improvements in shoulder disability and passive external rotation compared with intra-articular corticosteroid injections.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Hydrodilatation improves passive external rotation in the longer term. Moreover, hydrodilatation may be a preferable option over manipulation under anaesthesia, given its lower cost and better patient convenience.

GROWING POINTS

Intensive mobilization after hydrodilatation is a promising adjuvant treatment option for patients suffering from a frozen shoulder.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Although current evidence suggests that hydrodilatation provides a transient improvement in disability in patients with frozen shoulder, its clinical relevance remains unclear. Further research is necessary to establish its role in the management of the condition.

Efficacy of high-volume vs very low volume corticosteroid subacromial injection in subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

Subacromial corticosteroid injections (SCI) treat shoulder pain from subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). However, a high-volume corticosteroid injection (HVCI) increases the incidence of local and general complications from lidocaine. This study aimed to compare the results of functional and clinical outcomes between the very low-volume corticosteroid injection (VLVCI) and HVCI including to WORC (Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index), VAS (Visual Analog Scale), DASH (The disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand) and ROM (Range of Motion). A total of 64 patients presenting with SIS were evaluated in two SCI volume in a randomization-controlled trial study. The VAS for pain pre-injection and post-injection at 15 min, was from 5.34 ± 2.44 at before injection to 2.44 ± 1.58 at post injection 15 min in the HVCI group (P < 0.001) and from 5.19 ± 2.33 to 2.84 ± 1.49 in VLVCI group (P < 0.001). Not significant differences at mean difference VAS post-injection 15 min VAS (P = 0.324) and Percentage difference VAS pre-injection and post-injection (P = 0.24). All follow-up timing, there were no significant differences in WORC, DASH and ROM between two groups (P > 0.05). The results revealed the VLVCI is non-inferior to HVCI both of functional outcomes and VAS.