Erzin S. Using radial basis artificial neural networks to predict radiation hazard indices in geological materials.
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT 2024;
196:315. [PMID:
38416264 DOI:
10.1007/s10661-024-12459-8]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
The estimation of exposures to humans from the various sources of radiation is important. Radiation hazard indices are computed using procedures described in the literature for evaluating the combined effects of the activity concentrations of primordial radionuclides, namely, 238U, 232Th, and 40 K. The computed indices are then compared to the allowed limits defined by International Radiation Protection Organizations to determine any radiation hazard associated with the geological materials. In this paper, four distinct radial basis function artificial neural network (RBF-ANN) models were developed to predict radiation hazard indices, namely, external gamma dose rates, annual effective dose, radium equivalent activity, and external hazard index. To make RBF-ANN models, 348 different geological materials' gamma spectrometry data were acquired from the literature. Radiation hazards indices predicted from each RBF-ANN model were compared to the radiation hazards calculated using gamma spectrum analysis. The predicted hazard indices values of each RBF-ANN model were found to precisely align with the calculated values. To validate the accuracy and the adaptability of each RBF-ANN model, statistical tests (determination coefficient (R2), relative absolute error (RAE), root mean square error (RMSE), Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE)), and significance tests (F-test and Student's t-test) were performed to analyze the relationship between calculated and predicted hazard indices. Low RAE and RMSE values as well as high R2, NSE, and p-values greater than 0.95, 0.71, and 0.05, respectively, were found for RBF-ANN models. The statistical tests' results show that all RBF-ANN models created exhibit precise performance, indicating their applicability and efficiency in forecasting the radiation hazard indices of geological materials. All the RBF-ANN models can be used to predict radiation hazard indices of geological materials quite efficiently, according to the performance level attained.
Collapse