Knowledge and Attitude of Family Member of Mentally Ill Patient Regarding Restraint, 2016

A Cross-Sectional Study to Assess the Frequency of Restraint, and Knowledge and Attitudes of the Caregivers of Patients Toward Restraint in a General Hospital Psychiatry Setting from South India

Background

There is limited Indian data on the epidemiology of hospital-based restraint practices and the knowledge and attitude of caregivers toward restraint. Therefore, this study aimed to report the frequency and pattern of restraints in a general hospital psychiatry setting and assess the knowledge and attitude about restraint practices among caregivers of patients.

Methods

We calculated the frequency of restraints (physical and chemical) over one year. The knowledge and attitude toward restraint were assessed in 75 caregivers each of patients from inpatient and outpatient settings, using a questionnaire designed by the authors and pretested in a pilot study.

Results

The frequency of any form of restraint was 19%. The frequency of chemical and physical restraints was 19% and 0.5%, respectively. Less than 20% of caregivers in both groups reported that restraint was either stigmatizing (5.33% inpatient caregivers vs. 12% outpatient caregivers), cruel (8% inpatient caregivers vs. 15.33% outpatient caregivers), or a measure of punishment (9% inpatient caregivers vs. 16% outpatient caregivers). No significant difference was found between knowledge and attitude about restraint between caregivers of outpatients and inpatients, except for a significantly greater number of caregivers of outpatients reporting that the restraint practices in the hospital were similar to those adopted by faith healers or religious/spiritual centers.

Conclusion

The frequency of either physical or chemical restraint was less compared to the existing international and Indian data. In addition, most caregivers of patients of both outpatients and inpatients did not report a negative attitude toward restraints.

Effectiveness of a Home Based Training Program on Caregivers Knowledge in Managing Aggressive Behavior of Patients With Mental Illness

In India, more than 90% of the patient with chronic mental illness stayed with their family members. Approximately 77.4% of caregivers experience moderate to severe levels of aggression. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of caregiver-training program on knowledge in managing aggressive behavior of mentally ill at home. Research design was pre-experimental. Seventy two caregivers were recruited using purposive sampling technique. The caregivers knowledge was assessed at 3 time points with regard to training program; before, immediately (post-test 1), and after 1 month (±1 week; post-test 2). The baseline knowledge was reflective of the deficiencies existing in the management of aggression of the mentally ill by caregivers. The knowledge of caregivers regarding the management of aggressive behavior of mentally ill, increased after caregiver training program, from the pre-test score of 17.63 ± 3.3 to post-test 1 score of 23.26 ± 2.9, and slightly decreased post-test 2 score of 21.01 ± 3.3 at p < .05. Repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) was done to compare the differences in knowledge score over time with Bonferroni adjustment. This home based caregiver training program helped caregivers to identify etiological factors of aggression, warning signs of aggression and use of de-escalation strategies to manage aggressive behavior of mentally ill. Training caregivers regarding aggression management will make caregiver proficient in practicing safe approach during handling of aggressive patient which will ensure the physical safety of the caregiver as well as of the patient and let the patient stay at home.

Nurses' and consumers' shared experiences of seclusion and restraint: A qualitative literature review

Seclusion and restraint are coercive practices associated with physical and psychological harm. International bodies have called for an end to these practices. However, these practices continue to be used. Elimination programmes have had some success in reducing the rates of these practices. Understanding coercive practices through the perspectives of involved individuals may facilitate a complete cessation of seclusion and restraint from the practice. Therefore, this qualitative review explored how nurses and consumers experienced seclusion and restraint events in mental health care. Five databases were searched. The search strategy resulted in the inclusion of fourteen qualitative papers. A thematic analysis was used to synthesize the findings. Six themes emerged under three main categories; shared experiences: disruption in care, disruption in the therapeutic relationship and shared negative impacts; nurses' experiences: Absence of less coercive alternatives; and consumers' experiences: overpowered, humiliated and punished. Considering these experiences during planning for seclusion and restraint prevention might facilitate more effective implementation of seclusion and restraint elimination programmes. Our findings suggested that consumers should receive recovery-oriented, trauma-informed and consumer-centred care; while nurses should be better supported through personal, professional and organizational developmental strategies. Further research should focus on investigating shared interventions among consumers and nurses and exploring carers' experiences with coercive practices.

Analysis of the Restraint Model for Mental Disorder Clients in Health Care Facilities

Introduction: The reduction or elimination of restraint for psychiatric patients continues to be an area of concern and debate. The lack of accessible alternatives to restraint shows that nurses need to use restraints. The aim of the study was to gain insights from the restraint model used by mental disorder client nurses in health care facilities.Methods: The method used was the identification of interventions in the literature, the identification of the relevant literature by topic and title, obtaining the literature in full-text form and the analysis of the results from the various interventions used in the literature. We systematically searched Scopus, Proquest and Science Direct by including keywords such as ‘restraint models’ and ‘clinical restraint’. The years were limited to 4 (2015-2018).Results: From the 80 potentially relevant articles, 15 met our eligibility criteria with qualitative and quantitative designs; all discussed restraint interventions. The restraint models for mental disorder clients were physical, mechanical and chemical.Conclusion: This study reports on the latest experience that restraint cannot be eliminated from use. Nurses tended to disagree if the restraint method was removed. Restraint with physical, chemical, and mechanical solutions could be tailored to the client's case in health care facilities. The results of this review should be considered when developing interventions aimed at reducing the use of restraint.

Caregivers' Attitude and Perspective on Coercion and Restraint Practices on Psychiatric Inpatients from South India

Background:

Coercion and restraint practices in psychiatric care are common phenomena and often controversial and debatable ethical issue. Caregivers’ attitude and perspective on coercion and restraint practices on psychiatric inpatients have received relatively less research attention till date.

Aims:

Caregivers’ attitude and perspective on coercion and restraint practices on psychiatric inpatients.

Methodology:

This is a hospital-based, a descriptive, cross-sectional study. A total of 200 (n = 200) consecutive patient and their caregivers were chosen between June 2013 and September 2014 through computer-generated random numbers sampling technique. We used a semi-structured interview questionnaire to capture caregivers’ attitude and perspective on coercion and restraint practices. Sociodemographic and coercion variable were analyzed using descriptive statistics. McNemar test was used to assess discrete variables.

Results:

The mean age was 43.8 (±14.9) years. About 67.5% of the caregivers were family members, 60.5% of them were male and 69.5% were from low-socioeconomic status. Caregivers used multiple methods were used to bring patients into the hospital. Threat (52.5%) was the most common method of coercion followed by persuasion (48.5%). Caregivers felt necessary and acceptable to use chemical restraint (82.5%), followed by physical restraint (71%) and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) (56.5%) during acute and emergency psychiatric care to control imminent risk behavior of patients.

Conclusion:

Threat, persuasion and physical restraint were the common methods to bring patients to bring acutely disturbed patients to mental health care. Most patients caregivers felt the use of chemical restraint, physical restraint and ECT as necessary for acute and emergency care in patients with mental illness.