[Large population data bases for primary care research: "We have the advantage"]

Use of electronic health records for the management of diabetes and its risk factors in the Principality of Asturias from 2014 to 2018

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the implementation of electronic health records across all hospitals and primary care centres within the National Health System has significantly enhanced access to patients' clinical data. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in primary care settings and to outline its associated cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and epidemiological characteristics.

METHODS

An observational cross-sectional study was conducted including 89,679 patients diagnosed with T2DM who attended the primary health care system from 2014 to 2018. Data was provided by the Primary Health Care System of the Principality of Asturias (SESPA).

RESULTS

The estimated prevalence of diagnosed T2DM was 8.01% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 7.96-8.06) of the total population. Additionally, it was more prevalent in males compared to females (9.90% [95% CI: 9.81-9.99] vs. 6.50% [95% CI: 6.44-6.57]) and increased with age in both sexes. People with T2DM had an average age of 74 years, 52.3% were male, and the most frequently associated CVRF were: dyslipidaemia (47.90%) and hypertension (62.20%). Glycaemic control improved during the 2014-2018 period (31.69%), as did lipid control (23.66%). However, the improvement in blood pressure control (9.34%) was less pronounced for the same period. Regarding the multifactorial control of diabetes (measured by LDL-cholesterol, HbA1C and blood pressure) the overall degree of control improved by 11.55% between 2014 and 2018.

CONCLUSION

In this 5-year retrospective population-based study, the utilisation of data from electronic medical records provides insights into the prevalence of T2DM in a large population, as well as real-time CVRFs. Leveraging this data facilitates the development of targeted health policies.

Rationale, design and preliminary results of the GALIPEMIAS study (prevalence and lipid control of familial dyslipidemia in Galicia, northwest Spain)

AIMS

There is little information on the familial nature of dyslipidemias in the Spanish population. This knowledge could have potential diagnostic and treatment implications. The objective of the GALIPEMIAS study was to determine the prevalence of familial dyslipidemia in Galicia, as well as determine the degree of lipid control in the participants. Prevalence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) was also estimated. This paper presents the design, methodology and selected preliminary results.

METHODOLOGY

A cross-sectional study was performed in the population aged ≥18 years using cluster sampling and then random sampling. A sample of 1000 subjects was calculated and divided into three sequential phases with a specific methodology for each one. Phase I: selection of subjects from the general population and collection of informed consent documents; Phase II: collection of data from the digital clinical history to select subjects with dyslipidemia according to study criteria; Phase III: personal interview, blood analysis, family tree, and definitive diagnosis of dyslipidemia. Prevalence of different diseases and active medication was analysed. Corrected prevalence (to the reference population) of different risk factors and ASCVD was estimated.

RESULTS

Phase I participation was 89.5%. We extracted complete information from 93% of the participants (Phase II). According to the study's own criteria, 56.5% (n = 527) of the participants had some form of dyslipidemia and almost 33.7% of them had familial dyslipidemia with autosomal dominant inherit pattern. The corrected prevalence of ASCVD was 5.1% (95% CI 3.1-7.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Dyslipidemia was the most prevalent cardiovascular risk factor in our population with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern in one out of every three dyslipidemia cases. Approximately, 5.1% of the sample population aged ≥18 has suffered an episode of ACVD.

Diagnosis of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: a population-based study

INTRODUCTION

Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) remains an underdiagnosed condition despite initiatives developed to increase awareness. The objective was to describe the current situation of the diagnosis of AATD in primary care (PC) in Catalonia, Spain.

METHODS

We performed a population-based study with data from the Information System for Development in Research in Primary Care, a population database that contains information of 5.8 million inhabitants (80% of the population of Catalonia). We collected the number of alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) determinations performed in the PC in two periods (2007-2008 and 2010-2011) and described the characteristics of the individuals tested.

RESULTS

A total of 12,409 AAT determinations were performed (5,559 in 2007-2008 and 6,850 in 2010-2011), with 10.7% of them in children. As a possible indication for AAT determination, 28.9% adults and 29.4% children had a previous diagnosis of a disease related to AATD; transaminase levels were above normal in 17.7% of children and 47.1% of adults. In total, 663 (5.3%) individuals had intermediate AATD (50-100 mg/dL), 24 (0.2%) individuals had a severe deficiency (<50 mg/dL), with a prevalence of 0.19 cases of severe deficiency per 100 determinations. Nine (41%) of the adults with severe deficiency had a previous diagnosis of COPD/emphysema, and four (16.7%) were diagnosed with COPD within 6 months.

CONCLUSION

The number of AAT determinations in the PC is low in relation to the prevalence of COPD but increased slightly along the study period. The indication to perform the test is not always clear, and patients detected with deficiency are not always referred to a specialist.

Treatment patterns in COPD patients newly diagnosed in primary care. A population-based study

INTRODUCTION

Treatment for COPD is tailored based on clinical characteristics and severity. However, prescription patterns in COPD patients newly diagnosed in primary care may differ from guideline recommendations.

METHOD

We performed an epidemiological study with data obtained from the Information System for the Development in Research in Primary Care (SIDIAP), a population database that contains information of 5.8 million inhabitants (80% of the population of Catalonia). Patients newly diagnosed with COPD from 2007 to 2012 were identified and information about the initial treatment patterns was collected. The initial treatment was also described by phenotype and severity.

RESULTS

During the study period 41,492 patients were newly diagnosed with COPD. Patients were classified as non exacerbators (28,552 patients, 69%), asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) (2152 patients, 5.2%) and frequent exacerbators (10,888 patients, 27.6%). Among the patients in whom FEV1 was available, 13.9% were GOLD stage 1, 55.2% stage 2, 26% stage 3 and 4.8% stage 4. Globally, the most frequently prescribed treatment patterns were short-acting bronchodilators (SABD) in monotherapy (17.7%), long-acting β-2 agonists (LABA) + inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) (17.3%) and triple therapy (12.2%). The frequency of patients treated with a SABD increased from 15.9% to 19.5% during the study period, while the number of untreated patients decreased from 24.4% to 15.1%. Up to 45.2% of patients were initially treated with ICS, which were frequently prescribed in the ACOS (69.2%) and in the exacerbator phenotype patients (52.4%) while ICS use has decreased from 43.8% in 2007 to 35.8% in 2012 in non exacerbator patients. Up to 13.6% and 14.8% of GOLD 4 patients received no treatment or only SABD after diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial treatment patterns in newly diagnosed COPD patients often do no comply with guidelines. The use of ICS is excessive but has decreased mainly in non exacerbator patients. Many COPD patients still remain untreated after diagnosis, although this has decreased. Some GOLD 4 patients are still receiving SABD or no treatment at all after diagnosis.

[Low concordance between primary care and hospital clinical information]

Objetivos

Medir la concordancia respecto a las enfermedades crónicas registradas en atención primaria (AP) y hospitalaria, y valorar la utilidad de sus registros asistenciales con fines de investigación.

Emplazamiento

Estudio transversal retrospectivo integrando información diagnóstica de AP y hospitalaria de la población de Aragón ingresada en 2010.

Participantes

Se analizó a 75.176 pacientes

Intervenciones

Se analizaron coincidencias, divergencias e índice kappa de los diagnósticos registrados en AP y hospital, estratificando por grupos de edad y sexo.

Mediciones principales

Enfermedades estudiadas: EPOC, diabetes, hipertensión, enfermedad cerebrovascular, cardiopatía isquémica, asma, epilepsia e insuficiencia cardiaca.

Resultados

La concordancia fue mayor en hombres y entre los 45-64 años. Diabetes fue el diagnóstico más concordante (índice kappa: 0,75) mientras que asma obtuvo los valores más bajos (índice kappa: 0,34).

Conclusiones

La baja concordancia de la información diagnóstica contenida en AP y hospital obliga a adoptar medidas que permitan a los profesionales sanitarios a conocer el conjunto de problemas de salud que presenta un paciente.

Variability in screening prevention activities in primary care in Spain: a multilevel analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence of the benefits of prevention activities, studies have reported only partial integration and great variability of screening in daily clinical practice. The study objectives were: 1) To describe Primary Health Care (PHC) screening for arterial hypertension, dyslipidaemia, obesity, tobacco use, and excessive alcohol consumption in 2008 in 2 regions of Spain, based on electronic health records, and 2) To assess and quantify variability in screening, and identify factors (of patient, general practitioners and PHC team) associated with being screened, that are common throughout the PHC population.

METHODS

Multicentre, cross-sectional study of individuals aged ≥ 16 years (N = 468,940) who visited the 426 general practitioners (GPs) in 44 PHC teams in Catalonia and Navarre in 2008.

OUTCOMES

screening for hypertension, dyslipidaemia, obesity, tobacco use, and excessive alcohol consumption. Other variables were considered at the individual (sociodemographics, visits, health problems), GP and PHC team (region among others). Individual and contextual factors associated with the odds of being screened and the variance attributable to each level were identified using the SAS PROC GLIMMIX macro.

RESULTS

The most prevalent screenings were for dyslipidaemia (64.4%) and hypertension (50.8%); the least prevalent was tobacco use (36.6%). Overall, the odds of being screened were higher for women, older patients, those with more comorbidities, more cardiovascular risk factors, and more frequent office visits, and those assigned to a female GP, a GP with a lower patient load, or a PHC team with a lower percentage of patients older than 65 years. On average, individuals in Navarre were less likely to be screened than those in Catalonia. Hypertension and dyslipidaemia screenings had the least unexplained variability between PHC teams and GPs, respectively, after adjusting for individual and contextual factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the studied screenings, those for obesity, tobacco, and alcohol use were the least prevalent. Attention to screening, especially for tobacco and alcohol, can be greatly improved in the PHC setting.

[Research in primary care as an area of knowledge. SESPAS Report 2012]

Primary care offers huge potential for research. This setting is an area of knowledge that must expand to improve the quality of its services and patients' health. Population-based clinical studies with a focus on health promotion and primary, secondary and tertiary disease prevention offer unique research opportunities. Developing research in the biopsychosocial model of clinical practice and new models of integrated healthcare and community care is therefore a priority. The framework and activities carried out by the Research Network in Preventive Activities and Health Promotion have been instrumental in the development of research in primary care in Spain. Despite the efforts invested by various institutions, foundations, teaching and research departments in primary care research, the projected outputs in terms of volume, quality and impact have not been achieved. The involvement of primary care professionals in research platforms is insufficient, with scarce contribution toward investment in specific primary care research projects. To change the current status of research in primary care, a number of measures are required, namely, the consolidation of research organisms specific to primary care with adequate allocation of funding and staff, and the allocation of specific time for research to primary care professionals to enable them to produce significant projects and consolidate established research lines in their areas of expertise, with applications mainly in quality improvement and innovation of primary care services.