Rapidly Intensified Beef Production in Uruguay: Impacts on Water-related Ecosystem Services

Water use indicators at farm scale - An agro-hydrological software solution

The challenge to sustainably intensify agricultural production in farming systems in face of the increasing variability in regional water resources requires concerted action from many stakeholders, locally, regionally and globally. Models, such as the AgroHyd Farmmodel presented here, can provide information on how farm management decisions affect local water resources at various scales for use in multiple assessment frameworks. It is a stand-alone web-based software that connects agricultural and water-related systems, including all water flows related to farming systems. Results from a case study of the production of 12 crops with rainfed and supplemental irrigation on a farm in northeastern Germany are described here. Indicators that relate the water use to plant production on the farm such as water intensity or water productivity are compared in detail for three consecutive years with greatly varying annual rainfall amounts (from 373 to 790 mm) to highlight the effect of local variability on water flows and indicator values. The discussion illustrates how information on the effect of management decisions, such as crop type, seeding date, crop rotation, cultivation and irrigation on water use can be processed into indicators to help farmers make more effective decisions.

Sustainability of meat production beyond carbon footprint: a synthesis of case studies from grazing systems in Uruguay

Livestock production has been challenged as a large contributor to climate change, and carbon footprint has become a widely used measure of cattle environmental impact. This analysis of fifteen beef grazing systems in Uruguay quantifies the range of variation of carbon footprint, and the trade-offs with other relevant environmental variables, using a partial life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. Using carbon footprint as the primary environmental indicator has several limitations: different metrics (GWP vs. GTP) may lead to different conclusions, carbon sequestration from soils may drastically affect the results, and systems with lower carbon footprint may have higher energy use, soil erosion, nutrient imbalance, pesticide ecotoxicity, and impact on biodiversity. A multidimensional assessment of sustainability of meat production is therefore needed to inform decision makers. There is great potential to improve grazing livestock systems productivity while reducing carbon footprint and other environmental impacts, and conserving biodiversity.