MCNP5 evaluation of photoneutron production from the Alexandria University 15 MV Elekta Precise medical LINAC

Calculation of Photoneutron Contamination of Varian Linac in ICRU Soft-Tissue Phantom Using MCNPX Code

Purpose

The aim of this research was to calculate the fluence, dose equivalent (DE), and kerma of thermal, epithermal and fast photoneutrons separately, within ICRU soft-tissue-equivalent phantom in the radiotherapy treatment room, using MCNPX Monte Carlo code.

Materials and Methods

For this purpose, 18 MV Varian Linac 2100 C/D machine was simulated and desired quantities were calculated on the central axis and transverse directions at different depths.

Results

Maximum fluence, DE and kerma of total photoneutrons on central axis of the phantom were 43.8 n.cm^-2.Gy^-1, 0.26, and 3.62 mGy.Gy^-1, at depths 2, 0.1, 0.1 cm, respectively. At any depth, average of fluence, DE and kerma in the outer area of the field were less than the inner area and in general were about 72%, 52%, and 45%, respectively.

Conclusion

According to this research, within the phantom; variation of fluence, DE and kerma in transverse direction were mild, and along the central axis at shallow area were sharp. DE of fast photoneutrons at shallow and deep areas were one order of magnitude greater than thermal photoneutrons.

Neutron and photon out-of-field doses at cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) depths

The accuracy of an out-of-field dose from an Elekta Synergy accelerator calculated using the X-ray Voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) dose algorithm in the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS) for both low-energy (6 MV) and high-energy (15 MV) photons at cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) depths was investigated through a comparison between MCNPX simulated out-of-field doses and measured out-of-field doses using three high spatial and sensitive active detectors. In addition, total neutron equivalent dose and fluence at CIED depths of a 15-MV dose from an Elekta Synergy accelerator were calculated, and the corresponding CIED relative neutron damage was quantified. The results showed that for 6-MV photons, the XVMC dose algorithm in Monaco underestimated out-of-field doses in all off-axis distances (average errors: -17% at distances X < 10 cm from the field edge and -31% at distances between 10 < X ≤ 16 cm from the field edge), with an increasing magnitude of underestimation for high-energy (15 MV) photons (up to 11%). According to the results, an out-of-field photon dose at a shallower CIED depth of 1 cm was associated with greater statistical uncertainty in the dose estimate compared to a CIED depth of 2 cm and clinical depth of 10 cm. Our results showed that the relative neutron damage at a CIED depth range for 15 MV photon is 36% less than that reported for 18 MV photon in the literature.